[quote]Da Vinci wrote:
Does anyone else feel like his chest is lagging pretty badly in that pic compared to the rest of him and compared to the thread starters avatar as well? Is it just a bad picture?[/quote]
I think it’s just the picture, not the biggest chest but I wouldn’t knock him.
He did tear a pec benching with Franco back in the day though right ?
Yeah he tore it by trying to keep up with him on the bench one day according to his book.
[quote]Rattler wrote:
WS4JB wrote:
Lets add on Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris, David Carradine, Samuel L. Jackson, Wesley Snipes, Ron Perlman, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Kurt Russell, and Roddy Piper just for the hell of it.
Make it the Cannonball run of action flicks.
No Jean Claude please. He sucks ass.[/quote]
You need to watch JCVD. It’s actually a good Jean-Claude Van Damme movie.
Damn, how does Stallone stay so freaking lean all the time?
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Rattler wrote:
WS4JB wrote:
Lets add on Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris, David Carradine, Samuel L. Jackson, Wesley Snipes, Ron Perlman, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Kurt Russell, and Roddy Piper just for the hell of it.
Make it the Cannonball run of action flicks.
No Jean Claude please. He sucks ass.
You need to watch JCVD. It’s actually a good Jean-Claude Van Damme movie.[/quote]
I thought the same.
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
Rattler wrote:
WS4JB wrote:
Lets add on Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris, David Carradine, Samuel L. Jackson, Wesley Snipes, Ron Perlman, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Kurt Russell, and Roddy Piper just for the hell of it.
Make it the Cannonball run of action flicks.
No Jean Claude please. He sucks ass.
You need to watch JCVD. It’s actually a good Jean-Claude Van Damme movie.
I thought the same.
[/quote]
Ya know, I have heard nothing but good things about this movie.
But I loved Timecop as a kid…so, maybe my standards are set low.
[quote]ultimatethor wrote:
Damn, how does Stallone stay so freaking lean all the time?[/quote]
InStone pudding… chocolate flavor.
[quote]GumsMagoo wrote:
ultimatethor wrote:
Damn, how does Stallone stay so freaking lean all the time?
InStone pudding… chocolate flavor.[/quote]
2 years ago my parents shipped me a big case of that stuff for Easter. Not awful.
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
Rattler wrote:
WS4JB wrote:
Lets add on Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris, David Carradine, Samuel L. Jackson, Wesley Snipes, Ron Perlman, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Kurt Russell, and Roddy Piper just for the hell of it.
Make it the Cannonball run of action flicks.
No Jean Claude please. He sucks ass.
You need to watch JCVD. It’s actually a good Jean-Claude Van Damme movie.
I thought the same.
Ya know, I have heard nothing but good things about this movie.
But I loved Timecop as a kid…so, maybe my standards are set low.
[/quote]
Van Damme was actually offered the role that Dolph Lungren will play. He turned it down for reasons unknown. But please, for the love of God, I implore you to replace Seagal with Carl Weathers before it’s too late…
P.S. I still think that Timecop is one of Van Damme’s best movies.
P.P.S. Speaking of Timecop, did you know that Ron Silver died on Sunday?
Yeah, dead at 62, lung cancer i believe.
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
Yeah, dead at 62, lung cancer i believe. [/quote]
Dammit. Ron Silver was one of the greats. Never got his full dues IMO 
thank god for HRT + some
the music has to go
I actually thought Timecop was one of JCVD’s better films. For the time it was made, it was a pretty darn cool sci-fi/comic type film
S
[quote]ultimatethor wrote:
Damn, how does Stallone stay so freaking lean all the time?[/quote]
You forget Sly’s “Cop Land” bulk!
[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
I actually thought Timecop was one of JCVD’s better films. For the time it was made, it was a pretty darn cool sci-fi/comic type film
S
[/quote]
Yeah, I agree. I think you really kinda have to judge action movies by the era they were produced in. I mean, sure, the all-time classics are still great today (Die Hard 1, Pale Rider–not technically action, etc, etc) and definitely hold up favorably when compared to modern works (cinematography style differences aside) but overall it’s unfair to judge a movie by standards 10+ years after it was made. Things evolve and change too quick.
I mean, Rambo looks kinda lacking today just because of the lack of realism that films today portray in acting methods (better/more realistic dying reactions from getting shot) and better mimicry of shooting technique (ie–your rifle is actually shouldered appropriately instead of shot from the hip and sprayed around). But come on, for the time it was AWESOME. And it’s still a fantastic movie today for entertainment purposes and sentimental value. It doesn’t matter that the flaws are there because we love it anyway!
[quote]Da Vinci wrote:
Does anyone else feel like his chest is lagging pretty badly in that pic compared to the rest of him and compared to the thread starters avatar as well? Is it just a bad picture?[/quote]
If I recall correctly, the chest is one of the first things to atrophy in old age. If you look at great former bodybuilders who still train hard today, you’ll find a lot of them lack the size in their chest compared to the rest of their body (look at some of Drapers pics of him now…bigger than Sly’s but obviously smaller in comparison to the rest of him than it was).
If you go by Poliquin’s biosignature modulation readings, the chest is a prime androgen site, and androgen levels decrease with age, even if gH is used.
Besides, I think flyues might be one of the world’s most iffy movements to an old guy with a lot of accumulated injuries from decades of iron training.
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
GumsMagoo wrote:
ultimatethor wrote:
Damn, how does Stallone stay so freaking lean all the time?
InStone pudding… chocolate flavor.
2 years ago my parents shipped me a big case of that stuff for Easter. Not awful.[/quote]
I thought it was pretty good.
actually instone makes some pretty decent,yet overpriced products