Rebuttal to Poliquin's Article on Stomach Acid

[quote]johnnychimpo wrote:

[quote]frederickson wrote:

poliquin tends to make unsupported and outrageous claims, but don’t think for a second that a medical degree is in any way a nutritional qualification.

most md’s don’t know anything - and i mean NOT A FUCKING THING - about nutrition. it is most often an elective in medical school curriculum, and it is an afterthought (3 or 4 credit hours, max) in schools were nutrition is required.

before anyone starts huffing and puffing at me, i do have doctor after my name. most of my nutritional knowledge was self-taught and researched for my dissertation. the vast majority my physician colleagues (and even some phds) are clueless about nutrition, still touting low-fat diets and the food pyramid idiocy.[/quote]

I’m currently in medical school. I can agree, medical school has so far taught me very little about nutrition and nothing beyond the food pyramid. However Poliquin is discussing biochemical and physiological aspects of digestion, and is obviously talking out of his ass. A nutritionist is most likely far more qualified to produce a sound dietary plan than I ever will be. However when it comes to understanding how the body works, doctors do have the upper-hand. Through our education we have the ability to read and comprehend the textbooks and studies that people like Poliquin obviously misinterpret.

I’m posting this to counteract the impression that people seem to have of doctors being clueless about nutrition, injury rehab, or anything else related to health for that matter. There is a reason we go to school for upwards of 10 years, and PT’s and nutritionists can get their “degrees” in a few months. We spend that time building a deep foundation that gives us the ability to speak authoritatively on most things having to do with the human body.

People are smart enough to realize their mechanic isn’t qualified to design a race car, and that the kid selling them concrete down at the Home Depot isn’t capable of building a skyscraper. But somehow everyone seems to believe that some nurse, the trainer at the gym, or some asshole on the internet knows more than a doctor would about the human body. [/quote]

Actually, at Stony Brook University Hospital Department of Family Medicine, they are now giving future MDs THREE courses on nutrition, thanks to my former dietetic internship director and professor who’s teaching the classes.

Registered dietitians actually study sites of absorption too. I’ve had courses in medical nutrition therapy, anatomy & physiology, biochemistry, microbiology, and advanced nutrition metabolism.

It’s clear that Poliquin is off his rocker, as is the rest of the pseudo-healthcare professionals out there (Paul Chek comes to mind).

I’m also getting quite sick of people ripping on registered dietitians for things they’re not even involved with. I remember reading an article on here that started out with something like: "What I discuss here isn’t approved by the American Dietetics Association, which is why it makes it even more suitable for us… " - clearly a snide remark intended to ridicule we registered dietitians.

I find it quite amusing that a writers and forum members on a bodybuilding site rip on RDs when 1) a tiny minority–maybe a fraction of a percent–of RDs are even involved in sports and bodybuilding dietetics and 2) RDs not involved will tell you to go elsewhere if you question them on that field of dietetics.

Do these people think that we RDs run around telling patients, co-workers, clients, and consumers–some of whom are deathly ill, dirt poor, in trouble, or demented out of their gourds–in hospitals, ICUs, CCUs, outpatient clinics, college classes, nursing homes, foodservice operations, kitchens, WIC clinics, and food banks saying shit like: "Alright, this is what you do for your post-workout meal… The Anaconda Protocol seems to be working well for some people; give it a shot… For your next show… "

NO, we don’t!

So such criticism isn’t even warranted - criticism applied to people who don’t even bother with the field being spoken of.

And I don’t know what RDs people on here speak to secondary to all the talk of us being a bunch of carby-chomping, fruit-juice-guzzling, out-of-date, Food Guide Pyramid-loving jagoffs! Most of my professors and colleagues are open to studying and talking about different dietary protocols.

Actually most savvy nutrition professionals are now in favor of the Mediterranean Diet model, an approach to eating that is similar to the approach touted on here by Lonnie Lowery (an RD himself) and John Berardi. And new pyramids coming out are further stressing the importance of physical activity and decreasing the amount of starchy carbs everyone’s consuming in enormous amounts. A diagram depicting physical activity has replaced the starchy carb/grain diagram in some pyramids.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wait, what? You determined that your calf measurement tells you about your gh output???

What the hell does this mean and where did you find this information about calf measurements telling you about GH output?

What references show this to be the case?[/quote]

What i should have said is “my high calf measurement indicated bad sleeping patterns and bad sleeping patterns have a negative effect on GH production.”

“I” didnt determine anything. nor did “I” find any information about calf measurements determining GH output.

Im just telling you what my biosig practitioner told me. So i dont have any references.

my post was not meant to try to prove/disprove anything i was just informing you of my experience with biosignature

1 Like

This thread is full of blasphemy!

[quote]brentcozi wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wait, what? You determined that your calf measurement tells you about your gh output???

What the hell does this mean and where did you find this information about calf measurements telling you about GH output?

What references show this to be the case?[/quote]

What i should have said is “my high calf measurement indicated bad sleeping patterns and bad sleeping patterns have a negative effect on GH production.”

“I” didnt determine anything. nor did “I” find any information about calf measurements determining GH output.

Im just telling you what my biosig practitioner told me. So i dont have any references.

my post was not meant to try to prove/disprove anything i was just informing you of my experience with biosignature

[/quote]

Yeah, but what does your horoscope say?

Just an anecdotal story here. As my calories and protein went up the past couple years, so did my gassiness and general discomfort after eating. I started taking digestive enzymes with meals and almost instantly started to feel better. The mixture is protease, lipase, amylase, bromelian and some other stuff. One of the brands had pepsin and Betaine HCL as well.

I appreciate that the GI doc has systematically addressed each of Poliquins claims with respect to HCL, but what about general digestive enzyme supplements? I thought they were pretty well established, like lactase supplements for lactose intolerant folks.

I’ll be rethinking the brand(s) with betaine hcl until further clarification.

1 Like

Brentcozi, I don’t doubt that you got great results mate. But it takes a long time for the body to lay down 16.5Lb new muscle and all the supporting infrastructure that accompanies it like blood vessels etc. It certainly does not occur in a 10 week timeframe.

Throw some pictures up of the before and afters

Regardless keep training hard and good luck with the Biosig in February.

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
Sorry, but you did not gain 16.5 lbs of muscle in 10 weeks time, especially if you’re a non-beginner and you weren’t very overfat…unless you were severely detrained.

What people keep misconstruing is the difference between LBM and muscle.

LBM is muscle, WATER, glycogen, connective tissue. To say you went up by 10 lbs LBM does NOT necessarily mean that you gained 10 lbs of pure muscle.

You probably gained mostly water, possibly some muscle and probably some glycogen.

We need to establish an accepted method for tracking progress, such as pictures (same outfit, lighting, distance to camera) AND hydrostatic. I don’t accept people that say, “Well, I used a 7 site skinfold test BUT I really trust the guy who did it!” That doesn’t mean shit. You could be subjective yourself by virtue of it being YOUR body we’re talking about.[/quote]

In my post i did write that it was “muslce/leanmass” which means i am including water glycogen and connective tissue.

and i very much doubt that water and glycogen made up a majority of my gains. throughout my 10 week biosig stint i was on a paleo diet meaning i had no carbs except those from green veggies. and before i started the biosig i was on a moderate carb diet, so to say i gained mostly water and glycogen is pretty absurd and all most impossible.

i think the main reason i did gain so much “lean mass” is because of the radical change of training style. previously i was doing less than 6 rep strength work, and during biosig i did Poliquins GBC program which is high rep super sets designed to cause massive lactate buildup.
eg. 15 rep back squat, 15 rep bench, 15 rep chinup, 15 rep deadlift. thats 1 superset.

so i guess you could say it was non-functional hypertrophy but in bodybuilding terms that doesn’t matter one bit.

and whats with the hating on skinfold measurements?? when you are getting measured every single week pictures and hydrostatic are not really applicable.

skinfold measurements when done properly are very accurate. what you must relaize is as long as it is consistent from week to week it doesn’t matter if it measures me at 8.5% when really im at 9% according to hydrostatic. the goal here is measuring progress not finding my exact %

skinfold is actually better than hydrostatic for bodybuilding purposes as it only takes into account subcutaneous fat stores where as hydrostatic also takes into account internal visceral bodyfat which really has no effect on how you look. not to mention hydrostatic is exponentially more expensive and time consuming and just a pain in the ass.

all biosig practitioners use the exact same caliper, a Harpenden skin fold caliper which itself has been used in many clinical studies and is the de facto standard for skin fold measuremnt. it is a precision medical instrument engineered to precise standards.

also i had the same person measure my skinfolds every week and that person has done thousands of skinfold measurements on thousands of people and he is meticulous in ensuring he uses the exact correct spot and uses correct technique.

sure pictures are good for before and after but i think it would be much too hard to try and use pictures to evaluate progress every single week and is much more subjective than skinfolds.

skin fold is really the only way to measure weekly progress unless you can afford weekly DEXA scans.

1 Like

Good thread would read again.

1 Like

[quote]IrishMarc wrote:
Good thread would read again.[/quote]

Think they’ll make a movie out of it?

1 Like

[quote]brentcozi wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
Sorry, but you did not gain 16.5 lbs of muscle in 10 weeks time, especially if you’re a non-beginner and you weren’t very overfat…unless you were severely detrained.

What people keep misconstruing is the difference between LBM and muscle.

LBM is muscle, WATER, glycogen, connective tissue. To say you went up by 10 lbs LBM does NOT necessarily mean that you gained 10 lbs of pure muscle.

You probably gained mostly water, possibly some muscle and probably some glycogen.

We need to establish an accepted method for tracking progress, such as pictures (same outfit, lighting, distance to camera) AND hydrostatic. I don’t accept people that say, “Well, I used a 7 site skinfold test BUT I really trust the guy who did it!” That doesn’t mean shit. You could be subjective yourself by virtue of it being YOUR body we’re talking about.[/quote]

In my post i did write that it was “muslce/leanmass” which means i am including water glycogen and connective tissue.

and i very much doubt that water and glycogen made up a majority of my gains. throughout my 10 week biosig stint i was on a paleo diet meaning i had no carbs except those from green veggies. and before i started the biosig i was on a moderate carb diet, so to say i gained mostly water and glycogen is pretty absurd and all most impossible.

i think the main reason i did gain so much “lean mass” is because of the radical change of training style. previously i was doing less than 6 rep strength work, and during biosig i did Poliquins GBC program which is high rep super sets designed to cause massive lactate buildup.
eg. 15 rep back squat, 15 rep bench, 15 rep chinup, 15 rep deadlift. thats 1 superset.

so i guess you could say it was non-functional hypertrophy but in bodybuilding terms that doesn’t matter one bit.

and whats with the hating on skinfold measurements?? when you are getting measured every single week pictures and hydrostatic are not really applicable.

skinfold measurements when done properly are very accurate. what you must relaize is as long as it is consistent from week to week it doesn’t matter if it measures me at 8.5% when really im at 9% according to hydrostatic. the goal here is measuring progress not finding my exact %

skinfold is actually better than hydrostatic for bodybuilding purposes as it only takes into account subcutaneous fat stores where as hydrostatic also takes into account internal visceral bodyfat which really has no effect on how you look. not to mention hydrostatic is exponentially more expensive and time consuming and just a pain in the ass.

all biosig practitioners use the exact same caliper, a Harpenden skin fold caliper which itself has been used in many clinical studies and is the de facto standard for skin fold measuremnt. it is a precision medical instrument engineered to precise standards.

also i had the same person measure my skinfolds every week and that person has done thousands of skinfold measurements on thousands of people and he is meticulous in ensuring he uses the exact correct spot and uses correct technique.

sure pictures are good for before and after but i think it would be much too hard to try and use pictures to evaluate progress every single week and is much more subjective than skinfolds.

skin fold is really the only way to measure weekly progress unless you can afford weekly DEXA scans. [/quote]

So basicly you slept better(recovery), took cinnamon and apple cider vinegar(insulin management) and changed your training program(new stimulus = gains in muscle mass).

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
Registered dietitians actually study sites of absorption too. I’ve had courses in medical nutrition therapy, anatomy & physiology, biochemistry, microbiology, and advanced nutrition metabolism.

[/quote]

Yep - as far as curriculum goes, it’s definitely not basket weaving 101 - I’m about 30 credits from my Bachelors in nutritional biochem, and I’ve done all my lab sciences and math pre-reqs, and a few of my major courses. Believe me, people can rag on the ADA all they want, but the truth is they’re not certifying morons after 6 months of questionable course material.

It’s all there - anatomy, physiology, o-Chem, bio-chem, microbiology (which I found to be an absolutely fascinating course)and lots of other challenging material.

Which is why I laugh when some dope claims that RD’s don’t know shit…

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Just an anecdotal story here. As my calories and protein went up the past couple years, so did my gassiness and general discomfort after eating. I started taking digestive enzymes with meals and almost instantly started to feel better. The mixture is protease, lipase, amylase, bromelian and some other stuff. One of the brands had pepsin and Betaine HCL as well.

I appreciate that the GI doc has systematically addressed each of Poliquins claims with respect to HCL, but what about general digestive enzyme supplements? I thought they were pretty well established, like lactase supplements for lactose intolerant folks.

I’ll be rethinking the brand(s) with betaine hcl until further clarification.[/quote]

Can someone address this? I to use a digestive aid (a complete enzyme supplement) that contains HCL, but not a huge amount. It has helped tremendously with gas/bloat/overall digestion, but is it healthy, should it be continued?

[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Just an anecdotal story here. As my calories and protein went up the past couple years, so did my gassiness and general discomfort after eating. I started taking digestive enzymes with meals and almost instantly started to feel better. The mixture is protease, lipase, amylase, bromelian and some other stuff. One of the brands had pepsin and Betaine HCL as well.

I appreciate that the GI doc has systematically addressed each of Poliquins claims with respect to HCL, but what about general digestive enzyme supplements? I thought they were pretty well established, like lactase supplements for lactose intolerant folks.

I’ll be rethinking the brand(s) with betaine hcl until further clarification.[/quote]

Can someone address this? I to use a digestive aid (a complete enzyme supplement) that contains HCL, but not a huge amount. It has helped tremendously with gas/bloat/overall digestion, but is it healthy, should it be continued?[/quote]

I can’t say for sure, but I’ll note that I have improved digestion and elimination due to digestive enzymes.

Full disclosure: I’m a PICP coach and BioSignature practitioner. My opinion is this:

I’ve done things a myriad of ways and I’ve always struggled with my body. In my life I’ve been obese, had low testosterone, and a ton of other health issues. I’ve done a lot of things Charles has written about - some of them have worked, and some of them have not.

I did a protocol that Charles recommended for me. And this is key: the foundation for the program used supplements that are NOT his brand. Combined with a solid eating and training program, it completely changed my LIFE - not just my physique. Before it I was depressed, emotional, suicidal… and a fat 19% despite my best efforts to get lean.

I’ve also used things he recommended that didn’t work for me. Like his diets. They don’t do shit for me. I just get tired and stressed out on low carbs. And some of the supplement protocols just didn’t help me.

Charles is up to date on his research. Currently, the focus at the seminars is about vitamin D, cardiovascular health, and other topics along those lines. HEALTH-oriented topics. Since I’ve been attending his seminars, I’d hear him bring up a topic and then see it addressed 6-12 months later on this site.

My point is - try it and see if it works for you. If it does, great. If it doesn’t, move on - don’t sit there and complain about it. For what its worth, with almost everything in this industry you can find a person to support it AND a person to disagree, and they’ll both have had decent results with their way.

One thing I will say though - everything that has to do with training that Charles has ever said has worked extremely well for ME, and I find my PICP certification more valuable than the BioSignature.

1 Like

SkyNett:

I got a C+ in microbiology and thought it was an absolute nightmare. Had I taken it recently, I probably would have done a whole lot better. I was pretty young at the time and just wanted to get through that goddamn class. I liked biochemistry the best out of all the life sciences; I got an A in it. I was taught by a guy with a Phd in quantum physics from UPenn. It took me two hours to write some tests. At one time I could write the Krebs Cycle as easy as writing my name!

That’s right, people! Sky and I do NOT say this to brag - AT ALL! We say this so that people should be aware of what the fuck they’re saying the next time they refer to RDs as a bunch of granola-eating, hairnet-wearing chumps who simply “tell people what to eat” and who have the idea that anyone can be an RD and it’s simply a matter of “taking a test”.

In order to be an RD, you must obtain a BS in nutrition or food science that contains all the necessary coursework that constitutes a Didactic Program in Dietetics (DPD) approved by the Commission on Accreditation of Dietetics Education (CADE), a sub-agency of that sugar-eating ADA! Then you have to go through a 6- to 9-month dietetic internship consisting of several rotations. Then you take the RD exam.

So this is why I got fucking pissed off when Chris Shuggie–even though I like him–even spoke of the RD exam in the same fucking sentence or paragraph or fucking ARTICLE or POST as a personal trainer exam!

Over HALF of RDs hold an advance degree, usually a masters (and occasionally a Phd) in nutrition, public health, or business administration.

This is why I crack up when people rip on RDs - people ripping on people when they have no idea what this person has gone through and what they do on the job.

Next time I work in an ICU or CCU, I’ll tell the doc something like, “Hey doc, ya know da guy on da parenteral feeding (that’s intravenous feeding - for all you newjacks) - I tink maybe he’ll get a lil’ betta wit a cawb-up. He looks a little flat!”, and “Dat chic right der? Awda me a Grow! shake mixed wit some fish oil caps, preferably Flameout. She looks a lil malnourisht!”

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
That’s right, people! Sky and I do NOT say this to brag - AT ALL! We say this so that people should be aware of what the fuck they’re saying the next time they refer to RDs as a bunch of granola-eating, hairnet-wearing chumps who simply “tell people what to eat” and who have the idea that anyone can be an RD and it’s simply a matter of “taking a test”.

In order to be an RD, you must obtain a BS in nutrition or food science that contains all the necessary coursework that constitutes a Didactic Program in Dietetics (DPD) approved by the Commission on Accreditation of Dietetics Education (CADE), a sub-agency of that sugar-eating ADA! Then you have to go through a 6- to 9-month dietetic internship consisting of several rotations. Then you take the RD exam.

[/quote]

Shout it out brother! Lol - I actually just took micro last semester, got a B+ - awesome course. Just the differences in gram - vs gram + bacteria is a fascinating topic. And so much other cool shit, though I have to say there’s a lot of stuff that will seriously disgust folks - the chapter on STD’s was a real page turner…lol.

My prof gave 7 exams in 15 weeks - 5 lecture and two lab. Talk about a rough workload - averaged 8 hours of lecture material per exam - thank god for voice recorders!

I actually applied for a full-time position at your school that starts in September. We’ll see if I get it. It’s for teaching Food and Culture, Dietetics Management, and Contemporary Nutrition.

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
I actually applied for a full-time position at your school that starts in September. We’ll see if I get it. It’s for teaching Food and Culture, Dietetics Management, and Contemporary Nutrition. [/quote]

So you could potentially be one of my professors?

lol - that would be wild. : )

Yup! :slight_smile:

Do you have a course there on Nutrition Communications or is that going to be part of the coursework when you transfer?

[quote]brentcozi wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wait, what? You determined that your calf measurement tells you about your gh output???

What the hell does this mean and where did you find this information about calf measurements telling you about GH output?

What references show this to be the case?[/quote]

What i should have said is “my high calf measurement indicated bad sleeping patterns and bad sleeping patterns have a negative effect on GH production.”

“I” didnt determine anything. nor did “I” find any information about calf measurements determining GH output.

Im just telling you what my biosig practitioner told me. So i dont have any references.

my post was not meant to try to prove/disprove anything i was just informing you of my experience with biosignature

[/quote]

I understood exactly what you were saying…and it STILL makes no sense. How does your calf measurement tell you about how you sleep…and then how do you relate that directly to GH output?

I honestly don’t care if the “biosig practitioner” said that. What are his/her credentials and what is this belief based on? Is this person a doctor? They just made this statement and didn’t explain it?

Honestly, the more I hear, the more I enforce the belief that bullshit seems to the greatest export from this particular trainer.

[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Just an anecdotal story here. As my calories and protein went up the past couple years, so did my gassiness and general discomfort after eating. I started taking digestive enzymes with meals and almost instantly started to feel better. The mixture is protease, lipase, amylase, bromelian and some other stuff. One of the brands had pepsin and Betaine HCL as well.

I appreciate that the GI doc has systematically addressed each of Poliquins claims with respect to HCL, but what about general digestive enzyme supplements? I thought they were pretty well established, like lactase supplements for lactose intolerant folks.

I’ll be rethinking the brand(s) with betaine hcl until further clarification.[/quote]

Can someone address this? I to use a digestive aid (a complete enzyme supplement) that contains HCL, but not a huge amount. It has helped tremendously with gas/bloat/overall digestion, but is it healthy, should it be continued?[/quote]

Aside from things like lactase enzymes and acidophilus cultures I never put much stock into them. There are foods your body works well with and some it doesn’t. I consider it largely individual. I also know my body has adapted over time to my eating habits and volume of food intake to the point that I don’t get many of the discomfort issues I had years back. Moderate to low carb equals less discomfort for me. Bulking up or simply gaining is a different story.

I am also willing to bet that placebo effects are likely why SO MANY people act like they see such a benefit with all of this stuff across the board.

In other words, it may help a little but not more than understanding your own food choices does.

I can’t drink protein shakes from certain manufacturers unless I want to clear out whatever floor I am working on and set off the smoke detectors. I am lactose intolerant. Lactase helps with this. That is pretty straightforward. That is not quite the same as taking one single “cure all” enzyme and thinking it is needed across the board.