I LOL every time you post. Keep posting skanky pics on the internet, lord knows you could use the attention because you wouldn’t get a second glance in real life and the desperate idiots on this site could def use some new wank material. Don’t forget to suck in that gut!
And no pics because I post often in the steroid forum and I have very recognizable tattoos. You can rest assured that I’m bigger than you.[/quote]
Dude - blur out the tats and post up! C’mon man - you can’t use that as a cop-out - you have to admit that excuse is totally lame. Not saying that you aren’t bigger than a girl, but making excuses for never showing your physique isn’t very becoming.
Also, I disagree that only desperate idiots like her pics - I like her pics, and I’m not really desperate. An idiot maybe - but not a desperate one. [/quote]
No pics neccessary. The fact he doesn’t have any up now and thinks OP is “ripped” says enough.
I LOL every time you post. Keep posting skanky pics on the internet, lord knows you could use the attention because you wouldn’t get a second glance in real life and the desperate idiots on this site could def use some new wank material. Don’t forget to suck in that gut!
And no pics because I post often in the steroid forum and I have very recognizable tattoos. You can rest assured that I’m bigger than you.[/quote]
Dude - blur out the tats and post up! C’mon man - you can’t use that as a cop-out - you have to admit that excuse is totally lame. Not saying that you aren’t bigger than a girl, but making excuses for never showing your physique isn’t very becoming.
Also, I disagree that only desperate idiots like her pics - I like her pics, and I’m not really desperate. An idiot maybe - but not a desperate one. [/quote]
No pics neccessary. The fact he doesn’t have any up now and thinks OP is “ripped” says enough.
[/quote]
don’t hold your breath guys cause he’ll never post a pic. He’s just like the hundreds of other picture-less posters on this site who like to talk shit.
[quote]overstand wrote:
…lord knows you could use the attention because you wouldn’t get a second glance in real life…Don’t forget to suck in that gut!
[/quote]
[quote]overstand wrote:
…lord knows you could use the attention because you wouldn’t get a second glance in real life…Don’t forget to suck in that gut!
[/quote]
Are we all seeing the same woman here?[/quote]
I’m glad somebody else said that, because I was thinking that very thing.
I mean, I do not have shitty taste in women, and I think most dudes would agree that she would get a second, and third, and fourth…um, MANY glances…lol…
I mean - seriously - what red-blooded male wouldn’t want to get next to that?!
I just realized that 70 kg @ 1.78 (154 @ 5’10") is… underweight. Badly. (yes, I know you knew this) I need at least 8…10 more kg (going to ~170+ lbs) to have a “normal” weight…
Got me thinking… the “ideal weight = height (in cm) - 110” is ideal… for… dunno… slaves, bisexual male fashion models, metrosexual men… (no, I never did buy into it; just discussing the concept).
Still, my back looks better than 95% of people’s. Yep, not training is bad.
Also, the strength and CV endurance (as in going through a normal STRENGTH-TRAINING session without dying) of the average untrained sedentary male are about 6’ under…par.
[…]
2. While my DL of 140 (308) is most certainly not “high” by any means, I would like to tell all those guys who DLed 180 (400) the first time they went to the gym and who are now saying that “400 is nothing” to STICK IT.
It might take some people a good number of years of SOLID training.
It took me two years to get here (140) (add a congenitally weak spine to the equation). And my reps just halved these past few weeks (as in I did 120 for 7 and a few weeks ago I did 124 for 0 on tuesday. 110 for 10 some time ago and today 114 for 5), so I need to change something (I’ll go from DL to SLDL to below the knee, pushing hips back as much as possible)…
I also began reading “Science and practice of strength training” by the late prof. Verkoshansky… Depending on fibre distribution, a trainee with more fast twitch fibres can have an almost TEN times greater strength increase from a training program. (page 84) Over-simplified, maybe. But, genetics play a pretty big role. And leverages, too. If you lifted 400 within a month or two or none, it might take others a few years to get there. Oh, also, not everyone weighs 220+. Again, stick it. (kudos for your extraordinary strength, though)
(this is most certainly NOT saying that one should consider a 150/330 DL “great” or not strive for more, but what it’s worth is relative to how much effort you had to invest to get it. Yes, a 180/400 DL is an ACHIEVEMENT if it took you 5 years of solid training, eating, and sleeping. And you’re also <100/220. The idea is to better yourself.)
Strength to you,
Eisen[/quote]
Dont listen to these dickheads buddy, everyone has to start somewhere. just get some food down your throat, dont make excuses for being weak, train hard. and you will do great. better to be lean and training, than obese like most off the american population. not everone has to be a 300 pound ripped bb
I just realized that 70 kg @ 1.78 (154 @ 5’10") is… underweight. Badly. (yes, I know you knew this) I need at least 8…10 more kg (going to ~170+ lbs) to have a “normal” weight…
Got me thinking… the “ideal weight = height (in cm) - 110” is ideal… for… dunno… slaves, bisexual male fashion models, metrosexual men… (no, I never did buy into it; just discussing the concept).
Still, my back looks better than 95% of people’s. Yep, not training is bad.
Also, the strength and CV endurance (as in going through a normal STRENGTH-TRAINING session without dying) of the average untrained sedentary male are about 6’ under…par.
[…]
2. While my DL of 140 (308) is most certainly not “high” by any means, I would like to tell all those guys who DLed 180 (400) the first time they went to the gym and who are now saying that “400 is nothing” to STICK IT.
It might take some people a good number of years of SOLID training.
It took me two years to get here (140) (add a congenitally weak spine to the equation). And my reps just halved these past few weeks (as in I did 120 for 7 and a few weeks ago I did 124 for 0 on tuesday. 110 for 10 some time ago and today 114 for 5), so I need to change something (I’ll go from DL to SLDL to below the knee, pushing hips back as much as possible)…
I also began reading “Science and practice of strength training” by the late prof. Verkoshansky… Depending on fibre distribution, a trainee with more fast twitch fibres can have an almost TEN times greater strength increase from a training program. (page 84) Over-simplified, maybe. But, genetics play a pretty big role. And leverages, too. If you lifted 400 within a month or two or none, it might take others a few years to get there. Oh, also, not everyone weighs 220+. Again, stick it. (kudos for your extraordinary strength, though)
(this is most certainly NOT saying that one should consider a 150/330 DL “great” or not strive for more, but what it’s worth is relative to how much effort you had to invest to get it. Yes, a 180/400 DL is an ACHIEVEMENT if it took you 5 years of solid training, eating, and sleeping. And you’re also <100/220. The idea is to better yourself.)
Strength to you,
Eisen[/quote]
Dont listen to these dickheads buddy, everyone has to start somewhere. just get some food down your throat, dont make excuses for being weak, train hard. and you will do great. better to be lean and training, than obese like most off the american population. not everone has to be a 300 pound ripped bb
[/quote]
Making a thread about being anorexic and only deadlifting 308 pounds and a bunch of excuses to boot will attract some hatin, deservingly so.
[quote]Sterneneisen wrote: @SolidKhalid: I wasn’t saying I’m the shit and wasn’t bragging.
I was saying “average persons can’t DL 220 and can hardly chin w/o weight”. Not that my lifts are good. After some years of lurking around and also reading what others lift/weigh etc., I know all too well that my “lifts” are really not allowing me to brag. But I was SAYING that it still puts me above “untrained” (ahem, epiphany)
And I pull 308. Which is still less than some women pull. But that’s another point.
[/quote]
Ok I was kind of getting the picture now but then you threw this in there.
So your being objective about your topic and then this turns into “Mine is cooler.”?
WTfuckingF?
And to kill your curiosity, I don’t do pull up contests, so no thats not for 1 rep.
You know for a personal trainer, you have a lot of injuries/disabilities. Good luck.
[quote]overstand wrote:
lol, this entire thread was talking shit to the op, but I’m the troll because I call out the village attention whore.
go fuck yourselves [/quote]
What’s your beef with Hallowed? She’s got some funny posts and makes inspiring progress in the weight room. Seriously, why did you pick her out? Is this your weird way of expressing your e-crush?
[quote]Sterneneisen wrote:
if he could chin 135 and pull 400 (both of which I still can’t)…[/quote]
lol…What is your hard on for chins and deads?? There are at least 50 other lifts you could be and should be getting stronger at.
I am a bit perplexed that you can pull 254lbs with your back and arms on a chin up, but only pull 308lbs with your entire posterior chain…something doesn’t add up with your training.
(kudos for your extraordinary strength, though)