That WebMD article is retarded. That some dumb ass nutritionist feels qualified to tell someone who is obviously doing things right how to eat, just goes to show how so much of what “experts” say is b.s. Yeah, I’m sure that guy knows better than Phelps what Phelps should be eating.
Sounds like some of the “experts” around here. “Oh, if only [insert incredibly successful pro athlete] would train my way. Imagine the success!” Or, “They are successful in spite of their training, not because of it?” Why? Because you said so? Give me a break.
Here is a video of Phelps’ food intake: - YouTube
How much is exaggerated for TV? Who knows? I do know that if you’re swimming for 6 hours, that alone is going to eat up 4,000-6,000 calories.
And think of the EPOC. I think everyone has noticed that the day after doing legs, you’re starving. Imagine if every muscle was blasted every day?
And what’s the guy’s basal metabolic rate?
Even without activity, just fueling his large body while walking around, living life, would be 3,000 calories - at least.
So you get 3,000 in basal metabolic rate. Plus 3,000-6,000 in activity-based calorie burn. Plus who knows how many calories via EPOC.
It’s clearly not hard for an educated person to conclude that Phelps certainly eats at least 6,000 calories a day, and likely much more than that.
The energy drink comment makes no sense. How else is the guy supposed to get his calories? You can only eat so much.
And nutrient partitioning comment? Sure, some if it’s genetic. But if you trained 6 hours a day, your body would eventually figure out that the calories need to go towards glycogen replenishment and growth and repair. Add great genetics, and the guy can eat what he wants.
I don’t know how much he eats, but it’s clearly a lot - and way more than we can comprehend.