[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just learned what a GLORY HOLE is last year… by watching “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia”.[/quote]
C’mon man tell the truth. You found out about it at that bar you went to - The Blue Oyster right? lol
[quote]SickAbs wrote:
[quote]AndrewG909 wrote:
[quote]SickAbs wrote:
[quote]AndrewG909 wrote:
I bet if ProX turned gay he alone would have enough mass to tip the scales the other direction and there’d be news announcing gay men are bigger than normal men!
ProX: You alone have the power to decide the fate of the Gay vs Straight size statistic. With great power comes great responsibility
[/quote]
To even joke about Prof X doing some gay shit is just a fuckin no no dude. I dont know what you and the rest of the land scapers joke about, but that shits not cool. No habla el homo.[/quote]
No one said ProX was ghey, well okay vegita eluded to it, but I never said he was. You on the other hand appear to be a flaming homo! Don’t get me wrong, the way you jumped to his defense was quite corageous, but it also is quite ghey.
Racist jokes are played out now, you should find something new to descriminate against, like celtics for example.
[/quote]
looking up corageous, no meaning found If the land scaper thing is getting you mifted then I wont say it. And I’ve been hating on celtics for quite awhile. My original post was all in jest, no malice. I’ll leave you with a funny joke though. (only semi racist) What did the mexican guy say when two houses fell on him?
In cheech and chong voice Get off me homes![/quote]
Hahha! I’m trying to stock up on these jokes.
Related to this thread and I know I am going to get shit for the whole ‘no pics’ thing but I am friends with 2 lesbians that I would say are both attractive. Great bodies, attractive faces, etc. You can definitely tell one is the more dominant of the 2 though.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Many gay women seem to like the look of “androgyny” so they gain fat to look like a fat guy with a pot belly. I don’t know if this is their specific reason for wearing plaid and Doc Martins while having a gut as big as a construction workers, but it makes sense to me.[/quote]
This does not make sense to me. I’ve seen this over and over from afar, now I have a friend who’s an attractive lesbian. Of course her girlfriend is a bull dyke. I don’t understand why, if she’s a lesbian, she doesn’t go for a nice feminine, pretty girl instead of this substitute man. Or, just be straight and get a real man. What could possibly be the appeal?
I’d love to ask her about it but can’t imagine that conversation going well.[/quote]
I always have the same questions. I don’t mean to piss off anyone who may be gay here, but that makes little sense to me and seems to be rampant when it comes to lesbians. I seem to notice there is always the “man” and “woman” in the couple more often than it seems with gay guys. Sometimes, I can’t tell if they are a woman or a guy and this is a hassle when they are patients. Sometimes I walk in the room and don’t know what to call them.
[/quote]
Try calling them their names?
Also the butch / femme combo goes both ways in the gay community. Typically gay dudes will partner up in ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ relationships. Seems to me the top is usually the butch one.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just learned what a GLORY HOLE is last year… by watching “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia”.[/quote]
hahahahaha and the european guy sends Dennis and Frank in there together
[quote]Loudog75 wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just learned what a GLORY HOLE is last year… by watching “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia”.[/quote]
C’mon man tell the truth. You found out about it at that bar you went to - The Blue Oyster right? lol
[/quote]
The only thing that makes me want to go gay is your avatar!
lol
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Loudog75 wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just learned what a GLORY HOLE is last year… by watching “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia”.[/quote]
C’mon man tell the truth. You found out about it at that bar you went to - The Blue Oyster right? lol
[/quote]
The only thing that makes me want to go gay is your avatar!
lol
[/quote]
ha ha, you’re just mad that you can’t afford it.
Seriously though why on earth would she wear that?? lol
Delusional Fail
Soooooo, if guys have glory holes what do girls use?..a glory post? shaft?..
Glory Poles
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
side note, TMZ was showing a Justin Beiber look-a-like website…for lesbians!,hilarious, alot of lesbians look like this kid apparently.[/quote]
Uh…Link?
Btw,Havent you guys watched “Its Always Sunny”? They actually have an episode on this. But back to the OT,It does makes sense to me…in a way. I have a female supervisor that must be the lipstick lesbian (I use this term VERY loosely) because she is alot more feminine than her counterpart but not by much. Both are really over weight. Shes like 5’4 and 210 pounds.
[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
she is ALOT more feminine than her counterpart… but not by much…[/quote]
Wait… What?
i <3 andrew!
I dont know where I read or heard this I just tend to retain these things. It has been suggested that gay skinnyness / neatness is a manifestation of self-loathing (probably as a result of bigotry/homophobia)
They find self worth in being outwardly fashionable, skinny, generally put together while on the inside they feel like dirty fags.
Maybe bull-dyke lesbians internalize their self loathing with haagen daaz accounting for their heftiness.
HOWEVER: This is totally taboo to talk about but I feel like there is a gay physiognomy that is more than affected feminine facial expressions, vocal traits, movements and mannerisms.
Seems to me like there is like a long limbed, super skinny, prominent ribcage, long hands and feet, etc. gay body type which leads me to beleive that its a genetic trait.
I beleive that most cases of homosexuality are genetic but, just like deafness, I beleive there are a range of homosexuality genes / environmental triggers that account for the variances between effete gays/bear gays and lipstick/butch lesbians.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
A new study shows that gay men really are leaner than straight men. And conversely, it also found that gay women tend to be heavier than their heterosexual counterparts."
[/quote]
I find this to be mostly true where I train in Singapore, in my chain gym (affiliated to 24 Fitness in the USA) the guys who train here are mostly skinny, do mainly arm exercises and train together getting into the most compromising positions during exercises like Smith Machine Bench Press (like literally a nut sack hanging over a forehead). They mostly speak in an effeminate voice, chat on their mobiles and dress in designer clothes.
The gay women here for the most part are just ugly women who cut their hair short and spiky, wear glasses, dress like men and date pretty young things with long legs and great hair.
[quote]AndrewG909 wrote:
[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
she is ALOT more feminine than her counterpart… but not by much…[/quote]
Wait… What?[/quote]
Lol,Seig Heil Grammar Nazi. Yeah,kinda messed up there. I meant that…she is abit more girlish. The ways he talks and walks but her body is like a bell. She has huge tits (the part I consider feminine) but short,fat legs and a huge waist. Her counterpart has almost the same build but has no breast and is a bit muscular.
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Many gay women seem to like the look of “androgyny” so they gain fat to look like a fat guy with a pot belly. I don’t know if this is their specific reason for wearing plaid and Doc Martins while having a gut as big as a construction workers, but it makes sense to me.[/quote]
This does not make sense to me. I’ve seen this over and over from afar, now I have a friend who’s an attractive lesbian. Of course her girlfriend is a bull dyke. I don’t understand why, if she’s a lesbian, she doesn’t go for a nice feminine, pretty girl instead of this substitute man. Or, just be straight and get a real man. What could possibly be the appeal?[/quote]
Well, let’s hypothesize two possible causes for a woman preferring same-sex relationship.
Cause 1: Having the wiring (or other-caused characteristic – this is only a figure of speech) to be attracted to feminine physical traits but not by masculine physical traits.
This would explain the pot-bellied truck-driver lesbians being attracted to the good-looking lesbians.
Cause 2: Having a psychological aversion to intimate relationships with men for whatever reason, while having the wiring (again, so to speak) to be attracted to masculine physical traits but not by feminine physical traits.
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Many gay women seem to like the look of “androgyny” so they gain fat to look like a fat guy with a pot belly. I don’t know if this is their specific reason for wearing plaid and Doc Martins while having a gut as big as a construction workers, but it makes sense to me.[/quote]
This does not make sense to me. I’ve seen this over and over from afar, now I have a friend who’s an attractive lesbian. Of course her girlfriend is a bull dyke. I don’t understand why, if she’s a lesbian, she doesn’t go for a nice feminine, pretty girl instead of this substitute man. Or, just be straight and get a real man. What could possibly be the appeal?[/quote]
Well, let’s hypothesize two possible causes for a woman preferring same-sex relationship.
Cause 1: Having the wiring (or other-caused characteristic – this is only a figure of speech) to be attracted to feminine physical traits but not by masculine physical traits.
This would explain the pot-bellied truck-driver lesbians being attracted to the good-looking lesbians.
Cause 2: Having a psychological aversion to intimate relationships with men for whatever reason, while having the wiring (again, so to speak) to be attracted to masculine physical traits but not by feminine physical traits.[/quote]
It just seems very ironic…if not hypocritical because I often hear much men bashing from some of the same types (and yes, I do understand I am generalizing and again am not trying to piss anyone off)…but then, men not liking women yet dressing like them with no intention of becoming a woman makes no sense to me either.
I have often wondered if the now classic “flamboyant extreme femininity gay” portrayal is more an act because of the simple fact that so many act just a like…which shouldn’t even be statistically possible.
[quote]Eli B wrote:
Also the butch / femme combo goes both ways in the gay community. Typically gay dudes will partner up in ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ relationships. Seems to me the top is usually the butch one.[/quote]
More often than not, I’ve found that to be the opposite. Then again, there’s the whole world of versatile, but I don’t think y’all are ready for that discussion yet, lol.
Back to the OT, I can definitely see the validity in what the article says. Men are turned on a lot more by physical appearance, regardless of if it’s a guy or girl or both that does it for them, thus it follows that people that want attention from men would put more effort into being not fat (I didn’t want to say skinny, because I can’t stand guys without discernible muscle mass). As far as lesbians go, 95% of the ones I know are extremely athletic, not the lethargic androgynous masses previously described.
[quote]TKDCadet04 wrote:
[quote]Eli B wrote:
Also the butch / femme combo goes both ways in the gay community. Typically gay dudes will partner up in ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ relationships. Seems to me the top is usually the butch one.[/quote]
More often than not, I’ve found that to be the opposite. Then again, there’s the whole world of versatile, but I don’t think y’all are ready for that discussion yet, lol.
Back to the OT, I can definitely see the validity in what the article says. Men are turned on a lot more by physical appearance, regardless of if it’s a guy or girl or both that does it for them, thus it follows that people that want attention from men would put more effort into being not fat (I didn’t want to say skinny, because I can’t stand guys without discernible muscle mass). As far as lesbians go, 95% of the ones I know are extremely athletic, not the lethargic androgynous masses previously described.[/quote]
your saying in your experience the butch one is usually the bottom? or that you just never know and it varies on a case by case basis?