If you are doing a three day split… you are better much off doing full body. If you don’t want to full body you are better servered also moving up to 4 days a week.
If you are doing a three day split… you are better much off doing full body. If you don’t want to full body you are better servered also moving up to 4 days a week. [/quote]
I agree. However, I prefer to give legs/lower their own day in order to maintain proper intensity. YMMV, but for myself, something would get neglected if I combined the two. That is the reason I switched over to a split routine in the first place.
move to a 4-day split by giving shoulders/traps their own day and legs their own day. you will lose weight based on your diet. fullbody is good if your goal is performance or strength, imo, but for bodybuilding a split is essential.
I like
on
on
off
on
off
on
but do what you like (although i don’t think 3 days in a row is best when doing a 4-day split).
do 9-12 sets for big bodyparts and 5-8 sets for smaller ones.
If your goal is to be a bodybuilder, then train like one.
I’m no advocate for the site in general, but go to www.bodybuilders.com and look at the index of featured amateur bbers. I read through a shit ton of them and noticed that they all do 3-6 day splits (most 4-5 days). I noticed 1 guy who does upper/lower and 1 guy (real lightweight) that does total body. They train each BP once every 5-7 days and use the parameters described in CT’s program design article. Some of those guys go beyond the volume CT would recommend, but remember they are advanced guys who likely devote a more significant percentage of their time to their sport so recovery is probably more doable.
Articles, studies and bullshit aside, if you want to add mass and be a “bodybuilder” just train (and eat) like one- screw all this other shit.