Muscle Patheticness

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 5:54pm

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
And since you always remind us that you almost died(props for the rehab), and that was one of the main reasons that you could not complete a lunge in Colorado…maybe carrying all that bulk on your 5’10" frame is not good for your surgically repaired body.

In addition, does that extra bodyfat not make your asthma worse?[/quote]

I have had a knee injury since I was a kid made worse in the military.

[/quote]

So you had an injury so severe that it affected your ability to lunge, and you passed a military physical?[/quote]

I went into the military as a CAPTAIN…not enlisted. They wanted me because of my skills…not my ability to outdo everyone on a track. You don’t do lunges for PT exams nor is doing on required for entrance.

You need more life experience.

UtahLama · February 13, 2014, 6:01pm

If you base your knowledge on pure size…then maaaaaaaybe you are just not cut out for this.

And I have produced pics in the last two threads you were bloviating in, that’s not trolling bud.

I don’t have to wait for you to leave, we have a pool going on the next time you get the Banhammer…why waste all that fun.

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 6:02pm

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
If you base your knowledge on pure size…then maaaaaaaybe you are just not cut out for this.

And I have produced pics in the last two threads you were bloviating in, that’s not trolling bud.

I don’t have to wait for you to leave, we have a pool going on the next time you get the Banhammer…why waste all that fun.[/quote]

I wasn’t banned. I simply stopped posting here for a few months. I had shit to do. Sorry if me leaving somehow means I was banned to you.

I would hope no one bases their knowledge on “pure size” alone. I know I don’t…but if you think you look like I do by NOT knowing anything, you would be the dumbest person on the forum.

Please post pictures of shoulders the same size as mine that only need 30 more pounds of fat to complete the look.

The_Mighty_Stu · February 13, 2014, 6:08pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote]

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S

browndisaster · February 13, 2014, 6:14pm

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S[/quote]
Yeah also 30 inch thighs, 18+ inch arms, 270 lbs, would need double the calories of Amit Sapir to prep, and “not-fat”

Inb4 it’s common to give your rough height in shoes in addition to your real height.

Oh and those dudes are douches. Cmon now guys
http://m.comedycentral.com/videos/video.rbml?id=5lepme&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.comedycentral.com%2Fvideos%2Findex.rbml

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 6:28pm

I am exactly 5’11.5" in shoes to be exact which is “about six feet tall”.

According to military standards I am 5’10" and a quarter.

Apparently saying “about six feet in shoes” is now under examination.

Keep trying that hard to find things to bitch about.

DoubleDuce · February 13, 2014, 6:49pm

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
If you base your knowledge on pure size…then maaaaaaaybe you are just not cut out for this.

And I have produced pics in the last two threads you were bloviating in, that’s not trolling bud.

I don’t have to wait for you to leave, we have a pool going on the next time you get the Banhammer…why waste all that fun.[/quote]

You have more muscle, far less fat, and are way more capable of just plan doing physical things.

Arguing with a delusional imbecile can only bring you down to their level.

BrickHead · February 13, 2014, 7:15pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am exactly 5’11.5" in shoes to be exact which is “about six feet tall”.

According to military standards I am 5’10" and a quarter.

Apparently saying “about six feet in shoes” is now under examination.

Keep trying that hard to find things to bitch about.[/quote]

If I recall correctly, at some point it said in your profile you’re 5’10".

BrickHead · February 13, 2014, 7:17pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]MattyXL wrote:
I do think alot of times the person calling a muscular/developed guy a douchebag has alot to do with that person’s insecurities about their own self image. [/quote]

Especially if they are narrowing it down to style of dress…as if that has anything to do with character or personality specifically.
[/quote]

Style of dress is part of character–pretty much tied up in each other. It’s expression of character.

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 7:34pm

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am exactly 5’11.5" in shoes to be exact which is “about six feet tall”.

According to military standards I am 5’10" and a quarter.

Apparently saying “about six feet in shoes” is now under examination.

Keep trying that hard to find things to bitch about.[/quote]

If I recall correctly, at some point it said in your profile you’re 5’10". [/quote]

Which would be correct. What is the problem again?

EmilyQ · February 13, 2014, 7:49pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]MattyXL wrote:
I do think alot of times the person calling a muscular/developed guy a douchebag has alot to do with that person’s insecurities about their own self image. [/quote]

Especially if they are narrowing it down to style of dress…as if that has anything to do with character or personality specifically.
[/quote]

Am I misremembering that there’s been considerable talk about things like fat women wearing “muffin tops” in GAL and that you’ve been a major contributor to these threads?

I’m not against people showing muscle, but clothing is clothing and should not be physique-dependent. It should be appropriate to setting.

BrickHead · February 13, 2014, 7:51pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am exactly 5’11.5" in shoes to be exact which is “about six feet tall”.

According to military standards I am 5’10" and a quarter.

Apparently saying “about six feet in shoes” is now under examination.

Keep trying that hard to find things to bitch about.[/quote]

If I recall correctly, at some point it said in your profile you’re 5’10". [/quote]

Which would be correct. What is the problem again?[/quote]

Not a problem.

You just wrote you are 5’11" and change but in your profile it stated 5’10". Odd, that’s all.

super_saiyan · February 13, 2014, 8:20pm

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I think you drastically overestimate the amount of muscle you carry, and since you have consistently refused to get a hydrostatic or DEXA body fat(see any number of your shitstorm threads)or ever diet into non perma-bulk shape… all we will get is the same hunched shirted most muscular pose.

/also three year old shirtless photo
//although you are “bigger and leaner now”[/quote]

Why does it matter to you how much muscle I THINK I am carrying? And how would you know what I am thinking? [/quote]

Because you use your “size” as basis for your lifting knowledge.

It is a legitimate question therefore how much of your “size” is blubber.

After 52,000 posts… fucking EVERYBODY knows what you’re thinking.

Here’s an idea, why don’t you go post on a “hardcore” site like Stu has suggested…I’m sure all those IFBB and NPC guys will give you the respect you deserve.[/quote]

Best Post

super_saiyan · February 13, 2014, 8:24pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Because you use your “size” as basis for your lifting knowledge.

It is a legitimate question therefore how much of your “size” is blubber.

After 52,000 posts fucking EVERYBODY knows what your are thinking.

Here’s an idea, why don’t you go post on a “hardcore” site like Stu has suggested…I’m sure all those IFBB and NPC guys will give you the respect you deserve.[/quote]

Why would anyone try to make me leave a site unless they felt threatened by me being here?

Yes, I use my size to indicate I have some level of knowledge in building muscle mass. I seriously doubt anyone but keyboard warriors like you would argue against that in some lame effort to discredit everything I say in every thread possible.

But you won’t stop trolling these threads chasing after me…because you apparently fear the chance of people listening to me if you don’t.[/quote]

LOL. This is pure comedy.

Yes, that’s it; we are all scared that people will listen to you. It’s got nothing to do with the constant shit-stirring, race-baiting, or condescending remarks.

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 8:24pm

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am exactly 5’11.5" in shoes to be exact which is “about six feet tall”.

According to military standards I am 5’10" and a quarter.

Apparently saying “about six feet in shoes” is now under examination.

Keep trying that hard to find things to bitch about.[/quote]

If I recall correctly, at some point it said in your profile you’re 5’10". [/quote]

Which would be correct. What is the problem again?[/quote]

Not a problem.

You just wrote you are 5’11" and change but in your profile it stated 5’10". Odd, that’s all.
[/quote]

It isn’t odd at all. Stu grabbed that one statement from a thread about how tall CT is compared to me in a video.

Whenever I usually write my height, I use my military height, just like in my profile.

I was explaining in THAT ONE STATEMENT that I am closer to six feet in shoes.

How could that confuse anyone unless just searching for things to complain about?

Cherry picking statements out of context is real cute…but lazy as hell.

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 8:32pm

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]MattyXL wrote:
I do think alot of times the person calling a muscular/developed guy a douchebag has alot to do with that person’s insecurities about their own self image. [/quote]

Especially if they are narrowing it down to style of dress…as if that has anything to do with character or personality specifically.
[/quote]

Am I misremembering that there’s been considerable talk about things like fat women wearing “muffin tops” in GAL and that you’ve been a major contributor to these threads?

I’m not against people showing muscle, but clothing is clothing and should not be physique-dependent. It should be appropriate to setting. [/quote]

What does that have to do with calling someone a douche?

Girls with big muffin tops are just girls with big muffin tops. I don’t think I have ever called them a douche because of it…so what was your point again?

I would say they have poor taste in clothing or finding what fits…not call them a douche.

super_saiyan · February 13, 2014, 8:35pm

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote]

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S[/quote]
Yeah also 30 inch thighs, 18+ inch arms, 270 lbs, would need double the calories of Amit Sapir to prep, and “not-fat”

Inb4 it’s common to give your rough height in shoes in addition to your real height.

Oh and those dudes are douches. Cmon now guys
http://m.comedycentral.com/videos/video.rbml?id=5lepme&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.comedycentral.com%2Fvideos%2Findex.rbml
[/quote]

Of course they look like douches. PX defends anyone who has large amounts of muscle (e.g., Kai Greene banging a grapefruit).

If Hitler was jacked, PX would be defending the Holocaust.

The_Mighty_Stu · February 13, 2014, 9:26pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It isn’t odd at all. Stu grabbed that one statement from a thread about how tall CT is compared to me in a video.

Whenever I usually write my height, I use my military height, just like in my profile.

I was explaining in THAT ONE STATEMENT that I am closer to six feet in shoes.

How could that confuse anyone unless just searching for things to complain about?

Cherry picking statements out of context is real cute…but lazy as hell.[/quote]

If you can flash back several months, you purposely and repeatedly made an issue about how I had listed your height as “5’10” when I had never seen you in person. Yet your own profile, which you filled out yourself, stated just that. Had you not been so adamantly insistent that I was incorrect in my perception of your stature, I would never had even recalled the thread in question.

Label it what you want, but I doubt anyone would consider it cherry picking. That’s something that you wrote, because people were noticing that Thibs had competed in the 190 lb range, and his height was unconfirmed, so you needed to make yourself appear much larger in frame and structure so that people wouldn’t repeatedly bring up the topic of your bf% and how you looked next to him.

Nothing odd, unusual, out of context or anything about it. If I wanted to make my weight seem more impressive (like you’re trying to do in this thread by suddenly claiming you’re 5’10 again when talking to 6’1 UtahLama), I’d want people to think I was shorter as well. Of course intentionally trying to get people to think you’re 6’ tall (whoops, “Closer to 6’ in shoes”, never actually said it, just hoping that people would interpret it that way), well, what’s 2 inches in height here and there right?

S

Professor_X · February 13, 2014, 9:32pm