[quote]Matthew9v9 wrote:
This topic again? [/quote]
Sorry, I don’t frequent the forums as often as I used to…I didn’t know this was beating a dead horse.
So PLers wear this stuff for protection…but as a side benefit they get a couple hundred pounds extra on their bench? Convenient… ![]()
[quote]Mindeffer01 wrote:
Heres an idea. Find a shirt and set it on a bench. Drop a bar on the shirt. The shirt will get smushed by the bar. Now put the shirt on and try the same thing. Big difference, huh? You see, It is the person using the shirt that makes the difference, not the shirt.[/quote]
I think this completely misses the point…and I think you know it.
[quote]Crow wrote:
Right Side Up, you need to change your perspective.[/quote]
That’s what I’ve enlisted you for! Try to convince me there is some legitimate rationale behind the notion.
Agreed. But this seems to sidestep the crux of the issue. I think it’s purely inflationary – by the Feds (publicity) and the participants (ego?).
[quote]moshne wrote:
it all comes down to ego.[/quote]
I think I might agree with this.
Fortunately, I can run faster and farther!
[quote]basementD wrote:
1)Lifters use gear because it is required for the Feds they choose to compete in.[/quote]
This is besides the point.
[quote]
2)A lot of gear lifters are still strong as hell without the gear, the 1000lb bencher is hitting in the 600s or 700s without gear, so he is still strong and gets my respect. [/quote]
Of course – strength is strength, and strength is deserving of respect. I guess what I don’t credit is the difference between a lifter’s natural max lift and their geared max lift.
I’m not sure why the weight matters?
[quote]
4)The sport is supported financially by gear manufacturers, so in a sense gear keeps the sport alive.[/quote]
I think this is an excellent point, but still aside from the root of the issue.
[quote]
In an nutshell, live and let live. If you don’t like gear then look elsewhere. If you like it, then go for it. [/quote]
But of course. This thread wasn’t meant to knock competitive PLers, it was just to try to understand the point of adding this tool which increases performance so conclusively that the lifter shouldn’t even take credit for the increased lift above their raw max.
[quote]Dq wrote:
How many times do poeple have to say it. [/quote]
Once more, please?
Like I’ve said to others who make this point, it is sidestepping the crucial point.
No, lift away – I don’t care at all. It truly doesn’t bother me one bit. I’m just trying to understand the rationale.
Your reference to it helping your injury is interesting though…how much does it add to your raw bench?
Again, I have no problem with you or anyone else (competitive or not) using a shirt…unless we’re both trying to impress a chick and I’m like “Yo, I bench 285” and he’s like “Yo, I bench 360” but his max is the result of 4 guys squeezing him into some shirt that puts his hands parallel with his neck! (kidding, that wouldn’t bother me at all either)
I apologize for starting a thread that has been runover many times before.
I also want to make it clear that I in no way disrespect the goals of lifting as much weight as possible. I just don’t understand why gear is used.
Thanks for all non-trolling input thus far.