[quote]pushharder wrote:
And VegVamp’s conjecture that animals don’t kill for fun is completely false. Many don’t. Many do.[/quote]
Not sure if its for fun, but I seen a doc. on Chimps that sure as hell seemed like REVENGE.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
And VegVamp’s conjecture that animals don’t kill for fun is completely false. Many don’t. Many do.[/quote]
Not sure if its for fun, but I seen a doc. on Chimps that sure as hell seemed like REVENGE.
[quote]florelius wrote:
Wow did we replace vids of cute girl butt and post`s of Lulz with a discussion about hunting and killing of animals. cmon guys this aint PWI.
Let us settle this ones an for all: Killing and hunting of animals for food is totally okay and its a part of
who we as humans are and have always been, but killing animals for the fun of it are bad, but sometimes understandable, Like bullfighting as an example or offerings in pagan culture( offerings where in many ways a
redistribution of food in some cultures, think greece and rome, bullfighting too actually ).[/quote]
[quote]CAP1015 wrote:
Rogue…I give it up to you for posting the pic! I admit I was a doubter, but now like the man in othorpedic shoes, I stand corrected!
Please post threads more often, you are like lightening in a bottle, while I may not agree with your posts, I will say that you provide a lot of interest, entertainment, and a good shot in the arm to this site when you post.
Now if you really want to create some buzz, post a full bod pic of you next to your Superbee! I know you’ve got one and that it is yellow…comeon, you’ve proven you can take all the flames sent your way, show us the Full Rogue rocking out in the Superbee!
[/quote]
You must have seen my face book site, lol. i have a pic of my superbee on that. Ive put more money into that damm car is sickening.

[quote]scj119 wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]scj119 wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]scj119 wrote:
There is of course the fact that no one would claim that pic to be theirs unless it was real.[/quote]
Oh please, your pathetic. Yes, what person would want to be a 285+ monster. what person would want to military press what most dudes bench press. What dude would want a 59 inch chest, huge wide shoulders and back.
I mean, all those dudes in gyms all over the country, sure, they don’t want to get big, do they. lol. what world are you living in. I’m not saying i have the perfect body, and i can’t do with some improving, but most would eat their moms liver to have my size and power. [/quote]
I would have to eat my mom’s liver because there would be nothing else left on earth if I ate enough to look like that.[/quote]
Ok mr. buck 55. lol. I laugh at guys like you. You can’t get big to save your life. so you insult me. lol. You can say “id never want to look like that” all you want. You go on youtube, with ronnie coleman or jay cutler, and in the comment sections, tons of dudes are saying “id never want to look like that” we both know they are lying sacks of shit. they can’t look like that. and you can’t look like me. most guys will never get big, whether its cause of hormones, dedication, metabolism, who knows. [/quote]
buck 55? lmao[/quote]
Buck 110 is a CLASSIC!!!
[quote]scj119 wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]scj119 wrote:
There is of course the fact that no one would claim that pic to be theirs unless it was real.[/quote]
Oh please, your pathetic. Yes, what person would want to be a 285+ monster. what person would want to military press what most dudes bench press. What dude would want a 59 inch chest, huge wide shoulders and back.
I mean, all those dudes in gyms all over the country, sure, they don’t want to get big, do they. lol. what world are you living in. I’m not saying i have the perfect body, and i can’t do with some improving, but most would eat their moms liver to have my size and power. [/quote]
I would have to eat my mom’s liver because there would be nothing else left on earth if I ate enough to look like that.[/quote]
Would you eat it with a fine Chianti and some Fava beans?
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
.338? [/quote]
.338 bullet. .375 Weatherby case.[/quote]
Awesome. My dad used a .375 in Africa, but I won’t get into that here, for fear of being consumed by the large(r than me) anti-meat vampire[/quote]
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Humans are animals. This actually supports hunting for food more than if you insist that humans are higher beings. It could even support hunting for pleasure. Not every kill in the animal kingdom is purely for food.[/quote]
The thought on animals killing for pleasure is highly debatable and that is only in a very select circustances. Like a cat playing with a mouse before killing it. I think 2 things are at work there. Cats love to play, its in their nature, but they also have that instinct to kill. but its different with humans. humans take pleasure in the killing and suffering of animals. no animal things in those terms. With animals, everything is instinctual. [/quote]
There are many reasons one animal would kill another other than for food.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Humans are animals. This actually supports hunting for food more than if you insist that humans are higher beings. It could even support hunting for pleasure. Not every kill in the animal kingdom is purely for food.[/quote]
The thought on animals killing for pleasure is highly debatable and that is only in a very select circustances. Like a cat playing with a mouse before killing it. I think 2 things are at work there. Cats love to play, its in their nature, but they also have that instinct to kill. but its different with humans. humans take pleasure in the killing and suffering of animals. no animal things in those terms. With animals, everything is instinctual. [/quote]
There are many reasons one animal would kill another other than for food.[/quote]
Yep. One example would be a male lion killing a particular female’s cubs… in order to make her go into heat again, so HE can then impregnate her.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]scj119 wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]scj119 wrote:
There is of course the fact that no one would claim that pic to be theirs unless it was real.[/quote]
Oh please, your pathetic. Yes, what person would want to be a 285+ monster. what person would want to military press what most dudes bench press. What dude would want a 59 inch chest, huge wide shoulders and back.
I mean, all those dudes in gyms all over the country, sure, they don’t want to get big, do they. lol. what world are you living in. I’m not saying i have the perfect body, and i can’t do with some improving, but most would eat their moms liver to have my size and power. [/quote]
I would have to eat my mom’s liver because there would be nothing else left on earth if I ate enough to look like that.[/quote]
Would you eat it with a fine Chianti and some Fava beans?
[/quote]
Hahaha
A nice cabarnet would be goood as well.
[quote]JLone wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
.338? [/quote]
.338 bullet. .375 Weatherby case.[/quote]
Awesome. My dad used a .375 in Africa, but I won’t get into that here, for fear of being consumed by the large(r than me) anti-meat vampire[/quote]
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)[/quote]
Damn, that’s a really nice rifle. I used a Tikka T3 Lite .300 WSM with a Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 scope and it took down everything with ease. It’s not the size of the bullet, it’s where you can put it.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
Nature, you crazy!
Fuck me for drinking too much Spike and then opening this thread. 1 hour of life=gone. Goddamnit.
RV- respect for actually buying a webcam to post the pic. I don’t think there are many doubts that you exist and are a big dude. Not knocking the muscle you’ve built or your strength levels, but same leanness as the avatar pic though? Seriously? I was fat as hell for like 90% of my life, so I consider myself somewhat of an expert here: your arms look fat in that pic.
I’m not talking “bad lighting that doesn’t show muscle separation”- the outline of your biceps/armpit just looks like an asscrack there. If you want to say you’re big, go for it. But like, turn the lights on or something when you take pics if you want to claim any kind of leanness. If you can bench 500+ then you can flip a light switch lol.
Speaking of that, if you can get someone to video you moving some serious weight, you will be a shitload more credible as far as training discussion goes. Not saying I’m bigger or stronger than you. Maybe not even leaner if the pics are like you say. Just making some simple observations.
P.S. T NATION is the same number of letter as test.net so… why not just write that? Way more relevant.
And this is why people need to go to Africa and shoot lions and shit. They totally ruin the safari for the kids.
[quote]bigmac73nh wrote:
Fuck me for drinking too much Spike and then opening this thread. 1 hour of life=gone. Goddamnit.
RV- respect for actually buying a webcam to post the pic. I don’t think there are many doubts that you exist and are a big dude. Not knocking the muscle you’ve built or your strength levels, but same leanness as the avatar pic though? Seriously? I was fat as hell for like 90% of my life, so I consider myself somewhat of an expert here: your arms look fat in that pic.
I’m not talking “bad lighting that doesn’t show muscle separation”- the outline of your biceps/armpit just looks like an asscrack there. If you want to say you’re big, go for it. But like, turn the lights on or something when you take pics if you want to claim any kind of leanness. If you can bench 500+ then you can flip a light switch lol.
Speaking of that, if you can get someone to video you moving some serious weight, you will be a shitload more credible as far as training discussion goes. Not saying I’m bigger or stronger than you. Maybe not even leaner if the pics are like you say. Just making some simple observations.
P.S. T NATION is the same number of letter as test.net so… why not just write that? Way more relevant.
[/quote]
Damn kids and logic. ![]()
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)[/quote]
Damn, that’s a really nice rifle. I used a Tikka T3 Lite .300 WSM with a Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 scope and it took down everything with ease. It’s not the size of the bullet, it’s where you can put it.[/quote]
Yeah, my father in law carries a traditional wood stock Remington 700 in a .270 and has taken numerous elk with it. That would be on the other end of the spectrum from the .308 with maybe the .338 being bigger. But honestly I have never ran across a guy shooting a .338 or larger.
[quote]JLone wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)[/quote]
Damn, that’s a really nice rifle. I used a Tikka T3 Lite .300 WSM with a Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 scope and it took down everything with ease. It’s not the size of the bullet, it’s where you can put it.[/quote]
Yeah, my father in law carries a traditional wood stock Remington 700 in a .270 and has taken numerous elk with it. That would be on the other end of the spectrum from the .308 with maybe the .338 being bigger. But honestly I have never ran across a guy shooting a .338 or larger. [/quote]
Well, a .375 is considered the “ideal” rifle over in South Africa (at least by the professional hunters we were with), just because it can take down just about everything and it’s actually a law that it’s the smallest caliber rifle you can take certain game with (cape buffalo, lion, elephant even I think).
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)[/quote]
Damn, that’s a really nice rifle. I used a Tikka T3 Lite .300 WSM with a Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 scope and it took down everything with ease. It’s not the size of the bullet, it’s where you can put it.[/quote]
Yeah, my father in law carries a traditional wood stock Remington 700 in a .270 and has taken numerous elk with it. That would be on the other end of the spectrum from the .308 with maybe the .338 being bigger. But honestly I have never ran across a guy shooting a .338 or larger. [/quote]
Well, a .375 is considered the “ideal” rifle over in South Africa (at least by the professional hunters we were with), just because it can take down just about everything and it’s actually a law that it’s the smallest caliber rifle you can take certain game with (cape buffalo, lion, elephant even I think).[/quote]
Are you a movie star Ink in disguise on here?
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]JLone wrote:
Thinking about this beauty for Elk season next year:
http://www.savagearms.com/firearms/models/
in the .308 Winchester.
Haven’t settled on a scope yet.
EDIT
Model: 10 FCP McMillan
(Under law enforcement series)[/quote]
Damn, that’s a really nice rifle. I used a Tikka T3 Lite .300 WSM with a Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 scope and it took down everything with ease. It’s not the size of the bullet, it’s where you can put it.[/quote]
Yeah, my father in law carries a traditional wood stock Remington 700 in a .270 and has taken numerous elk with it. That would be on the other end of the spectrum from the .308 with maybe the .338 being bigger. But honestly I have never ran across a guy shooting a .338 or larger. [/quote]
Well, a .375 is considered the “ideal” rifle over in South Africa (at least by the professional hunters we were with), just because it can take down just about everything and it’s actually a law that it’s the smallest caliber rifle you can take certain game with (cape buffalo, lion, elephant even I think).[/quote]
Are you a movie star Ink in disguise on here?[/quote]
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
No, just a guy with a Dad that is doing well for himself, who wanted to take his boys hunting in Africa. If that makes RV want to kill me, comeatmebro.gif