Terri Schiavo: More Grandstanding

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I guess It’s not just the number of posts, it’s what you have been talking bout in those few posts. Overall you seem like yet another liberal wonder boy, so full of himself that there is really no room for conflicting opinion.

You want Shciavo dead, you rant about fat cyclists…I don’t know. The best body building site on the net and you seem sort of lost in here, but that’s your right I suppose. It just sort of makes me wonder why one such as you who feels himself so right, so gifted would waste his time around here,ha.

As far as the Schiavo case, when did it ever become “heroic” to starve your defenseless wife to death? Quite the c
ontrary seems rather cowardly to me. Then again I believe that life is a gift from God, so I would wager that we part company right from the start!

[/quote]

So now it’s the content of my posts, is that what you are saying now? Thanks for stuffing supposed “opinions” up my ass like a Thanksgiving Turkey. :wink:

  • Liberal Wonder boy, I’m now a “Liberal”?
  • I want Terri dead?
  • I’m lost?
  • I said the actions of Michael Schiavo are heroic?

I’ll give you the fat cyclist thing, but “ripping” on fat cyclist, and talking about a certain sect of overweight cyclist(this was a view into a particular mentality not a useless bash fest as you so have put it), but I see no huge uprising when Shugart points out the sect of very over weight “bodybuilders”, but even that is met with much friction, eh?

The law says one thing, and my opinion another. If I was Michael Schiavo and my wife’s family was determine to take care of her I would turn over control to the family, now that is in the most basic of simple terms, supposedly she didn’t want to live in this state, as many wouldn’t, but that again is another part of this issue that need not go into in this post.

As far as the cases out there are people coming to the media about how they too were in a state as “Terri” have any of them come back from a missing Cerebral Cortex? Even so whether she ever gets better or not (which theoretically she won’t) the opinions of many don’t seem to be concerned with this and I agree the choice of this case doesn’t seemed concerned on that.

I find it funny that you accuse me of not having room for conflicting opinion, as far as parting ways, sounds fair. I’ve too read a few of your posts and wasn’t exactly blown away, but I am sure the feeling is mutual.

[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
So how do you guys feel now that Jesse Jackson has entered the fray?
Does it give some of you lib types pause for a minute?[/quote]

Hahahaha, I would hope that someone’s opinion of something as dynamic as this case wouldn’t rest on the words of someone who would be part of their political leanings, if so that would be a person so naive and malleable it would be scary, sort of like the kid who dresses like a transexual because he saw Marilyn Manson do it. Doesn’t Jesse Jackson also coach Michael Jackson and root him on like he is Nelson Mandela, keep hope alive!

[quote]EmperialChina wrote:
Joe Weider wrote:
So how do you guys feel now that Jesse Jackson has entered the fray?
Does it give some of you lib types pause for a minute?

Hahahaha, I would hope that someone’s opinion of something as dynamic as this case wouldn’t rest on the words of someone who would be part of their political leanings, if so that would be a person so naive and malleable it would be scary, sort of like the kid who dresses like a transexual because he saw Marilyn Manson do it. Doesn’t Jesse Jackson also coach Michael Jackson and root him on like he is Nelson Mandela, keep hope alive!

[/quote]
well, a lot of Jackson’s supporters are exactly like what you described…

Firstly Caddell is a former democratic pollster, who mysteriously is never supporting democrats in his appearances on FOX, a putative democrat so to speak.
Secondly coma is a state somebody could recover from, a PVS patient is highly unlikely to recover. I’m sure if the poll asked very specifically, would you want your feeding tube removed if your cerebral cortex had turned to liquid, the poll numbers would be even higher.

From Scarborough Country,
Joe gets schooled by Dr. Cranford, a doctor who actually examined Terri.

transcript:
SCARBOROUGH: Now, the question on everybody’s mind tonight is this: How is Terri Schiavo doing? You know, it’s been 10 days. She is starting her 11th day now without food and water. Let’s go back to Pinellas Park [Florida], where Lisa Daniels [MSNBC daytime anchor] is standing by – Lisa.

DANIELS: Well, Joe, at this point, we are going to delve into the medical aspect of the story. I want to bring in Dr. Ronald Cranford. He’s a neurologist at Hennepin Medical Center in Minneapolis. And, Doctor, before we continue, I want our viewers to understand what your role was in the legal case. I understand that Michael Schiavo and his team asked you to examine his wife. Is that correct?

CRANFORD: Yes. Yes, they did.

DANIELS: And from my understanding, I just want to be accurate, you examined Terri Schiavo for about 45 minutes. Is that right?

CRANFORD: I think 42 minutes, but 45 is fine, sure.

DANIELS: All right. Well, we want to be accurate here. What was your conclusion at the end of –

[crosstalk]

CRANFORD: Wait a minute. You are not accurate on a lot of things here. You’re saying a lot of – she’s not starving to death. Do you understand that? She is dehydrating to death.

DANIELS: Well, why do you say that? Tell us how you came to that conclusion?

[crosstalk]

CRANFORD: Can I tell you why? Because I have done this 25 to 50 times. I don’t know how many times Joe has done it, but I’ve done it 25 to 50 times in similar situations. And they die within 10 to 14 days.

Nancy Cruzan did not die in six days [as guest Patrick Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition suggested earlier in the program]. She died in 11 days, 11.5 hours. And Terri Schiavo will die within 10 to 14 days. And they are dying of dehydration, not starvation. And that’s just a lie. And Joe doesn’t have any idea what he is talking about. And you don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

DANIELS: Well –

CRANFORD: I have been at the bedside of these patients. I know what they die from. I’ve seen them die. And this is all bogus. It’s all just a bunch of crap that you are saying. It’s totally wrong.

DANIELS: Well, with all due respect, Doctor, it sounds like you think that you know what you are talking about, so let’s ask you about that.

CRANFORD: Sure.

DANIELS: Are you 100 percent correct in your opinion that Terri Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state? Do you agree with that?

CRANFORD: I am 105 percent sure she is in a vegetative state. And the autopsy will show severe irreversible brain damage to the higher centers, yes.

DANIELS: Why are you so sure, Doctor?

CRANFORD: Because I examined her. The court-appointed guardian examined her. Four neurologists at the hospital where she was has said she’s carried a diagnosis of vegetative state for 12 years. Every neurologist that examined her, except for Dr. [William] Hammesfahr [a neurologist selected by Terri Schiavo’s parents], who is a charlatan, has said she is in vegetative state. That’s what the court found. Just because you don’t like –

[crosstalk]

DANIELS: Doctor, was a CAT scan – Doctor, your critics would ask you, was a CAT scan used? Was an MRI taken? Were any of these tests taken?

CRANFORD: You don’t know the answer to that? The CAT scan was done in 1996, 2002. We spent a lot of time in court showing the irreversible – you don’t have copies of those CAT scans? How can you say that?

The CAT scans are out there, distributed to other people. You have got to look at the facts. The CAT scan is out there. It shows severe atrophy of the brain. The autopsy is going to show severe atrophy of the brain. And you’re asking me if a CAT scan was done? How could you possibly be so stupid?

SCARBOROUGH: Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait a second.

[crosstalk]

SCARBOROUGH: Hold on a second, if I can interrupt here.

CRANFORD: Go ahead. Joe, interrupt me.

SCARBOROUGH: Why don’t you go ahead and tell the rest of the story there? Why don’t you tell us that the radiologist that looked at the two CAT scans said she showed improvement in 2002 over 1996? You know, you seem so sure of yourself. The Associated Press reported yesterday –

CRANFORD: Joe, the judge didn’t believe him.

SCARBOROUGH: Hold on a second. Hold on a second. You’re so sure of yourself – respond to this. AP had a report yesterday. They said seven doctors have looked at her. Four said she was in persistent vegetative state. You were one of them, hired by Michael Schiavo to do that. There were three others that looked at her that disagreed. How can you be so absolutely sure that everybody that agrees with you is 100 percent accurate and everybody on the other side is a charlatan?

CRANFORD: Joe, Judge – Judge [George W.] Greer disallowed, didn’t believe what [Dr. William] Maxfield [a doctor selected by Terri Schiavo’s parents] said. You got your numbers wrong. There were eight neurologists saw her. Seven of the eight said she was in a vegetative state. Only one said she wasn’t.

SCARBOROUGH: I am quoting an Associated Press report from yesterday.

CRANFORD: Joe, you’ve got to get your facts straight.

SCARBOROUGH: I have got my facts straight.

CRANFORD: Get your facts straight. You’ve got your facts way off.

SCARBOROUGH: Why don’t we talk about – hold on a second.

CRANFORD: Go ahead.

SCARBOROUGH: You talked about a 1996 scan.

CRANFORD: No, 2002, 2002.

SCARBOROUGH: Let’s talk about it. A radiologist told the court that the 2002 scan actually showed improvement over the 1996 scan. Is that inaccurate? Did the AP report that wrong?

CRANFORD: Absolutely. Maxfield said it was improved. And Judge Greer didn’t buy it because the others said it wasn’t improved. It was probably worse than it was before.

SCARBOROUGH: Is he a charlatan also?

CRANFORD: Yes. Maxfield is an HBO [hyperbaric oxygen], vasodilator – look it up, Joe. See what vasodilator does. See what hyperbaric oxygen, see in these cases, and you tell me they are not charlatans. Just because you don’t agree with me – I don’t call everybody a charlatan. I’m not calling [Dr. Richard] Cheshire [who has argued that Terri Schiavo is not in a persistent vegetative state] a charlatan. I think he’s a reputable neurologist. I think he examined her, he interviewed her. So, just because I disagree, I don’t call them charlatans. But you have got your facts so far off that it’s unbelievable, Joe. You don’t have any idea what you are talking about. You’ve never been at the bedside of these patients. And this will come out in the next three to five years about this condition and starvation.

SCARBOROUGH: You were there 42 minutes, Doctor.

CRANFORD: Yes, I was.

SCARBOROUGH: You are only one doctor that’s been there. And somehow, in your 42 minutes of observing her, you have all the answers and everybody that disagrees is dead wrong, I guess.

CRANFORD: No, that’s just a – you know what? You’ve gotta see what Judge Greer said. You’ve gotta see what the appeals court said. If you read that, Joe, you will understand why the judge decided the way he did.

SCARBOROUGH: All right.

CRANFORD: He didn’t believe Hammesfahr. He didn’t believe Maxfield. And it’s not starvation. And Nancy Cruzan did not die in six days. She died in 11 days and 11.5 hours, 11 days and 11.5 hours.

SCARBOROUGH: All right.

CRANFORD: OK?

SCARBOROUGH: Thank you, Doctor.

CRANFORD: My pleasure.

hilarious!

[quote]100meters wrote:
From Scarborough Country,
Joe gets schooled by Dr. Cranford, a doctor who actually examined Terri.
[/quote]
Funny. My commie lib friend sent me that vidclip this AM, he thought the same thing.
What I saw was a doctor who argued about the number of other doctors–and had to back off because he couldn’t argue with the AP reports, and called everyone he disagreed with a charlatan–except for one doc who was just plain wrong, and he admitted he was being paid by Mike Shiavo.
Hardly the hilarious schooling you portray, Bro!

I also like how he was clear to say “it’s not starvation, it’s dehydration”.
Yeah, okay. A judge is ordering her food and water cut off…does it really matter which kills her?

[quote]100meters wrote:
Firstly Caddell is a former democratic pollster, who mysteriously is never supporting democrats in his appearances on FOX, a putative democrat so to speak.
[/quote]

I’ve never seen Caddell on Fox,I’ve only seen him on PMSNBC, where he’s frequently on Lardball (hey, 100meters, hows that for insulting??? !!) so I can’t comment on him on Fox.
However, during the election cycle, I know he was on PMSNBC and he bemoaned the current state of the democrat party. He feels the party has moved away from him and its roots–much like my lib commie friend.
He objects to the insane liberal stances the party takes on things, and wishes it would get back to more basic working for the people, because the further left, the further wacky the d’s get, the further right the mainstream gets to be.
I hardly think that makes him a bad democrat, just a bad liberal nutjob!

One thing that I’ve found [u]very[/u] distasteful:

The Blogs, chats and Websites mocking Terri’s disabilities under the guise of “humor”…

“Freedom of speech”, right?

Right…

Mufasa

Jeese Jackson is a Politician…

And from the start I have not liked the way in which Polititians have intervened…

Hence, the original purpose of the thread…

Mufasa

[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
I’ve never seen Caddell on Fox, I’ve only seen him on PMSNBC, where he’s frequently on Lardball (hey, 100meters, hows that for insulting??? !!) so I can’t comment on him on Fox.
However, during the election cycle, I know he was on PMSNBC and he bemoaned the current state of the democrat party. He feels the party has moved away from him and its roots–much like my lib commie friend.

He objects to the insane liberal stances the party takes on things, and wishes it would get back to more basic working for the people, because the further left, the further wacky the d’s get, the further right the mainstream gets to be.

I hardly think that makes him a bad democrat, just a bad liberal nutjob!

[/quote]

Well he argued rightly that Joe has his head up his ass, and doesn’t know what he’s talking about. And also he didn’t say everybody he disagreed with was a charlatan, just 2 doctors. In fact he made a point of saying he didn’t think everybody whom he disagreed with was a charlatan. All in all, pretty hilarious to me. I don’t get the insult comment, but yeah that’s typical Pat Caddell for you regardless of whether he’s on Lardball or FOX, he plays the role of fake democrat.

The fact that Terri Shiavo is in a PVS is irrelevant.

She is being starved (dehydrated) to death by a “husband” who just wants to get rid of her. He has 2 children by another woman since her collapse. Isn’t that adultery?

Her family desperatly wants to keep her alive.

No one knows what her wishes were.

I am normally on the right to die side of things, but this case is too fishy.

100meters:
Serious question.
Why is it that you and the other wack job lib nut types feel free to call people who disagree with you “kooks” or “charlatans” or whatever?
What makes you so sure you’re correct?

It could just as easily be the other way 'round, after all.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
The fact that Terri Shiavo is in a PVS is irrelevant.
[/quote]

It’s very relevant, if she had a migraine that would be irrelevant, not having a cerebral cortex is central as to whether she would want to live. She wouldn’t. Nobody would. You know this.

Huge stretch. His wife essentially died 15 years ago. The body remains. She’s not being starved by her husband, you know that too. The court is allowing her to die with some dignity as they believe and most know she would want to.

of course

Most people can figure out that a person wouldn’t want to live without a brain. It’s really not that hard.

[quote]
I am normally on the right to die side of things, but this case is too fishy.[/quote]
It’s not that fishy. The court has made the same decision that any reasonable person would also make. A person without a brain wouldn’t want to continue living.

[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
100meters:
Serious question.
Why is it that you and the other wack job lib nut types feel free to call people who disagree with you “kooks” or “charlatans” or whatever?
What makes you so sure you’re correct?

It could just as easily be the other way 'round, after all.[/quote]

I’m trusting the conservative republican judge in the case,the GAL and the doctors involved that have SEEN and EXAMINED Terri, and you are trusting 33 doctors who haven’t spent anytime with Terri. Why did the conservative judge come to the same conclustions Joe? Only one doctor who has examined Terri said anything different, your man Dr. Hammesfahr who was disciplined by the Florida Board of Medicine and falseley boasts of a nobel prize nominee. So you have her attending physician, her court-appointed physician, and the 2 appointed by Micheal vs. Dr. Hammesfahr. Forget your analysis of the husband and ask yourself who’s more likely to be right about Terri’s condition (and remember her cat scans too!) And then move on to would you want to persist (she’s not living in the human being sense of the word) in that state?

And when people like Delay say she’s laughing and talking that is just nutty!
c’mon Joe, you know that.

As long as there is life there is hope.
Doctors are not infallible. Just because her brain appears to be gone by todays techniques does not mean improvement is impossible (although I believe it is highly unlikely).

Since Terri did not leave a living will you cannot know her wishes.

Her husband abandoned her years ago. He wants her to die.

Her REAL family wants her to live.

Seems a simple choice to me. Let her REAL family take care of her.

One more post before I have to go.

Just because the judge has decided for the “husband” and ordered her to be deprived of food and drink until dead doesn’t make it the right decision.

It only means that the husband was able to get the best lawyer.

There are plenty of innocent men on death row and OJ is a free man. The judicial system gets most of them right. It is the cases they get wrong that end up in the news. Like this one.

problem with the judges findings are: when this case first started, Mike had a high priced lawyer specializing in how to kill people, and the Schindlers had essentially a pro-bono lawyer who was out maneuvered at every turn. By then, the finding of fact was complete…and the judge chose to believe Mike.

The judge also has a history of bad rulings against women, favoring the husband to the point of the women getting killed.

Why are you trusting the doctors hired and paid for by Mike? The doctors who’re forthright in the right to kill movement?

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
One more post before I have to go.

Just because the judge has decided for the “husband” and ordered her to be deprived of food and drink until dead doesn’t make it the right decision.

It only means that the husband was able to get the best lawyer.

There are plenty of innocent men on death row and OJ is a free man. The judicial system gets most of them right. It is the cases they get wrong that end up in the news. Like this one.[/quote]

Whoops…The judge decided for Terri. Big difference and really the whole point.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
As long as there is life there is hope.
Doctors are not infallible. Just because her brain appears to be gone by todays techniques does not mean improvement is impossible (although I believe it is highly unlikely).
[/quote]
That’s why you get more than one doctor, and no technique will recreate the cerebral cortex that Terri is missing nor the lifetime of information lost with it.

You don’t have a brain, just a body, do you want to persist? NO.

He didn’t want her to be bulimic, have heart failure because of it, causing horribly tragic brain damage resulting in her cerebral cortex totally atrophying, being replaced by liquid essentially killing Terri the person, no he didn’t want that I’m pretty sure.

of course

[quote]
Seems a simple choice to me. Let her REAL family take care of her.[/quote]
Despite the fact that this might well be against Terri’s wishes?

[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
Why are you trusting the doctors hired and paid for by Mike? The doctors who’re forthright in the right to kill movement?[/quote]

I could ask you what makes you trust people who never examined Terri?