165…he’s 6’3 and has all those freakishly disproportionate limbs thats very surprising he looks bigger than that…
/end pointless “2009’r” post
165…he’s 6’3 and has all those freakishly disproportionate limbs thats very surprising he looks bigger than that…
/end pointless “2009’r” post
Fuckin '09ers
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
Fuckin '09ers[/quote]
You’re just jealous that Micheal Phelps (and probably the OP, too) is more jacked than you.
Hater.
[quote]BMellow wrote:
165…he’s 6’3 and has all those freakishly disproportionate limbs thats very surprising he looks bigger than that…
/end pointless “2009’r” post[/quote]
That’s hard to believe after they put so much emphasis on him working out in the gym before the olympics. meh
You have to be light to swim.
Where did this info come from ?
Says on Wikipedia ( yeah, i know…) that he weighs 200 lbs.
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
Where did this info come from ?
Says on Wikipedia ( yeah, i know…) that he weighs 200 lbs.[/quote]
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
200 does sound about right, I’m 5’10 160 and there is no way hes 6’3 165… unless he looks anorexic
[quote]Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
[/quote]
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.
[quote]malonetd wrote:
Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.[/quote]
What?
There are no biochemics or nuclear physics trolls?
[quote]orion wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.
What?
There are no biochemics or nuclear physics trolls?
[/quote]
They’re called ‘Creationists’
[quote]tjr-dk wrote:
orion wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.
What?
There are no biochemics or nuclear physics trolls?
They’re called ‘Creationists’[/quote]
Hahaha well played.
[quote]tjr-dk wrote:
orion wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.
What?
There are no biochemics or nuclear physics trolls?
They’re called ‘Creationists’[/quote]
For such a monumentally nerdy joke, it made me laugh … well done, brutha
[quote]tjr-dk wrote:
orion wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Amiright wrote:
Wikipedia is actually one of the more accurate places to get information now a days(they’ve made a lot of improvements over the years)… although that’s for scientific information.
Wikipedia has some of the better science and math articles/entries. It’s the biographical entries that you have to watch out for. Those are far more likely to be hit by vandals.
What?
There are no biochemics or nuclear physics trolls?
They’re called ‘Creationists’[/quote]
I lol’d
well done sire
His bones are HOLLOW!!!
there is no way Michael Phelps is 165. At the weekend I’m swimming 50 back in national championships. In the race (though not necessarily against me) is Liam Tamcock, the british world record holder. I’ve met him before and he’s a big lad, easily 200 pounds or more.
Gregor Tait and Kris Gilchrist, and Kirsty Balfour, all olympic swimmers, swam at my club and even before they were commonwealth were all 200 plus (170-180 for Kirsty). Dunno where you got that from. And working out routines for swimmers are in their infancy… only in the last 5 years have coaches realised you need to train legs with any intensity
200 lbs?
[quote]leaftye wrote:
200 lbs?[/quote]
Doesn’t matter how much he weighs since his power level is OVER 9000!!!
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
Fuckin '09ers[/quote]
Fucking 9ers fans
I have to admit I didnt go past the first page on google after typing in “michael phelps weight”
Full name: Michael Phelps
Weight: 165 (88 kg)
Feet size: 14
Arm span: 200 cm
Had i read further I would of come by this little tidbit, an interview with IGN:
IGN Sports: You’re 6’ 4", about 200 pounds. Is your physique all from swimming, or do you hit the weights?
Michael Phelps: I’ve never lifted a single weight in my life. It’s all from training in the water, period. That’s not to say I wouldn’t lift in the future, but now, no.
200lbs sounds a lot more realistic…
[quote]BMellow wrote:
I have to admit I didnt go past the first page on google after typing in “michael phelps weight”
Full name: Michael Phelps
Weight: 165 (88 kg)
Feet size: 14
Arm span: 200 cm
Had i read further I would of come by this little tidbit, an interview with IGN:
IGN Sports: You’re 6’ 4", about 200 pounds. Is your physique all from swimming, or do you hit the weights?
Michael Phelps: I’ve never lifted a single weight in my life. It’s all from training in the water, period. That’s not to say I wouldn’t lift in the future, but now, no.
200lbs sounds a lot more realistic…[/quote]
Whew! Now I can sleep!