[quote]KBCThird wrote:
heavythrower wrote:
…
i respect your opinion, you make a good point, but i am sorry i just disagree with you. powerlifting WAS at one time more readily accepted by the public, at my age i remember when on “wide world of sports” that came on the weekends that pl was often covered.
now for some reason that does not happen anymore. you can contend that PL would have fallen off the mainstream radar anyhow, for the reasons you stated above, and you may very well be right.
but one can also contend that the “evolution”(nicest word i could come up with) of the sport into what it is today has made it more confusing and unaccessible to the public and perhaps less understood and respected.
…
Heavy, I think that’s a pretty fair-minded way of putting it, BUT I would also add this: bodybuilding used to be much more popular as well - Mr. Universe competitions were at one time covered on wide world of sports. Many people might point to the more extreme physiques in todays bodybuilding world as explanation for the decline in popularity, and they may be right.
But as has been pointed out in many retrospective sports journalism pieces is that both horse racing and boxing were once kings of the sports scene - now they lay in shambles. Even the NHL can only be found on the vs. channel now.
I would suggest that it is just possible that sports go through cyclical periods (with the noted lack of any real downturn for the nfl, nba or mlb. THe nba may not be AS popular as when jordan was playing, mlb may not be AS popular as pre-'94 strike, or 98 homerun chase, or pre-Canseco book eras, but they are still billion dollar businesses.) I just dont see it as simple as gear ruining the popularity of PL. i think you touched on a great point when you mentioned the PARTICIPATORY nature of the fan base[/quote]
Interesting discussion. I have been sitting here over the course of the last couple days watching streaming video of IPF Worlds and from a historical perspective, don’t really feel it presents any differently than it did back when the sport got airtime. However, I am a lifter and fan of the sport so I am biased.
One of the things that has occured to me is that back in the day of Wide World of Sports, man that was a cool show, they had to produce a new show every week. That provided a great opportunity for fringe sports to get some exposure just by virtue of the fact they needed to fill air time and the show was not called “Narrow World of Sports.”
I guess what I am trying to say is, relative to USPF/ADFPA/USAPL/IPF I don’t even think a layperson watching a current video and then watching one from Wide World of Sports would note much difference. It is when we bring in APF/WPO IPA, etc. that it becomes a much different animal (not picking on these feds, just using as an example.)
However, some would argue it is more exciting given the atmosphere and weight being handled. Truth is I don’t know how the general public, from an entertainment standpoint(and I think this is what is often overlooked is for the sport to be mainstream it has to be entertaining to watch. Relativism doesn’t even make the list IMO.) would react to one or the other.
I think we get off track if we spend too much time trying to appeal to the general public and focus on the fact we are not on television and everybody you speak to may not understand the nature of the sport. The sport exists because lifters show up at meets.
The fact of the matter is it is not a particularly exciting sport to watch if you are not familiar with the lifters or are not put in a position to understand what is going on competitively and even then you typically have to wait for pulls to even begin to really have a story.
It is a hard sport to condense and make entertaining for the masses.