[quote]Professor X wrote:
nik133 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
ChesterCopperpot wrote:
http://asp.elitefts.com/qa/default.asp?qid=92565&tid=
This answer from Justin Harris to a similar question is exactly what people need to hear, however, they don’t want to.
Well said. There used to be very little distinction.
In fact, I think lines were only drawn when people who are NOT very serious began to get involved. People like that focus on minutia and expand it until it hinders their own progress. There is no other reason for lines to be drawn in the sand when everyone trained so fucking similarly in the same gyms at the same times just a decade previous.
Both have to eat big and lift big to get results.
Only now, you have newbs who literally need to be told that they still have to lift heavy and simply performing some exact number of reps is NOT the goal.
Prof I’m curious to get your opinion on this, for someone starting out and planning solely to bodybuild, would you recommend that they do Starting Strength or stick to a split?
First, you assume I even follow or know what “starting strength” is. I don’t. It means nothing to me. I still don’t get why anyone has made this so complicated…as if you don’t get strong by training chest and triceps on one day.
As soon as I see any of those guys that worried about “starting strength” bypass the progress made by serious lifters who simply understand the basics, then I’ll worry about it.
The most impressive people I know have never given a shit about 90% of the crap many of you worry about on this site.
I trained 2-3 body parts a day as a beginner. I train on average one body part a day now. Do people really think I held myself back by doing that?[/quote]
yeah, the main thing people dont get on this site is you have to lift heavy as fuck. you cant diddle daddle in the gym. if you can undergo a full conversation after your set of chest press, ur not working hard enough.
also nutrition, but it starts in the gym.