Yeah, it’s the “only the mirror can tell the truth” trope is a thing. I’ve never competed like you have, but I’d probably have to go down to the 190s to show it.
For body composition assessment the mirror is king.
A % body fat measurement is at best a tool to verbally express your body composition without pics, and at its worst is a number to boast on the internet.
I have grown to hate the term “bulk.” From my experience and working with others trying to achieve a good physique, a bulk causes more problems than it helps.
I would suggest that around 15% body fat be your “bulk” body composition. That is sufficient surplus at maintenance to add muscle, given plenty of good protein and good training. Since I place my faith in the mirror, “my 15%” shows major muscle group separation, and definitely no striations. You want to look beach ready at your fattest. No one needs ask if you lift weights. It is obvious.
Why go through these steps?
Why not just 275x.79=217.25.
Why break it down to 2.75?
I’m just curious.
1.) I wanted to walk through the process to explain all the steps of it.
2.) I’m an English major, so I treat math as loosely as I treat language.
X2 on the Velocity Diet. Takes out all the guess work.
If you’re really 21% bodyfat at 275, you’re an absolute beast! Any photos?