Matt Hughes VS Royce Gracie in May

[quote]ZEB wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:

Left him behind!!?? That is an incredible statement. What you term “left behind” is actually just a bunch of average to begin with fighters finally bringing their submission game up. In the final analysis, that’s all it is - guys have learned to fight and defend themselves on the ground - there have ALWAYS been strikers, stand up fighters. Shit, the athletes aren’t even better conditioned - not many of them can go the distance w/o gassing b/c 9 out of 10, with a twist on dan john’s favorite saying, look like tarzan but fight like jane. Hughes is strong yes, but strength, as you SHOULD be aware from rolling with Royce, is NOT an issue over proper technique. Hughes stand up would get him out of an amateur boxing match. He is an above average wrestler but are you going to sell me that his submission skills are there with Royce?

Okay, I think I know where you are coming from. However, I want you to consider these facts:

  1. When Royce ruled the UFC no one and I mean NO ONE understood ground fighting! Hence he had his way with all of them as soon as the fight hit the ground. And keep in mind while Dan Severon didn’t understand submissions he was a very good wrestler and it took Royce 15:00 to submit him. That should prove that big strong wrestlers (with little else) can give Royce trouble.

Now add this to the equation: All of the world class grapplers now understand submissions. I’m not saying that they are as good as Royce Gracie at Submission, but they know enough to stay out of trouble and, or counter a move that comes their way. And in many cases their skills do rival the Gracies!

By the way do you know how the last three Hughes matches ended? He SUBMITTED ALL OF THEM: One armbar, one choke and one Kimura! That my friend demonstrates a very good understanding of submission techniques!

  1. Royce has been away from the UFC for approximately 9 years! That’s not 9 months brother, it’s 9 long years. Do you think his skills have gotten better compared to the rest of the field? Not hardly!

How many fights has Hughes had in the Octagon over the past 8 years? That would be 42 fights winning all of them but 4! (2 losses very early on)

In other words, while the “ring rust” has been attaching itself to Royce at a steady rate. Matt has done nothing but polish his art and get better with each fight.

The fights or Jiu-Jitsu matches that Royce has had since leaving the UFC have been few and quite unspectacular. Remember the Walid Ismal (sp) fiasco? Royce was choked unconscious! And then there was his loss to Sakuraba in Pride. Of course Sakurba went through several Gracie’s like crap through a goose. But that’s another argument.

What has Royce Gracie done over the past 9 years that would lead you to believe that he is even as good as he was back in 97’? But then again, most of us know that he has to actually be BETTER than he was in the mid 90’s to defeat Matt Hughes.

  1. Let’s do a quick analysis of what it takes to win, and make a comparison.

SKILL

Stand up:

You stated that Hughes stand up skills are not all that great. I agree, they are not as good as most at his level. However what does this really mean in a head to head match with Royce Gracie? Have you ever seen Royce’s stand up skills? I have and if you would rank Hughes skills just below ametuer boxers then Royce’s would be somewhere around High School level. This is not a put down. The Gracies were never known for their stand up striking ability.

I’ve been punched and kicked by Gracie and while it doesn’t feel like a swedish massage, I shudder to think of the difference between his punches and Matt Hughes strikes.

(I will say that Gracie has a sneaky high face kick and if he gets lucky it might work…)

Stand up game: Hughes all the way!

Ground Game:

I know, I know the Gracies invented the ground game. But, remember one important factor; Hughes is a world class wrestler! In fact, he was a 4 time collegiate wrestling champion Division one. And was actually on the Olympic team. You don’t get much better than that. And while he may not have grown up with submissions the way Royce did, he has proven over the past 8 years and 42 fights winning all but 4, and 20 by submission that he is more than capable of mixing it up with Royce on the ground skill wise.

Ground Game: Equal.

A quick look at some other aspects of what it takes to win:

Strength: I don’t think that you or anyone else is ready to say that Royce is even in the same league with Hughes when it comes to strength and power.

Speed: Are you ready to say that Hughes lightning fast take downs are slower than Gracies moves? Not hardly. What drives a persons moves (besides skill obviously) muscle!

Stamina: Have you ever seen Hughes sucking wind after one or two rounds? No, he is supremely conditioned. I will admit that Gracie has excellent stamina as well. I’ll call this one a toss up.

I know how you feel Royce is most definitely the sentimental favorite. He WAS the UFC, no question. If not for Royce and his family we would not have MMA. I give Royce (and his family) a great deal of credit for taking martial arts to the next level and erasing for ever more the image of the mystical black belt fighter who can defeat all comers with lightning kicks and magical pressure points.

I am truly thankful that those days are over, for all but the most gullible, and of course children.

However, this is a new day my friend and the fighters of today are bigger (for their weight) stronger, faster, better trained and they are all well aware (at that level) of every aspect of martial arts, there are no more secrets on the ground! This erases the biggest component of the early Gracie arsenal.

Royce Gracie WILL be defeated by Matt Hughes. Whether he hangs on for 5 rounds (I assume it’s a recognized championship fight), or Hughes puts him to sleep early there is no way for the legend to live up to the reality! And the reality is, the game has passed him by!

Zeb

Nice analysis, respectful reply and, on the internet of all places, I appreciate it. However, just b/c it appears well thought out, don’t make it true :slight_smile:

First, Severn shouldn’t even figure into this analysis. As you pointed out later, Severn was much heavier and although I champion the FACT that technique reigns supreme over brute strength, all else equal and sometimes even unequal, big man beats little man.

Which brings me to Hughes strength. He is strong - yes. But he is not so large that he cannot be controlled by an expert like Royce. He is stronger, yes, but with the size similiarity, technique will carry that battle.

Next, knowing how to stay out of trouble also, to me, means not taking any chances for a submission or win of your own. It is irrelevent if you believe many other fighter’s skills rival the Gracies - Hughe’s skills on the ground DO NOT. And we are talking Hughes v. Royce.

It has already been pointed out that the three submissions you cite by Hughes were against suspect opponents. Hell, the one, I forget his name, had Hughes in a choke but couldn’t finish it. And I don’t credit that to Hughes’ skill, but due to the lack of his opponent’s skill. Once his opponent had that rear naked choke, Hughes should have been finished. It was more a failure by his opponent and his relative lack of skill than a victory by Hughes.

Royce has been away from the UFC - not fighting. He hasn’t exactly been “retired” or inactive. This isn’t a washed up boxer making yet another come back. He is still active and trains.

I don’t care how many fights Hughes has had - the competition is not so good. Therefore, his record is irrelevant. It’s not a knock in him; he fights who is there - but he’s not beating world class guys - he’s beating what the UFC has to offer.

I strongly disagree that Royce has to better than he was 9 years ago to beat Hughes…you are giving Hughes way too much credit. Hughes wins on strength and his considerable wrestling skills. His boxing and submission skills are amateurish and his win record is more a reflection of his opponents than his relative superiority.

An analysis of stand up skills is irrelevant. Matt will not win this fight on his feet - his stand up skills are worthless and Royce will not get in a punch out with him. So you are analyzing a so-called edge that will not be relevant in this fight. Royce can do enough on his feet to defend himself and that will be all that is required to defend Hughes’ “stand up” LOL.

Hughes is a world class wrestler - no doubt. But I remind you this isn’t a wrestling match. He can’t win this fight with a pin or wrestling points :slight_smile: Although these skills are arguably valuable - I can’t see Hughes getting a submission; for one, he isn’t skilled enough. Ground and pound perhaps? I don’t think so; I think Royce is too skilled in the guard. The submissions Hughes has in his resume, the recent ones especially, were against lesser fighters as already pointed out. The Riggs submission was laughable - Riggs was terrible. Royce will not be terrible. Edge; Royce.

Strength edge of course goes to Hughes but strength doesn’t win fights against a superior technician. Like it or not, Hughes wins his fights mostly on brute strength by man handling guys who cannot really defend themselves on the ground.

Speed? Largely irrelevant once they are on the ground. Hughes takes down Royce - so what? It’s what they do once they’re down there that counts and I’ll take Royce on the mat.

Royce is not my sentimental favorite - I’m not even sure he’ll win and not for the reasons you think. I am merely challenging this school of thought that Hughes will run thru him - I don’t see that happening. I am further challenging the analysis of so called internet experts that only watch the UFC, and now consider themselves “informed”, but have never had a real fight - by the way, a real fight is not you beating up someone smaller than you or less skilled - a real fight is fighting someone of equal size who knows how to fight back. Then, you can claim you were in a “fight”.

The bottom line is this; you can analyze these things until we’re blue in the face but at the end of the day, men are like dogs - until you put the two down for battle, you don’t know who will win. And that is the bottom line.

But I’m tickled by all this fan fare for Hughes; his so called skills are greatly exaggerated. Let’s go down the checklist:

  1. He has NO real stand up. I’ve seen women throw better and tighter punches.

  2. He’s an arrogant fuck and in the fight game, that’s enough to hate him.

  3. He’s a great wrestler; but this isn’t a wrestling match.

  4. His submission skills are below average period. Just b/c you submit someone of lesser skill, doesn’t elevate your relative skill.

  5. He is a physical specimen and strong. Yes. And the foregoing has really won his fights.

My best friend used to spar with the Gracies, at their request, all the time. I spar with him. Every single damn time I try to man handle him - we are close in size, but I am stronger, I make mistakes and get in trouble. BJJ is technique and leverage.

Unless Hughes can ground and pound Royce, I see a real tough match. But I’ll say again, until it happens - we don’t know - anything is possible and likely.

TheBodyGuard:

[quote]Zeb

Nice analysis, respectful reply and, on the internet of all places, I appreciate it. However, just b/c it appears well thought out, don’t make it true :)[/quote]

It’s actually more fun for me without the personal insults which of course is what Internet debates usually come down to.

He figures in for a few reasons. First, he was a very exceptional heavyweight wrestler who did not know any submission techniques. None, nada, zip! And it still took Royce 15:00 or so to put him away.

Secondly, and most importantly Royce was at the very top of his game at that point in his career…And he had trouble with a wrestler who knew no submission techniques, and was a much worse striker than Matt Hughes.

Not so fast…Have you ever grappled with someone of the same weight but who was about twice your strength? The Hughes power factor is a very important ingredient in his style. And in addition to that Royce is actually weak for his weight. I watched him lift weights and it was shocking what he could not lift! granted that was 8 years ago. But has he been weight training for 8 years? And if so why is he still about 180lbs.?

Don’t underestimate Hughes power-

If you are stating that Hughes ground skills relative to submission are inferior, I agree. But I don’t think that is an issue as his wrestling skills are second to none (in his weight class) on the ground. And he knows enough to stay out of trouble. this means that he can see something coming, not that he will not try to either ground and pound or submit Royce.

Trigg and St. Pierre are inferior opponents?

If you want to talk about “inferior opponents” let’s talk about the string of nobodies that Royce beat to win the UFC the first few times.

How do the names "Art Jimmerson, Jason Delucia, Patrick Smith and Harold Howard sound?

These guys were not traine athletes! They had no clue as to what would happen if they were ever on the ground.

Also, keep this in mind Royce’s record is 13-2-3. That’s it. So who has the MMA fighting experience? Who is currently at the top of their game? Who has 42 full contact fights and only lost 4?

See my point?

Yes I know he has been “active.” He has been busy getting choked out by Walid Ismal…(sorry I just had to mention it again-that was disgraceful).

Please go back and see the list that Royce beat. Anyone of those guys would have been beaten into submission by Matt Hughes. They were a bunch of stand up fighters or washed up boxers. I’m not saying they were not tough (they have my respect for getting in the octagon) but they were not world class atheletes.

Hughes beat several people who would have beaten Royce. BJ, St. Pierre to name just two.

Yes, I’m sure the Kung-Fu guys and the retired boxers and Savate fighters that Royce walked through were much tougher than anyone Hughes fought (eye roll).

Here take a look, it aint pretty:

Actually, while I understand why you would assume that, the best chance that Royce has is on his feet!

That may sound odd, but if Royce uses his long (very long) arms and height advantage he might be able to pull something off. By the way, he has been studying kick boxing for several years now. That is a fact that not many are aware of.

As I stated before-if Royce wins it will be from an odd kick or punch. I know that sounds like it’s coming from left field…

I tend to agree with you on that point. Not that Huhges is not skilled enough as he has submitted some of the best in the world at his weight class.

Here’s why, Royce will not tap out under any conditions! That’s another one that sounds odd, but he won’t I know he won’t. And I do think that he is too skilled to be caught in a submission, unless he is beaten up badly and is somewhat dazed.

I agree with this. Hughes will be on a mission and that mission will probably be called G&P!

You really have to stop disrespecting guys like GSP, and Trigg. They are very good ground fighters and Hughes submitted them both.

Take him to do what? Submit Hughes or stay out of trouble?

I could not agree more with the last few lines. Bravo, well said!

True it’s plenty of fun to analyze the fight ahead of time just to see how good you are :slight_smile:

[quote] I’m tickled by all this fan fare for Hughes; his so called skills are greatly exaggerated. Let’s go down the checklist:

  1. He has NO real stand up. I’ve seen women throw better and tighter punches.

  2. He’s an arrogant fuck and in the fight game, that’s enough to hate him.

  3. He’s a great wrestler; but this isn’t a wrestling match.

  4. His submission skills are below average period. Just b/c you submit someone of lesser skill, doesn’t elevate your relative skill.

  5. He is a physical specimen and strong. Yes. And the foregoing has really won his fights.[/quote]

Arrogant? Compared to some (or most) of the others in the UFC I wouldn’t call him arrogant. And again you are underestimating his submission skills, but I already pointed that out.

I would say that’s where we differ the most in our analysis.

[quote]My best friend used to spar with the Gracies, at their request, all the time. I spar with him. Every single damn time I try to man handle him - we are close in size, but I am stronger, I make mistakes and get in trouble. BJJ is technique and leverage.

Unless Hughes can ground and pound Royce, I see a real tough match. But I’ll say again, until it happens - we don’t know - anything is possible and likely.[/quote]

Royce will have two things going for him:

  1. He never ever gives up and would rather die than tap out.

  2. He is a better striker today than he was 8 years ago. Not many know that and it might play to his advantage as I stated earlier.

This gives him at least a chance, but not much of one.

And I agree with your final sentence. Anything can happen in a fight. that’s one reason why they are so much fun to watch.

I would rather watch a MMA fight than any other sport.

STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT

I know Zeb didn’t mean this, but just so everybody who might read this thread and think otherwise, Matt Hughes has never beaten BJ Penn…in fact he was so manhandled in that match that the look of shock on his face afterwards is priceless. See the link above for a viewing of Matt Hughes getting owned.

Royce’s only true loss remains that one to Sakuraba…the other loss they list on his record was a result of not being able to continue in the tournament after his fight with Kimo. I don’t want to debate this anymore because all we have to do is wait a few months and we’ll see what happens.

[quote]slimjim wrote:

Zeb said: a lot of stuff and then:

Hughes beat several people who would have beaten Royce. BJ, St. Pierre to name just two.

STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT

I know Zeb didn’t mean this, but just so everybody who might read this thread and think otherwise, Matt Hughes has never beaten BJ Penn…in fact he was so manhandled in that match that the look of shock on his face afterwards is priceless. See the link above for a viewing of Matt Hughes getting owned.

Royce’s only true loss remains that one to Sakuraba…the other loss they list on his record was a result of not being able to continue in the tournament after his fight with Kimo. I don’t want to debate this anymore because all we have to do is wait a few months and we’ll see what happens.

[/quote]

Please forgive me I didn’t mean to claim that Hughes had beaten BJ. My point was Hughes FOUGHT many guys who could have (and still can) beat Royce.

I type fast and think slow sometimes…sorry.

sorry zeb, I know, but it gave me another opportunity to talk about BJ, and at this point it must be pretty apparent how much I love to talk about Penn

Zeb:

It says here, and you can quote me after teh fight, that you are vastly overestimating Hughes’ submission skills. And no, I don’t consider Trigg or GSB very good submission fighters.

I think, and I don’t mean this disrespectfully, that you are giving more credit to these relative neophytes than they deserve merely because they are able to submit another fighter - but you must look at the other fighters. Most in the UFC, even though ALL of them now attempt to do some ground training, suck on the ground. Absolutely fucking suck. So it follows, if you’re at least somewhat proficient or skilled, you’re going to look like you know what you’re doing.

For instance, I can submit untrained guys all day and night while masturbating with the other hand; but it doesn’t make me a great or even good submission specialist - I was just better than someone who was no good.

These guys you name, all of them, are relative novices on the ground - they just look better because the competition is not good. Now, for example, although I did not see the BJ Penn fight, I believe he has considerable ground / submission skills; Hughes was supposedly owned. If Hughes was in fact owned, its because he aint’ really shit on the ground compared to a skilled submission specialist - which, in the UFC, is pretty fucking rare.

You are also overestimating Hughe’s strength and its not accurate to compare that to a much bigger man like Severn. Severn had weight AND greater strength. The two together are difficult to overcome. Strength can be dealt with with technique and Royce has technique in spades. But damn man, just someone leaning / laying on you exerting no energy is draining yours when they guy outweighs you by 70lbs.

And don’t get the wrong idea; I’m not disrespecting any of these fighters. They have my respect for getting in the octagon period as you said. Pointing out their RELATIVE weaknesses shouldn’t be taken as disrespect.

But where you tout so called skill, I see fighters gravitating to certain styles that fit the rules of the UFC and its just a fact that certain fighters are more apt to win with their style BECAUSE of the UFC rules. What I’m trying to say is that it allows relatively unskilled guys to compete at disciplines where they are not so great. One small example; if I can head butt, you aint laying up in my guard, you’re not in any lazy ass clinch with me, etc. etc. etc. and I’m only mentioning ONE small restriction. The restrictions allow for less skilled practice of the so called skill. Simply put, there is alot of lazy ass, sloppy shit on the ground in the UFC - and its not limited to the ground.

Here is what I see when I look at the UFC; I see guys with stand up skills that wouldn’t give them a winning record in amateur boxing. I see guys that can’t go the distance. I see lazy ass fucking so called thai style kicking that is a joke along with lazy and poorly thrown elbows. I see mediocre, at best, ground skills…and yes, Matt’s are mediocre…you only think they’re good b/c his competition IS “relatively” poor. What I see in the UFC are mostly a bunch of “ham and eggers”…guys that can do a little bit of everything but don’t do anything with expert skill. Chuck Lidell for instance; warrior yes. But how he connects these wild punches (yes he is ultimatley accurate many times - but looping and sloppy) is NOT anyone’s guess - its the relatively poor competition - those poor bastards can’t get out of the way of a poorly thrown punch! And Chuck is a premier fighter in the UFC and his game IS standup???

I really really don’t mean to be too critical; I’m not dogging these guys; the rules and nature of the UFC have created these type of “generalist” fighter. Jesus, I’m just sitting here thinking of some of these guys…and the punches thrown…its a joke.

Anyway, long winded…but Royce is an EXPERT on the ground. The fight will likely go to the ground; Hughes will have his hands full. I cannot predict a winner. Anything can happen in a fight.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
A bunch of stuff, a lot of which I actually agree with, however,

[/quote]

Not all the fighters are crap on the ground in the UFC. Babalu for one is a great submission grappler, and Randy has done his part to become a very good Ground N Pounder with at least enough knowledge to avoid submissions, though his application of them might not be that great. Arvlovski and Mir are pretty competent submission fighters as well, not nearly as well versed as Nogeira or Arona or Fedor, but competent.

Also, Rich Franklin is a very good striker in the MMA format. He is accurate and tends to pick apart his opponents. Granted, his competition has been subpar so far in the UFC, but I would say he is a good example of a skilled striker.

Nick Diaz is a good ground fighter as well, his last bout against Diego was crappy from the standpoint that he couldn’t sink a sub, but he is very competent.

Matt Hughes is very average and Royce Gracie is past it.
Ho-hum

As for the Hughes fight? I was dissapointed with the announcement…but people are talking and if the UFC wants to be able to pay to get the best fighters over from pride then I guess they need more people to talk about them.

Excuse the dumb question…but can someone explain to me how a persons “reach” is calculated? I watched the replay of UFN Live (not that good…2 hrs of tv = 20 mins fighting?? Brutal) and Sylvia was listed with an 80" reach? Is is fingertip to fingertip or what?

Thanks,

C

[quote]slimjim wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:
A bunch of stuff, a lot of which I actually agree with, however,

Not all the fighters are crap on the ground in the UFC. Babalu for one is a great submission grappler, and Randy has done his part to become a very good Ground N Pounder with at least enough knowledge to avoid submissions, though his application of them might not be that great. Arvlovski and Mir are pretty competent submission fighters as well, not nearly as well versed as Nogeira or Arona or Fedor, but competent.

Also, Rich Franklin is a very good striker in the MMA format. He is accurate and tends to pick apart his opponents. Granted, his competition has been subpar so far in the UFC, but I would say he is a good example of a skilled striker.

Nick Diaz is a good ground fighter as well, his last bout against Diego was crappy from the standpoint that he couldn’t sink a sub, but he is very competent. [/quote]

You made some good points; however, you only mention a few names of competent guys on the ground amidst dozens of fighters.

“Ground and pound” is not a skill - it is only a skill in the UFC because of the rules restrictions placed on the fighters. So, although I appreciate the insight - ground and pound to me, does not equal being adequate on the ground / submission.

I like Rich Franklin very much. Good all around skill and seem to be a good guy…I like that. Mir is an excellent submission guy I agree. But my friend, we’re still talking just a hand full and I still don’t see you mentioning hughes on that list :slight_smile:

Diaz drives me nuts with his stand up - another guy that can’t throw a punch but the comp is so weak he is actually beating guys on his feet…he is an example of what I was talking about and I couldn’t remember his name. I don’t recall his being especially skilled on the ground - just “competent”.

Anyway, I didn’t mean to imply they were all “crap”. I like Mir, Franklin and a few others alot. But top to bottom, the competition and skill level in the UFC is pretty thin and many contests amount to nothing more than a glorified MMA toughman. Some tough guys for sure - talented and skilled is another question.

[quote]deanosumo wrote:
Matt Hughes is very average and Royce Gracie is past it.
Ho-hum[/quote]

That is the best analysis I have read; to the point and accurate. In other words, should make for an interesting fight.

The match up itself and the announcement reminds me of the WWF.

I am surprised someone wasn’t hit with a chair.

Arlovski v. Hughes … Who would win & why?

Hughes vs Arlovski?

I believe Arlovski would own his ass, and in rather quick fashion.

Better question, how would Arlovski stack up agaisnt the Pride heavyweights, Fedor and his brother, Crocop, etc, ?

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Zeb:

It says here, and you can quote me after teh fight, that you are vastly overestimating Hughes’ submission skills. And no, I don’t consider Trigg or GSB very good submission fighters.

I think, and I don’t mean this disrespectfully, that you are giving more credit to these relative neophytes than they deserve merely because they are able to submit another fighter - but you must look at the other fighters. Most in the UFC, even though ALL of them now attempt to do some ground training, suck on the ground. Absolutely fucking suck. So it follows, if you’re at least somewhat proficient or skilled, you’re going to look like you know what you’re doing. [/quote]

Please name just one good ground fighter that Royce actually beat.

Thank you for proving my point relative to the overwhelming majority of guys Royce beat to win several UFC’s!

Yet, almost everyone of the 38 fighters that Hughes beat are better ground fighters than the 12 or so that Royce beat to win his UFC championships early on.

We agree that BJ Penn is a highly skilled submission expert. However, we disagree when it comes to the ground talent in the current UFC. If you want to see pathetic ground talent take a look at the first several UFC’s (even a few years after Royce left).

Rent the tapes at your local video store and you will seee some very poor ground fighting the first several years. And by the way, the stand up fighting was not much better. They were for the most part brawlers, taylor made for a guy like Royce Gracie!

I agree with this analysis. I have always believed that size alone is a great asset in a fight. If you add great strength to it, it can be overwhelming unless you have very good skill.

And that is what Shamrock did in the second fight to Royce. It was appalling! He should have been called for stalling.

I think that we can all agree on that one.

Yes, I think every sport practioner molds his style around the rules of his or her game.

If that’s the case it only helps Hughes and hurts Gracie-right?

While we are off the subject of Gracie vs Hughes I think you should reconsider your analysis.

Compare the typical MMA fighter to someone participating in the decathlon. While the decathlon participant is not the best runner, jumper, shot putter, javlin thrower etc. he is still able to perform them all pretty well.

The MMA fighter is never going to be able to trade blow for blow with a boxer according to boxing rules. Nor is the typical ground fighter going to be able to “pin” a wrestler on a mat according to wrestling rules.

However, they can perform many different things well enough to to enter the Octagon.

MIXED MARTIAL ARTS means that they perform many things inside the ring or Octagon. That they are not as good at one particular sport as those who specialize in that one fighting art should not be any reason to think that they are sloppy or ineffective.

Not really, they work for a reason. If you and I are facing off and you don’t know if I’m going to try to take you down, punch you in the face, or kick you your body should be in a different position than if you were simply waiting for me to throw a punch.

The form will mold to it’s specific function

Not compared to me :slight_smile:

Yes, I agree that anything can happen in a fight. That’s what makes them so much fun to watch and debate!

By the way make sure you get back to me with that first question that I asked: Name just one good ground fighter that Royce actually beat.

As for those disrespecting Hughes think again! You don’t compile a record of 38 - 4 because you are average, not hardly.

12 (T)KOs (31.58%)
18 Submissions (47.37%)
8 Decisions (21.05%)

He submits almost half of everyone he fights!

Less than a quarter of his fights have even gone the distance!

And so far the only guy that was able to take away his belt is considered an exceptional fighter.

How can anyone say that Hughes is average?

[quote]Creidem wrote:
As for the Hughes fight? I was dissapointed with the announcement…but people are talking and if the UFC wants to be able to pay to get the best fighters over from pride then I guess they need more people to talk about them.

Excuse the dumb question…but can someone explain to me how a persons “reach” is calculated? I watched the replay of UFN Live (not that good…2 hrs of tv = 20 mins fighting?? Brutal) and Sylvia was listed with an 80" reach? Is is fingertip to fingertip or what?

Thanks,

C[/quote]

You got it, arms out to the sides finger tip to finger tip.

It appears that a lot of folks on this site believe that Royce Gracie has been sitting around for ten years doing nothing. Any idea who his training partners are? They aren’t his students, they are serious tough, talented fighters.
Matt Hughes is a tremendous talent, he is very strong. However, he is going to get a wake up call that will either shake the very foundation of his psyche, or, hopefully, bring his “bad ass attitude” back down to earth.
Gracie by a footlock.

[quote]Old Dude wrote:
It appears that a lot of folks on this site believe that Royce Gracie has been sitting around for ten years doing nothing.[/quote]

I know exactly what he has been doing!

He has been losing to mediocre fighters and getting choked out by Walid Ismal…no he should not be fighting Hughes.

Can you say [b]mismatch?[b/]

Yea, i dont see Royce doing so well. I have trained with Royce many times. Obviously, he helped bring about BJJ to the mainstream. But I think the addition of Gloves really hurt his, and BJJ fighters overall, chances in MMA.

Bareknuckled, a majority of the strikes going around nowadays wouldnt happen. Gloves do not protect your head, only the hands of the striker. Without gloves, the BJJ guys would dominate MMA. Not so in todays era.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Old Dude wrote:
It appears that a lot of folks on this site believe that Royce Gracie has been sitting around for ten years doing nothing.

I know exactly what he has been doing!

He has been losing to mediocre fighters and getting choked out by Walid Ismal…no he should not be fighting Hughes.

Can you say [b]mismatch?[b/]
[/quote]

Losing to mediocre fighters? Sakuraba is his only loss…it is widely accepted in the BJJ community that Royce is not a great BJJ competitor while Walid Ismael is one of the best.