2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument.
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Even Mentzer had an odd-ball calf. Seems like some guys show a protuberance at the bottom when flexed. [/quote]
That is a fucking long way off from how Phil’s calves looked in that picture.
I have a decent understanding of human anatomy and how muscles contract, I highly doubt that Phil’s calves looked like that just because thats how they look contracted. It doesnt even make sense that they would get thicker and bubble out at the bottom of the calf muscle like that when being contracted. [/quote]
Not a long way off. And if it is, that just further defines an ANOMALY. Even between anomalies you often don’t find uniformity, thus it’s name.
As an artist, I’ve had extensive anatomy lessons and can draw the human body from my head
from all angles with great accuracy. Along with that training, understanding form within the context of position in space, point of view, and light and shading, my perceptions are pretty damn accurate.
That nodule, or protuberance at the bottom of Phil’s calf while flexed up on his toes looks very similar to the pic of Aaron Baker posted earlier.
In fact, look at the 3 pics above. The top is Phil. The next one is Nasser, who also has the same bulb at the bottom of his calves. The pic below that is Erik Fankhauser. Notice Fank’s odd-looking cleft shape protuberance on the inside bottom of his calves. If viewed from the front in a flexed state, it would look very similar to Phil’s, Aaron’s, and Nasser’s from the same POV.
And again, as I stated earlier, these odd protuberances only show when the gastroc is flexed.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
posts pictures 3 to 4 years older than the ones being discussed
‘WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, HATERZ?’
this just in : once you inject synthol it stays forever
I like cake
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
Wrong. Those pics corroborate the statements made earlier defending Phil’s freaky calves as natural. They show the same protuberance from the back… and ONLY appear in a flexed state.
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.
2008 Mr. Olympia.
Again,…what the fuck are people talking about?
I guess you don’t need a health science degree to get shit wrong.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.[/quote]
Well considering he isn’t wearing the same posing trunks as the pics you posted im guessing it’s an older pic. So no i don’t think he started using synthol now. Also more then one picture with that odd bulge in his calf was shown so i think the whole fluke photo theory is kind of out the window. Also worth noting both pics were different poses so it wasn’t just the way he was standing/angle of the pic.
With that all in mind posting pictures of his calves a year or more later in different poses won’t really further your argument.
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.[/quote]
Well considering he isn’t wearing the same posing trunks as the pics you posted im guessing it’s an older pic. So no i don’t think he started using synthol now. Also more then one picture with that odd bulge in his calf was shown so i think the whole fluke photo theory is kind of out the window. Also worth noting both pics were different poses so it wasn’t just the way he was standing/angle of the pic.
With that all in mind posting pictures of his calves a year or more later in different poses won’t really further your argument. [/quote]
I just posted one from the same year as that pic…and lack of synthol is evident.
Again, why accuse someone of something like that if you can’t find any sign of an oil bolus in other shots?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.[/quote]
Well considering he isn’t wearing the same posing trunks as the pics you posted im guessing it’s an older pic. So no i don’t think he started using synthol now. Also more then one picture with that odd bulge in his calf was shown so i think the whole fluke photo theory is kind of out the window. Also worth noting both pics were different poses so it wasn’t just the way he was standing/angle of the pic.
With that all in mind posting pictures of his calves a year or more later in different poses won’t really further your argument. [/quote]
I just posted one from the same year as that pic…and lack of synthol is evident.
Again, why accuse someone of something like that if you can’t find any sign of an oil bolus in other shots?[/quote]
Once again that isn’t from the same show as the original pictures, also i already told you that a SEO will be absorbed by the body and his calves will return to normal size/shape. So posting pictures from different shows proves nothing especially from different angles where you wouldn’t see it even if it was there.
Lastly if you posted pics from other shows of him in the same or similar poses and his calves didn’t display that odd bulge that would only serve as further evidence that synthol was used.
the amount of different, minute, pointless, unnecessary, and childish topics you guys can argue about in here just blows my mind… and it goes on for hours and hours. seriously people, take up a hobby…like bodybuilding…oh wait…
‘HERE IS PROOF THAT HE DIDN’T USE SYNTHOL. PICS WHERE HIS MUSCLE SHAPE HAS COMPLETELY CHANGED.’
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.[/quote]
Well considering he isn’t wearing the same posing trunks as the pics you posted im guessing it’s an older pic. So no i don’t think he started using synthol now. Also more then one picture with that odd bulge in his calf was shown so i think the whole fluke photo theory is kind of out the window. Also worth noting both pics were different poses so it wasn’t just the way he was standing/angle of the pic.
With that all in mind posting pictures of his calves a year or more later in different poses won’t really further your argument. [/quote]
I just posted one from the same year as that pic…and lack of synthol is evident.
Again, why accuse someone of something like that if you can’t find any sign of an oil bolus in other shots?[/quote]
Once again that isn’t from the same show as the original pictures, also i already told you that a SEO will be absorbed by the body and his calves will return to normal size/shape. So posting pictures from different shows proves nothing especially from different angles where you wouldn’t see it even if it was there.
Lastly if you posted pics from other shows of him in the same or similar poses and his calves didn’t display that odd bulge that would only serve as further evidence that synthol was used.[/quote]
? I just posted pics from the same year as the first pic and several more recent all NOT showing synthol…and your conclusion is that the one pic you THINK there is synthol present, that he used it that one time, never did again, and that it is NOT the angle???
Because it being the angle just could not be the answer?
LOL
But hey, it isn’t like any of you would admit being wrong anyway so what does it matter.
It is way better to randomly accuse people of shit and start rumors.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
2011 Sheru Classic.
once again…what the fuck are people talking about?
[/quote]
Once the SEO was absorbed by his body his calves would return to normal. Posting pictures from other shows/guest posing would be pointless because the SEO would be long gone by then anyway. Not to mention you are showing his calves from different angles then the original photo anyway so you can’t even get an accurate comparison shot to the original pic of his calves.
Furthermore if you did post a pic of Phil hitting the same pose from a more recent show and his calves DIDN’T look like that anymore that would only serve as further evidence that it was a SEO because his calves won’t magically change their genetic shape.
So really posting these pics doesn’t further your argument. [/quote]
? If the pose is why it looks like that along with the angle, that would be why it isn’t shown in other pics.
These pictures posted are from the last Olympia and the Shuru Classic…but you think he started using synthol now?
What show was that picture from?
I posted both major shows he competed in for 2011…while someone posted ONE pic at an angle but no one can find any other pics of all of this synthol.
But hey…clearly he threw in the synthol for that one pic just to fuck with you.[/quote]
Well considering he isn’t wearing the same posing trunks as the pics you posted im guessing it’s an older pic. So no i don’t think he started using synthol now. Also more then one picture with that odd bulge in his calf was shown so i think the whole fluke photo theory is kind of out the window. Also worth noting both pics were different poses so it wasn’t just the way he was standing/angle of the pic.
With that all in mind posting pictures of his calves a year or more later in different poses won’t really further your argument. [/quote]
I just posted one from the same year as that pic…and lack of synthol is evident.
Again, why accuse someone of something like that if you can’t find any sign of an oil bolus in other shots?[/quote]
Once again that isn’t from the same show as the original pictures, also i already told you that a SEO will be absorbed by the body and his calves will return to normal size/shape. So posting pictures from different shows proves nothing especially from different angles where you wouldn’t see it even if it was there.
Lastly if you posted pics from other shows of him in the same or similar poses and his calves didn’t display that odd bulge that would only serve as further evidence that synthol was used.[/quote]
? I just posted pics from the same year as the first pic and several more recent all NOT showing synthol…and your conclusion is that the one pic you THINK there is synthol present, that he used it that one time, never did again, and that it is NOT the angle???
Because it being the angle just could not be the answer?
LOL
But hey, it isn’t like any of you would admit being wrong anyway so what does it matter.
It is way better to randomly accuse people of shit and start rumors.[/quote]
The original pictures were NOT from the 2008 Olympia so no you DIDN’T post pictures from the same show. For godsakes man the posing trunks aren’t even the same.
Secondly there were TWO separate pictures that showed the odd bulge in his calf and BOTH pics were of different angles/poses. Both from the front. So this isn’t some once in a lifetime fluke pic.
Lastly a SEO would easily be absorbed and his calves would return to normal between shows unless the shows were very close together like a week or two apart.
what the fuck does it matter whether he used synthol or not?!? how in the world does it affect your lives!?
Love how.much PX is showing.he.completly.doesnt.understand how synthol works or what its being used.for lol
Stick to bulking.and hs machines discussions
