Is Bodybuilding 'Easy'?

I’ve been into training for over 10 years-they exist and are the majority. You may not consider them bodybuilders, but they are the average training person who is into bodybuilding and most likely the average T-Nation reader fits this discription to some degree.

Sure, any given person will not fit that exact image but it will be any combination of that above plus probably a few I didn’t list. If that wasn’t the case there would be quite a few bodybuilderesque guys walking around as well as in every gym. There are not.

[quote]1000rippedbuff wrote:
I’ve been into training for over 10 years-they exist and are the majority. You may not consider them bodybuilders, but they are the average training person who is into bodybuilding and most likely the average Tnation reader fits this discription to some degree. Sure, any given person will not fit that exact image but it will be any combination of that above plus probably a few I didn’t list. If that wasn’t the case there would be quite a few bodybuilderesque guys walking around as well as in every gym. There are not.[/quote]

The average person in most gyms is completely clueless so WHY would you consider them “bodybuilders”? Does that really even make sense to you? Some obese guy who won’t bother to eat to see progress and who doesn’t make gains falls into the “bodybuilding” category to you?

This shit gets real stupid after so many people say things like this.

[quote]Scott M wrote:
Alffi wrote:

I think the hardest part of BB is staying lean while getting larger
.

I think it’s becoming a monstrosity of a man when most people can’t get to the point where anyone can tell they lift and they’ve been at it for 5-10 years. Staying lean? Do some cardio and don’t eat a lot. Becoming a freak show? That’s a different story and there’s a reason why there is tons of 180-200 lb lean guys in each gym and only a few(if any) 260-310 lb off season lean guys in each. Maybe that’s an indication of what’s the hardest thing here.

The training itself is inherently easier than in a strength sport. BB reminds me of that time as a child when “exercise is good” and just fooling around and having fun and getting a little gassed is considered productive activity,that’s what they thought at school and that was enough.

I’ve seen some top strength sports athletes train and there is no doubt it’s intense and takes a dedicated person to keep it up, but bodybuilding is easier? Who are you making this observation off of? Hitting a heavy double on front squats is challening sure, but you aren’t going to vomit from it or walk around crippled because of it. Take a 20 rep front squat with shit heavy weights and see how you feel after… tell me which one you’d rather do on a regular basis. I don’t think “a little gassed” would be the appropriate way to describe how hardcore bodybuilders feel after training lol.

A BB’er can be happy with getting sore and lactic in the right places. He does not need to care about strength,speed,mobility,technique etc. and to psychologically push himself to new heights with maximum weights.

That’s why all bodybuilders are happy staying with 135 benches and 185 lb squats right? Oh wait… the inhumanly large ones tend to push 3-4 times that… maybe strength and pushing the limits progression wise is important to a bodybuilder. Go do 2000 pushups everyday, I bet you’ll be sore all the time but you sure as hell won’t be developing a massive chest anytime soon. Get your incline bench press to 425x12 and then take a look in the mirror. Who are these massive bodybuilders that aren’t insanely strong? 150-200 lb dumbbell presses, 400-500 lb rows, leg presses stacked to the brim with loaded barbells thrown on top… that’s what I’m seeing among top guys… what are you looking at?

He can employ methods that retard strength development,like lifting fatigued and slowing down a small weight to get that time under tension and the pump.Even partial ROM may be excused. He can switch exercises on and off, if strength in one goes down it’s allright,as long as the target muscles are torn. Just pump out a moderate weight for a while. That’s pretty fun and not stressful at all.

Besides strict pre contest periods where are these people getting weaker and weaker as they train lol. I can barely even fathom this as it’s beyond comprehension to think that someone would get weaker by WEIGHT TRAINING. Moderate weight for a little while… you can’t even be remotely serious. Watch Ronnie Coleman train his back with 800 lb deads and 14 plate t bar rows and tell me that he and other guys are just lifting moderate weights to get a pump. Get a clue

This is not meant to belittle bodybuilding,which I think is cool. Just present the argument for why it seems to me as if it is easier. I’ve seen some BB’s state that they think that it is the hardest sport in the world. Answer what you will.

Yes you are belittling bodybuilding when you make comments like you do about how you think some of us train. I don’t care if it’s a sport, if it’s the hardest sport etc but don’t come onto the BODYBUILDING forum of a weight training website and try to tell people that they don’t train hard when you’ve barely got a clue.

[/quote]

As for 180-200 pound and 260-310 pound guys, I do not know whether you’re taking their height and frame into account or not.
I would not expect to see many people who have gone at it for years and yet do not look they were ‘under the bar’. Might be a cultural thing though. In my country,there seems to be a disproportionate number of high achievers in strength athletics.

As for the 20 rep squat,I can only direct you to my earlier post about the difference of going to the limit in BB as opposed to going to the limit in strength (the jumping analogue). I’d much rather do pure bodybuilding because,God help me,I find it far less of a burden.

Regarding strength,I’m not saying that huge bodybuilders are not strong. However,they don’t have to worry as long as they are getting larger. It’s not the priority in their list of worries.

“Moderate” means moderate relative to the lifter’s strength. I thought that would be obvious. And I did not mean that they get weaker,but reaching for an artifical tempo,going to failure as a rule and generally getting wrecked as a general rule is not necessarily very good for something like explosiveness.

My arguments,which I’m willing to reject if tempted by strong counters,can be derived to the observation that bodybuilders are able to vary their lifts a lot,do not have to show any form of true fitness aside from moderate increases in maximum strength,which is a side-effect,evolve technically (in lifting technique,dreaming up superior programs does not count) or suffer the psychological stress of overcoming a specific weight in a specific lift. I’m willing to acknowledge that being a bodybuilder,or shall I say achieving as one,can be harder in some respects than being an oly or powerlifter,strongman etc.

I’m sorry if I came across as saying that you don’t train hard.

You sound like a 1980’s high school text book. Believe what you want, I’m not even sure why I cared.

[quote]ab_power wrote:
It is hard. The opposing team you face each day is your own body. You have to go against thousands of years of evolution to convince your body to carry more muscle than it should. You have to build muscle and keep it, both of which are tough. The thing is, some guy can quit a sport for a year, decide to play again, practice for a couple weeks, then instantly be at the same level he was at. Whereas if you don’t train in bodybuilding for a year, you will be back at square one. The psychological implications of this are astounding.

I’m sure there are people here who have missed a meal or training session and in the back of their mind kept saying “god damn, will this set me back at all?”[/quote]This is the first entirely novel argument I’ve witnessed.

I’m gonna take a wild guess and say you haven’t made much progress with bodybuilding…

[quote]Alffi wrote:
mr popular wrote:
it is one of the few if not the only sport that you train for literally every hour of the day as your diet and sleep are so critical to progress.

And if you don’t think bodybuilders need to “push themselves” or focus on their strength, technique, or flexibility, then you must not have been into this game for very long at all.

Bodybuilders do not just “pump out a moderate weight for a while”

And you think the fact that some bodybuilders make exercises MORE DIFFICULT TO PERFORM by changing technique and pre-fatiguing muscle groups, this makes it “easier” somehow?

Do you understand that using a partial range of motion is designed to make an exercises harder?

As opposed to powerlifting where as long as your technique is legal in competiton you use as many muscle groups as possible and use the technique that makes the lift as easy as can possibly be with the only goal being to get the weight up (once…)People like elite weightlifters lift just about every day,some of them two times a day. They vary heavy and light,do all kinds of technique drills etc. A bodybuilder can get away with wrecking himself in the gym once a week and then sleeping and eating until the next period. I’m sort of talking about extremes but this happens. Everyone needs to eat and everyone needs to rest. I train for strength and the only difference is I don’t count my calories. What about the weightclass fluctuations of competing lifters? That requires attention to diet too.

There is a huge psychological gap between doing a set of 15 or how much you can with a modest weight and a single that will require 100% concentration and the attitude that your life depends on it. When you are a BB,you get happy from the pump,failure and post-workout soreness,which indicates future hypertrophy. And hypertrophy does not necessarily result in any significant strength gain. So if you’re swinging the same weight the next time or possibly even less,it will not break your heart because “I’m a bodybuilder” and you can switch exercises around a lot,which excuses some plateau or regression.

I don’t think making exercises more ‘difficult’ makes it harder,no. The thing is,they will still be adjusted to the same principles,going for a lot of contracting around,with a weight that is clearly within your comfort zone,or if it is,you can stick with the partials because all the fibers contract regardless and getting stronger is not the big deal. I guess the major difference is in BB you seek to blow yourself out, while in strength athletics you need to overcome the weight.

[/quote]

God im probably one of the biggest fat asses on this forum and I know you are full of fuckin shit! God you dont know anything about body building all your trying to do is make power lifting look like this elite I GOT A FUCKIN 25 INCH DICK!!! sport. Sorry to disappoint jackass but it wont happen.

[quote]Alffi wrote:
mr popular wrote:
it is one of the few if not the only sport that you train for literally every hour of the day as your diet and sleep are so critical to progress.

And if you don’t think bodybuilders need to “push themselves” or focus on their strength, technique, or flexibility, then you must not have been into this game for very long at all.

Bodybuilders do not just “pump out a moderate weight for a while”

And you think the fact that some bodybuilders make exercises MORE DIFFICULT TO PERFORM by changing technique and pre-fatiguing muscle groups, this makes it “easier” somehow?

Do you understand that using a partial range of motion is designed to make an exercises harder?

As opposed to powerlifting where as long as your technique is legal in competiton you use as many muscle groups as possible and use the technique that makes the lift as easy as can possibly be with the only goal being to get the weight up (once…)People like elite weightlifters lift just about every day,some of them two times a day. They vary heavy and light,do all kinds of technique drills etc. A bodybuilder can get away with wrecking himself in the gym once a week and then sleeping and eating until the next period. I’m sort of talking about extremes but this happens. Everyone needs to eat and everyone needs to rest. I train for strength and the only difference is I don’t count my calories. What about the weightclass fluctuations of competing lifters? That requires attention to diet too.

There is a huge psychological gap between doing a set of 15 or how much you can with a modest weight and a single that will require 100% concentration and the attitude that your life depends on it. When you are a BB,you get happy from the pump,failure and post-workout soreness,which indicates future hypertrophy. And hypertrophy does not necessarily result in any significant strength gain. So if you’re swinging the same weight the next time or possibly even less,it will not break your heart because “I’m a bodybuilder” and you can switch exercises around a lot,which excuses some plateau or regression.

I don’t think making exercises more ‘difficult’ makes it harder,no. The thing is,they will still be adjusted to the same principles,going for a lot of contracting around,with a weight that is clearly within your comfort zone,or if it is,you can stick with the partials because all the fibers contract regardless and getting stronger is not the big deal. I guess the major difference is in BB you seek to blow yourself out, while in strength athletics you need to overcome the weight.

[/quote]

God im probably one of the biggest fat asses on this forum and I know you are full of fuckin shit! God you dont know anything about body building all your trying to do is make power lifting look like this elite I GOT A FUCKIN 25 INCH DICK!!! sport. Sorry to disappoint jackass but it wont happen.

OP/Troll,

compete and win at an elite level, if you still believe its easy go ahead an call it easy

I don’t think it is at all

[quote]mjc381 wrote:
OP/Troll,

compete and win at an elite level, if you still believe its easy go ahead an call it easy

I don’t think it is at all[/quote]

If I had started a thread about table tennis being easier in some respects than tennis (the other olympic sport), then I wonder what would be the response. Table tennis may well require more from the athlete in some ways,but perhaps I would be excused if I chose to let the opposition voice that view as a rebuttal. I think both sports require reflexes and a kind of intelligence,but I think tennis requires more strength. It could be un-PC to say that in a certain fan enviroment,but it would still be a discussion regarding facts rather than faith.

I don’t think it’s a sport. I don’t think anything where the winner is determined by judges is a sport. That said, it certainly isn’t easy.

Then I’m confused what the point of this is. Some things are harder that bodybuilders do, some are harder the strength athletes do. Welcome back to square one lol.

[quote]Scott M wrote:
I’m willing to acknowledge that being a bodybuilder,or shall I say achieving as one,can be harder in some respects than being an oly or powerlifter,strongman etc.

Then I’m confused what the point of this is. Some things are harder that bodybuilders do, some are harder the strength athletes do. Welcome back to square one lol. [/quote]
The training that all share,the lifting of some type of weights in one form or another,is different and my suggestion was that bodybuilders could be privileged in that regard. The BB people seem to count rest and diet as a part,which makes the distinction and comparison increasingly reasonable in my view.

[quote]Freaky Styley wrote:
I don’t think it’s a sport. I don’t think anything where the winner is determined by judges is a sport. That said, it certainly isn’t easy.[/quote]

LOL. There goes Olympic gymnastics and every other sport where judges determine the winner.

Some of you need to quit the bullshit. It is like it hurts some of you to accept bodybuilding as a sport. The fact that it takes literally several years of hard work before you could even do well on stage at a qualifying show, to say it doesn’t involve anything athletic is retarded.

[quote]Alffi wrote:
Scott M wrote:
I’m willing to acknowledge that being a bodybuilder,or shall I say achieving as one,can be harder in some respects than being an oly or powerlifter,strongman etc.

Then I’m confused what the point of this is. Some things are harder that bodybuilders do, some are harder the strength athletes do. Welcome back to square one lol.

The training that all share,the lifting of some type of weights in one form or another,is different and my suggestion was that bodybuilders could be privileged in that regard. The BB people seem to count rest and diet as a part,which makes the distinction and comparison increasingly reasonable in my view.[/quote]

Are you done yet?

[quote]Alffi wrote:
If I had started a thread about table tennis being easier in some respects than tennis (the other olympic sport), then I wonder what would be the response. Table tennis may well require more from the athlete in some ways,but perhaps I would be excused if I chose to let the opposition voice that view as a rebuttal. I think both sports require reflexes and a kind of intelligence,but I think tennis requires more strength. It could be un-PC to say that in a certain fan enviroment,but it would still be a discussion regarding facts rather than faith.

[/quote]

Lol. Did you just compare bodybuilding to Table tennis?

ab_power wrote:

Alffi wrote:

Probably, most people consider it too obvious to go to the trouble to spell out in detail what makes it hard.

If one were to ask “is the sky purple?” should one expect people to respond with an analysis of the light wavelengths reflecting off the sky to demonstrate that it is blue?

Have you ever done superslow eccentrics?
Or drop sets to failure?
Or tabatas for fat loss?

Furthermore, Zap Branigan has the best profile pic ever.

One more thing of interest is the training splits. Someone like an oly lifter engages just about every major muscle group in a lift. In p-lifting, the squat and the deadlift stress a lot of the same muscle groups,which also discourages training splits.

When splitting muscle groups is discouraged due to the difficulty of isolation without giving up the competition lifts, the burden is increased as the phenomenon encourages total body workouts,which translates to more exhausting training.

The bodybuilder,with his wide arsenal of machine assisted isolation movements,is privileged.

[quote]Alffi wrote:
One more thing of interest is the training splits. Someone like an oly lifter engages just about every major muscle group in a lift. In p-lifting, the squat and the deadlift stress a lot of the same muscle groups,which also discourages training splits. When splitting muscle groups is discouraged due to the difficulty of isolation without giving up the competition lifts, the burden is increased as the phenomenon encourages total body workouts,which translates to more exhausting training.

The bodybuilder,with his wide arsenal of machine assisted isolation movements,is privileged.[/quote]

I bet you think MacGuyver really could knock any man out with one punch.