Rupert Young/Charlie Francis

Ken: I certainly wouldn’t gather that from my interaction w/Charlie. Obviously we have different opinions of Charlie because I do hold him in high regard for his theory and methodology. I have never met Ben J. but think it would be great to sit and talk with the guy. I personally think he is the most impressive sprinter of all time to date.

If what you say is true then why would Ben not just coach himself? From what I understand Charlie was Ben’s coach through the '88 Olympics but was not when Ben tried to make his come back for the '92 Olympics.

Do you have any timeline for what you are saying? Meaning when did Ben supposedly start doing his own workouts and what injury? He had very, very few so I think it would be easy to pinpoint.

If D. Bailey is clean I think that is all the better of an accomplishment. Experience would tell me that most who finish top 3 in the Olympics are probably using something but I also say, “unless you’ve got the definitive proof then no need to speculate.”

I consistently visit CF.com. Along with most of the authors here and their site it is one of the few out there which offer quality information.

Don’t really know enough about ‘Clemson’ aka C. Valle but all the things i read on the forums from him seemed pretty good. Beligerent: why do you feel the remorse for Charlie and Carl? Have they personally offended you are someone close to you or are you extremely judgemental after hearing other’s stories?

[quote]BSims wrote:
Beligerent: why do you feel the remorse for Charlie and Carl? Have they personally offended you are someone close to you or are you extremely judgemental after hearing other’s stories?[/quote]

Charlie is a disgrace who rationalizes the fact by making baseless and unsupportable accusations against every athlete who enroaches on his and Ben’s “success”, and now a very large number of people believe that most or all top sprinters are dirty for no other reason than because Charlie Francis says so. He’s a fucking idiot and nothing more than an keboard guru. And no, he’s not quite as brilliant of a “sprinting mind” as all the lemmings on that site believe.

As for Carl Valle, he’s just a fucking joke. He’s the biggest pseudo-expert on the internet. I’d rather train under Bob Green. He also has the communicaiton skills of a third grader and has no business writing articles on anything.

And BTW, yes CF does offend me I have a handful of acquantances in high-level track and field who I believe are clean and who have been directly affected by CF’s jabbering and his participation in the recent doping crisis.

About three years ago, when word got out that Tim and Marion were working with CF, the man himself came onto the supertraining forum and posted a very sincere-appearing letter about how he had no involvement in drugs and he was so sure that the pair were clean. Now we know that he was an active participant in “project world record”. So he’s a disgrace and a liar. Why anyone believes anything he says about PEDs is beyond me.

[quote]BSims wrote:
Ken: I certainly wouldn’t gather that from my interaction w/Charlie. Obviously we have different opinions of Charlie because I do hold him in high regard for his theory and methodology. I have never met Ben J. but think it would be great to sit and talk with the guy. I personally think he is the most impressive sprinter of all time to date.

If what you say is true then why would Ben not just coach himself? From what I understand Charlie was Ben’s coach through the '88 Olympics but was not when Ben tried to make his come back for the '92 Olympics.

Do you have any timeline for what you are saying? Meaning when did Ben supposedly start doing his own workouts and what injury? He had very, very few so I think it would be easy to pinpoint.

[/quote]
Hi BSims,
I don’t know you, and sometimes words can seem antagonistic and I’m not trying to be that with you. Now that I’ve got that out of the way…

  1. As you probably know, there is much more to coaching sprinters than writing workouts. Also, Ben isn’t the brightest around. I’m sure that’s why he didn’t coach himself. I’m not going to get into timeline with you because I don’t like talking about Ben. I think he’s a punk too.
  2. I’m not sure how you’ve determined that Ben is the most impressive sprinter to date. The guy never broke 10.10 without rocket fuel. Let’s take Donovan out of the picture (as I’m probably not objective). How about Obadele Thompson?
  3. In your next post, you made the comment “if” Donovan was clean. I think you’re doing a disservice to him by saying that. That’s another reason why I dislike Charlie so much. He has that attitude that "everyone is on drugs, so you need them to compete on a level playing field. That’s just a bitch trying to justify cheating. Let’s say that you’re correct in your view of Ben’s talents. It’s too bad that Charlie convinced him that he needed drugs to compete. Maybe without, he would have been just as impressive.
    Like I said before, I KNOW that Donovan was clean. Charlie may have many great attributes, but the fact that he said what he said (in my opinion to make himself look important) makes him a bitch in my books.

[quote]belligerent wrote:
And BTW, yes CF does offend me I have a handful of acquantances in high-level track and field who I believe are clean and who have been directly affected by CF’s jabbering and his participation in the recent doping crisis.

About three years ago, when word got out that Tim and Marion were working with CF, the man himself came onto the supertraining forum and posted a very sincere-appearing letter about how he had no involvement in drugs and he was so sure that the pair were clean. Now we know that he was an active participant in “project world record”. So he’s a disgrace and a liar. Why anyone believes anything he says about PEDs is beyond me.

[/quote]
Couldn’t agree with you more. Charlie has hurt Athletics in Canada.

Hi BSims,
I don’t know you, and sometimes words can seem antagonistic and I’m not trying to be that with you. Now that I’ve got that out of the way…

[Ken: I agree with you, I certainly don’t have anything against you by any means. we have different backgrounds and such and obviously different opinions and I certainly think we can keep this as respectful as possible.]

  1. As you probably know, there is much more to coaching sprinters than writing workouts.

[very true and if you’ve ever read any of Charlie’s texts you would see he talks in depth about this]

Also, Ben isn’t the brightest around. I’m sure that’s why he didn’t coach himself. I’m not going to get into timeline with you because I don’t like talking about Ben. I think he’s a punk too.

[i have no comment about whether Ben is bright or not cos i’ve never met him. as for you not providing a timeline i didn’t think you would. i think your claims of Ben not following Charlie’s workouts aren’t factual and unless you can actually provide a timeline following and backing up the your statement of “soon after an injury” we are at a stand still. If Ben was supposedly doing his own workouts and not Charlie’s and getting results then he is smart enough to go without. (sarcasm -->) i am sure Charlie conversing with the East Germans about their training methods in the late 70’s/early 80’s and learning how they trained at top speed year round had nothing to do with the way he trained his athletes]

  1. I’m not sure how you’ve determined that Ben is the most impressive sprinter to date. The guy never broke 10.10 without rocket fuel. Let’s take Donovan out of the picture (as I’m probably not objective). How about Obadele Thompson?

  2. In your next post, you made the comment “if” Donovan was clean. I think you’re doing a disservice to him by saying that. That’s another reason why I dislike Charlie so much. He has that attitude that "everyone is on drugs, so you need them to compete on a level playing field. That’s just a bitch trying to justify cheating. Let’s say that you’re correct in your view of Ben’s talents. It’s too bad that Charlie convinced him that he needed drugs to compete. Maybe without, he would have been just as impressive.
    Like I said before, I KNOW that Donovan was clean. Charlie may have many great attributes, but the fact that he said what he said (in my opinion to make himself look important) makes him a bitch in my books.
    [/quote]

[i am referring to Ben in his prime, circa 86-88 pretty much untouchable. Didn’t win everything but was extremely dominant. if we look at the fastest 100 ever run, Seoul 88, he let up well before the line and came through with a 9.79 and not wind aided. the most impressive start to date, no one has replicated that at all. as for the rocket fuel you refer to…it is widely know that PED’s are widely used by olympic athletes. Hell, from what I know, Carl Lewis still claims he was natural and from what I know he had a positive test covered up as far back as 83. Re: Thompson. Impressive resume, my hats off to him, truly gifted! Re: Donovan…I say ‘if’ because i really don’t know and unless you followed him around all the time and can say you know everything about him inside and out then you don’t know cos people will hide things. I am not saying he did but i’m not saying he didn’t. If you say he didn’t then i have no reason to not believe you but then again there is no reason to think that Barry Bonds has used because he has never tested positive and he says he didn’t either and how about Ronnie Coleman, Mr. Olympia a police officer for how many years working side by side with other numerous officers of the LAW. He must be clean too.

On the topic of cheating: it is a semantic argument. It’s not a level playing field if 5 guys are using and 5 guys aren’t. But unless there is proof that those guys are cheating, concrete proof then there is only speculation and guess what…they aren’t cheating. Is it cheating if all 10 guys are using? according to the rules, yeah, but it is a level playing field. we could go round and round on this.

Do you KNOW that Charlie pushed him to use? You must know Ben as well as Donovan then to know information like that. Charlie does have many great attributes and as i’ve said before has always been a great individual to me. I understand if he said something to offend you then that is between you and him. I presume you are referring to him not repeating to Donovan what you said he said to you? You can call Charlie whatever adjective you like if it makes you feel better but could you please elaborate YOUR definition of “bitch” for me?

I am not out to change your opinion of Charlie by any means, that is your thing and yours alone and only you will change that or not. The topics you are not willing to talk about is what interests me…the claims about Ben doing his own workouts, etc.

Thanks for your time.]

Couldn’t agree with you more. Charlie has hurt Athletics in Canada.

[/quote]

It certainly isn’t fair to lay the blame on one individual. Fact is, Canada has hurt athletics in Canada. Sport Canada has been a joke. Any comparison to sporting and athletic programs in the states versus here in Canada will end that argument real quick. There are high schools in the states that have better facilites than universities here.

Send Rupert these two links :slight_smile:

http://www.megauploadforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=41&p=120483

http://www.megauploadforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=50406&p=118855&hilit=charlie#p118855

He will love it :slight_smile:

I see people complain about being banned from a forum. In my opinion if you get banned, there’s usually a reason for it. Site admins own their forums, and they decide who can post and who can not. If you disagree with the rules, or get upset when you become banned, it is time to think about it: “Hey man, it’s only an internet forum and it is not the end of the world!”

There are many other forums that you can start posting to. Of course there will be people and companies that you disagree with, and then you can simply stop using their services and stop posting on their forums. Nobody forces you to post there, and it is not a right you have to post there.

I run a forum for strength enthusiasts, and I restrict who will become members (all must be manually approved), and I ban those who do not adhere to forum rules. So far this has been a non-issue (two banned members in two years).

There’s also some values set forth in the vision of the site, and those who do not adhere to those will also become banned.

The point is that there are many discussion boards and forums you can use, if you don’t like one, then go to the next. Being banned is not a big deal. Of course there might be some admin assholes around, but their behaviour will eventually just strike back on themselves.

If you are a previous buyer of supplements from a site, and they treat you badly as a customer, and you feel you are treated unfairly, then give them a notice about that, and stop using their services and products.

Running around on other forums and yelling about who is such and such a prick is very immature imho.

– stallion

It’s ironic that you are distraught over this yet are posting on T-Nation.

God damnit, I got tricked into posting in a 4 year old thread.

[quote]DOHCrazy wrote:
God damnit, I got tricked into posting in a 4 year old thread.
[/quote]

Haha, the same with me!