[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]GrindOverMatter wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
Well I certainly don’t need this thread to keep going, but me having skinny legs sure doesn’t answer anything about why I and others would gain a lot of fat or need to in order to get big lol
Of course, I will continue to gain weight and increase my lifts…got some compliments from the cafeteria workers today that I’m looking bigger
(Been called the “egg man” and the “chicken guy” for all that I eat there haha)[/quote]
You don’t understand why having a balanced physique would help you avoid adding fat mass to reach your target weight?
Do you really think your body wants to keep growing if your legs aren’t big enough to support the weight.
I’d love to see a natural guy with a truly massive upper body and small legs. It’s just not going to happen. [/quote]
I’ve seen some close examples to that, of course i have no idea if they were natural or not, or if they had what you would consider a truely massive upper body, but its a plague that runs rampent at my university, oddly enough when i got back home for the summers i rarely ever see people look like that.[/quote]
?
You see guys weighing over 250lbs at 6 feet tall or less with NO leg development but 20" arms?
When we use words like “massive” it does NOT fucking mean some guy who is simply bigger than you.[/quote]
My definition of truly massive is someone who, upon seeing the person, your first reaction is “holy shit” and you automatically assume he could be a successful bodybuilder.
[/quote]
well if thats the case i’ve probably only have seen one guy ever who fits that definition. Dude had seriously crazy shoulders.
However i do see guys who sound more upper body developed then the op who never train legs, but i guess that doesnt account for truely massive. my bad.