It seems like certain posters get poked fun of more than others, but that’s because eventually, when sound arguments and logic get dismissed as laughable, the only thing left besides complete ignoring is poking fun. Sometimes you have to laugh at the “your smaller than me, so what do you know” kind of people.
I purposely didn’t say x because he thinks he gets singled out unnessecarrily, but in reality, anyone that acted like him would be treated the same way.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
^Oh, boy.[/quote]
Y’all serious?
Old back pic.
[photo]38769[/photo]
I fail to see how he looks like we are carrying the same size.
I will update these pics later but please.
Yes, I am carrying more fat in this pic…but if you can’t see the muscle there, something is wrong.[/quote]
Fucking ronnie rockel better watch out. You just gonna ignore my 3 year point?
Cause I kind wanna know why on earth you would lie saying that the vids are 3 years old…
You guys are all big mean jerks
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
You guys are all big mean jerks[/quote]
I know right?
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
You guys are all big mean jerks[/quote]
I know right?[/quote]
Where did that come from? Amazing
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
You guys are all big mean jerks[/quote]
I know right?[/quote]
Where did that come from? Amazing [/quote]
You dont know about the old meme thread?! Madness!
Its unreal how spot on the memes/commentary are
Funny how the same points were brought up 3 years ago eh? (3 years in prof x years cause the thread was in 2011)
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
You guys are all big mean jerks[/quote]
I know right?[/quote]
Where did that come from? Amazing [/quote]
You dont know about the old meme thread?! Madness!
Its unreal how spot on the memes/commentary are[/quote]
Holy shit amazing
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
Moral of the story: You aren’t as lean as you think,[/quote]
Who cares? I don’t care how lean you think I am. I care about having really big muscles and looking good. I did that. That is all that really matters.
It is like it hurts to admit I may have gained more muscle than many here. This ranting about what my specific body fat is makes no sense considering I am ok with it.[/quote]
actually it does make sense to know what your specific bodyfat is because you brag about being bigger than most here, yet dont seem to realise you are carrying a shit load more bodyfat than them to. you are NOT 15% bopdyfat, if your 15% im like 8%… which i know for a fact im not.
i guess good is a really subjective term now, because i actually think you have a rather shit looking physique for 15 years of serious weight training. sorry if i seem like a prick im just stating my opinion.
That magazine cover is one of the funniest images on the Internet.
I love where this has gone since I left. Lots of laughs.
I never take time to read these threads… what exactly is the argument between X and everyone else?
Well, pretty much everything. X is trying to inadvertently put a bunch of posters down by saying that he has more muscle than them. Although, he would just say that it’s “telling the truth” and not “being an asshole”. Posters then say that he doesn’t have as much muscle as he claims, and BAM. Another argument thread.
I think X’s back is bigger. ( God seriously did it have to come down to this lol). Still, just giving an objective opinion.
[quote]dt79 wrote:
I think X’s back is bigger. ( God seriously did it have to come down to this lol). Still, just giving an objective opinion.[/quote]
Bigger than Ronny Rockels? 
[quote]dt79 wrote:
I think X’s back is bigger. ( God seriously did it have to come down to this lol). Still, just giving an objective opinion.[/quote]
Bigger than?
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]dt79 wrote:
I think X’s back is bigger. ( God seriously did it have to come down to this lol). Still, just giving an objective opinion.[/quote]
Bigger than?[/quote]
Friend of mine’s. 190, 5’10".
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
In typical Brofessor X fashion, ignores the rest of the post.
[/quote]
That would be because it was filled with false info…like[quote]That population set would have been measured with underwater weighing, something you felt the need to put in quotes the last time I mentioned it to you. [/quote]
Most of those people tested before the 1980’s were by no means tested by underwater weighing…which calls into question the data set itself.[/quote]
Oh? So what were they using as the gold standard to determine the bodyfat of the population set the equations are based on?
A simple “I have no education in this methodology” would suffice.[/quote]
You can bet that if a percentage was known in the era of the 60’s and 70’s it was a caliper test, not under water weighing.[/quote]
I don’t even know what this means, and this is clearly above your level. Jackson/Pollock did not use caliper testing to develop the equations for…caliper testing. They used DEXA or hydrostatic weighing to cross compare their compartment models for bodyfat, which are quadratic formulas. I’m really not sure you understand what skinfold methodology even entails, so I suggest you read more.
All that said, you’re making my point for me. It’s an inaccurate tool for muscular people, especially considering that the equations are dated. Yet you are here arguing about it and saying you know your bodyfat because you used an inaccurate test.
Oh, and are you going to divulge whether this was 3-site or 7? I know you didn’t have any more measurement sites than that…don’t want to be too accurate, now.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
^Oh, boy.[/quote]
Y’all serious?
Old back pic.
[photo]38769[/photo]
I fail to see how he looks like we are carrying the same size.
I will update these pics later but please.
Yes, I am carrying more fat in this pic…but if you can’t see the muscle there, something is wrong.[/quote]
Note: I think you are bigger than I am.
That said, you carry a lot more fat in your back than I do. You literally have no definition at all, which I assume is why we never see a flexed pic from you. My avatar is me close to 18% BF and my back is still a lot leaner than yours.
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]dt79 wrote:
I think X’s back is bigger. ( God seriously did it have to come down to this lol). Still, just giving an objective opinion.[/quote]
Bigger than?[/quote]
Friend of mine’s. 190, 5’10". [/quote]
Well yes it doesn’t have 3-5 inches of fat covering it
