Natural vs Bodybuilding with Steroids

Post some pics then dude and lets see how much you put Columbo and the like to shame…

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Liv92 wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Liv92 wrote:
This roguevampire has become one of the top idiots of 2011 on this board for sure, and I don’t think he’s trying to troll, thats the sad part.

[/quote]

idiots of 2011? many people who speak their minds, that goes against what others think are often thought of as stupid or idiots. but im far from an idiot my little friend. far from it. im not some little 140lb punk kid here. [/quote]

You can be 140 or 280, doesn’t make you more or less dumb…

Edit: Okay I just read that he said 15% and 5% are the same thing. LOL I was wrong, we got trolled guys. [/quote]

no, i never said they were the same things. i said 2 guys going to a club, one being 15% and the other being 5%, dressed in clothes, nobody would tell the difference. neither guy has a gut, nobody would know. sure, if they were onstage competing, then sure, you can tell. but remember 99% of bodybuilders do not compete.[/quote]

People that don’t know shit and never trained a day in their lives may not be able to tell the difference…is that really your target audience? Kinda aiming for the low hanging fruit aren’t you? The rest of us have you sized up from the jump!
People that do not compete and have no definite plan to do so are not bodybuilders! You do not get to re-define what it means to be a bodybuilder. Runners to the starting line, lifters to the platform, westlers to the mat, bodybuilders to the stage. Until then you are a 200-215 lb. man in a 280 lb. body with a gym membership talking shit. There is nothing special or unique about that.
[/quote]

bahahahahahah. isn’t that like saying brock lesnar is really a light heavyweight in a heavyweight body. thats total bull. and no, you and nobody has me “sized” up. the truth is, im an extremely jacked dude. not bragging, but thats simply the case. i haven’t been training all these years to have a bunch of nobodies, tell me, they have me sized up. get real. even pro bodybuilders aren’t 4% bodyfat all the time. its not healthy to be that ripped. most bodybuilders look far more impressive in the offseason. just my opinion. and you don’t have to compete to be a bodybuilder. nothing special, to this day, the only people i have ever seen bigger than me are the top pro bodybuilders. jay cutler, branch, coleman. i can re define anything i like. what i say goes. its my world, your just living in it. bodybuilding means something different to everyone.

and a little extra fat, makes you alot stronger and alot bigger. obviously, you don’t want to go past a certain point. but show me one guy here bigger than me. anyone. 5’7 at 285lbs. yes, i weighed myself last night. thats ronnie coleman level. true, not as lean, but comeone, im a guy that doesn’t have a gut, at 285lbs, thats fucking impressive as all hell. [/quote]

Yeah, man, you’re totally huge. But what good is being so huge when the woman you love has been dead for 400 years?

/communication w/ celtics 2.0

This thread is shaping up to the potential of Am14g08’s thread. He is probably already squatting a grand by now.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Liv92 wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Liv92 wrote:
This roguevampire has become one of the top idiots of 2011 on this board for sure, and I don’t think he’s trying to troll, thats the sad part.

[/quote]

idiots of 2011? many people who speak their minds, that goes against what others think are often thought of as stupid or idiots. but im far from an idiot my little friend. far from it. im not some little 140lb punk kid here. [/quote]

You can be 140 or 280, doesn’t make you more or less dumb…

Edit: Okay I just read that he said 15% and 5% are the same thing. LOL I was wrong, we got trolled guys. [/quote]

no, i never said they were the same things. i said 2 guys going to a club, one being 15% and the other being 5%, dressed in clothes, nobody would tell the difference. neither guy has a gut, nobody would know. sure, if they were onstage competing, then sure, you can tell. but remember 99% of bodybuilders do not compete.[/quote]

People that don’t know shit and never trained a day in their lives may not be able to tell the difference…is that really your target audience? Kinda aiming for the low hanging fruit aren’t you? The rest of us have you sized up from the jump!
People that do not compete and have no definite plan to do so are not bodybuilders! You do not get to re-define what it means to be a bodybuilder. Runners to the starting line, lifters to the platform, westlers to the mat, bodybuilders to the stage. Until then you are a 200-215 lb. man in a 280 lb. body with a gym membership talking shit. There is nothing special or unique about that.
[/quote]

bahahahahahah. isn’t that like saying brock lesnar is really a light heavyweight in a heavyweight body. thats total bull. and no, you and nobody has me “sized” up. the truth is, im an extremely jacked dude. not bragging, but thats simply the case. i haven’t been training all these years to have a bunch of nobodies, tell me, they have me sized up. get real. even pro bodybuilders aren’t 4% bodyfat all the time. its not healthy to be that ripped. most bodybuilders look far more impressive in the offseason. just my opinion. and you don’t have to compete to be a bodybuilder. nothing special, to this day, the only people i have ever seen bigger than me are the top pro bodybuilders. jay cutler, branch, coleman. i can re define anything i like. what i say goes. its my world, your just living in it. bodybuilding means something different to everyone.

and a little extra fat, makes you alot stronger and alot bigger. obviously, you don’t want to go past a certain point. but show me one guy here bigger than me. anyone. 5’7 at 285lbs. yes, i weighed myself last night. thats ronnie coleman level. true, not as lean, but comeone, im a guy that doesn’t have a gut, at 285lbs, thats fucking impressive as all hell. [/quote]

Yeah, man, you’re totally huge. But what good is being so huge when the woman you love has been dead for 400 years?

/communication w/ celtics 2.0[/quote]

ha ha nice break. lol. ill tell you, it sucks. i seem to have very little interest in todays women. they all just seem to have way to much attitude, no loyalty or devotion to their man. compare divorce rates today with say 100 years ago. ya women are far more sexually active, but with that comes total lack of class.

So, any chance of pics rv?

pics plz

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
So, any chance of pics rv?[/quote]

i figure, since i broke my ankle back in january, in needed surgery and had 4 rods put in my ankle. i was in a cast for 10 weeks, but took me 11 weeks to finally make it back to the gym. it has’nt taken long to get pretty much back to where i was before the accident. probably in another month, ill be ahead of the game and post some pics then. if anyone has ever broken their ankle, it sucks big time. even now, i limp when i walk, ankle gets stiff and cracks alot. but its getting there.

How about pics from before you broke your ankle?

And you are lying if you say you have none.

Anyways just sounds like a decent troll job…

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]zraw wrote:
Yokozuna was also pretty big, bigger than Columbo, and Brock

Easy.

Not my fault if Columbo was small and lean.[/quote]

ok, you guys are judging by a bodybuilding judging criteria. [/quote]

Not to sound like a meme from the professor x thread, but…This is the bodybuilding forum…
[/quote]

true,LOL

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buzza wrote:

[quote]ebomb5522 wrote:
pics of high school guys that look like franco columbo please.[/quote]

yes,send some high school freaks pics pls…
Franco was a rock,very imo with way more muscles than Arnie.[/quote]

more muscle than arnold?? ha ha. arnold outweighed franco probaby by a good 50-60lbs. easy. [/quote]

not a very smart reply man,imo.
of course a taller TOP bber has to weight more than a shorter (TOP) one (remember; longer muscle bellies lenghts a/o thicker bones diameter).
muscle density of Franco was in my personal opinion better than Arnold.
or in other words,pounds per pounds Franco looked to carry more muscles than Arnold.
sorry for my english…

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
How about pics from before you broke your ankle?

And you are lying if you say you have none.

Anyways just sounds like a decent troll job…[/quote]
Dude, I called him out as a poser in another thread a week ago and he never even responded. You’re not getting any pics unless he has a fap-stash of the guy he’s pretending to be.

is this gonna be for-EVER?

:frowning:

[quote]buzza wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buzza wrote:

[quote]ebomb5522 wrote:
pics of high school guys that look like franco columbo please.[/quote]

yes,send some high school freaks pics pls…
Franco was a rock,very imo with way more muscles than Arnie.[/quote]

more muscle than arnold?? ha ha. arnold outweighed franco probaby by a good 50-60lbs. easy. [/quote]

not a very smart reply man,imo.
of course a taller TOP bber has to weight more than a shorter (TOP) one (remember; longer muscle bellies lenghts a/o thicker bones diameter).
muscle density of Franco was in my personal opinion better than Arnold.
or in other words,pounds per pounds Franco looked to carry more muscles than Arnold.
sorry for my english…[/quote]

arnold had near 22 inch arms or so say the mags, while franco had maybe 18 or 19. thats far from the same muscle mass. look at them next to each other. arnold dwarfs him in every way.

[quote]JayPierce wrote:

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
How about pics from before you broke your ankle?

And you are lying if you say you have none.

Anyways just sounds like a decent troll job…[/quote]
Dude, I called him out as a poser in another thread a week ago and he never even responded. You’re not getting any pics unless he has a fap-stash of the guy he’s pretending to be.[/quote]

that pic is me. what other pics are necessary. sorry, but i don’t go around taking pics of myself. i don’t see the reason to do so. i took one pic to put on my face book. other than that, what reason could there be.

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]JayPierce wrote:

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
How about pics from before you broke your ankle?

And you are lying if you say you have none.

Anyways just sounds like a decent troll job…[/quote]
Dude, I called him out as a poser in another thread a week ago and he never even responded. You’re not getting any pics unless he has a fap-stash of the guy he’s pretending to be.[/quote]

that pic is me. what other pics are necessary. sorry, but i don’t go around taking pics of myself. i don’t see the reason to do so. i took one pic to put on my face book. other than that, what reason could there be. [/quote]

To back up your claims

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

that pic is me. what other pics are necessary. sorry, but i don’t go around taking pics of myself. i don’t see the reason to do so. i took one pic to put on my face book. other than that, what reason could there be. [/quote]

To back up your claims[/quote]
Especially given all the ridiculous things that you’ve been saying

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buzza wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buzza wrote:

[quote]ebomb5522 wrote:
pics of high school guys that look like franco columbo please.[/quote]

yes,send some high school freaks pics pls…
Franco was a rock,very imo with way more muscles than Arnie.[/quote]

more muscle than arnold?? ha ha. arnold outweighed franco probaby by a good 50-60lbs. easy. [/quote]

not a very smart reply man,imo.
of course a taller TOP bber has to weight more than a shorter (TOP) one (remember; longer muscle bellies lenghts a/o thicker bones diameter).
muscle density of Franco was in my personal opinion better than Arnold.
or in other words,pounds per pounds Franco looked to carry more muscles than Arnold.
sorry for my english…[/quote]

arnold had near 22 inch arms or so say the mags, while franco had maybe 18 or 19. thats far from the same muscle mass. look at them next to each other. arnold dwarfs him in every way.[/quote]

I’ll agree with you on that. Arnold was bigger and looked better than Franco.

He’s probably going to say that taking too many pics of yourself is gay.

Can we get back to t3h r01dz? I w4nn4 kn0w wh3n 1 sh0uld st4rt my d3c4 cycl3??

OUT: birthers
IN: girthers