[quote]Chi-Towns-Finest wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Chi-Towns-Finest wrote:
Nice stats boss, when I saw the word dirty next to bulk I assumed that meant you were over 15 percent. .[/quote]
Wait, why would ANYONE assume that and further, what the fuck is wrong all of a sudden with being 15% body fat?
Further, why would THAT be the primary concern over whether what you are doing is leading to the most muscle growth?
Who the fuck cares if you hit over 15% body fat if you grew more muscle than everyone else?[/quote]
Don’t get me wrong PX, there isn’t anything wrong being over 15%. The phrase ‘dirty bulk’ has a connotation of being a fat fuck, otherwise it would just be bulking – in my opinion at least.
I have ‘dirty’ bulked in the past myself, it isn’t a particularly great look for me. Most likely because I approached it from an angle that was far from optimal, sub-par if you will. I’m certainly not trying to knock it for those of you that are following the path of strength. I’m a bodybuilding and fitness enthusiast and value symmetry in addition to strength.[/quote]
What if someone has a maintenance level of 3000 calories and eats 4000calories a day of chicken breast, brown rice, spinach, and eggs and gets up over 20% for months and doesnt get that strong in the gym. Is that a clean dirty bulk?
Ive been dirty bulking my whole life. Ive have visible serratus muscles my whole life. ZOMGANTIMATTERENOFTEHWORLDZ
Shit. Not everyone who eats “regular people” food 4-5 times a week gets fat. I’ll never eat a grilled chicken breast again in my life. That shit is disgusting.