POINTS OF INVESTIGATION: THE LONDON BOMBING
JULY 13, 2005. Several more issues are surfacing in the official investigation into the London bombings.
First, here is a brief excerpt from an AP piece:
Worried Mom’s Call Spurred Bombing Probe
Wednesday July 13, 2005 3:46 PM
AP Photo LON819
By BETH GARDINER
Associated Press Writer
…Detectives on Saturday revised their initial timeline of events, ascertaining from a review of the subways’ computer and electrical systems that the bombings on three Underground trains occurred within a minute of one another, at 8:50 a.m., not over a 26-minute span as they had initially thought.
…Four young men [the bombers] carrying backpacks chatted casually in King’s Cross station at about 8:30 a.m. - 20 minutes before the subway explosions - then separated. At rush hour in the busy station, a major hub for north London, they would have attracted little notice.
end AP excerpt
Someone who lives in London and is familiar with the underground system there should be able to answer the following question:
Given the locations where the three trains exploded, would it have been possible for the young men—supposedly IDed together on TV cameras at about 8:30AM, at King’s Cross—to have made their way to their separate trains and arrive at the spots where the bombs went off—at 8:50AM? That’s roughly 20 minutes, starting from King’s Cross. I don’t know the answer to this question, but it’s certainly worth exploring in detail.
Another issue: you’ll recall that yesterday I quoted a press report that stated bomber IDs were found very close to the seats on the trains where the bombs went off. I commented that these IDs must have been made of extremely thick steel to have survived the blasts. And to have remained in shape good enough to read There is another point. If these were true IDs, and if they weren’t planted after the explosions as a cover story, why would they have remained close to the seats where the bombs exploded? Wouldn’t air currents alone, from the bombs, have caused mere ID cards to blow some distance away—assuming they weren’t burned up altogether?
Here is a snip from that press report (Sky News). The comments about IDs found near seats where the bombs went off are from Peter Clarke/Scotland Yard:
“Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, head of Scotland’s Yard anti-terrorist branch…'We know that all four of these [bombers] arrived in London by train on the morning [of July 7]. We have identified CCTV footage showing the four men at King’s Cross Station shortly before 8.30am on that morning, July 7…We have since found personal documents bearing the names of three of those four men close to the seats of three of the explosions.”
You guys post really funny replies but have you read the info posted, is mainstream news, what are your opinions when confronted with the facts that they were running drills on July 7th 2005 and Sept 11, 2001? Nobody likes to doubt their government, but sometimes things just don’t add up and we have to be honest with ourselves, I voted for Bush and am a conservative, but that doesn’t mean that I have to accept and justify everything his administration does, we must learn from history so that we don’t repeat it…