Questions About Peri-Workout Nutrition

[quote]KeepAwaySheeple wrote:
GusBus07 wrote:
KeepAwaySheeple wrote:
Oh shit, scratch that, didn’t know the price on Surge Workout Fuel went down. Turns out I can afford it all, except the question remains. How the hell do I fit the protocol into a half an hour before training?

You could wake up earlier

Ya I could, but then I wouldn’t be getting enough sleep.

Anybody else who trains in the morning who is pinched on time?

[/quote]

I know it sucks, but I am going to agree with the wake up earlier crowd. There has been a lot of talk recently about how you need at least an hour after you wake up before you start training just to let your body get ready. Your joints need to warm up and get lubricated and your back needs to settle. I think it was just mentioned again in one of the articles recently where the disks in your back swell up with fluid and need to shrink back down, which takes about an hour. During that hour you are more susceptible to a back injury.

You could use that time you are awake to get other stuff done during the day to try and free up some time later on. I feel your pain on the “being pinched for time”.

[quote]KeepAwaySheeple wrote:
GusBus07 wrote:
KeepAwaySheeple wrote:
How the hell do I fit the protocol into a half an hour before training?

You could wake up earlier

Ya I could, but then I wouldn’t be getting enough sleep.

Anybody else who trains in the morning who is pinched on time?

[/quote]

Coincidentally, I logged on to T-Nation this morning to find advice for the exact same question, though I have to wake up even earlier (4:30 AM) to train due to an hour commute for work. I’ve asked the exact same question: Should I go with an absolute minimum protocol or go to bed earlier to get sufficient sleep?

I’ve decided to go to bed earlier on the nights before a heavy training session due to the “body prep” issue, which is especially important for me since I have lowerback concerns. It’s not very convenient but my workouts are much better and I feel better throughout the day if I’ve slept 8 hours the night before AND follow the protocol. The days that I don’t lift or only plan to get some ESW in, I’ll adjust bedtime and the protocol accordingly.

I go to bed at 9p and get up at 4’30a on days I will work out. I started the protocol and am not sure if it is that or the fact I’m up for an hr before training. Something is working because I’m hitting it harder and a lot more focused and alert.

I’ll sleep until 6a on non-workout days. Than if bot working on Sat. I catch up big time over the weekend. Now with winter approaching it should be a lot easier to get rest. Not so much to do outdoors.

Hey CT,

I’ve been using your peri-workout nutrition protocol as follows:

W-90 Alpha-GPC 2 caps
W-45 1 FINiBAR
W-30 1 scoop Surge Workout Fuel
W-15 1 serving Surge Recovery +5g creatine
W Sip on 20g casein hydrolysate + 5g creatine
W 90 Solid Meal

I’ve recently run out of CH and really don’t want to buy any more until Biotest releases MAG-10 since the CH I use tastes like vomit.

Just wondering what you would suggest I use in the interim to best mimic the CH response? I have access to Surge WOF, Surge Recovery, FINiBARs, and Whey isolate.

So say an individual cough (me) is strapped for money and only has Surge Workout Fuel and Surge Recovery what would be an Ideal way to use them?

W-30 2 scoops Workout Fuel
Workout
w + 5 - 2 scoops Surge Recovery

?

Thanks.

-Fulf

If one wanted to only eat whole food what would you suggest for per- workout? Thanks!

What’s the recommended workout nutrition for a fellow on the Anabolic Diet who can only take in about 30g carb TOTAL on most of my workout days?

Right now I do:

W-15: Start drinking Spike Shotgun (16 oz)
W: Finish Shotgun and drink water

Basic, I know. I’m usually eating some kind of meal around an hour after my workout, usually just meat and broccoli/spinach. Should I eat sooner? Should I use a Metabolic Drive or Grow! shake?

[quote]samdan wrote:
What’s the recommended workout nutrition for a fellow on the Anabolic Diet who can only take in about 30g carb TOTAL on most of my workout days?

Right now I do:

W-15: Start drinking Spike Shotgun (16 oz)
W: Finish Shotgun and drink water

Basic, I know. I’m usually eating some kind of meal around an hour after my workout, usually just meat and broccoli/spinach. Should I eat sooner? Should I use a Metabolic Drive or Grow shake?[/quote]

It actually will not do much for you as far as putting muscle on your frame and recovering faster.

Anaconda and MAG-10 will both be carb-free, so the protocol of using 1 scoop of each pre-training and 1 scoop of each during the training can be used.

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
samdan wrote:
What’s the recommended workout nutrition for a fellow on the Anabolic Diet who can only take in about 30g carb TOTAL on most of my workout days?

Right now I do:

W-15: Start drinking Spike Shotgun (16 oz)
W: Finish Shotgun and drink water

Basic, I know. I’m usually eating some kind of meal around an hour after my workout, usually just meat and broccoli/spinach. Should I eat sooner? Should I use a Metabolic Drive or Grow shake?

It actually will not do much for you as far as putting muscle on your frame and recovering faster.

Anaconda and MAG-10 will both be carb-free, so the protocol of using 1 scoop of each pre-training and 1 scoop of each during the training can be used.[/quote]

If I am understanding this correctly, based on what I’ve read from the “What I am Doing Now” thread, the pariworkout carbs are only coming from Finibars then? And The Mag10 or Anaconda have ingredients to spike insulin without carbs?

[quote]gabex wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
samdan wrote:
What’s the recommended workout nutrition for a fellow on the Anabolic Diet who can only take in about 30g carb TOTAL on most of my workout days?

Right now I do:

W-15: Start drinking Spike Shotgun (16 oz)
W: Finish Shotgun and drink water

Basic, I know. I’m usually eating some kind of meal around an hour after my workout, usually just meat and broccoli/spinach. Should I eat sooner? Should I use a Metabolic Drive or Grow! shake?

It actually will not do much for you as far as putting muscle on your frame and recovering faster.

Anaconda and MAG-10 will both be carb-free, so the protocol of using 1 scoop of each pre-training and 1 scoop of each during the training can be used.

If I am understanding this correctly, based on what I’ve read from the “What I am Doing Now” thread, the pariworkout carbs are only coming from Finibars then? And The Mag10 or Anaconda have ingredients to spike insulin without carbs?
[/quote]

Yes they do

CT, I’m NOT under 10 percent body fat (probably about 15). I tend to hold fat in the love handle area. Do you expect that the new “lower carb” Anaconda / MAG-10 protocol would be better for someone like me than the current one using SWF and SR?

I’m currently using the products that are out during my main workout days and staying relatively low carb the rest of the time. My goal is to increase LBM while minimizing body fat gain (so overall BF PERCENT should drop as I gain).

CT, my current goal is to gian muscle and maintain bf%. I weight 194 lbs and want to get to 205 by the end of the following summer. Here is my current Peri-workout nutrtion.

Typical work out day

7am
50 grams oatmeal
20 grams 100% Whey protein (GNC)
1 tablespoon PB
Handful blue berries
Handful rasphberries
2 900 mg fish oil (GNC)
1 200 mg Resveratrol (now nutrition)

8am 20 oz coffee (During class)Also chugging water

9am Pre
22 grams Hydrolyzed Whey (Proto Whey)
20 grams dextrose (now nutrition)
10 grams Maltodextrine (now nutrtion)
5 grams L-Leucine (Biotest)
1 600 mg Alph Lipoic Acid (GNC brand)

9:30am during
12 grams hydrolyzed whey (same brand)
10 grams dextrose (same brand)
3-9 BCAA caps (Biotest) depending on intestiy

10-10:30am post
12 gram hydrolyzed whey (same brand)
10 gram 100% whey
20-40 grams maltodextrine
5 grams c-monohydrate

Do you think the levels of carb are at high enough levels? I train well and make progression but I woulndt mind speeding it up. Also am i on point when it comes to a general level of peri workout nutrition?

just an update…

I have been using the following protocol for 4 weeks now after coming back from surgery and within the first week my strength was already up, after 3 weeks I broke all my previous PR’s on all lifts.

45 - 2 scoops SWF
30 - GPC (used to be 90 min out, but due to liquid I take it later)
15 - 2 scoops SR + 5g creatine
during workout - 20g CH
1 hr post - 12g CH + 5g creatine
1.5 hr post - meal

I find that with this protocol my strength levels have yet to top out. I also seem to be recovering amazingly fast. As far as weight gain goes I have gained 2-3 pounds with what seems to be a slight decrease in bf.

I also drink 12g CH upon waking then eat my first meal 15 mins later. My diet is not super strict but I make sure to get enough protein and taper my carbs off as the day goes on.

I cant wait on Anaconda and MAG-10, kinda gets annoying drinking so many shakes and mixing up so much shit. Not to mention that the CH tastes like puke. The only way I can tolerate it is to mix it with juice. I also have about 3-4 weeks left of supplements for this protocol, so hopefully by then they will be released!

Coach

I am taking it upon myself to run a 10 K, would the original protocol be a good pre event option?

+45 min 1-2 Finibar
+30 Surge Workout Fuel???
+15 or +30 Surge Recovery

I dont run distance and never have run a 10K but I just wanted to set a goal while I detrain a bit after some really heavy work and I wanted to mix it up a bit

Would that be a good prerace strategy I know the finibar would be but what about the rest??

Thanks

CT,

At the moment my workout nutrition looks like:
45 mins 2 Fini bars
30 mins 2 scoops SWF
15 mins 2 scoops Surge recovery
Cycle to the gym
5 min dynamic stretching
Sip on 20g WH during workout
Cycle home
15 mins PWO 2 scoops whey protein.

Do I need to change anything considering that I’m cycling to the gym before my workout (right after drinking recovery)? Just wondering if cycling is intense enough to inhibit the release of insulin and ruin the protocol?

Thibs,

The one scientific theory behind this new pre-workout nutrition you have presented has been that catecholamines blunt the effects of insulin - correct me if I’m wrong please.

My 7+ years of formal education in the biology/clinical sector has taught me no such direct pathway. I have actually been taught that with increase catecholamines your muscles increase the uptake of glucose which improves the effects of insulin.

Since it seems T-Nation’s next big supplement and your new pre/intra/post workout nutrition protocol seem to hinge greatly on the evidence behind them - I was hoping you had ANY type of scientific backing for either instead of just anecdotal (I understand that science is behind in this area of research but still there should be research that supports some of the basics of your protocol - even if it is as simple as by what pathway the catecholamines blunt insulin).

Side note: I have been getting better results over the past two years since I’ve switched to ‘high’ pre and intra carbohydrate intake from the typical post-workout protocol.

Thank you for your time Thibs!
David

[quote]retailboy wrote:
Thibs,

The one scientific theory behind this new pre-workout nutrition you have presented has been that catecholamines blunt the effects of insulin - correct me if I’m wrong please.

My 7+ years of formal education in the biology/clinical sector has taught me no such direct pathway. I have actually been taught that with increase catecholamines your muscles increase the uptake of glucose which improves the effects of insulin.

Since it seems T-Nation’s next big supplement and your new pre/intra/post workout nutrition protocol seem to hinge greatly on the evidence behind them - I was hoping you had ANY type of scientific backing for either instead of just anecdotal (I understand that science is behind in this area of research but still there should be research that supports some of the basics of your protocol - even if it is as simple as by what pathway the catecholamines blunt insulin).

Side note: I have been getting better results over the past two years since I’ve switched to ‘high’ pre and intra carbohydrate intake from the typical post-workout protocol.

Thank you for your time Thibs!
David[/quote]

Well, since you have been witnessing the powerful effects yourself, why the need for a study?

http://www.springerlink.com/content/j76485v703822g23/

Also…

J Clin Invest. 1976 March; 57(3): 791â??795.
doi: 10.1172/JCI108338.
PMCID: PMC436715
Copyright notice
A role for alpha-adrenergic receptors in abnormal insulin secretion in diabetes mellitus.
R P Robertson, J B Halter, and D Porte, Jr
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
To determine whether endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity contributes to abnormal insulin secretion in nonketotic, hyperglycemic, diabetic patients, alpha-adrenergic blockade was produced in normal and diabetic subjects. The diabetics had a significantly (P less than 0.01) greater increase in circulating insulin 1 h after an intravenous phentolamine infusion than did the normal subjects. During the phentolamine infusion, there was also a significant augmentation of acute insulin responses to intravenous glucose (20 g) pulses in normal subjects (P less than 0.05) and diabetics (P less than 0.02); this augmentation was fivefold greater in the diabetics. Simultaneous treatment with the beta-adrenergic blocking agent, propranolol, did not alter these findings. Thus a role for exaggerated endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity in abnormal insulin secretion of the diabetic subjects is suggested. To determine whether this alpha-adrenergic activity might be related to elevated circulating catecholamines, total plasma-catecholamine levels were compared in normal and nonketotic diabetic subjects given intravenous glucose pulses. These levels were significantly greater (P less than 0.02) in the diabetic compared to the normal group before the glucose pulse, and increased significantly in both groups (P less than 0.02 and less than 0.001, respectively) after the pulse. These data suggest that excessive catecholamine secretion may lead to an abnormal degree of endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity, which contributes to defective insulin secretion in diabetic subjects.

AND…

FEBS Lett. 1987 Jul 13;219(1):139-44.
Catecholamine inhibition of Ca2±induced insulin secretion from electrically permeabilised islets of Langerhans.
Jones PM, Fyles JM, Persaud SJ, Howell SL.

Noradrenaline (1-10 microM) inhibited Ca2±induced insulin secretion from electrically permeabilised islets of Langerhans with an efficacy similar to that for inhibition of glucose-induced insulin secretion from intact islets. The inhibition of insulin secretion from permeabilised islets was blocked by the alpha 2-adrenoreceptor antagonist, yohimbine. Adenosine 3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) did not relieve the noradrenaline inhibition of Ca2±induced secretion from the permeabilised islets, although noradrenaline did not affect the secretory responses to cAMP at substimulatory (50 nM) concentrations of Ca2+. These results suggest that catecholamines do not inhibit insulin secretion solely by reducing B-cell adenylate cyclase activity, and imply that one site of action of noradrenaline is at a late stage in the secretory process.

AND …

Biochem J. 1985 Mar 1;226(2):571-6.
Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by noradrenaline in rat islets of Langerhans.
Morgan NG, Montague W.

Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) was shown to be a potent inhibitor of glucose-induced insulin release from rat pancreatic islets, with half-maximal inhibition of the secretory response to 20 mM-glucose occurring at approx. 0.3 microM, and complete suppression of the response occurring at 4 microM-noradrenaline. Inhibition of insulin secretion by noradrenaline was antagonized by the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine (half maximally effective dose approximately 1 microM), but was largely unaffected by the alpha 1-adrenergic antagonist prazosin at concentrations up to 50 microM, suggesting that the response was mediated by alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. Noradrenaline significantly reduced the extent of 45Ca2+ accumulation in glucose-stimulated islets, although as much as 5 microM-noradrenaline was required for 50% inhibition of this response. The ability of noradrenaline to inhibit islet-cell 45Ca2+ uptake was totally abolished in media containing 1 mM-dibutyryl cyclic AMP, suggesting that the response may have been secondary to lowering of islet cyclic AMP. Under these conditions, however, noradrenaline was still able to inhibit insulin secretion maximally. The data suggest that the site(s) at which noradrenaline acts to mediate inhibition of insulin secretion in rat islets lies distal to both islet-cell cyclic AMP accumulation and Ca2+ uptake

AND …

GTP-dependent inhibition of insulin secretion by epinephrine in permeabilized RINm5F cells. Lack of correlation between insulin secretion and cyclic AMP levels.
S Ullrich and C B Wollheim

  • Author Affiliations

Institut de Biochimie Clinique, Centre Médical Universitaire, Genève, Switzerland.
Abstract

The mechanism by which alpha 2-adrenergic agonists inhibit exocytosis was investigated in electrically permeabilized insulin secreting RINm5F cells. In this preparation alpha 2-adrenoceptors remain coupled to adenylate cyclase, since basal- and forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production was lowered by epinephrine and clonidine by 30-50%. Cyclic AMP levels did not correlate with the rate of insulin secretion. Thus, at low Ca2+, forskolin enhanced cyclic AMP levels 5-fold without eliciting secretion, and Ca2±stimulated secretion was associated with decreased cyclic AMP accumulation. Epinephrine (plus propranolol) inhibited Ca2±induced insulin secretion in a GTP-dependent manner. The maximal inhibition (43%) occurred at 500 microM GTP. Clonidine also inhibited Ca2±stimulated secretion. Replacement of GTP by GDP or by the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5’-(3-O-thio)triphosphate as well as treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin prior to permeabilization abolished epinephrine inhibition of insulin secretion. Pertussis toxin did not affect Ca2±stimulated secretion. Insulin release stimulated by 1,2-didecanoyl glycerol was also lowered by epinephrine suggesting an effect distal to the activation of protein kinase C (Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent enzyme). These results taken together with the ability of epinephrine to inhibit ionomycin-induced insulin secretion in intact cells suggest that alpha 2-adrenergic inhibition is distal to the generation of second messengers. A model is proposed for alpha 2-adrenoceptor coupling to two effector systems, namely the adenylate cyclase and the exocytotic site in insulin-secreting cells.

AND …

i: 10.1172/JCI107887.
PMCID: PMC301695
Copyright notice
Glucagon Secretion from the Perfused Rat Pancreas STUDIES WITH GLUCOSE AND CATECHOLAMINES
Gordon C. Weir, Stephen D. Knowlton, and Donald B. Martin
Diabetes Unit and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Diabetes Unit Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
The isolated in situ perfused rat pancreas was used to study glucose and catecholamine control of glucagon secretion, and to investigate the possible role of endogenous cyclic AMP as a mediator of this secretory process. When perfusate glucose was acutely dropped from 100 to 25 mg/100 ml, glucagon was released in a biphasic pattern with an early spike and a later plateau-like response. 300 mg/100 ml glucose suppressed glucagon secretion to near the detection limit of the radioimmunoassay (15 pg/ml). When perfusate glucose was dropped from 300 to 25 mg/100 ml, a delayed, relatively small peak occurred suggesting persisting alpha cell suppression by prior high glucose exposure. 2-Deoxy d-glucose stimulated glucagon secretion and inhibited insulin secretion.
Glucagon was secreted in a biphasic pattern in response to both 2.7 Ã? 10-7 M epinephrine and norepinephrine. The glucagon response to epinephrine was markedly suppressed by glucose at 300 mg/100 ml, and the biphasic response pattern was obliterated. Glucose evoked a two-phase insulin secretory pattern, and the second phase was markedly and rapidly inhibited by epinephrine. Pancreases were perfused with glucose at 300 mg/100 ml which was then lowered to 80 mg/100 ml. 5 min later, epinephrine was infused and definite blunting of the first-phase spike occurred. 10 mM theophylline produced modest rapid uniphasic stimulation of glucagon release, and, in addition, caused enhancement of epinephrine-stimulated glucagon release. An inhibitory influence upon epinephrine-stimulated glucagon was observed as well. Insulin secretion was stimulated by 10 mM theophylline, and this stimulation was inhibited by epinephrine.

You get the point…

Hi Christian, i’m starting a fat loss cycle. I read the ‘ideal’ peri-workout stack you listed for gaining muscle, and also the earlier stack you mentioned on page 2 of 'Refined physique transformation.

I designed this compromise of a stack, what do you think? Could i tweak things to work better? Carbs will be very low (30g daily) as per other recommendations in that article.

STACK:

W-60: Alpha-GPC
W-30: 5g glutamine, 5g creatine, 5g leucine, 12g whey powder
W-15, until 15 mins into workout: 1 scoop Surge Workout Fuel (sipped)
During workout: 20g leucine, 10g glutamine (sipped)
W+15: 23g glutamine, 12g glycine, 15g leucine, 40g whey.

Thanks for your feedback

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
retailboy wrote:
Thibs,

The one scientific theory behind this new pre-workout nutrition you have presented has been that catecholamines blunt the effects of insulin - correct me if I’m wrong please.

My 7+ years of formal education in the biology/clinical sector has taught me no such direct pathway. I have actually been taught that with increase catecholamines your muscles increase the uptake of glucose which improves the effects of insulin.

Since it seems T-Nation’s next big supplement and your new pre/intra/post workout nutrition protocol seem to hinge greatly on the evidence behind them - I was hoping you had ANY type of scientific backing for either instead of just anecdotal (I understand that science is behind in this area of research but still there should be research that supports some of the basics of your protocol - even if it is as simple as by what pathway the catecholamines blunt insulin).

Side note: I have been getting better results over the past two years since I’ve switched to ‘high’ pre and intra carbohydrate intake from the typical post-workout protocol.

Thank you for your time Thibs!
David

Well, since you have been witnessing the powerful effects yourself, why the need for a study?

http://www.springerlink.com/content/j76485v703822g23/

Also…

J Clin Invest. 1976 March; 57(3): 791â??795.
doi: 10.1172/JCI108338.
PMCID: PMC436715
Copyright notice
A role for alpha-adrenergic receptors in abnormal insulin secretion in diabetes mellitus.
R P Robertson, J B Halter, and D Porte, Jr
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
To determine whether endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity contributes to abnormal insulin secretion in nonketotic, hyperglycemic, diabetic patients, alpha-adrenergic blockade was produced in normal and diabetic subjects. The diabetics had a significantly (P less than 0.01) greater increase in circulating insulin 1 h after an intravenous phentolamine infusion than did the normal subjects. During the phentolamine infusion, there was also a significant augmentation of acute insulin responses to intravenous glucose (20 g) pulses in normal subjects (P less than 0.05) and diabetics (P less than 0.02); this augmentation was fivefold greater in the diabetics. Simultaneous treatment with the beta-adrenergic blocking agent, propranolol, did not alter these findings. Thus a role for exaggerated endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity in abnormal insulin secretion of the diabetic subjects is suggested. To determine whether this alpha-adrenergic activity might be related to elevated circulating catecholamines, total plasma-catecholamine levels were compared in normal and nonketotic diabetic subjects given intravenous glucose pulses. These levels were significantly greater (P less than 0.02) in the diabetic compared to the normal group before the glucose pulse, and increased significantly in both groups (P less than 0.02 and less than 0.001, respectively) after the pulse. These data suggest that excessive catecholamine secretion may lead to an abnormal degree of endogenous alpha-adrenergic activity, which contributes to defective insulin secretion in diabetic subjects.

AND…

FEBS Lett. 1987 Jul 13;219(1):139-44.
Catecholamine inhibition of Ca2±induced insulin secretion from electrically permeabilised islets of Langerhans.
Jones PM, Fyles JM, Persaud SJ, Howell SL.

Noradrenaline (1-10 microM) inhibited Ca2±induced insulin secretion from electrically permeabilised islets of Langerhans with an efficacy similar to that for inhibition of glucose-induced insulin secretion from intact islets. The inhibition of insulin secretion from permeabilised islets was blocked by the alpha 2-adrenoreceptor antagonist, yohimbine. Adenosine 3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) did not relieve the noradrenaline inhibition of Ca2±induced secretion from the permeabilised islets, although noradrenaline did not affect the secretory responses to cAMP at substimulatory (50 nM) concentrations of Ca2+. These results suggest that catecholamines do not inhibit insulin secretion solely by reducing B-cell adenylate cyclase activity, and imply that one site of action of noradrenaline is at a late stage in the secretory process.

AND …

Biochem J. 1985 Mar 1;226(2):571-6.
Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by noradrenaline in rat islets of Langerhans.
Morgan NG, Montague W.

Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) was shown to be a potent inhibitor of glucose-induced insulin release from rat pancreatic islets, with half-maximal inhibition of the secretory response to 20 mM-glucose occurring at approx. 0.3 microM, and complete suppression of the response occurring at 4 microM-noradrenaline. Inhibition of insulin secretion by noradrenaline was antagonized by the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine (half maximally effective dose approximately 1 microM), but was largely unaffected by the alpha 1-adrenergic antagonist prazosin at concentrations up to 50 microM, suggesting that the response was mediated by alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. Noradrenaline significantly reduced the extent of 45Ca2+ accumulation in glucose-stimulated islets, although as much as 5 microM-noradrenaline was required for 50% inhibition of this response. The ability of noradrenaline to inhibit islet-cell 45Ca2+ uptake was totally abolished in media containing 1 mM-dibutyryl cyclic AMP, suggesting that the response may have been secondary to lowering of islet cyclic AMP. Under these conditions, however, noradrenaline was still able to inhibit insulin secretion maximally. The data suggest that the site(s) at which noradrenaline acts to mediate inhibition of insulin secretion in rat islets lies distal to both islet-cell cyclic AMP accumulation and Ca2+ uptake

AND …

GTP-dependent inhibition of insulin secretion by epinephrine in permeabilized RINm5F cells. Lack of correlation between insulin secretion and cyclic AMP levels.
S Ullrich and C B Wollheim

  • Author Affiliations

Institut de Biochimie Clinique, Centre M�©dical Universitaire, Gen�¨ve, Switzerland.
Abstract

The mechanism by which alpha 2-adrenergic agonists inhibit exocytosis was investigated in electrically permeabilized insulin secreting RINm5F cells. In this preparation alpha 2-adrenoceptors remain coupled to adenylate cyclase, since basal- and forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production was lowered by epinephrine and clonidine by 30-50%. Cyclic AMP levels did not correlate with the rate of insulin secretion. Thus, at low Ca2+, forskolin enhanced cyclic AMP levels 5-fold without eliciting secretion, and Ca2±stimulated secretion was associated with decreased cyclic AMP accumulation. Epinephrine (plus propranolol) inhibited Ca2±induced insulin secretion in a GTP-dependent manner. The maximal inhibition (43%) occurred at 500 microM GTP. Clonidine also inhibited Ca2±stimulated secretion. Replacement of GTP by GDP or by the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5’-(3-O-thio)triphosphate as well as treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin prior to permeabilization abolished epinephrine inhibition of insulin secretion. Pertussis toxin did not affect Ca2±stimulated secretion. Insulin release stimulated by 1,2-didecanoyl glycerol was also lowered by epinephrine suggesting an effect distal to the activation of protein kinase C (Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent enzyme). These results taken together with the ability of epinephrine to inhibit ionomycin-induced insulin secretion in intact cells suggest that alpha 2-adrenergic inhibition is distal to the generation of second messengers. A model is proposed for alpha 2-adrenoceptor coupling to two effector systems, namely the adenylate cyclase and the exocytotic site in insulin-secreting cells.

AND …

i: 10.1172/JCI107887.
PMCID: PMC301695
Copyright notice
Glucagon Secretion from the Perfused Rat Pancreas STUDIES WITH GLUCOSE AND CATECHOLAMINES
Gordon C. Weir, Stephen D. Knowlton, and Donald B. Martin
Diabetes Unit and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Diabetes Unit Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
The isolated in situ perfused rat pancreas was used to study glucose and catecholamine control of glucagon secretion, and to investigate the possible role of endogenous cyclic AMP as a mediator of this secretory process. When perfusate glucose was acutely dropped from 100 to 25 mg/100 ml, glucagon was released in a biphasic pattern with an early spike and a later plateau-like response. 300 mg/100 ml glucose suppressed glucagon secretion to near the detection limit of the radioimmunoassay (15 pg/ml). When perfusate glucose was dropped from 300 to 25 mg/100 ml, a delayed, relatively small peak occurred suggesting persisting alpha cell suppression by prior high glucose exposure. 2-Deoxy d-glucose stimulated glucagon secretion and inhibited insulin secretion.
Glucagon was secreted in a biphasic pattern in response to both 2.7 Ã?? 10-7 M epinephrine and norepinephrine. The glucagon response to epinephrine was markedly suppressed by glucose at 300 mg/100 ml, and the biphasic response pattern was obliterated. Glucose evoked a two-phase insulin secretory pattern, and the second phase was markedly and rapidly inhibited by epinephrine. Pancreases were perfused with glucose at 300 mg/100 ml which was then lowered to 80 mg/100 ml. 5 min later, epinephrine was infused and definite blunting of the first-phase spike occurred. 10 mM theophylline produced modest rapid uniphasic stimulation of glucagon release, and, in addition, caused enhancement of epinephrine-stimulated glucagon release. An inhibitory influence upon epinephrine-stimulated glucagon was observed as well. Insulin secretion was stimulated by 10 mM theophylline, and this stimulation was inhibited by epinephrine.

You get the point…[/quote]

Man am I glad that smarter guys than me are working on this. I mean I get the point, but I would have had a hell of a time creating a protocol around this information.

Thanks for the studies. I Apreciated them.