Rape-aXe: Anti-rape Condom

[quote]andrew_live wrote:

[quote]DickBag wrote:
seeing pushharder as the last poster on the main get a life forum for the rape axe thread is hilarious.

your user name just clashes with this thread push

in every other thread its cool though[/quote]

Rape-aXe: (Noun) An anti rape device in the form of a sheath embedded with barbs on the inside.

Synonyms: DickBag, Jaws of Penile Death, Sin stick guillotine.

Also see celtic’s mom.[/quote]

mom jokes? really?

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]andrew_live wrote:

Rape-aXe: (Noun) An anti rape device in the form of a sheath embedded with barbs on the inside.

Synonyms: DickBag, Jaws of Penile Death, Sin stick guillotine.

Also see celtic’s mom.[/quote]

mom jokes? really?[/quote]

Damn straight! But really it is a reference to one of Celtic’s call out threads not sure which one. There are so many.

[quote]debraD wrote:

Because then you’d know that the only defense a woman has from a rapist is Hiro Protagonist. :stuck_out_tongue:

I was being a smart ass though. :)[/quote]

Good “Snow Crash” reference. I seem to remember that the character Y.T. had a dentata to stymie would-be rapists.

“When you are wrestling for possession of a sword, the man with the handle always wins.” Hiro Protagonist.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]EurekaBulldogLaw wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:
11 pages of guys saying hurting a rapists dick will make him angry.

Don’t let anyone say bodybuilders aint smart like.[/quote]

LOL

I can’t believe I read through the majority of this shit.

OJ Simpson: “IF I did it, this is how…”

T-Nationer: “IF I were a rapist, this is how…”

Some of you all are some creepy motherfuckers, talking about how you would still beat a woman to death after having your erect penis stuck deep with barbs… fuck off…
[/quote]

The creepiness of the motherfuckers on this thread is dwarfed by the ignorance and lack of reading comprehension on your part. Call it the theory of relativity if you will.[/quote]

It couldn’t be a discussion on the internet without someone bringing up the cliched reading comprehension attack, could it? Quit misusing the phrase. Just because someone might have a different viewpoint from yours does not mean their reading skills are flawed.

I’m also not sure why you took this personally. Should I go back and read your posts specifically or something? And how does my “ignorance” trump someone’s earlier (and creepy) claim that “not all rapists are bad people”?

I completely comprehended what the individuals I’m referring to were saying. The ideas here are not THAT complex. If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.

[/quote]

It couldn’t be a discussion on the internet without someone bringing up the cliched, “LOL I can’t believe I read through the majority of this shit.”

Now fer the last dadgum time on this delightful subject:

If I were a woman I would strongly consider using one of these. I would love to inflict monumental pain on my rapist. I would not only use one of these but if I had the chance I would jump on him and relieve him of the Jaws of Penile Death caused pain by slicing off his dick with my Leatherman, dousing him with gasoline and lighting him up.

If I were a violent rapist and raped a woman who had one of these inserted in her tunnel of love AND I were capable, despite the monumental pain I found myself in, I would kill the woman.

As I am neither of the above I would strongly push for legislation that makes a capital crime out of violent rape (it used to be so in many states in the OoooooooooNytedStatesofAmerigoVespucci) and/or I would hunt down and execute, in any way I could, the rapist of one dear to me.

Now, Monsieur I’veFoundItPoodleLaw, do you get my drift?

Sincerely and with great regards,

Creepy Motherfucker Push[/quote]

In my previous post I said I was not even thinking of anything YOU said specifically. YOU in fact said sensible things and I agree with some of them (especially in regards to executing rapists (I think that was you)). You did not say that some rapists are good people or try to create contexts for rape. So I’m not sure where the problem is.

Respectfully,

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I imagine that if guys were getting raped up the ass in great statistical numbers, they’d damn sure be coming up with some “extreme” ideas for future defense.

[/quote]

bc you know, that works out so well in prison. they get weapons in prison all the time. they make weapons. i’m sure if such a “weapon” were truly a deterrent you’d have the meek and weak on the inside fashioning crude “gotcha” dick traps for the asshole…but they don’t. Why? Because they’d likely be fucking killed using such a contraption.

if only a solution were so easy. [/quote]

Yeah, you’re right.

Prison life is EXACTLY like life outside of prison.
[/quote]

violence is violence isn’t it? a predator hunts the weak…whether in prison or in public. what am i missing?

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Push, you’re just jealous. :wink:

Funny though, BG actually thinks I’d go out of my way for an internet call out.
[/quote]

i’d put up money. again, no need to do this here.[/quote]

Lol, dude, no one is going to meet you to settle an internet fight in real life. If you can’t see why that is retarded than you don’t have a firm grasp on reality, man![/quote]

Too bad for you that you acknowledge this illusion called “internet fights”. When I think of an “internet fight”, I picture some pimply faced teenager wearing glasses calling out some similar misfit over the web - not a grown man telling another grown man “fuck you” (or variations thereof) over the internet.

I guess in your tiny mind, the internet gives you a license to defame, insult, and pillage without retribution. You seem quite comfortable with that. I say it’s the language of cowards - to type insults. Far as I’m concerned, we shouldn’t say anything here to anyone that we wouldn’t say in person. Call me crazy - yes.
[/quote]

Old men and their crazy codes of conduct on the internet…
[/quote]

there is only a code…code and conduct are not situational or convenient. apparently you don’t get it. how sad for you. apparently, you’re the kinda guy to give another guy the finger on the road just before dodging off the exit.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Push, you’re just jealous. :wink:

Funny though, BG actually thinks I’d go out of my way for an internet call out.
[/quote]

i’d put up money. again, no need to do this here.[/quote]

Lol, dude, no one is going to meet you to settle an internet fight in real life. If you can’t see why that is retarded than you don’t have a firm grasp on reality, man![/quote]

Too bad for you that you acknowledge this illusion called “internet fights”. When I think of an “internet fight”, I picture some pimply faced teenager wearing glasses calling out some similar misfit over the web - not a grown man telling another grown man “fuck you” (or variations thereof) over the internet.

I guess in your tiny mind, the internet gives you a license to defame, insult, and pillage without retribution. You seem quite comfortable with that. I say it’s the language of cowards - to type insults. Far as I’m concerned, we shouldn’t say anything here to anyone that we wouldn’t say in person. Call me crazy - yes.
[/quote]

Old men and their crazy codes of conduct on the internet…
[/quote]

there is only a code…code and conduct are not situational or convenient. apparently you don’t get it. how sad for you. apparently, you’re the kinda guy to give another guy the finger on the road just before dodging off the exit.[/quote]

I’ve already told you there are very few reasons I’d get into a fight these days. Some douchebag on the internet certainly isn’t one of them. :slight_smile:

I still don’t know about this thing.

But I am not a women in South Africa. As I mentioned before, it seems like Thunder Dome for these women.

For years, for decades, the U.S. and other nations have sent money to South Africa, it has not improved the condition for women or just about anyone else. The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.

I don’t know about this, but…it is a choice for people who are being horrifically victimized. They are tho only ones who can make this decision.

Celeste

So now that BG is back raising a ruckus in the forums much to our amusement I wonder now where he was all that time. Did you work out non stop and get huge? Paid product tester for the rape-aXe and needed time to recover?

Damn I sure would die to see a video of a guy getting caught in one. No homo, you know it’d be some funny ‘jackass’ style shit.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Push, you’re just jealous. :wink:

Funny though, BG actually thinks I’d go out of my way for an internet call out.
[/quote]

i’d put up money. again, no need to do this here.[/quote]

Lol, dude, no one is going to meet you to settle an internet fight in real life. If you can’t see why that is retarded than you don’t have a firm grasp on reality, man![/quote]

Too bad for you that you acknowledge this illusion called “internet fights”. When I think of an “internet fight”, I picture some pimply faced teenager wearing glasses calling out some similar misfit over the web - not a grown man telling another grown man “fuck you” (or variations thereof) over the internet.

I guess in your tiny mind, the internet gives you a license to defame, insult, and pillage without retribution. You seem quite comfortable with that. I say it’s the language of cowards - to type insults. Far as I’m concerned, we shouldn’t say anything here to anyone that we wouldn’t say in person. Call me crazy - yes.
[/quote]

Old men and their crazy codes of conduct on the internet…
[/quote]

there is only a code…code and conduct are not situational or convenient. apparently you don’t get it. how sad for you. apparently, you’re the kinda guy to give another guy the finger on the road just before dodging off the exit.[/quote]

That’s when you follow them to that exit and they shit their pants lol. TIME TO GET CRAZAYYY!!!

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Bottom line:

I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).

So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]

It’s not wrong to say why it’s a bad idea.

And honestly, the other people saying that we’re saying women should “lie back and take it”, are you reading your own posts? The device is dependent on the woman lying back and taking it.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:
So many people keep bringing up guns. Please explain to me how these impoverished, perceieved 2nd class citizens are gonna get their hands on one??? Just whip out the ol Visa? Are they taking cheques on the black market arms trade now? I agree that the use of a weapon such as a gun, pepper spray or a stun gun is ideal, its not realistic. Unless S&W starts handing out .38 specials for 2 bucks, dont expect handguns to become the self defence method of choice amoungst potential rape victims in SA.

[/quote]
Who told you they were “impoverished?”[/quote]

Just making an assumption…alot of people earlier in the thread were alluding to third world conditions so i took that to mean they probably werent runnin around with tons of disposable cash.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:
So many people keep bringing up guns. Please explain to me how these impoverished, perceieved 2nd class citizens are gonna get their hands on one??? Just whip out the ol Visa? Are they taking cheques on the black market arms trade now? I agree that the use of a weapon such as a gun, pepper spray or a stun gun is ideal, its not realistic. Unless S&W starts handing out .38 specials for 2 bucks, dont expect handguns to become the self defence method of choice amoungst potential rape victims in SA.

[/quote]
Who told you they were “impoverished?”[/quote]

Just making an assumption…alot of people earlier in the thread were alluding to third world conditions so i took that to mean they probably werent runnin around with tons of disposable cash. [/quote]

I didn’t pull any stats but my best guess is South Africa is one of if not THE most modern country on the continent. That would tend to lead to relative non-impoverishment.[/quote]

http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=ENGUSA20080317004

“Rural women in South Africa are disproportionately affected by poverty and unemployment,” said Mary Rayner, Amnesty International’s South Africa researcher and author of the report titled “I Am At the Lowest End Of All.”

and another
From Economic Powerhouse to Rape Capital
http://www.spearhead.com/0002-jm.html

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:
So many people keep bringing up guns. Please explain to me how these impoverished, perceieved 2nd class citizens are gonna get their hands on one??? Just whip out the ol Visa? Are they taking cheques on the black market arms trade now? I agree that the use of a weapon such as a gun, pepper spray or a stun gun is ideal, its not realistic. Unless S&W starts handing out .38 specials for 2 bucks, dont expect handguns to become the self defence method of choice amoungst potential rape victims in SA.

[/quote]
Who told you they were “impoverished?”[/quote]

Just making an assumption…alot of people earlier in the thread were alluding to third world conditions so i took that to mean they probably werent runnin around with tons of disposable cash. [/quote]

I didn’t pull any stats but my best guess is South Africa is one of if not THE most modern country on the continent. That would tend to lead to relative non-impoverishment.[/quote]

http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=ENGUSA20080317004

“Rural women in South Africa are disproportionately affected by poverty and unemployment,” said Mary Rayner, Amnesty International’s South Africa researcher and author of the report titled “I Am At the Lowest End Of All.”

and another
From Economic Powerhouse to Rape Capital
http://www.spearhead.com/0002-jm.html

[/quote]
Key word: relative.

Also, why would impoverished, rural women be considered likely to be attending the World Cup events?

“The device, known as the Rape-aXe and invented by Dr. Sonnet Ehlers, is a female condom with hooks or ‘teeth’ inside. Ehlers sold her house and car in 2005 to launch the project, and plans to distribute 30,000 units of the condom at FIFA World Cup venues.”[/quote]

Well they may not be at the World Cup, but they might be around the venue buying bazookas and hand grenades, no? :wink:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]BobCat77 wrote:
So many people keep bringing up guns. Please explain to me how these impoverished, perceieved 2nd class citizens are gonna get their hands on one??? Just whip out the ol Visa? Are they taking cheques on the black market arms trade now? I agree that the use of a weapon such as a gun, pepper spray or a stun gun is ideal, its not realistic. Unless S&W starts handing out .38 specials for 2 bucks, dont expect handguns to become the self defence method of choice amoungst potential rape victims in SA.

[/quote]
Who told you they were “impoverished?”[/quote]

Just making an assumption…alot of people earlier in the thread were alluding to third world conditions so i took that to mean they probably werent runnin around with tons of disposable cash. [/quote]

I didn’t pull any stats but my best guess is South Africa is one of if not THE most modern country on the continent. That would tend to lead to relative non-impoverishment.[/quote]

http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=ENGUSA20080317004

“Rural women in South Africa are disproportionately affected by poverty and unemployment,” said Mary Rayner, Amnesty International’s South Africa researcher and author of the report titled “I Am At the Lowest End Of All.”

and another
From Economic Powerhouse to Rape Capital
http://www.spearhead.com/0002-jm.html

[/quote]
Key word: relative.

Also, why would impoverished, rural women be considered likely to be attending the World Cup events?

“The device, known as the Rape-aXe and invented by Dr. Sonnet Ehlers, is a female condom with hooks or ‘teeth’ inside. Ehlers sold her house and car in 2005 to launch the project, and plans to distribute 30,000 units of the condom at FIFA World Cup venues.”[/quote]

ah Push, why wouldn’t they be at the nation’s largest event.

I really am thinking you have not read the articles.

what r we supposed to be arguing about again?