Squats from the Bottom Position

I just tried doing squats with the bar in the bottom position in the squat rack (the bar resting on the safety bars) and holy crap are they hard. I could barely get 300 for 5 when my max for regular squats is 450x3. Although I guess I wasn’t going low enough prior to this.

I’m not sure if it’s the going lower or just that it’s harder to start at the bottom, either way I’d definitely recommend doing these.

I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I do a lot of squats and pause squats and take these a few inches below legal depth, but am throwing in the rack work to overload the top and get used to holding big weight on my back.

A lot of old timers, Paul Anderson most notably, did lots of rack work to condition their bodies for huge loads. If you’ve walked out 800 lbs., 600 doesn’t feel like that much.

However, what you’re doing is brutally hard work…I’ve done those before but not for awhile. They will probably help you stay super tight in the hole which is important.

[quote]Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I do a lot of squats and pause squats and take these a few inches below legal depth, but am throwing in the rack work to overload the top and get used to holding big weight on my back.

A lot of old timers, Paul Anderson most notably, did lots of rack work to condition their bodies for huge loads. If you’ve walked out 800 lbs., 600 doesn’t feel like that much.

However, what you’re doing is brutally hard work…I’ve done those before but not for awhile. They will probably help you stay super tight in the hole which is important. [/quote]

I know what you mean, before break I put 500 (which is a lot for me) pounds up and managed a half squat.

Have you found that doing supra-maximal loads with rack work really benefits your full squat though?

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I do a lot of squats and pause squats and take these a few inches below legal depth, but am throwing in the rack work to overload the top and get used to holding big weight on my back.

A lot of old timers, Paul Anderson most notably, did lots of rack work to condition their bodies for huge loads. If you’ve walked out 800 lbs., 600 doesn’t feel like that much.

However, what you’re doing is brutally hard work…I’ve done those before but not for awhile. They will probably help you stay super tight in the hole which is important.

I know what you mean, before break I put 500 (which is a lot for me) pounds up and managed a half squat.

Have you found that doing supra-maximal loads with rack work really benefits your full squat though?[/quote]

No clue, it’s an idea coach and me kicked around and I decided to add them in. I haven’t been using the idea for long. I should know better in a month or so.

Others report good gains from heavy lockouts or heavy walkouts but you have to see for yourself. I think it has its place so I expect good results.

[quote]Ramo wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I do a lot of squats and pause squats and take these a few inches below legal depth, but am throwing in the rack work to overload the top and get used to holding big weight on my back.

A lot of old timers, Paul Anderson most notably, did lots of rack work to condition their bodies for huge loads. If you’ve walked out 800 lbs., 600 doesn’t feel like that much.

However, what you’re doing is brutally hard work…I’ve done those before but not for awhile. They will probably help you stay super tight in the hole which is important.

I know what you mean, before break I put 500 (which is a lot for me) pounds up and managed a half squat.

Have you found that doing supra-maximal loads with rack work really benefits your full squat though?

No clue, it’s an idea coach and me kicked around and I decided to add them in. I haven’t been using the idea for long. I should know better in a month or so.

Others report good gains from heavy lockouts or heavy walkouts but you have to see for yourself. I think it has its place so I expect good results.[/quote]

I used to do these every few weeks last training cycle and they helped ENORMOUSLY

I think Dan John wrote about front squats from the bottom position. He said he liked them, and I think he even said he thought it was one of the best tests of strength. I could be wrong, though.

As for supra-maximal loads, I think another argument is the “spinal loading” school of thought, being that when you load 800lbs onto a bar, then load said bar on your back, your brain says “uhh, fuck, if I don’t support myself, I’m going to be crushed.” Then it releases a shit-ton of anabolic hormones into your body.

That’s the simplified version.

[quote]Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.
[/quote]

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.

[quote]Ramo wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I do a lot of squats and pause squats and take these a few inches below legal depth, but am throwing in the rack work to overload the top and get used to holding big weight on my back.

A lot of old timers, Paul Anderson most notably, did lots of rack work to condition their bodies for huge loads. If you’ve walked out 800 lbs., 600 doesn’t feel like that much.

However, what you’re doing is brutally hard work…I’ve done those before but not for awhile. They will probably help you stay super tight in the hole which is important.

I know what you mean, before break I put 500 (which is a lot for me) pounds up and managed a half squat.

Have you found that doing supra-maximal loads with rack work really benefits your full squat though?

No clue, it’s an idea coach and me kicked around and I decided to add them in. I haven’t been using the idea for long. I should know better in a month or so.

Others report good gains from heavy lockouts or heavy walkouts but you have to see for yourself. I think it has its place so I expect good results.[/quote]

Yeah, my plan for now is to get up to 450 from the bottom then maybe go back to regular squats or try heavy lockouts.

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
I think Dan John wrote about front squats from the bottom position. He said he liked them, and I think he even said he thought it was one of the best tests of strength. I could be wrong, though.

As for supra-maximal loads, I think another argument is the “spinal loading” school of thought, being that when you load 800lbs onto a bar, then load said bar on your back, your brain says “uhh, fuck, if I don’t support myself, I’m going to be crushed.” Then it releases a shit-ton of anabolic hormones into your body.

That’s the simplified version.[/quote]

That makes sense but then could it be applied to bottom squats? Since your body goes “if I don’t lift this up I’ll be crushed”?

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.[/quote]

What’s the weight difference when you do that vs. regular squats?

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.

What’s the weight difference when you do that vs. regular squats?[/quote]

I never really thought about it but I use about 15% more than my 1rm for sets of 5.

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.

What’s the weight difference when you do that vs. regular squats?

I never really thought about it but I use about 15% more than my 1rm for sets of 5.[/quote]

Wow, that’s a fair bit more.

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.

What’s the weight difference when you do that vs. regular squats?

I never really thought about it but I use about 15% more than my 1rm for sets of 5.

Wow, that’s a fair bit more.
[/quote]

It is but I’m not starting from below parallel. It’s added considerably to my leg strength. I think it’s helped a lot strenthening the lift just where my squat suit stops assisting.

I get panicked adding more weight with squats just for the pure feel of the weight on my back but doing this helps in that I know I can get it up after I hit that spot.

I’ve been told I can squat more than I am but I need to get my head around it. These assist in the head aspect of it for me.

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
I just tried doing squats with the bar in the bottom position in the squat rack (the bar resting on the safety bars) and holy crap are they hard. I could barely get 300 for 5 when my max for regular squats is 450x3. Although I guess I wasn’t going low enough prior to this.

I’m not sure if it’s the going lower or just that it’s harder to start at the bottom, either way I’d definitely recommend doing these.[/quote]

Real world lesson in the Stretch Shortening Cycle.

It’s why good coaches sometimes recommend a pause at the bottom of a particular movement (to inhibit it) box squats, floor presses etc.

Stretch Shortening Cycle. Check it out.

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
Ramo wrote:
I am actually taking the opposite approach, and doing half squats out of the rack to get more weight on my back.

I love these. I start at hip height for a couple sets and then go waist height at higher weight. Just breaking the inertia of the bar at the bottom on the first rep is a killer. It’s almost like deadlifts off your back because there is no kinetic energy at all on the first one. If that makes any sense. The bar is completely dead.

I like them to practice forcing my hips through on squat.

What’s the weight difference when you do that vs. regular squats?

I never really thought about it but I use about 15% more than my 1rm for sets of 5.

Wow, that’s a fair bit more.

It is but I’m not starting from below parallel. It’s added considerably to my leg strength. I think it’s helped a lot strenthening the lift just where my squat suit stops assisting.

I get panicked adding more weight with squats just for the pure feel of the weight on my back but doing this helps in that I know I can get it up after I hit that spot.

I’ve been told I can squat more than I am but I need to get my head around it. These assist in the head aspect of it for me.[/quote]

I know the feeling, when I first did 400 I was very skeptical that I’d be able to manage it just because it seemed like a lot of weight. Luckily for me I just seem to be fairly good at squats,