Jiu Jitsu Wrestling Takedowns

[quote]Sifu wrote:

You are such an ignorant fucking MMA fanboy. Before there was your MMA fanboy shit there was a thing called a “real fight”. My teacher was a cop who has been in heck of a lot of real fights. Fights where the winner gets a trophy called “the cops gun”. He never lost any of those get the cops gun fights. Though he did have a co-worker who lost one of the matches die on him while he was giving him CPR. Noone in UFC history has ever lost a match with a big fucking hole in their chest like my teachers co-worker.

We had another black belt from our group who was a cop in Windsor Canada which is a really safe city with no violent crime. He died from a knife to the chest.

How many sportsmen competing in Vale Tudo tournaments have been shot or stabbed in the chest as part of the competition? Bitch ass fanboy.

There was also a thing called dojo challenges, where strangers would walk into the dojo and want to fight someone. These people could be anyone from hard asses to bikers to trained martial artists. No where in America has as bad of a history of dojo challenges as Detroit.

Dojo rivalry in Detroit is so bad we have even had black belts from our own group come in and start shit. So it is offensive to read your fanboy shit coming from punk ass LA.
My teachers had a lot of respect for Ju Jitsu people, but they never got their asses kicked by anyone when they did dojo challenges. Not even the Ju Jitsu people.

Of all the ignorant shit you come out with nothing is more ignorant and disrespectful than your constant use of TMA. You don’t know shit about martial arts, yet your punk ass has the unmitigated gall to lump us all together like there is no difference.

There is a big difference between TKD and Kyokushin. There is difference between Kyoushin and Isshinryu. It’s a good example of your ignrance that your punkass doesn’t talk shit about Kyokushin while Isshinryu which I study is a much more modern and advanced system. When Kyokushin founder Mas Oyama held his first full contact karate tournament in Madison Square Garden in 1962 it wasn’t the Kyokushin people who won it. It was won by Don Nagles Isshinryu students.

You are a fucking tournament weenie. You act like sport martial arts is the same as self defense martial arts or somehow it is better because you can get trophies to show off how great you are.

[/quote]

In fairness there are a lot of videos made by the gracies pre ufc of challenge dojo matches…not all against total bullshit martial artists. For example there is a video against jason delucia who fought pancrase. While I agree that TMA can have a level of effectiveness (I should given that I teach it). I also think your living in a dream world when it comes to defending takedowns…also who the hell is gonna take down some body weilding a knife or gun…Holes in chests??? Don’t get off topic…we were talkin about unarmed combat…lets keep it at that…armed combat is an entire different thread.

As I’ve said b4…you seem to be informed mostly but not now. Unless you are trained in a specific takedown art…your in the wrong conversation.

P.s the head twisting movement you described is already utilised…its called cross facing. It can’t be performed however unless you have already sprawled…and the movement has stalled.

OMC

[quote]slimjim wrote:
Huh, not really the direction I thought this thread would go when I read it a couple weeks ago.[/quote]

You’ve been around look enough to see the pattern:

  1. Take downs are cool, aren’t they?
  2. Yeah, except that in THE STREET, they don’t work.
  3. [50% of readers sigh: “Oh, God. Not this shit again.”] The other 50% take the bait, patiently explaining that no TMA bullshit can stop a good take down.
  4. More TMA bullshit.
  5. Repeat steps 3-4 infinite number of times.

[quote]Therizza wrote:
o and btw i hear alot of crap about how good ninjitsu is, but alot of it looks like crap. any thoughts?[/quote]

My instructors have trained in ninjitsu under both Robert Bussey and Steven Hayes. I’ve done some ninjitsu with them, but they don’t teach much of it anymore due to people misusing it in the past.

For unarmed combat it doesn’t have much to offer in my limited experience, but it can teach some useful skill sets (such as a big emphasis on awareness, stealth, climbing skills and trickery). It also is very much focused on efficiency and getting out of trouble as fast as possible.

[quote]Therizza wrote:
why not learn both styles? muay thai and BJJ? maximize the strengths and minimize the weaknesses? thats what i think alot of self proclaimed “mma” practioners forget. the “mixed martial arts” part. mma is not a style, its a mix to dominate your opponent. look at GSP or Anderson Silva. two of the best athletes in the UFC, both hold belts in BJJ and practice a striking art. both are champs.

now people go to the local gym, do some bullshit “mma” training where they punch a bag a bit and practice takedown defense, ie senslessly clinching but not moving to a hip toss or trip, because they are not proficient at the takedown.

then when a “mma” guy fights a BJJ guy he gets choked out because his bullshit takedown defense aint worth piss.
and when he fights a guy who knows some kyukushin or muay thai he gets knocked out with gloves and headgear.

but this is all in the “ring” or “gym” or whatever. real life defense i gotta say krav maga is probably your best bet.
[/quote]

If you are talking about MMA, then of course striking and grappling are pretty much the only two skill sets that one must develop. And anyone who thinks that they can neglect either one of those disciplines and still excel in MMA is kidding themselves.

From a self defense standpoint, then one should learn every possible effective discipline. My instructor Walt Lysak Jr. always says that in Sento he teaches everything that is effective that you see in MMA, and everything that is effective that you don’t see in MMA. Anyone who is serious about self defense that purposely avoids training any effective skill set is doing themselves a dis-service.

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote: Real fights are not always weaponless one on one affairs.

There is some truth to this. But what follows from that? That some mythical TMA that doesn’t even work in a one-on-one fight is superior? [/quote]

There is a lot of truth to that dumbass. If anyone is talking about mythical shit it is you. What follows from that is a real fight is not the same as a sports competition dip shit. Things you can take for granted or get away with in sports you may not be able to in a street fight. If you weren’t such an ignorant asshole you would realize that. But you don’t because you are so hung up on your sport. [quote]

If a TMA guy can’t keep a 150-pound Gracie off of him, how is he going to do against multiple attackers?

On the other hand, if you can knock a guy out with a punch, or devastate him with a leg kick, how is that not helpful in “the streets.”

Here, e.g., is a boxer going against multiple attackers:

People always want to bring guns into the discussion. If a guy pulls a gun on you, is Sifu-Fu really going to help?

I know “moves” to disarm someone. But if you pull a gun on me, you’re getting my wallet. Period.[/quote]

You are totally trying to change the point I was making and mislead this into some more of you bullshit.

I trained with several people who were cops. They have been in real fights where they have had to use their martial arts training. Here in America Police carry guns. A lot of cops have been shot with their own guns by someone who took it away from them. So when a cop gets into a fight it can be life or death. It’s not trophy or no trophy, like MMA.

The bottom line (which I have to spell out for you because you are such an ignorant fucking dipshit) is this. The person I learned from has had to use his knowledge on multiple occassions in real fights.

So when he said this works in a real fight, or this doesn’t work in a real fight he was speaking from experience. Not theory. Not myth. Experience.

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote: If I ever get in a real fight again and someone tries to pull guard on me I will ruin his face with headbutts. Lots of openings like that in current MMA style fighting.

If you leaned your head that far forward, you’d lose posture and the BJJ guy would take your back. Here’s a video demo:

Also, while BJJ is known for the guard, most good BJJ guys know how to take top control, too. The way it’s taught, a BJJ would throw a kick to try to close the distance on you. He’d clinch. Then he’d take you down, putting you on your back.

In comp, guys will pull guard. But that’s because it’s usually easier since the other guy has good takedown defense.

Don’t get me wrong, I am on your side - which seems to be that we should objectively analyze claims. And there are myths about BJJ, too.

The BJJ guys who say they could beat up Mike Tyson piss me off just as much as the TMA guys who claim to have mythical powers of self-defense.

Delusion and superstition are always bad.

That said, there is much more to BJJ that meets the eyes. And many obvious weaknesses are not weaknesses.

BJJ was created as a fighting style. Gracies would fight. Helio Gracie himself almost went to prison for fighting in the street. So guys would expose a hole in the game, and then they’d come up with a counter.

In fact, one reason I love BJJ so much is that you can do most anything. In Judo rules, it’s actually a “defense” to roll flat onto your belly. The rear naked choke is not allowed in judo, so it’s hard to get a choke on you from that position. Yet being on your belly is the most vulnerable position.

In BJJ, none of that shit is tolerated. If there’s a vulnerability, a guy will take it.

People like Sifu want to pretend that I and other BJJ guys just saw UFC on TV and went to the nearest BJJ academy. That makes them feel comfortable. Knowing that I have decades in various martial arts (including TMA), boxing, thai boxing, etc, and that I realized the superiority of BJJ for myself is just too much for them to accept. [/quote]

It is highly doubful that you have decades of experience studying martial arts. Because noone I know who has decades of training talks as much shit about other styles while talking up their own style as you do.

[quote]Therizza wrote:
why not learn both styles? muay thai and BJJ? maximize the strengths and minimize the weaknesses? [/quote]

To me you are making sense. You add on to what you so you are more rounded. In Okinawa the old karate masters all practiced the Okinawan wrestling art known as Tegume.

When Gichin Funakoshi introduced karate to Japan in the 1920’s some of his first students were Ju Jitsu teachers who had their own Ju Jitsu dojo’s and they taught and practiced both arts in the same dojo.

The issue with California law is he likes the feeling of another mans body pulled up against his, because he’s a homosexual. He doesn’t want to admit it so instead he says stand up arts are useless and trashes anyone who practices an art that doesn’t rolling around on the ground with another man.

[quote]Therizza wrote:
o and btw i hear alot of crap about how good ninjitsu is, but alot of it looks like crap. any thoughts?[/quote]

Ninjas were assasins. Their system is geared towards that. If a Ninja’s mission was to kill the Shogun he wasn’t going to waste time or get himself killed fighting the Shogun’s bodyguards.

Ninjas wanted to get past them quick and unharmed. So they would use deception and sneakiness.

The Samurais thought they were dishonorable and feared them because they wouldn’t present themselves and give them a fair fight.

The system isn’t geared towards having a long drawn out fair fight with one person. It is geared towards getting past guards so it has some techniques that are useful for getting away from multiple opponents.

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
slimjim wrote:
Huh, not really the direction I thought this thread would go when I read it a couple weeks ago.

You’ve been around look enough to see the pattern:

  1. Take downs are cool, aren’t they?
  2. Yeah, except that in THE STREET, they don’t work. [/quote]

You little bitch that is not what I said at all. I merely pointed out that there are vitals zones that you leave open performing them. If you were an honest practitioner of martial arts you would admit as much.

[quote]
3. [50% of readers sigh: “Oh, God. Not this shit again.”] The other 50% take the bait, patiently explaining that no TMA bullshit can stop a good take down.
4. More TMA bullshit. [/quote]

You feel threatened because you realize that people might realize that yes they are leaving the head and neck open to hug the other guys leg.

You’re afraid that if the move falls out of favor you will lose an opportunity to hug a mans leg and bury your face in his crotch without people thinking you are gay.

[quote]
5. Repeat steps 3-4 infinite number of times.[/quote]

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
slimjim wrote:
Huh, not really the direction I thought this thread would go when I read it a couple weeks ago.

You’ve been around look enough to see the pattern:

  1. Take downs are cool, aren’t they?
  2. Yeah, except that in THE STREET, they don’t work. [/quote]

You little bitch that is not what I said at all. I merely pointed out that there are vitals zones that you leave open performing them. If you were an honest practitioner of martial arts you would admit as much.

[quote]
3. [50% of readers sigh: “Oh, God. Not this shit again.”] The other 50% take the bait, patiently explaining that no TMA bullshit can stop a good take down.
4. More TMA bullshit. [/quote]

You feel threatened because you realize that people might realize that yes they are leaving the head and neck open to hug the other guys leg.

You’re afraid that if the move falls out of favor you will lose an opportunity to hug a mans leg and bury your face in his crotch without people thinking you are gay.

[quote]
5. Repeat steps 3-4 infinite number of times.[/quote]

[quote]OMC wrote:
Sifu wrote:

You are such an ignorant fucking MMA fanboy. Before there was your MMA fanboy shit there was a thing called a “real fight”. My teacher was a cop who has been in heck of a lot of real fights. Fights where the winner gets a trophy called “the cops gun”.

He never lost any of those get the cops gun fights. Though he did have a co-worker who lost one of the matches die on him while he was giving him CPR. Noone in UFC history has ever lost a match with a big fucking hole in their chest like my teachers co-worker.

We had another black belt from our group who was a cop in Windsor Canada which is a really safe city with no violent crime. He died from a knife to the chest.

How many sportsmen competing in Vale Tudo tournaments have been shot or stabbed in the chest as part of the competition? Bitch ass fanboy.

There was also a thing called dojo challenges, where strangers would walk into the dojo and want to fight someone. These people could be anyone from hard asses to bikers to trained martial artists. No where in America has as bad of a history of dojo challenges as Detroit.

Dojo rivalry in Detroit is so bad we have even had black belts from our own group come in and start shit. So it is offensive to read your fanboy shit coming from punk ass LA.
My teachers had a lot of respect for Ju Jitsu people, but they never got their asses kicked by anyone when they did dojo challenges. Not even the Ju Jitsu people.

Of all the ignorant shit you come out with nothing is more ignorant and disrespectful than your constant use of TMA. You don’t know shit about martial arts, yet your punk ass has the unmitigated gall to lump us all together like there is no difference.

There is a big difference between TKD and Kyokushin. There is difference between Kyoushin and Isshinryu. It’s a good example of your ignrance that your punkass doesn’t talk shit about Kyokushin while Isshinryu which I study is a much more modern and advanced system.

When Kyokushin founder Mas Oyama held his first full contact karate tournament in Madison Square Garden in 1962 it wasn’t the Kyokushin people who won it. It was won by Don Nagles Isshinryu students.

You are a fucking tournament weenie. You act like sport martial arts is the same as self defense martial arts or somehow it is better because you can get trophies to show off how great you are.

In fairness there are a lot of videos made by the gracies pre ufc of challenge dojo matches…not all against total bullshit martial artists. For example there is a video against jason delucia who fought pancrase.

While I agree that TMA can have a level of effectiveness (I should given that I teach it). I also think your living in a dream world when it comes to defending takedowns…also who the hell is gonna take down some body weilding a knife or gun…Holes in chests???

Don’t get off topic…we were talkin about unarmed combat…lets keep it at that…armed combat is an entire different thread. [/quote]

Over here police carry guns. A lot of them have died from getting shot by someone who took their gun away from them. It is a dangerous job. It isn’t sport. My teachers who were cops were using their skills for a serious reason. They weren’t just playing games in a dojo and going to tournamanets but never getting into a real fight.

In a real fight you have no way of knowing the other guy isn’t going to pull a weapon. You can’t just take things for granted like you can in a tournament. ie In a tournament a guy will have padded gloves so you don’t get hurt as badly. In a street fight he might have lead filled gloves so he will really hurt you if he hits you.

Or you go for a take down and didn’t realize he has a knife in his hand which he jams in your neck on the way down.

or shoves a finger in your eye. A finger in the eye is not a complicated technique. It is not difficult to do. It can even happen accidentaly. Just because it isn’t complicated and difficult to learn doesn’t mean it won’t work.

A lot of other styles diss the system I study because it is favors simple uncomplicated movements delivered from natural body positions, over complicated intricate movements delivered from unnatural contorted body positions. But that is what works in a real fight, simple stuff.

The head twisting movement I was describing is intended for breaking the neck. A cross face is something ese.

One last point. The OP is not black belt level practitioner, who has a high level of education in martial arts. He is a guy who is learning and I am trying to help him learn, by pointing out that while takedowns are neat moves to learn there are things that can happen.

In this regard I am being an honest teacher. Because I am pointing out some of the potential pitfalls. Which is more than a ot of the other posters are pointing out. I’m not being a cheerleader for style and saying this is invincible technique noone can beat it, because it’s my style and my style is unbeatable, like some of these other guys.

This is the real crux of the matter. I have pointed out something that can go wrong and all the immature MMA fanboy/cheerleaders are upset becaue they know I am right. They can’t bear to see a vulnerability in their style pointed out.

In this regard they are no different from the Tae Kwon Do people who get pissy when an Isshinryu person points out that they are leaving their groin open with all their head kicks. Then when they fight us and get kicked in the nuts they don’t like it.

All the good teachers I have ever known will point out what can go wrong with the techniqes they teach. You have to in order to teach a technique properly, otherwise you are setting your student up to get hurt or killed.

What this thread has shown is there are some on this board who talk like they really know what what they are talking about, but they really aren’t teachers. Because if they were real teachers, pointing out some simple facts would not have turned this into a my style is better than every other style pissing match.

I guess it’s my bad for wanting to teach something to my boy. In the future I’ll remember this. You guys can learn your lessons the hard way.

There’s a lot of love in this thread.

If you can say that maybe I’m not trying hard enough.

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote: If I ever get in a real fight again and someone tries to pull guard on me I will ruin his face with headbutts. Lots of openings like that in current MMA style fighting.

If you leaned your head that far forward, you’d lose posture and the BJJ guy would take your back. Here’s a video demo:
[/quote]

Nice technique. But I wonder if he’s ever actually tried that technique on pavement, or worse yet against a good wrestler on pavement.

Environmental factors have to be taken into consideration. On a nice slick, soft mat it’s fairly easy to “shrimp”, slide out to the side, slide an arm off your neck/head, etc… But pavement is a different animal. If you’ve ever actually trained grappling on pavement you’ll know what I mean.

I realize though that the instructor didn’t put the technique into context. And it would work on a more forgiving surface (like grass for example). So it’s very possible that if you asked him about it, he’d tell you that it wouldn’t be the best technique to use on certain surfaces.

Based on Sifu’s posts, it’s pretty clear that he loses control over his emotions. Too much TMA mysticism will do that to you. You become like a raging religious lunatic.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
OMC wrote:
Sifu wrote:

You are such an ignorant fucking MMA fanboy. Before there was your MMA fanboy shit there was a thing called a “real fight”. My teacher was a cop who has been in heck of a lot of real fights. Fights where the winner gets a trophy called “the cops gun”.

He never lost any of those get the cops gun fights. Though he did have a co-worker who lost one of the matches die on him while he was giving him CPR. Noone in UFC history has ever lost a match with a big fucking hole in their chest like my teachers co-worker.

We had another black belt from our group who was a cop in Windsor Canada which is a really safe city with no violent crime. He died from a knife to the chest.

How many sportsmen competing in Vale Tudo tournaments have been shot or stabbed in the chest as part of the competition? Bitch ass fanboy.

There was also a thing called dojo challenges, where strangers would walk into the dojo and want to fight someone. These people could be anyone from hard asses to bikers to trained martial artists. No where in America has as bad of a history of dojo challenges as Detroit.

Dojo rivalry in Detroit is so bad we have even had black belts from our own group come in and start shit. So it is offensive to read your fanboy shit coming from punk ass LA.
My teachers had a lot of respect for Ju Jitsu people, but they never got their asses kicked by anyone when they did dojo challenges. Not even the Ju Jitsu people.

Of all the ignorant shit you come out with nothing is more ignorant and disrespectful than your constant use of TMA. You don’t know shit about martial arts, yet your punk ass has the unmitigated gall to lump us all together like there is no difference.

There is a big difference between TKD and Kyokushin. There is difference between Kyoushin and Isshinryu. It’s a good example of your ignrance that your punkass doesn’t talk shit about Kyokushin while Isshinryu which I study is a much more modern and advanced system.

When Kyokushin founder Mas Oyama held his first full contact karate tournament in Madison Square Garden in 1962 it wasn’t the Kyokushin people who won it. It was won by Don Nagles Isshinryu students.

You are a fucking tournament weenie. You act like sport martial arts is the same as self defense martial arts or somehow it is better because you can get trophies to show off how great you are.

In fairness there are a lot of videos made by the gracies pre ufc of challenge dojo matches…not all against total bullshit martial artists. For example there is a video against jason delucia who fought pancrase.

While I agree that TMA can have a level of effectiveness (I should given that I teach it). I also think your living in a dream world when it comes to defending takedowns…also who the hell is gonna take down some body weilding a knife or gun…Holes in chests???

Don’t get off topic…we were talkin about unarmed combat…lets keep it at that…armed combat is an entire different thread.

Over here police carry guns. A lot of them have died from getting shot by someone who took their gun away from them. It is a dangerous job. It isn’t sport. My teachers who were cops were using their skills for a serious reason. They weren’t just playing games in a dojo and going to tournamanets but never getting into a real fight.

In a real fight you have no way of knowing the other guy isn’t going to pull a weapon. You can’t just take things for granted like you can in a tournament. ie In a tournament a guy will have padded gloves so you don’t get hurt as badly. In a street fight he might have lead filled gloves so he will really hurt you if he hits you.

Or you go for a take down and didn’t realize he has a knife in his hand which he jams in your neck on the way down.

or shoves a finger in your eye. A finger in the eye is not a complicated technique. It is not difficult to do. It can even happen accidentaly. Just because it isn’t complicated and difficult to learn doesn’t mean it won’t work.

A lot of other styles diss the system I study because it is favors simple uncomplicated movements delivered from natural body positions, over complicated intricate movements delivered from unnatural contorted body positions. But that is what works in a real fight, simple stuff.

As I’ve said b4…you seem to be informed mostly but not now. Unless you are trained in a specific takedown art…your in the wrong conversation.

P.s the head twisting movement you described is already utilised…its called cross facing. It can’t be performed however unless you have already sprawled…and the movement has stalled.

OMC

The head twisting movement I was describing is intended for breaking the neck. A cross face is something ese.

One last point. The OP is not black belt level practitioner, who has a high level of education in martial arts. He is a guy who is learning and I am trying to help him learn, by pointing out that while takedowns are neat moves to learn there are things that can happen.

In this regard I am being an honest teacher. Because I am pointing out some of the potential pitfalls. Which is more than a ot of the other posters are pointing out. I’m not being a cheerleader for style and saying this is invincible technique noone can beat it, because it’s my style and my style is unbeatable, like some of these other guys.

This is the real crux of the matter. I have pointed out something that can go wrong and all the immature MMA fanboy/cheerleaders are upset becaue they know I am right. They can’t bear to see a vulnerability in their style pointed out.

In this regard they are no different from the Tae Kwon Do people who get pissy when an Isshinryu person points out that they are leaving their groin open with all their head kicks. Then when they fight us and get kicked in the nuts they don’t like it.

All the good teachers I have ever known will point out what can go wrong with the techniqes they teach. You have to in order to teach a technique properly, otherwise you are setting your student up to get hurt or killed.

What this thread has shown is there are some on this board who talk like they really know what what they are talking about, but they really aren’t teachers. Because if they were real teachers, pointing out some simple facts would not have turned this into a my style is better than every other style pissing match.

I guess it’s my bad for wanting to teach something to my boy. In the future I’ll remember this. You guys can learn your lessons the hard way.[/quote]

Your right, style is an irrelevant matter however as everything has a flip side and what I see is that your unintentionally breaking your own rules. You say don’t go for the takedown in case the opponent is carrying a weapon…in a heavier gun culture like the states I would push for a take down quite quickly once the attacker has been visually assesed for items in his hands. I will concede that a poor takedown attempt will leave you in a vulnerabe position but if performed with any sort of skill your real world street attacker will be on his ass hard and eating elbows. This of course changes for multiple attackers but again, like the weapons topic, is a different discussion as there are too many variables to be covered in one.I will briefly indulge you though.

If your standing even a couple of feet away and an attacker pulls out a projectile weapon…your fucked. This is what can go wrong with not going for the takedown or close quarter combat situation. Clinching nulifies the potential impact of brass knuckles or “lead filled gloves”.The crossfacing maneuver I mentioned is simple…it is a basic neckcrank that forces your opponent to move to release the pressure…if he does not…a lot of pain will ensue.

You said it yourself, your trying to avoid tailoring advice to a black belt level but techniques like eye gouges flying knees or effective elbows to the spine while havin your legs taken out from under you are completely unrealistic even for 99 % of the blackbelts I’ve encountered. One of the clubs I instruct is based in a university here in Ireland and I regularly have to deal with the kung fuey/nin-fuck-u-up crowds coming in to do a little spying and trying to discredit the non TMA stuff. The amount of stories we have of guys telling us how they’ll poke me in the eye when I have them in a rear naked choke or how they’d snap my cross with 2 simultaneous inward blocks is ridiculous.

Your advice and input is absolutely welcome and appreciated. I hope you keep it up, just expect people not to agree with everything you write because you know what?? Everything you write isn’t correct and the same goes for me and anybody else here when discussing MA/selfdefence since it needs to be tailored specifically to the individuals strenghts.

OMC

[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Based on Sifu’s posts, it’s pretty clear that he loses control over his emotions. Too much TMA mysticism will do that to you. You become like a raging religious lunatic. [/quote]

Thats some good contributing there Cali…thanks

OMC

[quote]OMC wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Based on Sifu’s posts, it’s pretty clear that he loses control over his emotions. Too much TMA mysticism will do that to you. You become like a raging religious lunatic.

Thats some good contributing there Cali…thanks

OMC

[/quote]

Have to keep the ball rolling.

[quote]OMC wrote:
Your right, style is an irrelevant matter however as everything has a flip side and what I see is that your unintentionally breaking your own rules. You say don’t go for the takedown in case the opponent is carrying a weapon…in a heavier gun culture like the states I would push for a take down quite quickly once the attacker has been visually assesed for items in his hands. I will concede that a poor takedown attempt will leave you in a vulnerabe position but if performed with any sort of skill your real world street attacker will be on his ass hard and eating elbows. This of course changes for multiple attackers but again, like the weapons topic, is a different discussion as there are too many variables to be covered in one.I will briefly indulge you though.
[/quote]

Honestly I wouldn’t go for a takedown in a real fight unless:

  1. I was losing on my feet
  2. I absolutely positively knew that the person didn’t have a weapon, and there would be no additional attackers

And even then, I would do my best not to go down with them. Something like a “high double” would be a great street takedown IMO.

You know, I would have agreed with you in the past. But, after actually testing this out a couple weekends ago, I’d have to disagree.

In law enforcement there is something called “the 23 foot rule”. Basically what it pertains to is that you need at least 23 feet between you and an attacker to be able to draw a firearm and use it effectively.

And you know what? Unless you really train for it, and you can reload your weapon fast and under stress, that’s not even enough. In fact, in many cases even if you have the weapon drawn and pointed at center mass to begin with, 23 feet is not enough.

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
OMC wrote:

If your standing even a couple of feet away and an attacker pulls out a projectile weapon…your fucked.

You know, I would have agreed with you in the past. But, after actually testing this out a couple weekends ago, I’d have to disagree.

In law enforcement there is something called “the 23 foot rule”. Basically what it pertains to is that you need at least 23 feet between you and an attacker to be able to draw a firearm and use it effectively.

And you know what? Unless you really train for it, and you can reload your weapon fast and under stress, that’s not even enough. In fact, in many cases even if you have the weapon drawn and pointed at center mass to begin with, 23 feet is not enough.

[/quote]

That 23 foot rule is to keep the gunman safe from the other guy. It does not mean the other guy is safe from th egun at shorted distances, just that he will have the opportunity to do some damage before his lights go out.