[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]sam_sneed wrote:
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
[quote]Loudog75 wrote:
I believe the point of the article should be - don’t carry excess fat in your effort to look big. [/quote]
Bingo - that’s really all the article is saying. That’s BG’s point as well.
I don’t know how it got so convoluted.[/quote]
Yeah and I agreed with the that point. But when BG said:
"It wasn’t the point of the article and it wasn’t my point. The point of the article was, a lot of guys are on a constant bulk and carry more junk that necessary and it’s unhealthy (it absolutely is). My point was as middle age nears, it’s not healthy to be 250 plus no matter what the composition . It’s a strain on your heart - period. End of story. "
despite bragging about how great shape he is in at 240 lbs. 240 is OK. 250, that’s unhealthy.[/quote]
Exactly. If all BG was saying was “don’t get obese”, no one would be challenging him. Instead, a guy with very little to no medical background is trying to tell us that a specific weight is the cause of poor health…all while degrading every single person who disagrees with him.
If “250lbs” is now unhealthy, why the hell would he weigh just 10lbs south of death?
…and then act like the guys with medical training are clueless?
OK.[/quote]
If bodyweight was all that mattered in lifespan, then elephants would be fucked.
[/quote]
Maybe if the elephants didn’t get so big, then maybe they’d live twice as long?
So much for that theory, asshole.
:)[/quote]
Maybe if they used protein powder and lifted weights they would live twice as long.
Oh wait, thats ridiculous isnt it? So its not really relevant.
Small animals have much reduced lifespans. Theres a pretty good correlation between body size and lifespan.
So much for your theory asshole.
Strap-ons ready by the way, but who knows, I might put sand in the lube…[/quote]
Wrong AGAIN, MassiveVagina.
The numbers are all over the place, as seen here:
African Grey Parrot 73 Amazon Parrot 104
American Alligator 56 American Box Turtle 123
American Newt 3 American Toad 15
Angleworm 15 Anole 3
Ant --Queen 3 Ant – Worker 1/2
Banksian Cockatoo 29.3 Bat 24
Bear 40 Beaver 20
Bee – Queen 5 Bee – Worker 1
Binturong 18 Blackbird(redwinged) 15.8
Boa Constrictor 23 Budgerigar 29
Bull 28 Bull Frog 16
Bull Snake 18 Caiman 28
Camel 50 Canada Goose 24.3
Canary 24 Canvasback duck 22.4
Capybara 12 Carp 100
Cat 25 Chicken 14
Chinchilla 20 Civet 13
Cockatiel 35 Common Goldeneye 14.3
Congo Eel 27 Conure 22.5
Cottonmouth Mocassin 21 Cow 22
Crocodile 45 Deer 26.8
Dog 22 Domestic Pigeon 18
Donkey 45 Eclectus Parrot 30
Egyptian Goose 25.5 Elephant 70
Fence Lizard 4 Ferret 12
Flying Squirrel 14 Fox 14
Galah 27.2 Galapagos Land Tortoise 193
Gerbil 5 Goat 15
Golden Hamster 4 Gouldian finch 14
Grey Cheeked Parrot 15 Grey Squirrel 20
Grouse (blue) 14 Guinea Pig 8
Hare 10 Hellbender 29
Hippopotamus 45 Hog 18
Horse 40 Kangaroo 9
Koala 8 Leopard Frog 6
Lion 35 Macaw 64
Mallard 29 Mongoose 12
Mouse 4 Muscrat 6
Mudpuppy 9 Mynah 25
Norwegian Rat 4 Nutria 15
Opossum 4 Ox 20
Painted Turtle 11 Pea Fowl 23.2
Pheasant 14 Pig – wild 25
Pionus Parrot 40 Platypus 10
Porcupine 20 Prarie Dog 10
Quail (California) 6.9 Rabbit 9
Rainbow Lorikeet 15 Rat Snake 23
Rattlesnake 22 Red Eared Turtle 30.5
Ring-necked Duck 20.5 Rhinoceros 40
Rosella 15.4 Sheep 15
Snapping Turtle 57 South African Clawed Toad 15
Sulphur Crested Cockatoo 80 Superb Parrot 36
Tapir 30 Tasmanian Tiger 7
Teal 22.3 Tiger 22
Tiger Salamander 11 Toucan 20
Tree Frog 14 Trumpeter Swan 33
Wood Duck 22.5 Wombat 15
Wolf 18 Woodchuck 15
Zebra Finch 12
Your “pretty good” correlation of animal and size theory sucks MassiveCock.[/quote]
Where did you get that list, some of those numbers seem off. African greys don’t generally live that long, averages are more in the 45-55 range, at least in captivity. Same for amazons. They average like 50-60 years.[/quote]
I got it here… Life Spans
It looked like a few were off, also. Plus, when I cut and pasted the info, some of the numbers were misplaced…[/quote]
As usual you’re way behind the freakshow brah. You got ass-raped by the 12 inch penetrator and you haven’t even realised it yet. Guess you’ve done this before sugar puff…[/quote]
Wut?
That info was pretty interesting, to be honest. I never would have guessed the lifespan of some of these animals in a million years.
In any case, I have no problem conceding that I was wrong in what I thought. No biggie.
Also, big props to ImpatientBull for making his first post count. He did the work that MassiveShit couldn’t do.[/quote]
Actually, it’s not so much a correlation between body mass and life span but a perception of time and life span. Flies live very brief lives but scientists have observed that they burn through their lives in a way that allows them to view time differently than us. Ever wondered why it’s so hard to catch a fly? Their lives are condensed and somehow their perspectives are too.
I’m not going to post up a shopping list of animal life expectancies, but the galapagos tortoise can live to be hundreds of years old. Much smaller than an elephant.
