My Experience On the Anabolic Diet

[quote]Owen70 wrote:
vasudeva wrote:
I would like some of the long-time users of the AD to speak a bit more about the early refeeds. A couple of us are on Day 10 and are quickly approaching our first refeed.

i havent done the AD itself, but i have done many a cyclical ketogenic diet like this.

I think input from people who have employed both a cyclical and targeted approach to ketogenic diets would be a great compliment to the primary focus on the AD, which by Dr. D’s definition, is not ketogenic.
vasudeva wrote:
Dr. D states that we should be consuming 20-40% FAT, 15-30% PRO, and 35-60% CHO during this first refeed. But what sort of overall caloric intake should I be aiming for during the early stages of adaptation to fat as the primary fuel source? Should we maintain the 18 x Bdywt he recommends for this first weekend, or can we jump directly into, for example, a Mass-gaining phase, where he suggest 25 x desired Bdywt? And if opt for the 25, do I drop this to the 18 during the week, or maintain it for the length of desired gain period, and just adjust the macro-nutrient percentages?

everything is going to depend on your goals, and your body. if you have a slow metabolism you are going to want to hit the low end of that scale. so if you are cutting, and he reccomends 18xBW?? i dunno what the rec is, but aim for the lower end. especially if you really think your endomorph, you may even wanna drop below the levels he suggested. i know this is true for other authors diets i have followed.

Well, my initial goal is to successfully make the shift to burning FAT. My long-term goal is to rotate between Mass and Strength phases to improve my three lifts. I would like to keep my BF between 10-12%, which is where it’s at currently.

vasudeva wrote:
And for a bit of clarification… By refeeding, leptin increases and thus stimulates the thyroid, increases GH and testosterone, decreases cortisol and generally improves fat burning, right? Dr. D doesn’t address leptin directly in the AS, but this seems to be the reason for the refeed, right? Or is it more of a total caloric thing?
Thoughts?

i’m not sure all the leptin bonanza that is around now was around back then, this is prob the reason it isnt mentioned much. and your right about all the increases/decreases. the point of the refeed(i thinK) is to help all of your hormones get into a positive state, and to refill the glycogen in your muscles for the coming week. because your glycogen is full the first couple days off of the refeed, you notice “a great pump” or whatever on the ensuing workouts following the refeed, you’ll be able to give your all these workouts, and so if you are following a WS template or whatever, you’ll prob wanna put your ME lower day soon after the refeed, or ME upper, whichever you need more help with. the less glycogen demanding days(at least the was I do them)DE days, you can put near the end of the week.

I employ the conjugate method, following a rough Westside template. And yeah, I’ve had some real concerns about losing intensity in my movements as my glycogen levels diminish. So far, my strength hasn’t dropped nor has my intensity. I think I might be a natural fat oxidizer.

I’m still interested in learning how other Aders have played with weekly caloric levels to manipulate gains in bdywt and strength & losses in BF.

[/quote]

DH, should I be concerned that I haven’t crashed? It is Day 10.

You’d do well with AAS, too. By putting your body in the best position to keep your natural hormonal levels up and in good ratio (the one variable being T levels with AAS usage)you are still ahead of the other guys. Also the insulin control and new preferential fat burning your body now has will aid you in both muscle growth and fat loss. Now, AAS do seem to enable one to “tolerate” more CHO. But that doesn’t make it necessary per se. The biggest difference is your caloric tolerance and your carb load type/duration. AAS give some more forgiveness. BUT I’d not push it much at all. If you load too long, you revert back to carb burning. And if you are carbing in such a cyclical fashion that you break the diet, you can begin to get too much CHO and having insulin issues when you begin eating Pro and Fat. This is not good long term. The 12-48 hour duration must be adhered to no matter what. The Gear will allow you (provided you are not carrying too much fat to begin with) to get the max duration on the load. Just alter your calories for the AAS usage depending on your goal (mass/cut).

Best,
DH

[quote]Ramo wrote:
DH, IC or whoever: What are your thoughts on the use of anabolics in conjunction with the diet?

Traditionally people keep fat as low as possible on AAS cycles, specifically anabolics that negatively affect blood lipid profiles.

Are anabolics wasted on this diet? This is pretty much mental masturbation for me, but I’m curious…

P.S. I bought the AS, and have been doing this for coming up on two weeks now. It’s going phenomenally well, and a big reason is this thread. Thanks for everything guys. [/quote]

[quote]vasduva wrote:
I employ the conjugate method, following a rough Westside template. And yeah, I’ve had some real concerns about losing intensity in my movements as my glycogen levels diminish. So far, my strength hasn’t dropped nor has my intensity. I think I might be a natural fat oxidizer.

I’m still interested in learning how other Aders have played with weekly caloric levels to manipulate gains in bdywt and strength & losses in BF. [/quote]

yeah. its hard to give you some good training/nutrition advice without some idea of your stats, but heres what i would suggest as far as training
monday: ME lower
tuesday:off, or if you have good recovery, ME upper
wednesday:depending on above, ME upper
thursday:off
friday:DE lower and upper combined…so something like this…
-box squat 8x2xwhatever
-dumbell bench 5x3xwhatever(i REALLY am against DE bench, but if you want to do it, put it here)
-full squat or close stance box squats, 3x15xwhatever
-bb bench 3x15xwhatever
-bent row 3x15xwhatever

the last 3 exercises are going to help you deplete glycogen. by depleting the glyco, your muscles will be even moreso primed for taking in all the CHO’s from your carb load, this will help keep you from “spilling over”(overconsumption of carbs ->fat gain) and to not be so bloated.

another thing to think about, when you are dieting, you will naturally probably become faster because you are using a similar weight to what you used to, because your strength levels arent really going up as fast as if you weren’t dieting. By doing the same % of your max over and over, your CNS will become more trained for that %, and you will (probably) end up becoming even faster, i know I am right now(i’m dieting too.) the 5x3-5 whatever will help you hold on to muscle, which is much harder to hold onto than speed on a diet(in my experience.)

Vasudeva,
A good way to lean out while maintaining (or even bumping)muscle is to wave your calories. I used a pattern such as this to get very lean a few summers ago. I’d severed the tendon, artery, and nerve in my thumb at work and had to consequenlty quit training/eating for mass. I needed to drop the weights and change the movements. Of course, had my doctor known that I was sliding the sheath off of my forearm and training still, he’d have killed me, but we’re lifters man, and this wasn’t bone we’re dealing with ;-). This forced me on a little “leanness” detour.

I decided to start cutting at 2500 cals

2500x7 = 17,500 cals weekly.

Monday (after loading so I felt strong)
1500 cals

Tuesday (still pretty glyco full)
2000 cals

Wednesday
3000 cals (to prevent T3 level drop??)

Thurday
2000 cals (burning some fat now)

Friday
1500 cals (rapid fat burning)

Saturday
4000 cals (GOOD carbos w/ few treats)

Sunday
3500 cals (all clean carbs and a slight drop in cals as I approach the end of the load)

I would use some of the following to make sure I’d be ready to have my blood sugar back down and be ready to burn fat faster too:

Slo-Niacin. (WATCH THE DOSE/START LOW)
and some Vanadyl Sulfate.

I went with about 10mg VS on the afternoon and evening meal on Sunday. By the next morning I was very hungry and knew there was no residual excess glucose in the blood to be concerned with. You WILL likely be hungry so eat some fat fast on Monday morning. VS can drop you pretty fast sometimes.

best,
DH

Nope. Just as long as you are certain that you’ve not been getting hidden CHO, then you’re fine. Just a lucky duck.

Best,
DH

[quote]vasudeva wrote:
DH, should I be concerned that I haven’t crashed? It is Day 10. [/quote]

Thanx for the response, Owen. Actually, I’ve been training for a number of years, and am comfortable with the conjugate method.

I think I might understand the ME and DE a bit differently than you. I understand the ME movements to be about neural adaptation more than LBM or strength gain, and the DE movements to be where strength is trained. Does this make sense to you?

I didn’t really follow what you were saying about cutting and still increasing speed. Maybe if you rephrased it…

Thanx for the post, DH. Yeah. That is the sort of information I’m interested in. I’ve been thinking of creating a significant deficit during the 5-day and a surplus during the 2-day. I’d still be achieving my needed 25 x desired bdywt, but would be shocking the hell our of my body. But I think you made a good point, I should probably incorporate a moderatae increase midweek to ensure that my metabolism doesn’t begin to drag.

I’m taking in close to 5000 calories/day to maintain. I inferred from Dr. D’s writings that I can actually take in a bit more than 30g CHO/day because of the higher caloric intake, so long as my fat intake was still where it needed to be. Nonetheless, I’m doing my best to remain under 30g/day. But yeah, hidden CHO is more problematic than I initially thought. They’re in freaking everything!

[quote]vasudeva wrote:
I think I might understand the ME and DE a bit differently than you. I understand the ME movements to be about neural adaptation more than LBM or strength gain, and the DE movements to be where strength is trained. Does this make sense to you? [/quote]
neural adaption=increase in strength, as far as I understand it. increasing muscle size will increase strength because the fibers from which your CNS draws on to execute the action are bigger(therefore stronger if it is sarcomeric hypertrophy)…at least as I understand it. DE days increase your speed because at the speed they are executed, fast twitch fibers are selectively recruited vs. a more overall fiber recruitment(although preference I would think is given to fast twitch fibers) recruitment. and yeah, on ME days, if you cycle moves, the first week of a new move you will adapt, i guess you can say neurally too.

[quote]vasudeva wrote:
I didn’t really follow what you were saying about cutting and still increasing speed. Maybe if you rephrased it…[/quote]
well my bullshit empirecal reasoning is that because it is the same load, you are used to that movement/weight, so your body becomes more proficient at recruiting fibers for that move. fuck it still doesn’t make sense but I know it is pretty much true for me haha.

Vas,
See my post a bit earlier. The glycogen depletion (Duchaine’s baby) is not necessary. If you want to do it best, then do an active recovery high rep day. Don’t train to failure and keep the weights low. Low as in 40-60% 1RM low. And just go through the motions for some enhanced recovery , working on techinque, and a bit of depletion. It is very important to not make Friday a traditional high rep day where you use perhaps a 20rm for sets of 15-18 like on Waterbury’s TBT. Your glycogen is very low and this type of workout will just be “fluff”, as you don’t have it in you to do your best high rep stuff. Now, as I said, if you are ADDING an additional workout for the sake of active recovery, then do it a la Waterbury’s 100 reps parameters. A few core movements are fine. DON’T approach failure and DON’T count this as a “standard” workout. Just something to assist with the load. A practice day if you will. Duchaine considered it a bona-fide workout. He’d do heavy on mon and tues then do a glyo deplete on Friday. This is NOT necessary. Duchaine didn’t have a full handle on this whole thing and was a big advocate of 5-7 day training cycles such as Poliquin’s. Low reps build muscle…10-12 or below. The rest assists and throws some sarcoplasmic “growth” in too, but the gold is in the lower end with multiple sets. Waterbury style. You’ll feel better by keeping reps moderate or low on thurs and fri. That being said for all to benefit from, Westside would be a great cycle to use here too. I’d do my first ME day on Saturday. If you load on Sat and Sun, you’ll be very strong/full for this. Just do it later Sat, so that you’ve had time to fill up before training. Getting a few hundred grams of CHO before an early afternoon or evening Sat ME would be great.

Example (feel free to switch lower/upper per your taste)

Sat: ME Upper
Sun: DE lower
Mon: rest/GPP
Tues: ME lower
Wed: DE upper
Thurs: rest
Fri: rest and/or super easy full body active recovery/practice session.

(Friday is optional)

best,
DH

[quote]Owen70 wrote:
vasduva wrote:
I employ the conjugate method, following a rough Westside template. And yeah, I’ve had some real concerns about losing intensity in my movements as my glycogen levels diminish. So far, my strength hasn’t dropped nor has my intensity. I think I might be a natural fat oxidizer.

I’m still interested in learning how other Aders have played with weekly caloric levels to manipulate gains in bdywt and strength & losses in BF.

yeah. its hard to give you some good training/nutrition advice without some idea of your stats, but heres what i would suggest as far as training
monday: ME lower
tuesday:off, or if you have good recovery, ME upper
wednesday:depending on above, ME upper
thursday:off
friday:DE lower and upper combined…so something like this…
-box squat 8x2xwhatever
-dumbell bench 5x3xwhatever(i REALLY am against DE bench, but if you want to do it, put it here)
-full squat or close stance box squats, 3x15xwhatever
-bb bench 3x15xwhatever
-bent row 3x15xwhatever

the last 3 exercises are going to help you deplete glycogen. by depleting the glyco, your muscles will be even moreso primed for taking in all the CHO’s from your carb load, this will help keep you from “spilling over”(overconsumption of carbs ->fat gain) and to not be so bloated.

another thing to think about, when you are dieting, you will naturally probably become faster because you are using a similar weight to what you used to, because your strength levels arent really going up as fast as if you weren’t dieting. By doing the same % of your max over and over, your CNS will become more trained for that %, and you will (probably) end up becoming even faster, i know I am right now(i’m dieting too.) the 5x3-5 whatever will help you hold on to muscle, which is much harder to hold onto than speed on a diet(in my experience.)[/quote]

[quote]Disc Hoss wrote:
Vas,
See my post a bit earlier. The glycogen depletion (Duchaine’s baby) is not necessary. If you want to do it best, then do an active recovery high rep day. Don’t train to failure and keep the weights low. Low as in 40-60% 1RM low. And just go through the motions for some enhanced recovery , working on techinque, and a bit of depletion. It is very important to not make Friday a traditional high rep day where you use perhaps a 20rm for sets of 15-18 like on Waterbury’s TBT. Your glycogen is very low and this type of workout will just be “fluff”, as you don’t have it in you to do your best high rep stuff. Now, as I said, if you are ADDING an additional workout for the sake of active recovery, then do it a la Waterbury’s 100 reps parameters. A few core movements are fine. DON’T approach failure and DON’T count this as a “standard” workout. Just something to assist with the load. A practice day if you will. Duchaine considered it a bona-fide workout. He’d do heavy on mon and tues then do a glyo deplete on Friday. This is NOT necessary. Duchaine didn’t have a full handle on this whole thing and was a big advocate of 5-7 day training cycles such as Poliquin’s.
[/quote]
DH, just discussing some things, but wouldn’t you consider it best, as the diet progresses on and the trainee gets to a lower BF%, that a depletion(see below) workout is very beneficial. Of course you dont have to do it, but one of my favorite quotes…“Just Because it works doesn’t mean it is optimal” (kelly baggett) pertains to this.

And by depletion workout, I wasn’t suggesting anything like duchaines. I realize an approach like his is somewhat outdated now. What I meant when i wrote up that post for vasduva is something like 3x15x50% of the persons 1RM. This is by no means meant to be hard at all. Yeah, it should suck ass, but everything does after 5 days of low -carb. And this will help to get your muscles completely depleted which I already explained why it is beneficial in an above posts.

Just some food for discussion.

I don’t really disagree. Neural adaption does equate to an increase in strength. ME movements will improve neural efficiency. So, over time, strength will increase. However, muscle size does not equate to neural efficiency. In my experience, ME movements do not induce hypertrophy. With the conjugate approach, it is the accessory work that has the most potential for hypertrophy.

DH, my current training is:

Sun - DE upper
Mon - ME lower
Wed - ME upper
Fri - DE lower

I do sled work on Tues for recovery. Sat is for accessory work; this workout doesn’t last much more than 20 minutes.

For me, the potential problematic day with the AD is the ME upper on Wed. If this proves to be the case, perhaps a moderate mid-week refeed can be employed.

Whatcha think?

Hey this thread is defininetly my favorite, just topping the Cardoza strongman thread…

What is the difference between the bodybuilding version and the powerlifting version? I’ve received the Anabolic solution but in my excitement I negelected to check which one (got a decent discount), BB or PL…

Anyone?

Fuckin good thread.

[quote]vasudeva wrote:
I don’t really disagree. Neural adaption does equate to an increase in strength. ME movements will improve neural efficiency. So, over time, strength will increase. However, muscle size does not equate to neural efficiency. In my experience, ME movements do not induce hypertrophy. With the conjugate approach, it is the accessory work that has the most potential for hypertrophy. [/quote]

My understanding is that the ME and DE work recruits more muscle fibres, and the assistance work builds new muscle fibres for the ME and DE work to recruit. That’s why for WS4SB, Defranco replaces the DE day with a preference for a higher rep day in an effort to build more muscle fibres.

You build new muscle then your body recruits it into your lifts. If this is wrong, somebody please smack me…

OK, I think I missed a day at acronym school. I have a few guesses, but does anyone care to tell me exactly what ME and DE represent?

Nevermind. Mod-Alpha hooked me up.

[quote]Arctos wrote:
OK, I think I missed a day at acronym school. I have a few guesses, but does anyone care to tell me exactly what ME and DE represent?[/quote]

DH,
YOu’ve been doing this a while so I thought I’d ask you this. I’m on day 11, 1 to go. After my carb up this weekend, I’m going on a cutting phase for a couple of weeks. (It’s summer you know :slight_smile: ). I’m shooting for 21000 cals a week, cycled 2000, 2500, 3500, 2500, 2000, 5000, 3500. I noticed in the AD book that it said that 30gms isn’t written in stone. My weekdays look like this: 25, 30, 40, 30, 25 gms carbs. I use %'s because it’s easier for me. This amounts to 5% daily during the week. What’s your take on this?

Once you’re fully adapted, then your proposal is perfectly fine. Some people who are ultra sensitive to CHO may find even 30-40g to be too much, but most will be just fine. As calories increase you get a bit of a fudge factor to bump the carbos a bit. When cutting be very mindful of your progress. CHO is a bit more important when you’re leaning out. Also, to lean out I like trying the standard caloric ration and comparing it to an alternative. Try to bump your protein up to 1.5g/lb and then consequently drop fat a little. This will probably bump you to 40% pro and about 55% fat. As long as fat is about 45% or more, then you’ll be burning the adipose tissue at maximum rate.

Extra protein is a bit more important while cutting to offset the more catabolic state that you’ll be in. Of course, because your body won’t cannibalize muscle for the AA’s for the purpose of gluconeogenesis, cutting on the AD is far easier and muscle protective. It’s anti-catabolic as well as anabolic. Is this diet great or what!

I’d be interested to see how HOT-ROX would do on a cutting cycle of the AD. With this additional insurance against T3 decreases you’d be rockin’ and rollin’.

All in all I’d say go for it.

best,
DH

[quote]ruglayer09052000 wrote:
DH,
YOu’ve been doing this a while so I thought I’d ask you this. I’m on day 11, 1 to go. After my carb up this weekend, I’m going on a cutting phase for a couple of weeks. (It’s summer you know :slight_smile: ). I’m shooting for 21000 cals a week, cycled 2000, 2500, 3500, 2500, 2000, 5000, 3500. I noticed in the AD book that it said that 30gms isn’t written in stone. My weekdays look like this: 25, 30, 40, 30, 25 gms carbs. I use %'s because it’s easier for me. This amounts to 5% daily during the week. What’s your take on this?[/quote]

Absolutely. I just wanted to reiterate that BodyOpus had some flaws that some folks aren’t aware of. More of an “audience” statement for all the readers rather then a dialogue with you per se. Your suggested scheme is fine. My primary point is to make sure that one doesn’t alter their training to any significant degree on the AD. There is no need. We can tweek things, but an overhaul is not at all necessary. Duchaine made it of primary consideration, but this is not advantageous in the least. The standard WS, Waterbury, or Thib template will be best. Adding in an AR workout is certainly within bounds. Just as long as it is an add in and is nowhere near taxing.

Best,
DH

[quote]Owen70 wrote:
Disc Hoss wrote:
Vas,
See my post a bit earlier. The glycogen depletion (Duchaine’s baby) is not necessary. If you want to do it best, then do an active recovery high rep day. Don’t train to failure and keep the weights low. Low as in 40-60% 1RM low. And just go through the motions for some enhanced recovery , working on techinque, and a bit of depletion. It is very important to not make Friday a traditional high rep day where you use perhaps a 20rm for sets of 15-18 like on Waterbury’s TBT. Your glycogen is very low and this type of workout will just be “fluff”, as you don’t have it in you to do your best high rep stuff. Now, as I said, if you are ADDING an additional workout for the sake of active recovery, then do it a la Waterbury’s 100 reps parameters. A few core movements are fine. DON’T approach failure and DON’T count this as a “standard” workout. Just something to assist with the load. A practice day if you will. Duchaine considered it a bona-fide workout. He’d do heavy on mon and tues then do a glyo deplete on Friday. This is NOT necessary. Duchaine didn’t have a full handle on this whole thing and was a big advocate of 5-7 day training cycles such as Poliquin’s.

DH, just discussing some things, but wouldn’t you consider it best, as the diet progresses on and the trainee gets to a lower BF%, that a depletion(see below) workout is very beneficial. Of course you dont have to do it, but one of my favorite quotes…“Just Because it works doesn’t mean it is optimal” (kelly baggett) pertains to this.

And by depletion workout, I wasn’t suggesting anything like duchaines. I realize an approach like his is somewhat outdated now. What I meant when i wrote up that post for vasduva is something like 3x15x50% of the persons 1RM. This is by no means meant to be hard at all. Yeah, it should suck ass, but everything does after 5 days of low -carb. And this will help to get your muscles completely depleted which I already explained why it is beneficial in an above posts.

Just some food for discussion.

[/quote]