[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It undermines the very fabric of the Constitution. And the inevitable result is that President Obama felt legally entitled to execute a US Citizen without trial. I have a HUGE issue with this. Not because I believe he wasn’t a terrorist. Not because I believe he didn’t deserve to die. But because of the precedent it sets. Obama crossed a line PUBLICLY, and got away with it. It was a HUGE line. And if that’s the power they currently have, then it needs to be taken back before it get’s out of hand and abused even further than it already has been.[/quote]
Communism is like a fucking disease. Our country has been infected (back in the 60’s) and the disease is spreading. They laid their groundwork VERY well - MEDIA controlling the message, Left leaning SCOTUS appointments at every opportunity, dumbing down the school system so that the newer generations can’t critically think for themselves, utilizing technology in a way that distracts from important issues while making “urgent/unimportant” issues the primary focus of the MSLM - it’s a VERY well orchestrated attack.
[/quote]
I find this thought-provoking.
Is it your view that some person or body consciously planned and is carrying this out, or am I misunderstanding? If so, who would you identify as it being?
I guess I’m asking who is “they?”
[/quote]
This is a fairly well established theory. You’ll find a lot of it in the “conspiracy theory” realm which in turn discredits the rest. However, if you read the very words of some of the masterminds and other Useful Idiots for the last 100+ years, it reads out like a well oiled plan.
McCarthy went off the deep end, and it’s too bad. He really was the air support the pinkos needed to dig in deeper.
It isn’t like those filthy hippys sitting on the lawn Sunday afternoon at Woodstock suddenly decided to invade classrooms, board rooms and elections in order to “fix” anything. They did it to tear down the status quo and replace it with utopia… And they were/are on enough drugs to think utopia is possible if we all just have a giant orgy…
45% of voters are concerned that the government will use U.S. military training operations to impose greater control over some states, with 19% who are Very Concerned. Just over half (52%) are not concerned that the government has an ulterior motive for the training exercises, including 26% who are Not At All Concerned.
Communism is like a fucking disease. Our country has been infected (back in the 60’s) and the disease is spreading. They laid their groundwork VERY well - MEDIA controlling the message, Left leaning SCOTUS appointments at every opportunity, dumbing down the school system so that the newer generations can’t critically think for themselves, utilizing technology in a way that distracts from important issues while making “urgent/unimportant” issues the primary focus of the MSLM - it’s a VERY well orchestrated attack.
[/quote]
I find this thought-provoking.
Is it your view that some person or body consciously planned and is carrying this out, or am I misunderstanding? If so, who would you identify as it being?
I guess I’m asking who is “they?”
[/quote]
I can only look at the results and the implication of those results (I.E. LESS freedom for Americans). I’m not smart enough or well educated enough to articulate my “hunches” without coming across as a crazy tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist, so I apologize in advance for my poor communication skills and ask that any specific sentences that I make a mistake on not be picked out of the paragraph and attacked. I know I’m not as smart as most of you, but I’m doing my best. In other words, I don’t have the time to respond to cherry picking anymore - address the POINT of my post and kindly refrain from picking one sentence out of one paragraph and using that to distract from the discussion at hand. I’m kinda sick and tired of that “internet debate” tactic and won’t be indulging in it anymore (not addressed specifically at you Chushin). It distracts from the discussion.
I think there are elements of Special Interest Groups (minorities, LGBTABCDEFG, and the rest of the “politically correct police” who control the MEDIA), elements of “Big Money” interested in influencing the government in their favor for profit and promoting “consumption”, elements of international influences who want to tear down American exceptionalism, elements of socialist/communist second and third generation people/institutions actively working to meet that agenda, elements within our government who are tasked with “protecting us” and are pressured to do by any means necessary (even if it means effectively neutering the population and violating the Constitution to do so), and an overall “decline” in Conservative values fueled by Radical Feminism which has basically made divorce and the systematic financial castrating of the American Man commonplace which has led to the diminishing of the Family unit, single mommy syndrome, and a host of other social issues that move us in a negative direction. These ideas are literally beaten into our brains everyday with advertizing, TV shows, Movies and other forms of MEDIA. It is compounded when these ideas are LEGISLATED and ENFORCED - the result of which is more police encounters and the incarceration of a significant percentage of our population. 90% of the time, these people who get caught up in the “justice system” will NEVER go on to lead any kind of “productive” life. This leads to a permanent “under class” and everything that goes along with it. Even the basic non violent traffic laws result in what is essentially debtors prison and systematic disenfranchisement of the poor, uneducated and many minorities. Which, of course, is basically another form of taxation - more laws = more arrests = more inmates = more prisons = more money = better cop cars, more “justice” jobs and an incentive to keep that cycle (of abuse and raping citizens financially to justify their pathetic existence) going. This concept is furthered by the Liberal agenda who want’s to have MORE “protection” and is too stupid to realize that the very system that they fearfully support actually CREATES more desperate people who are in fact MORE likely to commit crime - after all, who want’s to hire a felon? it’s a feed-forward loop that continues to spiral out of control to the detriment of our society.
I don’t think it’s “one person” pulling the strings. I think it’s a result of poorly thought out Liberal ideas that have been gaining ground little by little over the course of decades. These ideas have produced a critical mass of uninformed, government dependent voters who view themselves as victims and feel entitled to XYZ… Their voices are magnified by special interest groups who are financed by “big money” in exchange for influence.
Our laws (specifically Tort laws) have been used to create very harmful precedents that have had unforeseen consequences. Instead of changing the laws in the interest of the general population, concessions are made for minorities and special interests at the expense of the general population. This has become very apparent in government where it’s become virtually impossible to fire an incompetent person. If you have a culture of incompetence and special interest, fueled by entitlement and “victim” culture, it’s pretty obvious that the results are going to be less than stellar.
Other laws (usually rammed down our throats in the form of HUGE bills that are not debated or even given adequate time to READ before being voted on) give unprecedented power to the Federal government in the form of the Three Letter Agencies. This has given rise to the effective militarization of the Executive Branch and opens the door to all kinds of unsupervised actions in our Homeland against AMERICANS. The “war on XXXX” (drugs, terror, etc…) gives the government the excuse to spy on us. Here is a great article that sums that up nicely:
And here is a great video showing the active ignorance of some individuals and their BLIND faith in the Government and the unconstitutional actions of President Obama.
[/quote]
I don’t think I can articulate this so well either, but I have the feeling that a lot of this stuff (and Beans’ post contributed to this) is a kind of “natural rotting” of our society, that grows (unavoidably?) from our having achieved great levels of affluence (relatively speaking) and “abundance.”
I read somewhere about a Japanese proverb that goes something like, “It takes 3 generations to ruin a hardworking, successful family.” The grandad works like a slave and manages to make life for his son fairly comfortable. The father expands on the success with a better education and more hard work. The father gives his son everything he needs – thereby destroying the attitudes that made the success possible in the first place.
Maybe the concern for small groups and minorities grows when people have full bellies. Maybe we want “the government” to be responsible for us when we’ve grown flabby and unaccustomed to taking care of ourselves.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
45% of voters are concerned that the government will use U.S. military training operations to impose greater control over some states, with 19% who are Very Concerned. Just over half (52%) are not concerned that the government has an ulterior motive for the training exercises, including 26% who are Not At All Concerned.
[/quote]
45% of voters don’t have a modicum of understanding of military science or national security policy and process. As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. It’s indicative of a substantial discrepancy between the responsibilities of policymakers and basic knowledge of high politics.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. (USASOC News Service, March 24, 2015) - Members of U.S. Army Special Operations Command will train with other U.S Armed Forces units July 15 through Sept. 15 in a multi-state exercise called Jade Helm 15.
"USASOC periodically conducts training exercises such as these to practice core special warfare tasks, which help protect the nation against foreign enemies. It is imperative that Special Operations Soldiers receive the best training, equipment and resources possible.
While multi-state training exercises such as these are not unique to the military, the size and scope of Jade Helm sets this one apart. To stay ahead of the environmental challenges faced overseas, Jade Helm will take place across seven states. However, Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) will only train in five states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado. The diverse terrain in these states replicates areas Special Operations Soldiers regularly find themselves operating in overseas.
The training exercise will be conducted on private and public land with the permission of the private landowners, and from state and local authorities. In essence, all exercise activity will be taking place on pre-coordinated public and private lands.
The public can expect nothing much different from their day-to-day activities since much of exercise will be conducted in remote areas. The most noticeable effect the exercise may have on the local communities is an increase in vehicle and military air traffic and its associated noise. There will also be economic gain: an increase in the local economy, in fuel and food purchases and hotel lodging.
This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for ARSOF since they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world at a momentâ??s notice.
During this eight-week period, ARSOF soldiers will use this opportunity to further develop tactics, techniques and procedures for emerging concepts in Special Operations warfare.
USASOC intends to conduct the exercise safely and courteously while providing the best possible training available for the nation’s Army Special Operations Forces. State and local officials are being informed of the scope of Jade Helm and will continue to be updated as the exercise progresses."
[quote]Bismark wrote:
As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. [/quote]
Do me a favor, let me know when it’s appropriate for us imbeciles to be concerned with what our military and government is doing.
Seriously. I posted this same request when I was told I was stupid for being curious and concerned.
Let me know at what specific point, before it’s too late, being concerned and observing isn’t stupid or imbecilic.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
45% of voters are concerned that the government will use U.S. military training operations to impose greater control over some states, with 19% who are Very Concerned. Just over half (52%) are not concerned that the government has an ulterior motive for the training exercises, including 26% who are Not At All Concerned.
[/quote]
45% of voters don’t have a modicum of understanding of military science or national security policy and process. As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. It’s indicative of a substantial discrepancy between the responsibilities of policymakers and basic knowledge of high politics.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. (USASOC News Service, March 24, 2015) - Members of U.S. Army Special Operations Command will train with other U.S Armed Forces units July 15 through Sept. 15 in a multi-state exercise called Jade Helm 15.
"USASOC periodically conducts training exercises such as these to practice core special warfare tasks, which help protect the nation against foreign enemies. It is imperative that Special Operations Soldiers receive the best training, equipment and resources possible.
While multi-state training exercises such as these are not unique to the military, the size and scope of Jade Helm sets this one apart.[/quote]Which is why it merits scrutiny and is why some of us are concerned about it.[quote] To stay ahead of the environmental challenges faced overseas, Jade Helm will take place across seven states. However, Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) will only train in five states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado. The diverse terrain in these states replicates areas Special Operations Soldiers regularly find themselves operating in overseas.
The training exercise will be conducted on private and public land with the permission of the private landowners, and from state and local authorities. In essence, all exercise activity will be taking place on pre-coordinated public and private lands.
The public can expect nothing much different from their day-to-day activities since much of exercise will be conducted in remote areas. The most noticeable effect the exercise may have on the local communities is an increase in vehicle and military air traffic and its associated noise. There will also be economic gain: an increase in the local economy, in fuel and food purchases and hotel lodging.
This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for ARSOF since they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world at a momentâ??s notice. [/quote]Well up there, it’s size and scope was way larger than anything else ever done on US soil, but now it’s “routine” and “move along, nothing to see here”? Which one is it? You can’t have it both ways…[quote]
During this eight-week period, ARSOF soldiers will use this opportunity to further develop tactics, techniques and procedures for emerging concepts in Special Operations warfare.
USASOC intends to conduct the exercise safely and courteously while providing the best possible training available for the nation’s Army Special Operations Forces. State and local officials are being informed of the scope of Jade Helm and will continue to be updated as the exercise progresses."
Take a look at the attached map. If you were Texas or Utah, don’t you think you’d have a RIGHT to be just a WEE bit concerned? Especially since it was infowars who leaked the map in the first place and then the Pentagon originally denied it…
And if they are training on terrain common in FOREIGN lands, why are they making Texas and Utah hostile states? Why not California? Why not Colorado? (oh yeah, they suspended JH15 in their state)
Why do they need trains with shackles in Texas? Is that common overseas?
Before you criticize the source, remember it was infowars who originally broke this news in the first place, while the MSLM was just sucking Obama’s cock and reporting what they were spoon fed.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
45% of voters are concerned that the government will use U.S. military training operations to impose greater control over some states, with 19% who are Very Concerned. Just over half (52%) are not concerned that the government has an ulterior motive for the training exercises, including 26% who are Not At All Concerned.
[/quote]
45% of voters don’t have a modicum of understanding of military science or national security policy and process. As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. It’s indicative of a substantial discrepancy between the responsibilities of policymakers and basic knowledge of high politics.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. (USASOC News Service, March 24, 2015) - Members of U.S. Army Special Operations Command will train with other U.S Armed Forces units July 15 through Sept. 15 in a multi-state exercise called Jade Helm 15.
"USASOC periodically conducts training exercises such as these to practice core special warfare tasks, which help protect the nation against foreign enemies. It is imperative that Special Operations Soldiers receive the best training, equipment and resources possible.
While multi-state training exercises such as these are not unique to the military, the size and scope of Jade Helm sets this one apart.[/quote]Which is why it merits scrutiny and is why some of us are concerned about it.[quote] To stay ahead of the environmental challenges faced overseas, Jade Helm will take place across seven states. However, Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) will only train in five states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado. The diverse terrain in these states replicates areas Special Operations Soldiers regularly find themselves operating in overseas.
The training exercise will be conducted on private and public land with the permission of the private landowners, and from state and local authorities. In essence, all exercise activity will be taking place on pre-coordinated public and private lands.
The public can expect nothing much different from their day-to-day activities since much of exercise will be conducted in remote areas. The most noticeable effect the exercise may have on the local communities is an increase in vehicle and military air traffic and its associated noise. There will also be economic gain: an increase in the local economy, in fuel and food purchases and hotel lodging.
This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for ARSOF since they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world at a momentÃ??Ã?¢??s notice. [/quote]Well up there, it’s size and scope was way larger than anything else ever done on US soil, but now it’s “routine” and “move along, nothing to see here”? Which one is it? You can’t have it both ways…[quote]
During this eight-week period, ARSOF soldiers will use this opportunity to further develop tactics, techniques and procedures for emerging concepts in Special Operations warfare.
USASOC intends to conduct the exercise safely and courteously while providing the best possible training available for the nation’s Army Special Operations Forces. State and local officials are being informed of the scope of Jade Helm and will continue to be updated as the exercise progresses."
Take a look at the attached map. If you were Texas or Utah, don’t you think you’d have a RIGHT to be just a WEE bit concerned? Especially since it was infowars who leaked the map in the first place and then the Pentagon originally denied it…
And if they are training on terrain common in FOREIGN lands, why are they making Texas and Utah hostile states? Why not California? Why not Colorado? (oh yeah, they suspended JH15 in their state)
Why do they need trains with shackles in Texas? Is that common overseas?
Before you criticize the source, remember it was infowars who originally broke this news in the first place, while the MSLM was just sucking Obama’s cock and reporting what they were spoon fed.[/quote]
A 1,200 man strong force - constituted mainly by Army Green Berets, in addition to a small group of Navy SEALS, Air Force special operations forces, and conventional Army infantry (all light forces) are going to be able to take over a state of nearly 27,000,000, the majority of them gun owners. Seems plausible.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
45% of voters are concerned that the government will use U.S. military training operations to impose greater control over some states, with 19% who are Very Concerned. Just over half (52%) are not concerned that the government has an ulterior motive for the training exercises, including 26% who are Not At All Concerned.
[/quote]
45% of voters don’t have a modicum of understanding of military science or national security policy and process. As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. It’s indicative of a substantial discrepancy between the responsibilities of policymakers and basic knowledge of high politics.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. (USASOC News Service, March 24, 2015) - Members of U.S. Army Special Operations Command will train with other U.S Armed Forces units July 15 through Sept. 15 in a multi-state exercise called Jade Helm 15.
"USASOC periodically conducts training exercises such as these to practice core special warfare tasks, which help protect the nation against foreign enemies. It is imperative that Special Operations Soldiers receive the best training, equipment and resources possible.
While multi-state training exercises such as these are not unique to the military, the size and scope of Jade Helm sets this one apart.[/quote]Which is why it merits scrutiny and is why some of us are concerned about it.[quote] To stay ahead of the environmental challenges faced overseas, Jade Helm will take place across seven states. However, Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) will only train in five states: Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado. The diverse terrain in these states replicates areas Special Operations Soldiers regularly find themselves operating in overseas.
The training exercise will be conducted on private and public land with the permission of the private landowners, and from state and local authorities. In essence, all exercise activity will be taking place on pre-coordinated public and private lands.
The public can expect nothing much different from their day-to-day activities since much of exercise will be conducted in remote areas. The most noticeable effect the exercise may have on the local communities is an increase in vehicle and military air traffic and its associated noise. There will also be economic gain: an increase in the local economy, in fuel and food purchases and hotel lodging.
This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for ARSOF since they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world at a momentÃ???Ã??Ã?¢??s notice. [/quote]Well up there, it’s size and scope was way larger than anything else ever done on US soil, but now it’s “routine” and “move along, nothing to see here”? Which one is it? You can’t have it both ways…[quote]
During this eight-week period, ARSOF soldiers will use this opportunity to further develop tactics, techniques and procedures for emerging concepts in Special Operations warfare.
USASOC intends to conduct the exercise safely and courteously while providing the best possible training available for the nation’s Army Special Operations Forces. State and local officials are being informed of the scope of Jade Helm and will continue to be updated as the exercise progresses."
Take a look at the attached map. If you were Texas or Utah, don’t you think you’d have a RIGHT to be just a WEE bit concerned? Especially since it was infowars who leaked the map in the first place and then the Pentagon originally denied it…
And if they are training on terrain common in FOREIGN lands, why are they making Texas and Utah hostile states? Why not California? Why not Colorado? (oh yeah, they suspended JH15 in their state)
Why do they need trains with shackles in Texas? Is that common overseas?
Before you criticize the source, remember it was infowars who originally broke this news in the first place, while the MSLM was just sucking Obama’s cock and reporting what they were spoon fed.[/quote]
A 1,200 man strong force - constituted mainly by Army Green Berets, in addition to a small group of Navy SEALS, Air Force special operations forces, and conventional Army infantry (all light forces) are going to be able to take over a state of nearly 27,000,000, the majority of them gun owners. Seems plausible. [/quote]
I have NEVER said they are planning to “take over”. I HAVE said that this operation seems like a false flag and that it is a “dry run” that would get the military FAMILIAR with potential territory that could be contended in the future. I think it could be a fantastic cover to “disappear” anyone they want to in those states. I think the Obama administration lies consistently, has an agenda to “fundamentally reshape America” (HIS quote, not mine) and that the three letter agencies are more concerned with spying on “domestic threats” (i.e. people who support the CONSTITUTION) than they are with catching terrorists (or even labeling them as “muslim”).
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
Both of these links shed light on the fact that the FBI, DHS, ATF and other agencies are more worried about classifying conservatives and people who support the Constitution as “terrorists” than they are about rooting out and destroying ISIS and other muslim based terror organizations. They are going after CITIZENS with the same rulebook that they used to go after TERRORISTS.[/quote]
That’s because they ARE terrorists. Timothy McVeigh was most certainly a terrorist in every sense of the word, and the articles you provided more or less suggest that the authorities are afraid of another such incident.
It seems entirely reasonable to believe that right-ring extremists have a greater foothold in the U.S. than Islamic extremists. Given that, it seems entirely reasonable to believe that they’d consider them a greater threat relative to Islamic extremists.
To my knowledge, Islamic terrorists have failed to murder a single person in the U.S. since 9/11. Based on the CNN article, right-wing extremists have murdered at least two since 9/11.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
As I’ve said before, I hope there is new level of hell created for “W” and Cheney for their role in implementing the Patriot acts. Those fuckers blew the lid off of Pandora’s box.[/quote]
Hopefully you include every single member of Congress who voted “yes” during the vote, and millions of Americans who thought it was a good idea at the time in there too.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
Both of these links shed light on the fact that the FBI, DHS, ATF and other agencies are more worried about classifying conservatives and people who support the Constitution as “terrorists” than they are about rooting out and destroying ISIS and other muslim based terror organizations. They are going after CITIZENS with the same rulebook that they used to go after TERRORISTS.[/quote]
That’s because they ARE terrorists. Timothy McVeigh was most certainly a terrorist in every sense of the word, and the articles you provided more or less suggest that the authorities are afraid of another such incident.
[/quote]No “they” (conservatives) are NOT all terrorists. McVeigh was. But he hardly represents ALL conservatives.[quote]
It seems entirely reasonable to believe that right-ring extremists have a greater foothold in the U.S. than Islamic extremists. Given that, it seems entirely reasonable to believe that they’d consider them a greater threat relative to Islamic extremists.
[/quote]“Right wing extremists” are still AMERICAN CITIZENS and entitled to the protections guaranteed under the Constitution. If the fucking Lib-tards weren’t eroding the Constitution with their socialist/communist ideas, then we wouldn’t have very many “right wing extremists”. The fact is, there are people in our government who overtly express their desire to eliminate the second amendment. THAT is what people are worried about. So they naturally feel the need to protect themselves from the GOVERNMENT’S plan to USURP our rights. [quote]
To my knowledge, Islamic terrorists have failed to murder a single person in the U.S. since 9/11. Based on the CNN article, right-wing extremists have murdered at least two since 9/11.
[/quote]There’s a word for people who kill people. It’s called MURDERER. It’s NOT called “TERRORIST”. We have laws to investigate and prosecute those who commit murder. We do NOT need to re-write the Constitution, suspend several of the bill of rights because in the last FIFTEEN YEARS, two people MAY HAVE BEEN murdered… [quote]
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
As I’ve said before, I hope there is new level of hell created for “W” and Cheney for their role in implementing the Patriot acts. Those fuckers blew the lid off of Pandora’s box.[/quote]
Hopefully you include every single member of Congress who voted “yes” during the vote, and millions of Americans who thought it was a good idea at the time in there too.[/quote]
I do. It’s downright shameful. For the record, I was NEVER supportive of the Patriot act or any of the subsequent acts that stripped us of our privacy.
To my knowledge, Islamic terrorists have failed to murder a single person in the U.S. since 9/11. Based on the CNN article, right-wing extremists have murdered at least two since 9/11.
[/quote]
Lmao… Boston Marathon and Fort Hood trump your two by “right-wing” extremists, by quite a wide ass margin.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. [/quote]
Do me a favor, let me know when it’s appropriate for us imbeciles to be concerned with what our military and government is doing.
Seriously. I posted this same request when I was told I was stupid for being curious and concerned.
Let me know at what specific point, before it’s too late, being concerned and observing isn’t stupid or imbecilic.
Thanks. [/quote]
Seriously, can anyone clear this little detail up for me?
I need a fairly specific event or comment that allows me to not be called names for asking questions of the government.
Prior to Katrina, “preppers” were called all sorts of names, now people with a couple days of food and water + are called “responsible American Citizens”. They declared Martial Law Lite in the entire city of Boston, and heavy in Watertown looking for a teenage boy hiding in a boat… Sold it with “Boston Strong”, and I’m called names for thinking kicking down doors and suspending the constitution is bullshit.
SO if people can give me a gentlemen’s guide on how not to end up like a European Jew in 1942, without being called names for understanding the historical precedent of government, that’d be great. Thanks.
To my knowledge, Islamic terrorists have failed to murder a single person in the U.S. since 9/11. Based on the CNN article, right-wing extremists have murdered at least two since 9/11.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
As a Texan, I’m ashamed of the imbecilic behavior of Greg Abbot and Senator Ted Cruz in regard to Jade Helm 15. They are doing a disservice to the state, the nation, and our service members. If anything, Americans should be disconceted that such nescient individuals hold high office. [/quote]
Do me a favor, let me know when it’s appropriate for us imbeciles to be concerned with what our military and government is doing.
Seriously. I posted this same request when I was told I was stupid for being curious and concerned.
Let me know at what specific point, before it’s too late, being concerned and observing isn’t stupid or imbecilic.
Thanks. [/quote]
Seriously, can anyone clear this little detail up for me?
I need a fairly specific event or comment that allows me to not be called names for asking questions of the government.
Prior to Katrina, “preppers” were called all sorts of names, now people with a couple days of food and water + are called “responsible American Citizens”. They declared Martial Law Lite in the entire city of Boston, and heavy in Watertown looking for a teenage boy hiding in a boat… Sold it with “Boston Strong”, and I’m called names for thinking kicking down doors and suspending the constitution is bullshit.
SO if people can give me a gentlemen’s guide on how not to end up like a European Jew in 1942, without being called names for understanding the historical precedent of government, that’d be great. Thanks. [/quote]
