[quote]kinetics.1981 wrote:
[quote]Marzouk wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
"While a gain of ten pounds seems like a huge deal to most athletes, the truth is that it’s actually a trivial amount of muscle mass over an entire body. Have a look at this picture of 5 pounds of muscle vs. 5 pounds of fat.
“Now, imagine spreading two of the red masses on the right over the course of an entire body; you would barely notice they’re there, especially if you’re tall.”[/quote]
That image is complete horse shit.
Bf has a density of about 0.9gm/cm3 and muscle has a density of about 1.1gm/cm3.
Somehow that image doesn’t compute…[/quote]
yeah your ~ right
being accurate , muscle density is 1.06 g/ml but if you round it up its what you said , 1.1.
Source : Source:
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56:B191-B197 (2001)
Specific Force Deficit in Skeletal Muscles of Old Rats Is Partially Explained by the Existence of Denervated Muscle Fibers
Melanie G. Urbancheka, Elisa B. Pickenb, Loree K. Kalliainenc & William M. Kuzon, Jr.a,d Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences -- Sign In Page
Reference given by the authors: Mendez J, Keys A, 1960. Density& composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9:184-188.)
The density of fat (adipose tissue) is about 0.9 g/ml
Source : Association of adiponectin and resistin with adipose tissue compartments, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia
M. S. Farvid1, T. W. K. Ng2, D. C. Chan2, P. H. R. Barrett2 and G. F.

So what a good picture comparison looks like marzouk? Would you please poost a near approximation.Thanks[/quote]
Unfortunately i don’t have one / cba looking for one. But going off the densities the difference is similar to the density of ice vs the density of water.