Been a while since I came so close to hurling!
Just the highlights!
SQ -210x50x1
Press -250x20T/20B/20Wx1
Sissy -BWx35
What was the point of that?
[quote]mr popular wrote:
What was the point of that?[/quote]
The ‘meat & potatoes’ of my training has always been built around basic movements in the four to ten rep. range for all body parts.(see my other youtube clips) However; I beleive there is a time & place for all types of training. I have periods when I run sprints & bleachers, medicine ball throws & bell swings, barbell/d.bell complexes, jumps, field agility, intensification techniques, unilateral work, high rep work, etc.
Legs/quads generally respond well to high rep. work for lifters with the ‘sack’ to tolerate the discomfort. I beleive the current term in fashion is ‘Time Under Tension’. Partial range of motion work is an excellent volume builder when used correctly & sissy squats IMO are a great way to end Quad. work or as part of a superset.
Stength/Stamina are measured in many ways.
And here I was thinking that Voldemort did only low rep work.
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
mr popular wrote:
What was the point of that?
The ‘meat & potatoes’ of my training has always been built around basic movements in the four to ten rep. range for all body parts.(see my other youtube clips) However; I beleive there is a time & place for all types of training. I have periods when I run sprints & bleachers, medicine ball throws & bell swings, barbell/d.bell complexes, jumps, field agility, intensification techniques, unilateral work, high rep work, etc.
Legs/quads generally respond well to high rep. work for lifters with the ‘sack’ to tolerate the discomfort. I beleive the current term in fashion is ‘Time Under Tension’. Partial range of motion work is an excellent volume builder when used correctly & sissy squats IMO are a great way to end Quad. work or as part of a superset.
Stength/Stamina are measured in many ways.
[/quote]
Your legs don’t look very massive for how much sack you have.
good stuff, great job on the sissies.
AR
I’m a little surprised at some of the feedback here…
BCT can put up some fine numbers on back squats, especially for his age and weight.
He just happened to post a high rep day…
SQ LHC 090602 410x15 - YouTube ← still high as far as reps go, but come on… 410x15 is a lot more than what the majority of the T-Nation population is capable of.
(I couldn’t squat 405x15 back when I was weighing in at 207… Not even close)
yea man. fuck the haters. that was sick. And your numbers speak for themselves.
btw, I could see what was done on the leg press, but what does the B, T, and F mean? I also feel retarded for being surprised at those sissy squats. I have never seen that apparatus before.
[quote]DaveyD wrote:
BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
Legs/quads generally respond well to high rep. work for lifters with the ‘sack’ to tolerate the discomfort.
Your legs don’t look very massive for how much sack you have.
[/quote]
Post your clip of a bodyweight squat for 50 & we’ll go from there? Or perhaps 2x for 15?
[quote]humanimal wrote:
And here I was thinking that Voldemort did only low rep work.[/quote]
LOL!
Years ago I was a Sleestak…glad to see I’m keeping up with the times!
Thanks for the positive comments guys!
dawg: T=top portion of rep/ B=bottom portion/ F=full rep. There may be times when I do the bottom first; or a rep & a half w/the only the bottom or top. The designation enables me to record the specific order in my log.