[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
keaster wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Yet another little guy who obsesses over the big guys. You guys in the “under 200 club” need to get over it.
Be happy with meeting your own goals, and stop worrying about what everyone else is doing.
Sour grapes??
Yes, it’s a classic case of sour graps. There are so many little guys who were never able to get big. So they find every way imaginable to degrade big guys. There are three primary ways of doing this:
- All big guys are fat.
- Girls don’t like big guys. They like guys who look like me/Brad Pitt.
- I have more “pound for pound”/relative strength.
I have yet to meet a little guy who, deep down, didn’t really want to get more muscular. Indeed, one T-Mag contributor, after failing in his quest to get big, finally adopted “arguments” 1 & 2. As someone who has followed this site for years, it’s pretty amusing to see sour grapes in action. (Most of the time I have to infer that a poster is suffering from sour grapeitis.)
Listen, I will never move on the mat as quickly as someone who is shorter and weighs less than I do. But I don’t go around degrading guys who, because of their smaller size, are able to move like lightening. If anything, I give them propers for their speed.
Once a person meets his own goals, he doesn’t look for false measurements to make him feel superior to others.[/quote]
I would not agree that there aren’t smaller guys who train for relative strength or sports performance or any other reason who really have no interest in getting bigger. But on this site, when someone makes a post like this it usuallly IS sour grapes. If someone wants to bitch about someone being an asshole at the gym, I don’t know why most of the post would focus on the guy’s size. Asshole is asshole. Big or small has nothing to do with it.