[quote]sam_sneed wrote:
After months on 1,100 calories a day (bad move IMO) , I’m not even sure how many calories you’ll need each day. I do highly doubt, it’ll be 2,600 like you have outlined above. This seriously looks like a diet I would cut on, not bulk. If you’re working out as hard as you’re supposed to be then there is no way this is going to cut it. I bulked pretty much during the same time period as you and got to a similar weight. (6’ 230). The difference was that my diet was there to support my strength gains. If I gained weight without significantly getting stronger, I made an adjustment.
The key, as other’s have said, is to focus on getting stronger and eating to sustain this goal. I don’t believe the diet above does this. By the time you hit 240 on your last bulk, you were doing 70x6 on incline dumbells and 60x10 on decline. These numbers need to be in the 100’s when you’re done with this bulk.[/quote]
I don’t think it’s right to say his diet “isn’t going to cut it.” It’s more than double the amount of calories he’s on now, so this diet would be more than sufficient. I think it’s waaaay too much food considering how little food he’s been consuming.
I think the best route would be to eat instinctively. If you’re training hard, eat when you’re hungry. If you’re still hungry, eat more. Stick with the food choices you have outlined, but if you suddenly stuff yourself double the amount of food and maybe 10x the amount of carbs you were previously consuming, you’ll have significant fat rebound and digestive distress.
Eat to fulfill your needs, not to reach an arbitrary number.