Could it be you weren’t too enthused about posting new pics because it would show that your avatar is quite old?
Also, can you please be honest? You’re a big dude. You did not build THAT much size being a vegan, admit it! [/quote]
The lighting in each pic is alot different. I’m not softer. my bf% is the same. The lighting in this current pic shows absolutely no definition. I may take another pic. but I have to sit, to click on the right button to take the pic. But trust me, i’m not softer.
A few people have said, i look softer in the new pic. But, let me point out a few things, the lighting is noticably different, body position is totally different. I know my bf% levels are the same, by going by the mirror, my strength levels are greater and i’m bigger.
The shadowing and lighting is much better in the first pic. You may say, well, “why can’t you just duplicate the same conditions as the first pic?” its a different and newer cam, it, for whatever reason, takes the pic differently, shows me differently.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
That’s what I was thinking. Something still doesn’t add up. I’m still calling shenannigans.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
That’s what I was thinking. Something still doesn’t add up. I’m still calling shenannigans.[/quote]
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
Ok, Ill see about a new pic. Ill say, “hey Rockula” hows that?
That’s what I was thinking. Something still doesn’t add up. I’m still calling shenannigans.[/quote]
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
Exactly.
trolls dont gain credibility by posting pictures on their own terms.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
Exactly what I thought. The only way to really demonstrate authenticity is for RV to post something that is requested of him.
For all we know these could be cheesed off someone else’s Facebook as requested.
[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
Impressed that there is an actual pic.
Not impressed at all with the ‘physique’.
S[/quote]
and your what, a buck 80. paleeeeeeeaaaaaaseeeeeee[/quote]
Yes insult the guy witha pro card that makes complete sense. You sir are a moron.[/quote]
If someone insulted you, without good reason, would you simply take it and not respond. I realize saying hes not impressed, isn’t really an insult. but, my pic really can’t be judged fairly, given the lighting and various other things. (holding pic up, does kinda take away from the pic) lol
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Like I said in the other thread, I’m not familiar enough with RV’s post history to understand what the big deal is, so I have no real investment in these threads, but from a purely puzzle solving perspective, no one is pointing out the obvious flaw in this new ‘proof’.
That pic could have already existed (ie. he knew the note said “test.net”, which is an odd reference). A better proof would be a pic holding a piece of paper with a date (like today’s or recent) or something relevant like “Ct. Rockula wishes he could be 1/2 the vampire I am” or “Hey DJ, Dallas sucks!”
Should be real easy with the new web cam, eh?[/quote]
Exactly.
trolls dont gain credibility by posting pictures on their own terms. [/quote]
What do you mean, “on their terms” just curious. Am I not supposed to take my own pic? Should I date the paper i was holding up?
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
What’re the odds RV won’t post any pics that actually prove anything and instead comes up with ridiculous excuses as to why there’s no pic?[/quote]
You must be late to the party. I did post a new pic. lol. not sure what you mean.
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
You look like butterbean. Fat. [/quote]
yup
and let’s not forget the solid gold the guy has given us from day one. i was never too caught up in whether he was “real” or not. i’m more interested in whether he actually believes the shit he writes.
bhahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha, gee, like I wasn’t expecting that. Like a kid who lashes out after he was proven wrong. bhahahaahahahahahahah. [/quote]
proven wrong about what? I was never big on the whole conspiracy angle. i accepted your picture for what it was and always assumed (correctly apparently) that you didn’t post other pictures b/c you are fat and other pics are unflattering.