[quote]Hrastnik wrote:
Don’t want to hijack, but i’m wondering to what degree can your weight hinder your success in rock climbing?
I mean, i so far haven’t seen a rock climber
as big as a random bodybuilder or a weightlifter.
I’m interested in this sport (climbing), haven’t tried it yet, will have to someday, but I’m quite tall, relatively big, and legs are my strongest bodypart.
Which I think goes against my view of what a climber should look like.
[/quote]
I’ve been climbing, on and off, for over 10 years. When I started I probably weighed 175-180ish, fairly lean. I’m now 240, not so lean. At my best I was probably around 200 and climbing 5.11 consistently and 5.12 occasionally.
Haven’t really climbed in a year or so, but when I was doing it a lot, at my current weight, I found that the extra weight really killed my endurance. At 180-200 I could get to the crag or gym in the morning, and stay til dark, with only the occasional break.
At 240, I’ve only got a couple of hours before my grip is shot. And I do mean SHOT, like “holy crap, I can’t wrap my fingers around the steering wheel to drive home” shot.
Also, excess weight makes anything overhanging a lot harder. When you get past vertical your weight shifts away from the rock and hangs below your hands so you lose the support of your legs. It takes a lot of technique and abdominal strength to use your legs when you’re hanging upside down.
btw, funny timing for this thread. It’s finally starting to warm up in New England, almost 50 yesterday and in the 40s today, and just this morning I was thinking about how it’ll be good climbing weather soon.