[quote]debraD wrote:
11 pages of guys saying hurting a rapists dick will make him angry.
Don’t let anyone say bodybuilders aint smart like.[/quote]
LOL
I can’t believe I read through the majority of this shit.
OJ Simpson: “IF I did it, this is how…”
T-Nationer: “IF I were a rapist, this is how…”
Some of you all are some creepy motherfuckers, talking about how you would still beat a woman to death after having your erect penis stuck deep with barbs… fuck off…
[/quote]
The creepiness of the motherfuckers on this thread is dwarfed by the ignorance and lack of reading comprehension on your part. Call it the theory of relativity if you will.[/quote]
Now you’ve stepped over the line, Push… using the word “dwarfed”!
Hmmmff!
[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:
If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.[quote]
Exactly. This device is said to deliver “excruciating” pain that leaves its victim unable to even walk.
All it would take is for the rapist to reflexively stumble back to get away from whatever was causing that pain and the victim would have ample opportunity to run away… it’s not like he is going to run her down.
You would think pain like that would tend to distract someone for a few seconds, at least… but again, maybe I have abnormally sensitive genitals, as well.
[quote]Nan-c wrote:
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off … [/quote]
You clearly do not watch enough movies. [/quote]
Why do you say that?[/quote]
Because then you’d know that the only defense a woman has from a rapist is Hiro Protagonist.
[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:
If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.[quote]
Exactly. This device is said to deliver “excruciating” pain that leaves its victim unable to even walk.
All it would take is for the rapist to reflexively stumble back to get away from whatever was causing that pain and the victim would have ample opportunity to run away… it’s not like he is going to run her down.
You would think pain like that would tend to distract someone for a few seconds, at least… but again, maybe I have abnormally sensitive genitals, as well.[/quote]
I’ve already mentioned this numerous times in the thread.
[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:
If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.[quote]
Exactly. This device is said to deliver “excruciating” pain that leaves its victim unable to even walk.
All it would take is for the rapist to reflexively stumble back to get away from whatever was causing that pain and the victim would have ample opportunity to run away… it’s not like he is going to run her down.
You would think pain like that would tend to distract someone for a few seconds, at least… but again, maybe I have abnormally sensitive genitals, as well.[/quote]
I’ve already mentioned this numerous times in the thread.[/quote]
Exactly.
When faced with that kind of pain and possible serious damage, my guess is it would be a normal self-preserving reflex to back away and try to stop whatever it is that’s causing it. Going after the woman in revenge would eat up precious seconds that could mean further damage your cock.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Push, you’re just jealous.
Funny though, BG actually thinks I’d go out of my way for an internet call out.
[/quote]
i’d put up money. again, no need to do this here.[/quote]
Lol, dude, no one is going to meet you to settle an internet fight in real life. If you can’t see why that is retarded than you don’t have a firm grasp on reality, man![/quote]
Too bad for you that you acknowledge this illusion called “internet fights”. When I think of an “internet fight”, I picture some pimply faced teenager wearing glasses calling out some similar misfit over the web - not a grown man telling another grown man “fuck you” (or variations thereof) over the internet. I guess in your tiny mind, the internet gives you a license to defame, insult, and pillage without retribution. You seem quite comfortable with that. I say it’s the language of cowards - to type insults. Far as I’m concerned, we shouldn’t say anything here to anyone that we wouldn’t say in person. Call me crazy - yes.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I imagine that if guys were getting raped up the ass in great statistical numbers, they’d damn sure be coming up with some “extreme” ideas for future defense.
[/quote]
bc you know, that works out so well in prison. they get weapons in prison all the time. they make weapons. i’m sure if such a “weapon” were truly a deterrent you’d have the meek and weak on the inside fashioning crude “gotcha” dick traps for the asshole…but they don’t. Why? Because they’d likely be fucking killed using such a contraption.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I imagine that if guys were getting raped up the ass in great statistical numbers, they’d damn sure be coming up with some “extreme” ideas for future defense.
[/quote]
bc you know, that works out so well in prison. they get weapons in prison all the time. they make weapons. i’m sure if such a “weapon” were truly a deterrent you’d have the meek and weak on the inside fashioning crude “gotcha” dick traps for the asshole…but they don’t. Why? Because they’d likely be fucking killed using such a contraption.
if only a solution were so easy. [/quote]
Yeah, you’re right.
Prison life is EXACTLY like life outside of prison.
I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).
So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]
Very few, if any, people have said that these things should be banned. The main argument has been about the ramifications of using them “successfully”. My argument has been that they shouldnt be used for the sake of improving the condition of that society and avoiding even further violence.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Push, you’re just jealous.
Funny though, BG actually thinks I’d go out of my way for an internet call out.
[/quote]
i’d put up money. again, no need to do this here.[/quote]
Lol, dude, no one is going to meet you to settle an internet fight in real life. If you can’t see why that is retarded than you don’t have a firm grasp on reality, man![/quote]
Too bad for you that you acknowledge this illusion called “internet fights”. When I think of an “internet fight”, I picture some pimply faced teenager wearing glasses calling out some similar misfit over the web - not a grown man telling another grown man “fuck you” (or variations thereof) over the internet. I guess in your tiny mind, the internet gives you a license to defame, insult, and pillage without retribution. You seem quite comfortable with that. I say it’s the language of cowards - to type insults. Far as I’m concerned, we shouldn’t say anything here to anyone that we wouldn’t say in person. Call me crazy - yes.
[/quote]
Old men and their crazy codes of conduct on the internet…
[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:
If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.[quote]
Exactly. This device is said to deliver “excruciating” pain that leaves its victim unable to even walk.
All it would take is for the rapist to reflexively stumble back to get away from whatever was causing that pain and the victim would have ample opportunity to run away… it’s not like he is going to run her down.
You would think pain like that would tend to distract someone for a few seconds, at least… but again, maybe I have abnormally sensitive genitals, as well.[/quote]
I’ve already mentioned this numerous times in the thread.[/quote]
Exactly.
When faced with that kind of pain and possible serious damage, my guess is it would be a normal self-preserving reflex to back away and try to stop whatever it is that’s causing it. Going after the woman in revenge would eat up precious seconds that could mean further damage your cock.
[/quote]
Ok lets say this thing catches on. 3 months go by. 500 men get trapped in one. How much longer do you think itll take for the rest of the would be rapists to catch on?
These are human beings we are talking about. Robots may make the same mistake each time but unless this thing has the potential to adapt and continually deceive the would be rapists how do you expect it to work long term?
These are the type of things that legislators consider when making laws.
These are the type of things that legislators consider when making laws.
[/quote]
Actually, I’m of the opinion that most legislators only consider public opinion when making laws.
“Will this look good in the eyes of the people?”
Facts are often irrelevant.[/quote]
In some cases youre very right. THis case? I have no idea. Based on this thread it seems as if the public opinion is somewhat even. If this were a site with equal amount of men and women there would be a lot more posts supporting the device.
