Off Season Maxx Charles

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
Playing lots of basketball and doing tons of push-ups & sit ups =/= simply not eating very much

You mean to tell me you can get lean by doing lots of cardiovascular activity and explosive movements like sprinting/jumping along with working out your upper body?

No way.
Get out of town.[/quote]

Dude no stop antagonizing it[/quote]

I think the point to take from this is that there are plenty of folks who are very lean without even trying to be, but how many people do you see who are huge and muscular despite never having that in mind as a goal?[/quote]
So you think these lean muscular guys play tons of basketball and do tons of push-ups and sit ups so they can be chubby?
LOL @ “without even trying too”
[/quote]

I never mentioned anyone that does tons of push ups/sit ups. You will notice I referred to a specific friend who does absolutely nothing in an effort to be lean (he has told me this) and a group of friends who have never lifted weights and do not care about what they eat, yet are very lean simply because of being active and not eating all that much. Granted, my friends are not a representation of the entire population.

I find it odd you would argue this point. At my high school tons of people were lean, and hardly anyone lifted weights/cared about diet. A lot of young people that are reasonably active don’t have to do much to be lean, apart from eat whatever mom puts on the dinner table. So yes, I think this does constitute “without even trying”.

Does it bother you that many folks who literally don’t know a thing about diet/lifting are perhaps leaner than you?
[/quote]

Nope because I was one of those kids in Hs and also had plenty of Frieda’s like you speak of. But training for sports does not equal not doing anything to be lean. Now if these people sat on their ass all day everyday and did no sport training/playing and remained lean sure. Also lean IMO means there is a decent amount of muscle. And no people are not gonna be lean and have muscle without trying in some way shape or form.[/quote]

Google tells me lean can be defined as ‘having no superfluous fat’, not quite sure what muscle has to do with it. Pretty sure you are just altering the definition of the term to suit your argument.

What we are talking about is a concerted effort to achieve a goal. You cannot deny that many people are lean (low bodyfat levels) without working specifically to achieve this. I don’t know of many teenagers who play soccer or basketball because they are trying to get lean, they simply play because it is fun. For your argument to hold up, its as if you expect normal, functioning, healthy adult males to sit down all day and avoid any physical activity.

Definition of arguing for the sake of arguing.

It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing.

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
Definition of arguing for the sake of arguing.[/quote]

Okay. Getting lean is so much more difficult than getting big, there is absolutely no way that normal young males who happen to venture off their seat could ever get lean without playing hours of sport and strict calorie counting. Better?

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :slight_smile:

No one side is going to relent on this issue. Is there really a reason to keep having the debate? Why not just agree to disagree and move on?

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
Definition of arguing for the sake of arguing.[/quote]

Okay. Getting lean is so much more difficult than getting big, there is absolutely no way that normal young males who happen to venture off their seat could ever get lean without playing hours of sport and strict calorie counting. Better?[/quote]
LOL brah.
I never said one was easier than the other.
They are both difficult.
My original comment, and subsequent comments, have been about how saying its so easy to be lean by “simply eating less” isn’t an accurate or truthful statement.

That’s all.

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]

Your physique has clearly improved, a lot.
I just don’t understand why people are arguing it. I think its kind of interesting that many people out there are lean, when (in my opinion) they don’t seem to try that hard to be that
way.

But fair enough, agree to disagree.

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]
Oh the irony of him calling you small.
Profile says he weighs 155?

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]
Oh the irony of him calling you small.
Profile says he weighs 155?[/quote]

I got a long ways to go so for my goal I am :slight_smile:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]
Oh the irony of him calling you small.
Profile says he weighs 155?[/quote]

Read my subsequent post about his physique.
The profile was created in 2011. Started at 115lbs and am now 175lbs. Still got TONS to learn/room for improvement. This is why I don’t argue about training methodologies and what is possible, as I don’t know yet. But I can argue what I have seen of people my age being lean. It seems as though many people on these forums assume they know everything, when like me, their training experience is limited.

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]
Oh the irony of him calling you small.
Profile says he weighs 155?[/quote]

I got a long ways to go so for my goal I am :)[/quote]

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]JBL5 wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
It’s just how I define it.

And omg you are supporting the other argument. So you are saying that they have to run and sprint and jump for hours to be lean. Wow astonishing. [/quote]

Okay. Continue to be the know-it-all on these forums while lacking the physical development/training experience to back this up.
[/quote]

Ok mr no pic. I know I am small I presence many of posts with this. Also I am attempting to constantly learn. This site is not a place for that for the most part and one of the reasons is stupid mind numbing discussions like the one you want to continue. :)[/quote]
Oh the irony of him calling you small.
Profile says he weighs 155?[/quote]

I got a long ways to go so for my goal I am :)[/quote]
[/quote]

I don’t understand

Just stopped in to say you guys are lame.
Max Charles reminds me of Victor Martinez in the contest pics.

You gotta love PX’s ultra high tech subtle racism.

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The Anchor wrote:
When you’re on steroids, form doesn’t really matter. Your muscles will grow with any kind of stimulation. But that doesn’t mean his form doesn’t suck.[/quote]

This is massively untrue.[/quote]

I think people like saying things like that just to make themselves feel better, trying to convince themselves that all assisted lifters are cheaters who don’t even have to try. If assisted lifters don’t have to work hard, I better go let Bauber know that so he stops performing 20 rep sets of squats.[/quote]

you want to know something cool? they DONT even have to try!

there was a study a while back proving that even people on only 500mg of test a weak can gain more muscle by sitting on the couch than nattys who train seriously. the nattys gained an average of 3lbs of muscle, the group on test gained an average of 4lbs. then the group on 500mg of test that actually trained gained an average of 6lbs of muscle. now imagine adding GH, insulin, tren, anavar, deca, dbol, even more test and other assorted substances to the mix… yeah scary shit huh.

now im not saying that they dont train seriously! but when your on the much stuff its pretty hard NOT to get big, regardless of how good/bad your training is. these men could throw a rock around a park once a week and still gain more muscle in one year than a natty can in ten.

note: im not against people using, that is there own personal choice.

[quote]ryan.b_96 wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The Anchor wrote:
When you’re on steroids, form doesn’t really matter. Your muscles will grow with any kind of stimulation. But that doesn’t mean his form doesn’t suck.[/quote]

This is massively untrue.[/quote]

I think people like saying things like that just to make themselves feel better, trying to convince themselves that all assisted lifters are cheaters who don’t even have to try. If assisted lifters don’t have to work hard, I better go let Bauber know that so he stops performing 20 rep sets of squats.[/quote]

you want to know something cool? they DONT even have to try!

there was a study a while back proving that even people on only 500mg of test a weak can gain more muscle by sitting on the couch than nattys who train seriously. the nattys gained an average of 3lbs of muscle, the group on test gained an average of 4lbs. then the group on 500mg of test that actually trained gained an average of 6lbs of muscle. now imagine adding GH, insulin, tren, anavar, deca, dbol, even more test and other assorted substances to the mix… yeah scary shit huh.

now im not saying that they dont train seriously! but when your on the much stuff its pretty hard NOT to get big, regardless of how good/bad your training is. these men could throw a rock around a park once a week and still gain more muscle in one year than a natty can in ten.

note: im not against people using, that is there own personal choice.[/quote]

I’ve seen the study you speak of but I have seen way to many people doing large amounts and small amounts of AAS that you have trouble determining if they lift As much as studies like that make it look like they are the magic bullet they are not. That is just plain false that all you have to do is do some injects and you will transform even if you half ass your workouts and diet. You will end up growing a little but most likely will look worse than before becue you will bloat as well as gain fat. Or if you don’t eat you just won’t grow at all. I do find it funny when people think they just need steriods and they are gonna add tons of msucle without trying. LOL

Multiple points to address across this thread.

  1. Maxx Charles looked great, and was the clear winner (imo) in the line-up.

  2. X, and anyone else questioning the possibility of achieveing this level of physique, naturally, is just being plain stupid or living in a dream. Proof is the hundreds of natural competitors who come in at around the same weight range as each other based on height. Genetics will not naturally get you that build… steroids will.

  3. Videos posted are not always 100% how people train, especially the pro’s. They do certain things “for the fans” and for publicity. Maxx may have lied, but it did get his name out there.

  4. Hugeness of a person is purely subjective and relative. A steroid user will look huge/beastly that does a good job and will most likely dwarf a natural guy. Put that natural guy next to your average guy, skinny jeans guy, or fatty, and all of a sudden he can be viewed as huge. Realistically, but many folk’s standards, you can’t be “huge” with a shirt on, without assistance or being in “bulk mode.”

  5. Many pro’s are known for being “lazy” or not really training any harder than your average gym goer (see consistent gym goer, not weekend/summer season derp twerp). What separates them is their eating, drug usage, and their body’s ability to respond to the prior to (ie genetics). Top level trainers have stated that some of the pro’s in years past could have been so much better if they trained harder. The difference between being gifted and grinding for every pound/proportion you’ve got.

  6. Maxx Charles looked great, and looks beastly off-season. Bodybuilders don’t need to train huge and heavy, they want to build muscle, not totals. What he did was a publicity stunt… stupid, but it worked.