Ultimately, what trumps everything is ones ability to adapt to the AD per se. Most will do fine, IF they stick it out. but some are genetically equipped to deal with a bit more CHO.
My big beef is that the majority always think they’re the minority on this (and training and etc…) I think Poliquin is about right that 75-80% of the population should follow a very low CHO cyclical diet of sorts.
From here it seems that there are some who do a bit better on a “Beverly” type diet (50p/20c/30f) up to a Isocaloric diet (33p/33c/33f).
Going above 33-40% CHO is left for a very small minority who are heavily (as in hours per day) training for athletics and the rare person who is just genetically built to run on carbs. Again, this is the small minority.
For example my step dad is a lean 54yo man who is acitve. He could always eat CHO more than most and not get fat but when he does low carb he drops 5 pounds, leans out, and has better energy. Also his blood profile improves. He is in the minority, but can go both ways to a degree. He doesn’t eat crap even when he eats CHO, though. He eats apples, wheat toast, oatmeal, oranges, etc… Maybe a candy bar or ice cream every week or two when he takes my boys somewhere. And no pop. Just tea. Dad works, does lawn work on the side and does some farm help. He’s a man’s man. He can keep up with me on ANYTHING, except for the heavy lifting. We should all be so blessed. I love dad and hope to be able to do what he does when I’m 20 years older.
So when he does add carbs at times, he has learned that even though his body can burn them better than most, he still is “better” when they are low or very controlled (50-100g and no loads). Now, mom gets fat just smelling cookies. So dad does the diet to help her and because they have dinner with us a few times a week and I make fun of him if he eats “girl” food. AKA carbs. 
Ok… back to all this…seems like Poliquin breaks it down like so: 75-80% Low carbs cycling; 15-20% using between 10-40% CHO total, and about 5-10% on a standard high CHO (55-70%)diet.
I push hard for starting in the majority because it will work the vast majority of the time. From here, Doc has a flow chart (in the Metabolic Diet text and maybe the AS books) on how to add small amounts of CHO at targeted times unitl a person feels well.
Where it gets tricky is with people like SpiderDan here. His strength is going up, but he’s feeling a little off. so, I’d suggest a long intro to the diet. 3 weeks of low carbs. Get yourself fully depleted and get a good look at how you fare. Then IF needed slowly begin to titrate in some carbs according to Docs chart. But really, just add a bit of CHO peri-workout. SD may still be lingering in adaptation limbo. I had a woman do this once. We had to dig hard to get her adapted over. Then she flew and went from 155 to 114 in about 3 months. Just walking and doing the diet at the appropriate caloric level.
Anyway…as far as timing of pre vs post, well, Doc is going with the rationale that pre will blunt exercise induced release of GH and IGF-1. GH may not be too much of an issue, but I do seem to recall I’ve seen info on IGF-1 being blunted. And really, this is significant substance to stimulate so we don’t want to miss it. Something post (say 25-50g for a guy who needs to add a bit more)will help this type of person more. And for the guy who wants to try it both ways AND stick to the diet, then keep your CHO for post workout use.
Thib is going on the idea of using specific CHO to get a large insulin flux pre workout to drive aminos in and fuel the workout. Now that is fine, but not so much for us. We are loaded from a supercompensation period and HE is NOT. So, he is mini-loading pre-workout which will work much better if this is the only CHO you take in.
But we don’t need that. I’ve shown time and again that BCAA, hydrolysates, and even standard old whey concentrate will all stimulate insulin to the necessary degree to give us maximum anabolism.
So, without putting words into Mauros mouth, as Ive not talked with him in awhile, I think post is better for us (vs Pre) and none or a very minimum (keeping you under your daily limit) is best of all.
But when one is following a pattern like Thib is, where he keeps his CHO very low except for peri-workout, then he is never doing a “load” period per se. This is allowing him to use CHO more liberally peri-workout. With no load one can do this.
Now, to me, if you use the right insulinogenic supps pre AND post workout(BCAA, whey etc…) and some OPTIONAL small amount of CHO (say 20g) post workout, then we will get insulin driving the nutrients into the muscle pre workout (from the aminos)and the long term effects after training as per Docs artcile. And as the body sees large amounts of EAA’s (mainly BCAA) in the bloodstream it will stimulate protein synthesis AND inhibit breakdown. In effect we are tricking the body into thinking muscle is being broken down and that the substrate for protein synthesis (The EAA’s) are plentiful. This makes the body begin to try to create muscle (synthesize protein) and inhibit breakdown WHILE you are workout out. And since these also stimulate insulin AND trigger PS independent of insulin via the MTOR pathway, we get all we could want.
so then IF a person just must have some CHO (the small minority here) or if one wants to have some post workout (which is NOT necessary and MAY have some negatives) he can add some. If you want to stick to the diet as such, just use about 20g and keep your meals throughout the day good and strict. This will allow you to still load on the weekends. A study by Paddon-Jones et al, using an amino mixture with minimal CHO (20g) was able to fully stimulate anabolism between meals without negative impact on the next solid meals post prandial anabolic response. AKA pulsing as I’ve talked about in other threads.
Norton and Wilson will be doing a study soon (within a year hopefully) to see if the CHO was even necessary at all. I’m saying that they will find what Doc has always said. If you have substrate (aminos etc…) in the bloodstream (and you do for 4-8 hours after a meal) and you stimluate insulin (we do with aminos and protein. no CHO needed), then you will drive those aminos in even without CHO. Because proteins are insulinogenic. Why use CHO, when we can accomplish the same thing with aminos and proteins? They are NOT necessary, especially when you keep the proper paradigm in mind here. We are ADAPTED and thus our body reacts differently than carb burners. If you keep that idea at the fore, you will avoid analysis paralysis and diet jumping with every new article you read.
Finally, the loads we do are quite anabolic/anticatabolic and also serve to keep the body from acclimating to a specific macro ratio being used every day.
Its also far more social and enjoyable. I could go on and on…
DH
Sorry for all the tangents and rambling. I had too much Diet Mt. Dew.
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
DH or anyone who knows, has DiPasquale changed his views on PWO nutrition since the Anabolic Solution or something?
I’m reading it now and he says this:
“If youâ??re OK most of the time but just donâ??t have enough energy for your workouts, then you might try taking in around 50 to 100 grams of carbs after your training. You can vary the amount of carbs you use after exercise by using anywhere from 10 to 150 grams and see what works for you. The type of carbohydrate you use also makes a difference in this case. For various reasons Iâ??ve found that the use of a combination of high glycemic and low glycemic carbs works best.
One word of caution, donâ??t take any carbs prior to working out. Thatâ??s because carbs at that time will decrease GH and IGF-1 production and effect, increase insulin and decrease the use of bodyfat as an primary energy source during training. The ideal pre-workout supplement is my Resolve (see below), which has no carbs but is meant, among several other things, to selectively increase growth hormone and insulin simultaneously to maximize their synergistic anabolic effects while minimizing insulin adverse effects on lipolysis and free fatty acid oxidation.”
but it was posted earlier how he thinks carbs PWO can actually be bad so whats with the discrepancy? Also the “no carbs pre-workout” thing really goes a lot against what I’ve been reading from people like CT and Dave Barr but I’m more curious about the discrepancy with his own writings[/quote]