NY Thug Versus Arizona Trucker

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Just gonna attach that pic again as you seemed to have missed it entirely and are building up a shitty argument regarding costs equating quality?

In terms of quality care, U.S. ranked 6th.

In terms of safe care, U.S. ranked 7th.

In terms of timelines of care U.S. ranked 5th.

In terms of efficiency, guess what? U.S. ranked dead last yet again at 7th.

I don’t care to try and explain why a minority of european citizens go abroad for healthcare as it has nothing to do with the point at hand and would be purely conjecture.

You are making bold sweeping statements that universal healthcare here in Europe sucks when quite frankly the facts are right in front of you indicating that that is indeed not the case, if you cared to read the first link I posted you would have seen U.S.A ranked 37th whilst Italian healthcare ranked second and French first.

[quote]Bauber wrote:

Explain why we have so many people come HERE for treatment then, if they can afford it?

I live very close to St. Jude and do charity work every year throughout the year there. They have people clamoring to come there from everywhere in the world for treatment. Since Europe’s medical care is so much better why don’t they all go there?

The US is where the cutting edge medicine is produced, so all your European hospitals can thank us for that too. When you provide the latest and most advanced care it usually costs more. Kind of like buying a new car versus a model 20 years old.[/quote]

[/quote]

I see your fucking picture and I stand by what I said. And like I said these statistics are based on what parameters? You do realize anyone with a ounce of a fucking brain can make stats say whatever they want. And if you had read what I said, I did not say costs directly equated quality. But it does take more money to stay on the cutting edge and keep researching better and more advanced options, fucking get it?

And the links you posted are not exactly what I would call credible sources.

That is funny considering my experience in Italy. If that is what it means to be ranked 1st, I will pass.

Typical though all you do is spout google searches and have ZERO firsthand experience in both to compare. Because no websites would ever try to push an agenda… I don’t have an agenda. All I am telling you is what I know and see. And my mom is a cardiologist who is actively in cutting edge cancer research in joint with St. Jude. I think she has a better perspective than you. And we talk about these same issues frequently.

"Another point worth considering is the impact of United States healthcare system on the worldâ??s, in effect allowing populations underserved by non-innovative, ration-rich nationalized systems to act as free riders on the American plan.

As long as the United States exists as a safety value for those in need of urgent, critical or innovative care and therapies, the pressure that could be applied on politicians to reform their non-market based, government controlled systems will never materialize. Critics would say denationalization of the healthcare system amounts to taking away from the voters a free entitlement, something that is thereâ??s by right. And thatâ??s the winning argument as long as those whom the national healthcare system canâ??t or wonâ??t help have someplace else to go when they need to, e.g., the United States.

There are also those Canadians who have been critical of the public system sending expectant mothers into the United States to get their babies delivered. But thatâ??s not because their babies are more likely to die because the U.S. has higher infant mortality rates (which is a subject for another column); itâ??s because it makes it harder for family members to get to the hospital to visit. People may mind, they may be inconvenienced, but not to the degree that they want to invest time and treasure in changing the system.

Itâ??s fair to say that the demands for changes in the nationalized healthcare systems are ratcheting up in places like Canada and Great Britain, albeit incrementally. If the United States moves to a system more like Canadaâ??s or Europeâ??s, expect the demand for change to come even faster."

This says it better than me.

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Just gonna attach that pic again as you seemed to have missed it entirely and are building up a shitty argument regarding costs equating quality?

In terms of quality care, U.S. ranked 6th.

In terms of safe care, U.S. ranked 7th.

In terms of timelines of care U.S. ranked 5th.

In terms of efficiency, guess what? U.S. ranked dead last yet again at 7th.

I don’t care to try and explain why a minority of european citizens go abroad for healthcare as it has nothing to do with the point at hand and would be purely conjecture.

You are making bold sweeping statements that universal healthcare here in Europe sucks when quite frankly the facts are right in front of you indicating that that is indeed not the case, if you cared to read the first link I posted you would have seen U.S.A ranked 37th whilst Italian healthcare ranked second and French first.

[quote]Bauber wrote:

Explain why we have so many people come HERE for treatment then, if they can afford it?

I live very close to St. Jude and do charity work every year throughout the year there. They have people clamoring to come there from everywhere in the world for treatment. Since Europe’s medical care is so much better why don’t they all go there?

The US is where the cutting edge medicine is produced, so all your European hospitals can thank us for that too. When you provide the latest and most advanced care it usually costs more. Kind of like buying a new car versus a model 20 years old.[/quote]

[/quote]

I see your fucking picture and I stand by what I said. And like I said these statistics are based on what parameters? You do realize anyone with a ounce of a fucking brain can make stats say whatever they want. And if you had read what I said, I did not say costs directly equated quality. But it does take more money to stay on the cutting edge and keep researching better and more advanced options, fucking get it?

And the links you posted are not exactly what I would call credible sources.

That is funny considering my experience in Italy. If that is what it means to be ranked 1st, I will pass.

Typical though all you do is spout google searches and have ZERO firsthand experience in both to compare.[/quote]

Sorry, what?

The World Health Organisation is not a credible source lol? Seriously?!

Read the links ya fucking clown.

This Business Insider article sums up the WHO World Health Report of 2000, which I have also so kindly linked before but will, yet again, as you seem to be unable to read them.

http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf

I personally have no problems with you saying in your experience you didn’t personally like the treatment, thats fine and dandy. However, don’t make bold claims that european healthcares are shit when the facts are right there lol.

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Just gonna attach that pic again as you seemed to have missed it entirely and are building up a shitty argument regarding costs equating quality?

In terms of quality care, U.S. ranked 6th.

In terms of safe care, U.S. ranked 7th.

In terms of timelines of care U.S. ranked 5th.

In terms of efficiency, guess what? U.S. ranked dead last yet again at 7th.

I don’t care to try and explain why a minority of european citizens go abroad for healthcare as it has nothing to do with the point at hand and would be purely conjecture.

You are making bold sweeping statements that universal healthcare here in Europe sucks when quite frankly the facts are right in front of you indicating that that is indeed not the case, if you cared to read the first link I posted you would have seen U.S.A ranked 37th whilst Italian healthcare ranked second and French first.

[quote]Bauber wrote:

Explain why we have so many people come HERE for treatment then, if they can afford it?

I live very close to St. Jude and do charity work every year throughout the year there. They have people clamoring to come there from everywhere in the world for treatment. Since Europe’s medical care is so much better why don’t they all go there?

The US is where the cutting edge medicine is produced, so all your European hospitals can thank us for that too. When you provide the latest and most advanced care it usually costs more. Kind of like buying a new car versus a model 20 years old.[/quote]

[/quote]

I see your fucking picture and I stand by what I said. And like I said these statistics are based on what parameters? You do realize anyone with a ounce of a fucking brain can make stats say whatever they want. And if you had read what I said, I did not say costs directly equated quality. But it does take more money to stay on the cutting edge and keep researching better and more advanced options, fucking get it?

And the links you posted are not exactly what I would call credible sources.

That is funny considering my experience in Italy. If that is what it means to be ranked 1st, I will pass.

Typical though all you do is spout google searches and have ZERO firsthand experience in both to compare.[/quote]

Sorry, what?

The World Health Organisation is not a credible source lol? Seriously?!

Read the links ya fucking clown.

This Business Insider article sums up the WHO World Health Report of 2000, which I have also so kindly linked before but will, yet again, as you seem to be unable to read them.

http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf

I personally have no problems with you saying in your experience you didn’t personally like the treatment, thats fine and dandy. However, don’t make bold claims that european healthcares are shit when the facts are right there lol.

[/quote]

I can read them just fucking fine, so you can stop linking them ya fucking tiny man.

"Another point worth considering is the impact of United States healthcare system on the worldâ??s, in effect allowing populations underserved by non-innovative, ration-rich nationalized systems to act as free riders on the American plan.

As long as the United States exists as a safety value for those in need of urgent, critical or innovative care and therapies, the pressure that could be applied on politicians to reform their non-market based, government controlled systems will never materialize. Critics would say denationalization of the healthcare system amounts to taking away from the voters a free entitlement, something that is thereâ??s by right. And thatâ??s the winning argument as long as those whom the national healthcare system canâ??t or wonâ??t help have someplace else to go when they need to, e.g., the United States."

This is my main point. And European healthcare systems are shit, sorry.

You do realise that in European countries, there exists a private health care system too lol?

You’ve shown your ignorance repeatedly (WHO not a credible source lulz) and can’t admit you were wrong to make bold statements based on your experience alone.

My work is done, gooooooodniiight.

[quote]Will207 wrote:
How does a thread about a parking lot beat down turn into this?[/quote]

By the magic we like to call “Series of tubez”.

Go to PWI, there, any thread whatsoever can turn into a thread about evolution.

Its like when Jesus turned water into wine.

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
You do realise that in European countries, there exists a private health care system too lol?

You’ve shown your ignorance repeatedly (WHO not a credible source lulz) and can’t admit you were wrong to make bold statements based on your experience alone.

My work is done, gooooooodniiight.[/quote]

Yes, and if you have any kind of a working brain and you can afford it, you have a private insurance on top of socialized medicine.

Because socialized medicine is

just…

that…

bad…

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
You do realise that in European countries, there exists a private health care system too lol?

You’ve shown your ignorance repeatedly (WHO not a credible source lulz) and can’t admit you were wrong to make bold statements based on your experience alone.

My work is done, gooooooodniiight.[/quote]

No shit Sherlock. Then why are they not on the cutting edge and just adopt the US’ tech and procedures? I am still not wrong. The US healthcare is still the best in the world. If I wanted an operation or anything of a serious nature, I would want it done in the US. That to me constitutes the best healthcare. The place where I have the highest chance of living and the most options for advanced care.

Either way socialized medicine sucks. You just proved my point. Privatized healthcare is the best. As anyone with money chooses privatized care. Since, we were talking about socialized medicine this entire time…

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
You do realise that in European countries, there exists a private health care system too lol?

You’ve shown your ignorance repeatedly (WHO not a credible source lulz) and can’t admit you were wrong to make bold statements based on your experience alone.

My work is done, gooooooodniiight.[/quote]

No shit Sherlock. Then why are they not on the cutting edge and just adopt the US’ tech and procedures? I am still not wrong. The US healthcare is still the best in the world. If I wanted an operation or anything of a serious nature, I would want it done in the US. That to me constitutes the best healthcare. The place where I have the highest chance of living and the most options for advanced care.

Your work is far from done, if you avatar is any measure.[/quote]

Ok, last response - I pinky promise!

By resorting to cheap insults regarding my far less developed physique you just highlight your lack of ability to argue effectively or admit you were wrong -obviously due to stubbornness and ignorance - in addition to not being able to read links lol.

But I really must go, gotta call up the World Health Organisation ya know. Gotta tell them they are not a reputable source regarding world health issues ;).

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
You do realise that in European countries, there exists a private health care system too lol?

You’ve shown your ignorance repeatedly (WHO not a credible source lulz) and can’t admit you were wrong to make bold statements based on your experience alone.

My work is done, gooooooodniiight.[/quote]

No shit Sherlock. Then why are they not on the cutting edge and just adopt the US’ tech and procedures? I am still not wrong. The US healthcare is still the best in the world. If I wanted an operation or anything of a serious nature, I would want it done in the US. That to me constitutes the best healthcare. The place where I have the highest chance of living and the most options for advanced care.

Your work is far from done, if you avatar is any measure.[/quote]

Ok, last response - I pinky promise!

By resorting to cheap insults regarding my far less developed physique you just highlight your lack of ability to argue effectively or admit you were wrong -obviously due to stubbornness and ignorance - in addition to not being able to read links lol.

But I really must go, gotta call up the World Health Organisation ya know. Gotta tell them they are not a reputable source regarding world health issues ;).[/quote]

I don’t like pink promises. I got injured that way once. If I thought I was wrong, I really would admit it. I am not above admitting I am wrong.

I had to though because you called me a clown. I hate clowns. I am terrified of them, asshole.

Dude I can’t read.

Do that and while you are at it - tell them to eat a dick for me because I had to pay 500 dollars out of pocket just to get passed the door in a hospital.

Ah I see you have edited the insult out now, lol.

If you say sorry we can shake hands and leave it at that with no ill feelings?

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Ah I see you have edited the insult out now, lol.

If you say sorry we can shake hands and leave it at that with no ill feelings?[/quote]

Deal, just no funny business when we shake hands.

Okayyy, who can I start shit with next. We have to max out this thread. Biotest isn’t paying me to slack! (kidding)

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Ah I see you have edited the insult out now, lol.

If you say sorry we can shake hands and leave it at that with no ill feelings?[/quote]

Deal, just no funny business when we shake hands.[/quote]

Ok dead, i’m glad you can you see the error of your ways.

Alas, I really must leave this thread!

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:

[quote]Bauber wrote:

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
Ah I see you have edited the insult out now, lol.

If you say sorry we can shake hands and leave it at that with no ill feelings?[/quote]

Deal, just no funny business when we shake hands.[/quote]

Ok dead, i’m glad you can you see the error of your ways.

Alas, I really must leave this thread![/quote]

You’re coming back with a chrome plated and polished ax aren’t you?

Did anyone else read this thread expecting the last 5 pages to be a Professor X-involved shitstorm?

Anyway, not that the white guys fighting prowess really showed it, but watching that fight made me want to try Jiu Jitsu. That DJ was trapped and couldn’t do anything about it.

This is the exact reason why you take your shirt off before you fight.

Worst thread I’ve ever read on a site usually renown for intelligence. Lost a lot of respect for a few guys in here. I won’t bother posting my point of view, Rattlehead said everything I wanted to say.

[quote]orion wrote:

Its like when Jesus turned water into wine.

[/quote]

Pffft, that didn’t actually happen, and if you think it did you’re stupid.

:wink:

!

Infant mortality rates in the US are among the highest of the developed countries. (Source: CDC)

[EDIT: Click the image to see it]

My take on it. Both the US and Europe have some great hospitals. They also both have horrible hospitals. It’s possible that the best of the US hospitals are better than the best of Europe’s hospitals. (And, vice versa.)

The WHO statistics seem to say that, [i]on average[/i], the average patient will have a better healthcare experience in Europe. It doesn’t seem to say anything about either extreme.

As a working professional in the US with decent health coverage and a choice of hospitals, I can pretty much guarantee that my experience will exceed that of most/all uninsured unemployed Medicaid patients.

Likewise, it’s quite possible that it will exceed that of the “average” European patient.

And I think that sort of outlines the basic issue – those who are productive to society receive the benefits of that society; those who aren’t, don’t. If you want a better life for yourself and your children, you need to find a way to add more value. Whether that’s right or wrong, that’s been a prevalent line of thought through US history.

But it also means that if you look at certain statistics, you can see some weird paradoxes like… how the US can have both cutting edge pediatrics care and also one of the highest infant mortality rates of the developed nations.