Most Human Power Produced?

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I see what you’re saying about sprinters, but think about how much power it takes to get a human body moving close to 30 mph. The amount of ground contact time for these guys is almost non existent, and to propel oneself over 100 meters in less than 10 seconds is fucking insane and would seemingly require or at least generate more power than throwing a fastball.[/quote]

Once the runner’s rate of acceleration has STARTED to fall (probably near 20mph), power output falls drastically, and it is pretty much all about leg speed after that. You have to look at acceleration rates alone, not top speed.

Although 28mph is absolutely ridiculous on feet.

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
artw wrote:
Kilosprinter2 wrote:
artw wrote:
Creating power relies on speed created as much as it does on mass moved. Even though the mass is so insignificant, the massive amount of speed and torque that the arm experiences, along with the high speeds of the projection of the ball out of the hand (remember that radar guns measure the speed as it crosses the plate; a pitch will deccelerate by about 1mph for every seven feet traveled; a 100mph fastball has a “muzzle velocity” of 107) are so much higher than any speed created during sprinting or heavy weightlifting or anything like that. The arm moves 7000 degrees/second.

Even though the arm isn’t moving a heavy weight, to approach the same type of power, a weightlifter would have to move thousands of pounds at a significant speed. The torque applied to the arm is insane as well.

Take the squat for example. If you use the knee joint as the place to measure degrees of movement, then a 1,000 lb. squat would have to move at less than 1/7 the speed of the pitching arm to equal the same power produced.

Basically, the body (or the bar) would have to travel from the bottom of a squat at just under 1/7 of the speed that the pitching arm moves at to create more power, if we assume that power=mass x speed.

I see what you’re saying. Power is defined at work/time.

These two examples below should equal the same about of work, right?
Can we assume that we have about 10lbs moving at 110mph?
Would that then equal 200lbs moving at 5.5mph?

How long does it take for a pitcher to accelerate his arm up to speed? 1/5 of a second?

I wish there was some way to measure it. But it’s really hard when you’re dealing with such short durations, that’s why in my original post I mentioned at least 1 second.

I think you are right though, the power output of a fast pitch is very high. It’s just hard to imagine since it doesn’t primarily use the large muscle groups.

I believe that in any “explosive” or “powerful” movement, there is some sort of pivot point or axis upon which degrees of movement can be measured. The movements that have a high amount of degrees per second will have the highest speeds generated. This kind of makes the speed of anything being projected from the body immaterial since the speed of those objects are affected by many other factors besides the power generated to move them (air resistance, gravity, drag, etc, etc.)

The pitching movement actually does use the large muscle groups to generate the power. The midsection and thighs uses momentum and torque to allow the arm to experience what would otherwise be extremely traumatic over and over again. That is why any pitching drill that does not incorporate the legs creates an arm motion that is actually completely alien to the arm motion needed to throw at high speeds with an acceptable amount of stress on the elbow and shoulder.

As for one second, remember that most of the truly explosive, powerful movements take much less than a second to occur. Even sprinting, which seems very powerful, isn’t nearly as explosive as a hammer throw. The sprinter is generating a lot of power in trying to move an object close to or more than 200lbs, but he really isn’t going fast at all until he hits top speed, which is probably only about 28mph anyways.

I see what you’re saying about sprinters, but think about how much power it takes to get a human body moving close to 30 mph. The amount of ground contact time for these guys is almost non existent, and to propel oneself over 100 meters in less than 10 seconds is fucking insane and would seemingly require or at least generate more power than throwing a fastball.[/quote]

Sprinting definitely requires a lot of strength, but it is actually a pretty inefficient use of that strength. What makes soemthing move quickly is strength, but the highest speeds, if all else is equal, is created through a more efficient movement. That’s why sprinters who tend to strike the ground heel first (like you and I and other non-elite runners) run much slower than those who land on the balls of their feet, which doesn’t create a slight braking action like landing on your heels does.

That being said, the pitching motion is a much more efficient use of the body to create such high speeds. It doesn’t look as powerful as running because a major reason for the speed generated is efficient movement rather than brute strength. That’s also why pitchers can continually repeat what is actually extremely stressful for the arm.

What about a punch, Quinton Jackson produced 1800 pounds of force with a single punch.

Since p = w/t, I’d say konstantin konstantinov’s typical training sessions.

[quote]artw wrote:
The most force produced during an athletic movement is when a pitcher throws a fastball.

The sudden acceleration that occurs when an arm moves from a near stop when the throwing hand is at its highest point before coming forward (the “L” position) at speeds that allow the ball to travel at or near 100mph is the highest amount of acceleration per degree of movement ever recorded in any sort of athletic movement (7000 degrees per second). The sudden decceleration after release is equally intense.

Tim Lincecum, although his velocity is usually around 93-95mph, can throw a 4-seam fastball around 97-98. For a pitcher as small as he is, when compared to other pichers who throw that hard but are much bigger, his pitching delivery may generate power from his arm that tops the force output of virtually any other athlete.

Pedro Martinez and Roy Oswalt used to hit the high 90’s with smaller than average sizes as well.

http://www.asbweb.org/conferences/2000/pdf/031.pdf[/quote]

Don’t forget cricket.

The fastest delivery that has ever been officially recorded clocked in at 161.3 km/h (100.2 mph) and was bowled by Shoaib Akhtar of Pakistan during a match against England in the 2003 Cricket World Cup.

Olympic weightlifters have recorded power outputs between 3000-5000Watts, the highest I’m aware of for any athlete.

[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:
artw wrote:
The most force produced during an athletic movement is when a pitcher throws a fastball.

The sudden acceleration that occurs when an arm moves from a near stop when the throwing hand is at its highest point before coming forward (the “L” position) at speeds that allow the ball to travel at or near 100mph is the highest amount of acceleration per degree of movement ever recorded in any sort of athletic movement (7000 degrees per second). The sudden decceleration after release is equally intense.

Tim Lincecum, although his velocity is usually around 93-95mph, can throw a 4-seam fastball around 97-98. For a pitcher as small as he is, when compared to other pichers who throw that hard but are much bigger, his pitching delivery may generate power from his arm that tops the force output of virtually any other athlete.

Pedro Martinez and Roy Oswalt used to hit the high 90’s with smaller than average sizes as well.

http://www.asbweb.org/conferences/2000/pdf/031.pdf

Don’t forget cricket.

The fastest delivery that has ever been officially recorded clocked in at 161.3 km/h (100.2 mph) and was bowled by Shoaib Akhtar of Pakistan during a match against England in the 2003 Cricket World Cup.
[/quote]

There’s a few pitchers in the bigs who routinely throw 99-100mph. I saw Brian Wilson (closer for the Giants) hit 100 about ten times last night. Nolan Ryan was clocked as high as 105mph.

[quote]artw wrote:
The most force produced during an athletic movement is when a pitcher throws a fastball.[/quote]

No. Throwing a little ball, is not the most force a human is going to produce.

Baseball is the worst sport ever anyways.

Long jump or high jump?

[quote]artw wrote:
Creating power relies on speed created as much as it does on mass moved. Even though the mass is so insignificant, the massive amount of speed and torque that the arm experiences, along with the high speeds of the projection of the ball out of the hand (remember that radar guns measure the speed as it crosses the plate; a pitch will deccelerate by about 1mph for every seven feet traveled; a 100mph fastball has a “muzzle velocity” of 107) are so much higher than any speed created during sprinting or heavy weightlifting or anything like that. The arm moves 7000 degrees/second.

Even though the arm isn’t moving a heavy weight, to approach the same type of power, a weightlifter would have to move thousands of pounds at a significant speed. The torque applied to the arm is insane as well.

Take the squat for example. If you use the knee joint as the place to measure degrees of movement, then a 1,000 lb. squat would have to move at less than 1/7 the speed of the pitching arm to equal the same power produced.

Basically, the body (or the bar) would have to travel from the bottom of a squat at just under 1/7 of the speed that the pitching arm moves at to create more power, if we assume that power=mass x speed.[/quote]

Hey genius, momentum is mass x speed
force is acceleration (NOT SPEED) x mass
and power is force per unit time…
therefore the squat would not even have to be remotely 1/7 the speed of the pitch…
You really need to study your physics.

[quote]WRPL wrote:
artw wrote:
Creating power relies on speed created as much as it does on mass moved. Even though the mass is so insignificant, the massive amount of speed and torque that the arm experiences, along with the high speeds of the projection of the ball out of the hand (remember that radar guns measure the speed as it crosses the plate; a pitch will deccelerate by about 1mph for every seven feet traveled; a 100mph fastball has a “muzzle velocity” of 107) are so much higher than any speed created during sprinting or heavy weightlifting or anything like that. The arm moves 7000 degrees/second.

Even though the arm isn’t moving a heavy weight, to approach the same type of power, a weightlifter would have to move thousands of pounds at a significant speed. The torque applied to the arm is insane as well.

Take the squat for example. If you use the knee joint as the place to measure degrees of movement, then a 1,000 lb. squat would have to move at less than 1/7 the speed of the pitching arm to equal the same power produced.

Basically, the body (or the bar) would have to travel from the bottom of a squat at just under 1/7 of the speed that the pitching arm moves at to create more power, if we assume that power=mass x speed.

Hey genius, momentum is mass x speed
force is acceleration (NOT SPEED) x mass
and power is force per unit time…
therefore the squat would not even have to be remotely 1/7 the speed of the pitch…
You really need to study your physics.
[/quote]

Well, then it’s settled. Throwing a baseball is the highest amount of acceleration (and probably decceleration) that the human body endures during an athletic movement.

[quote]WRPL wrote:
artw wrote:
Creating power relies on speed created as much as it does on mass moved. Even though the mass is so insignificant, the massive amount of speed and torque that the arm experiences, along with the high speeds of the projection of the ball out of the hand (remember that radar guns measure the speed as it crosses the plate; a pitch will deccelerate by about 1mph for every seven feet traveled; a 100mph fastball has a “muzzle velocity” of 107) are so much higher than any speed created during sprinting or heavy weightlifting or anything like that. The arm moves 7000 degrees/second.

Even though the arm isn’t moving a heavy weight, to approach the same type of power, a weightlifter would have to move thousands of pounds at a significant speed. The torque applied to the arm is insane as well.

Take the squat for example. If you use the knee joint as the place to measure degrees of movement, then a 1,000 lb. squat would have to move at less than 1/7 the speed of the pitching arm to equal the same power produced.

Basically, the body (or the bar) would have to travel from the bottom of a squat at just under 1/7 of the speed that the pitching arm moves at to create more power, if we assume that power=mass x speed.

Hey genius, momentum is mass x speed
force is acceleration (NOT SPEED) x mass
and power is force per unit time…
therefore the squat would not even have to be remotely 1/7 the speed of the pitch…
You really need to study your physics.
[/quote]

Actually, I just looked up the equation for power. It can be written as either work/time, force x displacement/time or force x velocity (velocity being displacement/time.) Here’s a helpful link.

http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/energy/u5l1e.html

[quote]Producer wrote:

No. Throwing a little ball, is not the most force a human is going to produce.

Baseball is the worst sport ever anyways.[/quote]

Fail.


This guy’s punch of course

[quote]GluteusGigantis wrote:
Olympic weightlifters have recorded power outputs between 3000-5000Watts, the highest I’m aware of for any athlete.[/quote]

This.

Ivan Drago when he punches the pad and registers 2250 lbs/sq in

[quote]Bunyip wrote:
This guy’s punch of course

[/quote]

SOB, you beat me to it, lol

Rocky put at least 3000 lbs/in^2 of pressure into each one his wood chops.

[quote]artw wrote:
The arm moves 7000 degrees/second.
[/quote]

Measuring in terms of degrees seems as if it could be a mistake.

For example, if the lever is short, the actual speed will be vastly reduced. A helicopter blade has to move a hell of a lot faster than a fan to rotate 360 degrees in say, a second.