I thought I’d just chime in, having just read my newly acquired versions of the Anabolic Diet (4 versions total, I think).
Weekday ideals,
C/CFP: 30g; 5-8%, 55-60%, 30-35%
Weekend ideals,
C/CFP: no limit; 45-60%, 30-40%, 10-15%
He’s really sticking to the 30g, which is something I oppose in favor of vegetable intake. I’m so torn on this diet. It seems as if the manipulations take the physiological effects of food to such extremes that without careful monitoring, they can take you down the wrong path. He’s basically entrusting the readers to ‘know when to stop’ with the carb loads, otherwise you’ll be gaining fat. It’s beginning to seem a bit too ridiculous for me.
Diet is something I’ve struggled to understand ever since my junior year of high school when I suspected it played a big role in lifting weights. The AD is preaching this one way, while I just read Chad Waterbury’s recommendations on eating during his mass program which includes eating slightly more carbs than I normally do on a carb load, a relatively low amount of fat with regards to AD, and a typical amount of protein. Basically a lot of food, and a lot of carbs.
The question comes up now and then in this thread about how good the AD REALLY is for building the body as opposed to polishing it. It seems to me from all the input we’ve received, it’s only use should be for polishing the body, OR if you’re not a hardcore bodybuilder, the AD looks very suitable for a maintenance sort of lifestyle.
Thoughts?