(Mighty) Stu Yellin, WNBF Pro Updates n Q&A

[quote]timmcbride00 wrote:
Thanks Stu. I am still working to break 17" in off season mode (obviously would be smaller in contest prep, but like you, I don’t lose much off the arms because they don’t get too fat). Arms have become my new obsession.[/quote]

I think any smart competitor has to go through periods of focusing on ‘weaker’ areas. Every off season I had, I tried to focus on both, my chest and my legs. Luckily, I was able to continue to make progress year after year, but damn if specializing on 2 areas didn’t make for some constant discomfort. With the illusion that is bodybuilding, smart dieting is always the best option (as you well know!) I’ve mentioned before how a close friend of mine is so much bigger than I am offseason, and yet our contest weights are only about 8 lbs apart.

As an aside, even when I first started following the sport, I noticed some people seemed to more easily develop their pecs while others are more back inclined. Sure there will be those who come up at a perfectly even pace, but more often than not, there seems to be some degree of unevenness in terms of ease of development.

S

[quote]kravi wrote:
Stu,

Not posting a link (because I don’t want anyone to think I’m pushing a product - which I’m not) but for me, the best thing I ever did in terms of making life better was buy this:

8 Steps to a Pain-Free Back: Natural Posture Solutions for Pain in the Back, Neck, Shoulder, Hip, Knee, and Foot Paperback
by Esther Gokhale

First, it completely blew my mind. She did her homework. Second, it works. I can sit for hours without pain, my posture is great, no more back pain. The only down side is that I had to get all of my suits re-tailored because my posture changed so radically.

–Me

P.S. I have absolutely no affiliation with her, her company, or anything else to do with training, pain management, etc. Its just a good ****ing book.[/quote]

Thanks for the info. It’s funny, but I was online a few weeks ago reading about various “back pain” books. Now admitedly, I’m very happy (and lucky) to have the resources that I do in terms of therapists and Drs, and I also realize that despite being very careful and smart in all of my years of training, that you can only do so much when you insist on constantly pounding away at your body. As such, I figured I’d buy a book that not so much goes into the therapeutic details of addressing the issues, but talks more about the everyday things we do that aren’t really conducive to being 100%.

I forget which one I purchased (I’m at work at the moment), but once I have the time to sit down and get through it, I’ll give a little summary on here. It had quite a list of very positive reviews, from people certainly much more beaten up than this aging bodybuilder :slight_smile:

S

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]timmcbride00 wrote:
Thanks Stu. I am still working to break 17" in off season mode (obviously would be smaller in contest prep, but like you, I don’t lose much off the arms because they don’t get too fat). Arms have become my new obsession.[/quote]

I think any smart competitor has to go through periods of focusing on ‘weaker’ areas. Every off season I had, I tried to focus on both, my chest and my legs. Luckily, I was able to continue to make progress year after year, but damn if specializing on 2 areas didn’t make for some constant discomfort. With the illusion that is bodybuilding, smart dieting is always the best option (as you well know!) I’ve mentioned before how a close friend of mine is so much bigger than I am offseason, and yet our contest weights are only about 8 lbs apart.

As an aside, even when I first started following the sport, I noticed some people seemed to more easily develop their pecs while others are more back inclined. Sure there will be those who come up at a perfectly even pace, but more often than not, there seems to be some degree of unevenness in terms of ease of development.

S[/quote]

I can relate, chest and back both grow fairly well for me, while ares definitely do not.

It is an area I need to focus on. I have two things working against me:

  1. Years of only doing basic pressing and rows with little direct arm work (before I cared about bodybuilding).

  2. Longer limbs which creates leverages favoring chest and back growth over arms growth on compound exercises.

#1 also contributed to a good mind/muscle connection with the chest and back. Now I have to work to do the same thing with my arms.

I am kind of new to posting on the these forums so I am not sure the normal response time for a new thread.

Anyways, I feel as if I can trust the answer of the people in here as they all seem pretty experienced.

So can someone take a look at this and leave me a reply?

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/sports_body_training_performance_bodybuilding/is_this_idea_good_bad

Thanks a million.


A little non-training sharing today… My wife is 5 months pregnant, and we just got a few new sonogram photos the other night. Most were the usual looking stuff you would expect, but this one just jumped out at me. If I didn’t know better, I’d swear my lil’ guy is already hitting a bicep shot :slight_smile:

S

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
A little non-training sharing today… My wife is 5 months pregnant, and we just got a few new sonogram photos the other night. Most were the usual looking stuff you would expect, but this one just jumped out at me. If I didn’t know better, I’d swear my lil’ guy is already hitting a bicep shot :slight_smile:

S[/quote]

That is awesome! The fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree, eh?

–Me

That’s awesome Stu, really happy for you and Cat :slight_smile:

He’s gotta start early if he wants to be as good as his dad.

[quote]truthandlife wrote:
Stu,

I have you ever done a front carb load for peak week? If you have what has been your experience and what are the pluses and minuses? Also, how do you really know you have “filled out.” I have had a tough time evaluating that in my past two shows. Thanks. [/quote]

Sorry, I guess I missed this and started going on about other topics. I know you already competed (saw the pics, very good showing brother!)

I know of a few coaches who make arguments for front loading. The rationale usually being that by having the majority up front, and training through the week, you can assess your fullness day by day and if you look like you’re starting to spill, you scale pull back.

The usual approach most competitors take (I guess this is the more traditional method just by popularity) is to drop for a period (a few days), and then count on the supercompensation effect during an abbreviated (a day, possibly 2 days) load to fill out the carb hungry muscles.

With either method, as far as gauging when you’ve “filled out”, it really is a matter of developing an eye for how you look, and how that can change over the course of just a few hours. When I started competing, I figured it was preferable to undercarb and look shredded albeit smaller than try for an extra lb of stage muscle and end up smooth in the process. Each year I got a little ballsier in how much I ate the day before and day of the show. Of course I also learned to pay very careful attention to how I looked, and how ingesting certain foods while I was pumping up affected not just my physique, but how I felt onstage.

What I would suggest, with either approach, is to always leave yourself enough time (the morning of the contest) to pull back a little bit. If your contest is on a Saturday morning, and you’ve been stuffing your face all day Friday to the point that you’re going to bed with a horribly distended stomach, and all the “really cool” veins and feathering you’ve been bragging about all week are nowhere to be seen, there’s a pretty good chance that you pushed things a little too far. You can only do so much ‘cleaning up’ in the few hours before prejudging Saturday morning.

S

Hey Stu, sorry if you’ve answered this question somewhere else but I have some specific questions about a reverse diet into a lean bulk and how you do/would do it. I’m currently at 200 protein, 180 carb, and 60 fat adding in 5 carbs everyday Monday thru Friday, I’ve been doing this since 110 carbs. Should I just keep doing this slowly but surely until I get to a calorie level where I feel like is 200-300 above maintenance?

[quote]chobbs wrote:
Hey Stu, sorry if you’ve answered this question somewhere else but I have some specific questions about a reverse diet into a lean bulk and how you do/would do it. I’m currently at 200 protein, 180 carb, and 60 fat adding in 5 carbs everyday Monday thru Friday, I’ve been doing this since 110 carbs. Should I just keep doing this slowly but surely until I get to a calorie level where I feel like is 200-300 above maintenance?[/quote]

Wow, 5g of carbs,… that’s really a very small amount. I usually try to make 25g jumps every week or so, which is about a bowl of oatmeal, a poptart, basically one extra carb feeding to most people.

Remember though that everyone will be different though in terms of how quickly you re-acclimate. Also, how low your carbs were during your cut can have some effect on reintroducing carbs. If you went for a while with pretty run down glycogen stores (very low carb, or even keto diet), you’ll be able to load in quite a bit right away without any visible ill effect.

Of course as your stores become full, if you keep a very accelerated intake, you’ll see a lot more spilling due to your now skewed tolerance. This is why the slow and steady approach is often advised.

As to how far you should go, do you know what your starting maintenance numbers were? I’d definitely get back there slowly, but then instead of just trying to bring every day macros up further, I’d push for more of a nutrient load on the days where you can really put them to use. I’m a big fan of cyclical nutrition, not just when cutting, but even when pushing for size. I remember Scott Conolly (sp?) talking about better physique progress with this approach vs steady, baseline ones.

S

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]chobbs wrote:
Hey Stu, sorry if you’ve answered this question somewhere else but I have some specific questions about a reverse diet into a lean bulk and how you do/would do it. I’m currently at 200 protein, 180 carb, and 60 fat adding in 5 carbs everyday Monday thru Friday, I’ve been doing this since 110 carbs. Should I just keep doing this slowly but surely until I get to a calorie level where I feel like is 200-300 above maintenance?[/quote]

Wow, 5g of carbs,… that’s really a very small amount. I usually try to make 25g jumps every week or so, which is about a bowl of oatmeal, a poptart, basically one extra carb feeding to most people.

Remember though that everyone will be different though in terms of how quickly you re-acclimate. Also, how low your carbs were during your cut can have some effect on reintroducing carbs. If you went for a while with pretty run down glycogen stores (very low carb, or even keto diet), you’ll be able to load in quite a bit right away without any visible ill effect.

Of course as your stores become full, if you keep a very accelerated intake, you’ll see a lot more spilling due to your now skewed tolerance. This is why the slow and steady approach is often advised.

As to how far you should go, do you know what your starting maintenance numbers were? I’d definitely get back there slowly, but then instead of just trying to bring every day macros up further, I’d push for more of a nutrient load on the days where you can really put them to use. I’m a big fan of cyclical nutrition, not just when cutting, but even when pushing for size. I remember Scott Conolly (sp?) talking about better physique progress with this approach vs steady, baseline ones.

S

[/quote]

Obv go with the pop tart increase a week

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]chobbs wrote:
Hey Stu, sorry if you’ve answered this question somewhere else but I have some specific questions about a reverse diet into a lean bulk and how you do/would do it. I’m currently at 200 protein, 180 carb, and 60 fat adding in 5 carbs everyday Monday thru Friday, I’ve been doing this since 110 carbs. Should I just keep doing this slowly but surely until I get to a calorie level where I feel like is 200-300 above maintenance?[/quote]

Wow, 5g of carbs,… that’s really a very small amount. I usually try to make 25g jumps every week or so, which is about a bowl of oatmeal, a poptart, basically one extra carb feeding to most people.

Remember though that everyone will be different though in terms of how quickly you re-acclimate. Also, how low your carbs were during your cut can have some effect on reintroducing carbs. If you went for a while with pretty run down glycogen stores (very low carb, or even keto diet), you’ll be able to load in quite a bit right away without any visible ill effect.

Of course as your stores become full, if you keep a very accelerated intake, you’ll see a lot more spilling due to your now skewed tolerance. This is why the slow and steady approach is often advised.

As to how far you should go, do you know what your starting maintenance numbers were? I’d definitely get back there slowly, but then instead of just trying to bring every day macros up further, I’d push for more of a nutrient load on the days where you can really put them to use. I’m a big fan of cyclical nutrition, not just when cutting, but even when pushing for size. I remember Scott Conolly (sp?) talking about better physique progress with this approach vs steady, baseline ones.

S

[/quote]

  1. The last week of my cut my carbs were 110 but they were normally in the 150 range.
  2. My starting numbers were 250 protein 250 carb and 75 fat but if I had to do it all over again I would start at 225 protein 275 carb and 75 fat.
  3. When talking about cycling…are you advising kind of like a carb cycling approach but with every macro?
    EDIT: Also as an education major, I was wondering how do you get all of your meals in throughout the day?

Stu,

Great Thread! When you were competing, did you track macro’s both in the off-season as well as when you were in contest prep? Would you mind sharing some examples? Thx!

Stu, I read this quote from you in the thread where the guy was asking if he could be ready in 6 weeks:

How would you go about doing that?

I’m not looking at doing that myself, so I’m speaking somewhat hypothetically, but I’m a little lost between all the different approaches I’ve seen and read about. I’d like to know what your general approach would be to this.

[quote]chobbs wrote:

  1. The last week of my cut my carbs were 110 but they were normally in the 150 range.
  2. My starting numbers were 250 protein 250 carb and 75 fat but if I had to do it all over again I would start at 225 protein 275 carb and 75 fat.
  3. When talking about cycling…are you advising kind of like a carb cycling approach but with every macro?
    EDIT: Also as an education major, I was wondering how do you get all of your meals in throughout the day?[/quote]

1- OKay, now this is important. As you weren’t really dieting on a very high carb approach, you might want to take smaller steps, or even (as I like to do), just bump #s on some days each week at first. 110g + 25g (a banana or a bowl or oatmeal) can be your first step up, possibly only on days you train, taking advantage of the heightened insulin sensitivity. One more 25g bump a week or two later and you’re pretty close to where you were and can then plan a slow increase from there.

2- Yeah, this is something that I think a lot of people need to realize on their own. In the right nutritional environment, when your body is using macros for their intended (ideal) purposes, you don’t need to overeat protein as most of us were instructed when we first started out. I was very surprised when I started comparing notes with other natty competitors, in finding how little some of them were eating during preps.

3- Carbs are the major nutrient that is adjusted and readjusted during most cuts, but that doesn’t mean that you never pay attention to fats or protein. When you’re loading in carbs on a high day, or refeed, you can drop protein (won’t need extra because your body won’t scavenge aminos in the presence of higher carbs) and fats (which can slow digestion, making you feel fuller and possibly uncomfortable getting all your carbs in) accordingly.

Also, there has been some good pieces written on the possible advantages of protein cycling as well. I’ve never tried it personally with the intention of influencing a greater growth response, but some people do seem to give the premise some credit.

Fitting food in huh? I must be the only teacher who carries a full cooler to work every day. It’s not always easy, but I also realize that where I work, there aren’t too many options to support my goals if I don’t. Years ago, I figured if I popped into any bodega or 7-11 and grabbed a protein bar I was good. Of course I also didn’t have the big-picture perspective I do now. The more factors that you control each day, the less progress can get derailed when you do have to fudge things for a bit.

And yes, I do have top routinely eat in class. While I wouldn’t suggest whipping out a tupperware of chicken and rice expecting people not to look at you funny, a pre-loaded shaker of protein powder, beef jerky and almonds, or even some string cheeses can definitely get you through.

S

Thanks stu, I really appreciate it

My bad about asking that question. I suppose that’s kind of a slippery slope (e.g., Stu said I should… and it didn’t work…), as well as being just very very vague.

I just read through your first contest prep thread the other day, back in 2009, and I had a few questions. One of the things that stood out was that everything started coming together once you added in the morning walks.

Given the 5 years of experience you’ve had since then, how/when/where do you use HIIT, and at what point do you start and increase LISS? Do you make any diet changes around the cardio itself? (Peri-cardio nutrition, lol)

I guess as a second question, do you actually use any sort of carb refeed approach? Obviously it’s effective for some people, but I’m just wondering your experience with it. (I realize some of these questions could be answered if I read your other prep threads.)

EDIT: I’ve now read another two of your prep logs, and I’ve kind of answered the first question, but I’m still curious about your current views about nutrition around cardio… specifically the HIIT.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
My bad about asking that question. I suppose that’s kind of a slippery slope (e.g., Stu said I should… and it didn’t work…), as well as being just very very vague.[/quote]

That’s just it, when you introduce the constant issue of individuality, the slippery slope is people ignoring that very important premise and assuming “This” is how you do it. Then when it doesn’t pan out, so and so has no clue what he’s talking about -lol.

Trust me, I’ve seen competitors engage in some serious self torture in making certain weight classes, as a bodybuilder, and in watching my brother and several close friends who were wrestlers. My old training partner was helping a co-worker who had entered a weight loss contest. As this woman had no interest in looking ‘fit’, my buddy did everything he could to crash her down with the largest number value of weight loss you could imagine. As a bodybuilder though, you have to look at the big picture, and unless you’re on the cusp of two weight classes and/or have muscle to spare (who would ever admit to that?) intentional muscle loss is never acceptable.

[quote]
I just read through your first contest prep thread the other day, back in 2009, and I had a few questions. One of the things that stood out was that everything started coming together once you added in the morning walks.

Given the 5 years of experience you’ve had since then, how/when/where do you use HIIT, and at what point do you start and increase LISS? Do you make any diet changes around the cardio itself? (Peri-cardio nutrition, lol)[/quote]

I look back at that prep, and while it definitely worked, I think I learned a lot more as the years went on. There was certainly some science behind what I was doing, but admittedly there was also the push from being a gym rat so long, and always hearing from self-professed experts. The issue for me was in figuring out what the right call was, knowing that there wasn’t time for “do-overs”. In '09, there weren’t really too many competitors voicing their experiences on here to my recollection. There were plenty of folks all trying to help, but let’s just say that it’s a very different landscape in the bodybuilding forum in 2014 than it was in 2009.

When I added the bit of morning walking, I don’t think it was anything magical, merely that extra bit that tilted me into progress again. I do think LISS can have its place, and if you look back at the prep you’re speaking of, my carb intake was considerably lower than it would be in subsequent ones. It’s always a delicate balance between keeping enough to fuel your training and stave off muscle catabolism, with being low enough to allow your body to dig into fat at a dependable rate.

I’ve had clients who are more sensitive to carbs, that I tried the LISS approach with and as it wouldn’t be stressful in their usual lower carb daily intake approach. I’ve also had clients who were equally sensitive, but we could target carbs around their HIIT, while keeping intake very low the rest of the day, and gotten good results as well. When faced with a call of which approach to take that first guess with, I try to figure around their daily schedules, how much time they’re spending in the gym, and how receptive they have been to what we’ve done up to this point.

Personally, in my latter contest preps, you’ll notice the pattern I had of heavy carb feedings before HIT. I felt that I got a lot more out of being able to power through a session than being the guy half asleep doing a 1 mph walk on a treadmill for an hour or more every day. I’m currently prepping an NPC bikini girl who’s last “trainer” had her doing 2 hours of cardio a day, and barely eating (no carbs and no fats, brilliant understanding of nutrition this ‘trainer’ has). In the last month she’s got back definition she’s never had, a visible bicep, rear delts, things she never saw before, but, most importantly, she tells me she feel healthy and energetic! She’s eating more now than during any previous prep, BUT, she’s FEEDING HER TRAINING (including cardio), and so she’s getting more out of it.

[quote]
I guess as a second question, do you actually use any sort of carb refeed approach? Obviously it’s effective for some people, but I’m just wondering your experience with it. (I realize some of these questions could be answered if I read your other prep threads.)[/quote]

I’m definitely a big fan of a cyclical approach. Now if that means your basic low/med/high carb cycling, a cyclical keto, full keto with refeed… will depend on the person, and how their body is responding at that time in their prep. To consider is always what their average day looks like in terms of carb intake.

SOme people have a 200g daily carb intake, but for whatever reason feel the need to refeed every week at over 1000g. To me, that’s silly. Sure your body benefits after prolonged dieting from an influx of carbs, but I highly doubt that 1000g is necessary, and if 400g would do the same job, isn’t the extra 600g (600 x 4 = 2400 extra calories!) just counterproductive?
I’ve seen coaches who recommend this type of approach, who also have people doing hours of cardio a day. To me, that’s just a waste of time and energy. Refeed on less, do less cardio, and enjoy the process of not being on a piece of cardio equipment all the day!

S

Then you have ppl like me that will do anythign to be able to eat more :slight_smile: and enjoy the walking and more training. For school it focuses me and gets me off my ass so studying isn’t so awful. Scheudle will most likely change with clinicals though :slight_smile: