[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
400-500 lbs even for high reps on bb shrugs is real low for someone your weight, steely, that might just be the issue…
[/quote]
FML
Can you (or X, sorry for the hijack) give us a relative range of numbers we should be hitting at particular body weights? Say… 245lbs and up.[/quote]
For shrugs? Dude, that is very individual. The guys I used to train with when I was really first getting serious weighed about 225lbs at average height and we were shrugging at least 3 plates a side back then on a barbell.
There just aren’t guidelines like that. Everyone is different…but I will say that if huge fucking traps are your goal, being able to shrug 405 will probably follow it.[/quote]
Yeah I fucking pwn 405, and 495 isn’t too bad. 585 is a bit much right now with a BB, but I’m getting there.
C_C just freaked me out a bit, lol.[/quote]
To give an example…
Jeremy Hoornstra weighs 242-250 and shrugs up to 1035 for sets of 5.
I think Matt Kroc can do 800 for 20 or so with straps ? You saw the strapless vid already.
No pressure.
[/quote]
Come on, man. This isn’t practical, even for the serious drug free bodybuilder.[/quote]
For the record, I wasn’t agreeing with the weights listed. I don’t use 1,000lbs and don’t know anyone else using that much either. If you need that much weight to build big traps, I would actually think you are at a disadvantage. That muscle group needs heavy weight…but it isn’t like you have to become a human pick up truck to make that happen.[/quote]
I was just using those as examples, they’re obviously at the high end of shrugging strength.
However… Especially for natties who rarely seem to have much trap on them (I’ve heard the opinion expressed that you don’t need to work your traps much as a drug-free bodybuilder because users get big traps of their gear. I fail to see any logic in there, but yeah), if you just so decide that 6 plates a side is “not practical” to shrug… What do you do if your traps still aren’t much to look at? Try to get 500 reps at 405? I don’t hear people say “well, surely deadlifting 6 plates a side is not practical”…
Not sure if you were kidding here lanky (with you I never know, you sneaky little critter).
X is quite right about the 1035 guy being at sort of a disadvantage… Hoornstra certainly doesn’t look like you’d expect someone with a 675 lb (or more?) touch and go raw bench, 700+ raw squat etc to look. It’s just a genetic thing.
That kind of weight (1035) does place a huge strain on the entire body, plus most gyms don’t have bars which allow for that kind of loading (or enough plates haha) etc… But what can he do? He’s gifted in the strength department (upper body anyway), he’s got to work with what he has. Plus being able to work you way up to such huge amounts of weight is fun after all…
If you keep free BB shrugs in your exercise list throughout your training career (i.e. you don’t replace them… I wasn’t able to, I had no HS Shrug machine available for example), 585 for a bunch of reps should be entirely doable for any healthy male eventually (shit, many serious trainees here deadlift at least that much, it’s not like shrugs are a more difficult exercise) as long as he doesn’t decide to stay at 180 lbs of bodyweight…
Whether that kind of weight is needed or not is another story entirely and just depends on the individual. I’ve found that guys with narrow-ish traps which angle up sharply (levrone, Hoornstra) tend to become very strong on shrugs… And guys with wider-attaching traps (which sort of take away from shoulder width imo) don’t need that kind of weight to have big traps…
For those who want a very big raw bench etc though, I think super-heavy shrugs can help a great deal. The more mass you have all over your upper back the better.