[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]IronWarrior34 wrote:
even though some protein may be sweet it doesnt mean there are alot of sugars in it?? some people are going to argue that PWO carbs are necassary and others will argue thats they arent that important. But, in my opinion PWO carbs are definitely something you need especially after a tough workout…you just have to make sure your taking the proper amount of protein/carbs in that PWO shake…and im sure a Diabetic wouldnt have a double dose of Surge Recovery after a workout…
IronWarrior[/quote]
And where is this literature coming from? Not trying to be smart.
Interesting wording you chose “bad idea”. Why would it be bad if it’s worked so well for countless people up to 6 months ago before the whole “ANACONDA Protocol”?
Perhaps it may not be seen as optimal any more, but bad?
Carbs are needed for people looking to add muscle. But consuming carbs immediately after a workout with the goal of spiking insulin is a bad idea. There is a lot a lot of new-ish literature on this topic. [/quote]
[/quote]
With the amount you spend on supplements you cant tell me you havent read the “para-workout nutrition” stuff.
But unless CT is blatantly lying to us about how catecholamine levels increase after a workout, I cant see any way how consuming carbs in an attempt to spike insulin can do anything positive for body composition.
[/quote]
What I am getting at, is why is spiking insulin PWO an awful idea for body comp, if even CT was recommending doing such 6 months ago. The human body hasn’t changed, granted the science may be giving us a better picture of things. But to say carbs PWO is a bad idea is limited thinking IMO.
For fat loss, they may not be necessary or even ideal, for gaining muscle I don’t see the harm[/quote]
Considering the fact that you aren’t in elite shape, shouldn’t you be trying to do as much as possible to make improvements?
Why even pay attention to science or anything technical if you are going to disregard facts because theyre “only 6 months old”? The muscle is built using magic spells, right? A fat loss occurs because of ritual sacrifice.
[/quote]
Way to side step the argument. And since I’m not in elite shape, i doubt having carbs PWO is going to be detrimental for me ;)[/quote]
I just think it’s too easy to move a maltodextrin/whey shake to 30 minutes pre workout instead of post workout for this to even be an issue. If something that simple can provide even 5% better results I am definitely going to do it.
Have you at least tried having a carb/whey shake pre workout as opposed to post before passing judgment? [/quote]
I am not passing judgment, really just trying to say it’s not a “bad idea” to have protein/carbs PWO when many studies have shown it’s benefit.
That being said, I have used SR a few times prior/during workout, but not long enough to report anything on it.
I personally don’t see how having it before as opposed to after can provide significant differences physique wise, assuming all others things equal.
Right now I am still dieting, but I’m sure once I get back to SR (If I even do, may be a while) I will probably include it at the onset of training, to give it a better chance.
