
Pikehunter with a score of 3 at ratemyfish.com

Pikehunter with a score of 3 at ratemyfish.com

I ran across this photo on the Internet. I think this seagull’s head is very impressive whilst it may not be perfectly symmetrical (one eye slightly higher than the other etc.) Beak is unreal. Just curious about whether this is a steroid build. Any opinions? Who is this seagull?

I actually ran across this picture on the internet. I think her win at Wimbledon today was very impressive though not perfectly symmetrical ( her opponent sister lost, etc ). Flower is unreal. Just curious about whether this is a steroid victory. Any opinions? Who is this girl?
P.S. This thread is hilarious!
[quote]Jetric9 wrote:
Pikehunter with a score of 3 at ratemyfish.com[/quote]
Fukin lulz
Serious fucking ownage in this thread, jesus. I am laughing my ass.

I ran across this photo on the internet. I think this guy’s expression is very impressive while it may not be perfectly symetrical (left eyebrow higher than left etc.). Eyes are unreal. Just curious about whether this is a steroid build. Any opinions? Who is this guy?
Why is that anyone who is:
Is always considered juiced? Really? Get in the gym and fucking lift. Just because you are A) Strong and Fat or B) Lean and Shredded, doesn’t make you juiced.
Lift until you die…then go lift again.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
chitown34 wrote:
I’m guessing that if he took a drug test and people were to bet on whether he tested positive or not for anabolics, most people would bet on a positive test. still, it’s a pretty dumb post
Your post is worse than the Op’s.[/quote]
Oh dear, epic fail
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
I actually ran across this picture on the internet. I think her win at Wimbledon today was very impressive though not perfectly symmetrical ( her opponent sister lost, etc ). Flower is unreal. Just curious about whether this is a steroid victory. Any opinions? Who is this girl?
P.S. This thread is hilarious![/quote]
I thought it was shaving foam on her booty at first. I must be tired…
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
I ran across this photo on the internet. I think this truck’s build is very impressive while it may not be perfectly symetrical (grill lights etc.). Wheels are unreal. Just curious about whether this is a steroid build. Any opinions? Who is this truck?
[/quote]
this made me lol
[quote]tnationmuscle wrote:
Yes, he’s juiced, but, do you. to each his own.[/quote]
It’s like the OP brought out all of these types. Apparently, just being muscular and lean now means that faceless people on the internet know for sure steroids were involved.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
tnationmuscle wrote:
Yes, he’s juiced, but, do you. to each his own.
It’s like the OP brought out all of these types. Apparently, just being muscular and lean now means that faceless people on the internet know for sure steroids were involved.
[/quote]
Not in all cases, just in the ones that are apparent. Do you stand and defend all drugs users or just those that use AAS?, Just curious.
[quote]tnationmuscle wrote:
Professor X wrote:
tnationmuscle wrote:
Yes, he’s juiced, but, do you. to each his own.
It’s like the OP brought out all of these types. Apparently, just being muscular and lean now means that faceless people on the internet know for sure steroids were involved.
Not in all cases, just in the ones that are apparent. Do you stand and defend all drugs users or just those that use AAS?, Just curious.[/quote]
How is it apparent? It’s obviously a photo shoot. He’s got lightning, a pump, and photoshop retouching on his side.
[quote]That One Guy wrote:
tnationmuscle wrote:
Professor X wrote:
tnationmuscle wrote:
Yes, he’s juiced, but, do you. to each his own.
It’s like the OP brought out all of these types. Apparently, just being muscular and lean now means that faceless people on the internet know for sure steroids were involved.
Not in all cases, just in the ones that are apparent. Do you stand and defend all drugs users or just those that use AAS?, Just curious.
How is it apparent? It’s obviously a photo shoot. He’s got lightning, a pump, and photoshop retouching on his side. [/quote]
Because, you know, he has muscles. Everyone knows that if you actually make progress in the weight room then you’re a juice-head. I’ll bet there’s no way the guy EVER put on extra-weight to acquire the muscles he has today, and then perhaps went on a diet to become as lean as he is now.
Nope - It’s all teh roidz. Don’t argue with '09ers. The logic is flawless.
You could easily obtain that build without anabolics.
DirtyGerdy was more built and lean than that with no juice.
Theres plenty of guys that have good genetics.
the guy is supposed to be so big that we could accuse him of steroids usage ?
ok … what a useless thread, funny tough.
He’s probably really short.
The first question I asked myself on seeing the pic in the original post wasn’t “Is he on steroids?”
It was “How has he neglected shoulders that badly?”
[quote]tnationmuscle wrote:
Professor X wrote:
tnationmuscle wrote:
Yes, he’s juiced, but, do you. to each his own.
It’s like the OP brought out all of these types. Apparently, just being muscular and lean now means that faceless people on the internet know for sure steroids were involved.
Not in all cases, just in the ones that are apparent. Do you stand and defend all drugs users or just those that use AAS?, Just curious.[/quote]
You know, if people like you started looking at pictures of random people and blurting out, “that guy is a cocaine user!” based on nothing but an unrelated photo, you can guarantee I would make the same issue. Unfortunately, bodybuilding seems to stand alone in that little people (and especially those who have made very little progress) rush to label anyone who has made progress as a drug user whether there is any proof of that or not.
According to you, his “steroid use” is apparent. In what way is it apparent?
[quote]tnationmuscle wrote:
alas…an answer, thread closed.
[/quote]
You want to close the thread, show us the amazing physique you have naturally built. Then you can talk shit to try and degrade the achievements of others.