I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).
So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]
Wrong, we do have the right to tell our loved ones how to defend themselves. I’m sure you taught that charmer of a son of yours how to throw a punch, no? And I, for one, do not tell any of my loved ones to defend themselves passive aggressively(as this device is so clearly doing). Not only is it unbecoming in other areas(such as asking for a fight, saying it wont end well for the other party, and then not making it happen because you have to go home to change your panties), but it is horribly ineffective. This is a fucking death trap for the wearer.
I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).
So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]
Wrong, we do have the right to tell our loved ones how to defend themselves. I’m sure you taught that charmer of a son of yours how to throw a punch, no? And I, for one, do not tell any of my loved ones to defend themselves passive aggressively(as this device is so clearly doing). Not only is it unbecoming in other areas(such as asking for a fight, saying it wont end well for the other party, and then not making it happen because you have to go home to change your panties), but it is horribly ineffective. This is a fucking death trap for the wearer.[/quote]
Comprehension fail. ID said we don’t have a right to tell women how to defend themselves. He never said we don’t have a right to tell our loved ones how to defend themselves.
You have been tried and have been found wanting. Move along, sir.
lol well I feel like everything has been regugitated a million times, and seems like everyone here can just agree to disagree on these things…we all obviosuly aren’t budging with our opinions…
I imagine that if guys were getting raped up the ass in great statistical numbers, they’d damn sure be coming up with some “extreme” ideas for future defense.
I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).
So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]
This.
Also this:
I didn’t think that was part of the thread’s debate. Also, I don’t recall our gov. being unreasonable as such.
[/quote]
You have to ask yourself, at least in the context of making “Rape-aXe” available in the US “Do I trust the FDA to make this decision for me” as this device would fall under their jurisdiction.
The government already mandates what firearms we may defend ourselves with and which compounds we may put into our bodies (think steroids, PH’s, recreational drugs, etc).
Common condoms, birth control, and STD protection all fall under their jurisdiction.
I don’t want a woman telling me how I can and how I cannot defend myself (choice of weapon, etc).
So as men, we have no right to tell women how to defend themselves. [/quote]
This.
Also this:
I didn’t think that was part of the thread’s debate. Also, I don’t recall our gov. being unreasonable as such.
[/quote]
You have to ask yourself, at least in the context of making “Rape-aXe” available in the US “Do I trust the FDA to make this decision for me” as this device would fall under their jurisdiction.
The government already mandates what firearms we may defend ourselves with and which compounds we may put into our bodies (think steroids, PH’s, recreational drugs, etc).
Common condoms, birth control, and STD protection all fall under their jurisdiction.
[/quote]
Oh, I see what you’re saying.
In that light, it seems doubtful that the FDA or other agency would pass it for US sale and use.
[quote]debraD wrote:
11 pages of guys saying hurting a rapists dick will make him angry.
Don’t let anyone say bodybuilders aint smart like.[/quote]
LOL
I can’t believe I read through the majority of this shit.
OJ Simpson: “IF I did it, this is how…”
T-Nationer: “IF I were a rapist, this is how…”
Some of you all are some creepy motherfuckers, talking about how you would still beat a woman to death after having your erect penis stuck deep with barbs… fuck off.
It picked up for a bit when BG - He Who Shalt Always Throweth Down - came in, but what thread doesn’t?
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off …
[quote]Nan-c wrote:
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off … [/quote]
[quote]Nan-c wrote:
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off … [/quote]
[quote]Nan-c wrote:
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off … [/quote]
The problem is multiple rapists
if its just biliy joe bob trying to rape someone the RApe-aXe works fine, but if billy bob and jim joe bob decide to go family style and billy bob gets a hook in his pecker jim joe bob might decide to kill and torture the rapee.
[quote]Nan-c wrote:
I stopped reading at page 6 … there is a lot of " a rapist would get mad with this device on his dick. He would beat and/or kill the victim…" But don’t you think that the guy would be more like rolling himself on the ground screaming in excruciating pain…and not be able to stand or do anything…just like after receiving a nut shot ??? It says in an article that the man can’t walk when it’s on and that it takes a doc to take it off … [/quote]
The problem is multiple rapists
if its just biliy joe bob trying to rape someone the RApe-aXe works fine, but if billy bob and jim joe bob decide to go family style and billy bob gets a hook in his pecker jim joe bob might decide to kill and torture the rapee.[/quote]
I agree but the people who made this kind of comments did say “If I … I would kill…” not …“the rest of the gang would kill her…”
[quote]debraD wrote:
11 pages of guys saying hurting a rapists dick will make him angry.
Don’t let anyone say bodybuilders aint smart like.[/quote]
LOL
I can’t believe I read through the majority of this shit.
OJ Simpson: “IF I did it, this is how…”
T-Nationer: “IF I were a rapist, this is how…”
Some of you all are some creepy motherfuckers, talking about how you would still beat a woman to death after having your erect penis stuck deep with barbs… fuck off…
[/quote]
The creepiness of the motherfuckers on this thread is dwarfed by the ignorance and lack of reading comprehension on your part. Call it the theory of relativity if you will.[/quote]
It couldn’t be a discussion on the internet without someone bringing up the cliched reading comprehension attack, could it? Quit misusing the phrase. Just because someone might have a different viewpoint from yours does not mean their reading skills are flawed.
I’m also not sure why you took this personally. Should I go back and read your posts specifically or something? And how does my “ignorance” trump someone’s earlier (and creepy) claim that “not all rapists are bad people”?
I completely comprehended what the individuals I’m referring to were saying. The ideas here are not THAT complex. If you think a rapist is not going to be taken aback by having their genitals mutilated and at least provide their victim an opportunity to escape (probably what the device is meant for - everyone here is acting like it would solve humanity’s problems), well… fuck, maybe MY genitals are weird in that they are extremely sensitive to pain. I dunno. I guess we’d have to agree to disagree.