Identify Flaws in This Physique

[quote]bugeishaAD wrote:
Too many things I’d like to respond to individually, but I’ll throw out my thoughts:

The guy had a hell of a physique from a purely aesthetic standpoint. He wanted to look good naked and be pleasing to the eye; I’d say he accomplished his goal. OBVIOUSLY he does not compare to a competitive bodybuilder. Apples and oranges. If he had added 15 more lbs of lean muscle, IMO he would have made a hell of a physique competitor. Dude had some awesome lines and some good muscle bellies.

Lol @ whoever said “he looks good compared to the average joe”. HE LOOKS 10X BETTER THAN 90% of the POSTERS IN THIS THREAD. Special shout out to all the people without pics – STFU.

lol @ people like Akuma saying dieting is easy. Easy to say that when you’ve never been lean… Yeah it’s a shorter process, but until you have walked the walk, please shut the fuck up. Aren’t you the guy who gave up on your diet? Guess it’s not so easy, even with Stu in your corner? Sorry for being a dick, but I call it like I see it.

If I could have his aesthetics, I would take them in a heartbeat, and then work for the next 10 years to slap on another quality 40lbs of lean mass.

His nuthuggers get equally annoying, I agree, but I think they are kind of funny because they?re so childish and can?t really be taken seriously.

In closing, dude looks sick, obvi not a bb’er, it’s not easy being lean 24/7 if you don?t have the genetics for it.

K I’m done, hope that post makes sense.
[/quote]

This is more or less what I was trying to say, but I needed someone respected on here to come out and say it.

I have no obvious way to judge if you have better/worse “genetics” then him really but have to agree with everything else you said man. Bug 2k11 4 lyf <3

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]DanielDJ wrote:
flaws? hes not a BBer how is any part of physique a flaw :S he didnt step onto stage or plan to?[/quote]

You did read the original post and its title right? It is posted in a ‘bodybuilding’ forum right? I didn’t start this thread -lol.

I’m sure you can find plenty of nut-hugging Zyzz threads to chime in on various other sites, but on this site, in this forum, and with the question posed by the OP, I have a feeling that YOU will not be a happy camper with the replies that have and are coming.

S[/quote]

not nut hugging zyzz i would do the exact same if you died today and some one said you numerous flaws in your physique

not in anyway offended by the flaws pick out theyre obvious but just the fact you picking out flaws of a deseased man bemuses me

[quote]DanielDJ wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]DanielDJ wrote:
flaws? hes not a BBer how is any part of physique a flaw :S he didnt step onto stage or plan to?[/quote]

You did read the original post and its title right? It is posted in a ‘bodybuilding’ forum right? I didn’t start this thread -lol.

I’m sure you can find plenty of nut-hugging Zyzz threads to chime in on various other sites, but on this site, in this forum, and with the question posed by the OP, I have a feeling that YOU will not be a happy camper with the replies that have and are coming.

S[/quote]

not nut hugging zyzz i would do the exact same if you died today and some one said you numerous flaws in your physique

not in anyway offended by the flaws pick out theyre obvious but just the fact you picking out flaws of a deseased man bemuses me [/quote]

If it bemuses you, you need to remind yourself that the OP started a thread inviting people to identify those flaws…

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]DanielDJ wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]DanielDJ wrote:
flaws? hes not a BBer how is any part of physique a flaw :S he didnt step onto stage or plan to?[/quote]

You did read the original post and its title right? It is posted in a ‘bodybuilding’ forum right? I didn’t start this thread -lol.

I’m sure you can find plenty of nut-hugging Zyzz threads to chime in on various other sites, but on this site, in this forum, and with the question posed by the OP, I have a feeling that YOU will not be a happy camper with the replies that have and are coming.

S[/quote]

not nut hugging zyzz i would do the exact same if you died today and some one said you numerous flaws in your physique

not in anyway offended by the flaws pick out theyre obvious but just the fact you picking out flaws of a deseased man bemuses me [/quote]

If it bemuses you, you need to remind yourself that the OP started a thread inviting people to identify those flaws…[/quote]

fair enough i guess, was a stupid thread to begin with

as stu clearly stated its a bb forum and i should have kept that in mind before posting sorry, just got caught up with the fact he’s dead and a poster talked about his defective heart being a flaw

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
What do you consider ‘decent muscle’, for a 5’10" fellow at about your level of leanness?[/quote]

5’ 10" at my current level?

210 = decent
230 = big
250 = manimal
270 = beast
290+ = monster [/quote]

230 at <10% BF is “big”? Wow, tough standards…
[/quote]

I started at 160lbs. These are the standards I envisioned for myself 25 years ago. Looking back, I should have set the bar a bit higher.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Dude, “contest condition” is close to 6% or less with the use of diuretics on board as well. While you may be able to say few get as heavy as 20%, acting like most stay even near contest shape is a tad overboard. I would think the average now is at least 30lbs or more in off season and don’t believe the drug strategy hasn’t also changed to aid that.

Johnny Jackson isn’t near contest shape in the off season.[/quote]

How much of that 30lbs is water? 10-15 lbs, if not more due to water retention from drugs.[/quote]

Your muscles are over 70% water. What is your point? I said “OR MORE”. It is not odd to see a pro today 40-50lbs over contest weight in the off season. Obviously many would stay leaner if they have photo shoots or guest posings coming up.

Bodybuilders in the 60’s and 70’s didn’t have that as much of an issue, so the off season was just to gain.[/quote]

EDIT

TL;DR - THeres nothing controversial posted here, just some info on how drug use has changed to allow pros to stay lighter in the offseason but still be completely monsterous on contest day.

Youre right about pro’s not staying near contest shape in the offseason. Definitely right.

But the thing that throws people off nowadays is the fact that the top level pros dont get as huge in the offseason and then diet down only to reveal all the muscle theyve built. That was common about 10 years ago or so but not anymore.

Id bet a huge sum of money that all the top pros are getting drug advice from 3 or 4 people. The trend is to keep a bodyfat level as low as possible while still being able to make gains, with the making gains part as the dominant goal out of the two. Offseason gains are not what they used to be.

All of the top guys are taking advantage of modern drugs and drug protocols that allow them to add significant amounts of muscle WHILE losing fat on their contest diet. Guys are running relatively low doses of drugs in the offseason and then running obscene amounts pre contest.

You used to only hear about Levrone “growing into a show”. That is commonplace now.

It’s the only way to explain how Cutler goes from being 285 off season with a good deal of fat on him to stepping on stage at 265. Meaning he is 3% bodyfat down from at least 15% and has cut a lot of water. The bigger a man is the more raw water weight is lost, as you know Im sure.

Its impossible to say that he didnt add muscle in the process. Not A LOT of muscle, obviously, but the days of Mr O contenders ballooning up 50lbs over their contest weight are over. ESPECIALLY for the guys who are all but maxed out in how much muscle they can add.

I know you said the average is 30lbs bigger in the offseason but that single number says nothing about the body composition. A guy may lose 30lbs of scale weight and still add muscle. DOing so would create such a dramatic visual effect that it’s easy to say, based on a picture, that the guy got pretty fat in the offseason.

Its healthier and easier to maintain a lower offseason weight. Less drugs are needed, which is obviously a good thing, even for the guys who respond well.

Of course there are exceptions like Kevin English who loses 70lbs to get in shape, but thats just because he chooses to compete in a weight class. And Johnny Jackson, but he has the powerlifting thing going for him, giving him an incentive to add fat to aid his leverages.

Ronnie Coleman stepping on stage at 296lbs in '04 (I think) is a perfect example. He was never 330, 340, or 350 pounds. Id be surprised if he was even 320 that offseason.

At this point I dont even know what the thread is about, to be honest.

Just seems small overall. Reminds me of guys in Staten Island (esp. with the weird hair and tan).

Since he’s not big he’ll get a lot of fans, I’m sure. If I had a dollar for every time I was asked for advice concerning “I want to get muscular, but not TOO big (as they throw their arms out ILS style) y’know?” I’d be rich.

That post was way too long. Congrats to anyone who read more than a quarter of it lol.

This is sort of on topic and readable.

Zyzz isnt a pro bodybuilder. No idea why he’s being comapred to one.
He looks like a physique competitor. That is a form of bodybuilding IMO, just a less extreme version. I’d compare him to that, but that’s just me. To say that staying lean all year round is not impressive is retarded.

And the only ones saying that are people who have never seen veins in their lower abs. It may not be the ideal way to gain the most muscle ever, but it’s still impressive in the same exact sense that gaining a lot of muscle is. two sides of the same coin.

And in case people are wondering. All NPC physique competitors use steroids, diuretics, etc. Clearly they dont need to use big doses of anything or the most powerful diuretics as that would actually negatively impact their look. But to think Zyzz’s look is less impressive beacuse he used steroids is about as ignorant as it gets within a bodybuiling community.

So go ahead and say ‘oh he’s cycled but he doesnt look like Phil Heath so he sucks’. You (anyone) sound like a fucking idiot. Compare him to the physique competitors that have used steroids. Does he suck now? Maybe because he wears makeup and has a dumbass haircut but not because of his muscle/leanness/proportion.

Would he win a physique pro card based on any of the pictures Ive seen of him? Probably not. So if not able to get a pro card = sucks/flawed/unimpressive, well then so be it. Keep on hating.

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:
If I had a dollar for every time I was asked for advice concerning “I want to get muscular, but not TOO big (as they throw their arms out ILS style) y’know?” I’d be rich.[/quote]
You need to switch gyms.

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
What do you consider ‘decent muscle’, for a 5’10" fellow at about your level of leanness?[/quote]

5’ 10" at my current level?

210 = decent
230 = big
250 = manimal
270 = beast
290+ = monster [/quote]

230 at <10% BF is “big”? Wow, tough standards…
[/quote]

I started at 160lbs. These are the standards I envisioned for myself 25 years ago. Looking back, I should have set the bar a bit higher.[/quote]

Your standards are your standards, but man…

Ronnie Coleman was the only “monster” out there??

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
What do you consider ‘decent muscle’, for a 5’10" fellow at about your level of leanness?[/quote]

5’ 10" at my current level?

210 = decent
230 = big
250 = manimal
270 = beast
290+ = monster [/quote]

230 at <10% BF is “big”? Wow, tough standards…
[/quote]

I started at 160lbs. These are the standards I envisioned for myself 25 years ago. Looking back, I should have set the bar a bit higher.[/quote]

Your standards are your standards, but man…

Ronnie Coleman was the only “monster” out there??[/quote]

And Ruhl. Cant forget about Ruhl.

Or RogueVampire on a slightly scaled down level. Actually he surpasses the ‘monster’ category. Must be in his own category.

Manimal
Beast
Monster
RogueVampire

RougeVampire and undead zzyyz should make out

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
RougeVampire and undead zzyyz should make out[/quote]

o rly?

[quote]JLone wrote:

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:
If I had a dollar for every time I was asked for advice concerning “I want to get muscular, but not TOO big (as they throw their arms out ILS style) y’know?” I’d be rich.[/quote]
You need to switch gyms. [/quote]

For realz. I don’t even see this much anymore. If anything, I would say I see way more guys trying to get big than before. The ones who don’t want to get too big seem to have quit coming to the gym so much…until New Years.

With regards to Kevin English, he loses up to 50lbs or more for a contest…and likely hits the stage weighing about 220lbs or more. He is a bad example of a “bulk fail”.

If this is now some debate about staying lean, that comes down to who grows more. Pros are already monsters to start with. Most of the guys here don’t need to approach training like a 240lbs IFBB pro using 2 grams of test 10iu’s of GH, 5 dBol tabs a day and insulin with veins on his abs.

I am all for staying as lean as you can while gaining optimally.

If most here were gaining optimally, people would be making more progress over years of time.

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:

[quote]bugeishaAD wrote:
Too many things I’d like to respond to individually, but I’ll throw out my thoughts:

The guy had a hell of a physique from a purely aesthetic standpoint. He wanted to look good naked and be pleasing to the eye; I’d say he accomplished his goal. OBVIOUSLY he does not compare to a competitive bodybuilder. Apples and oranges. If he had added 15 more lbs of lean muscle, IMO he would have made a hell of a physique competitor. Dude had some awesome lines and some good muscle bellies.

Lol @ whoever said “he looks good compared to the average joe”. HE LOOKS 10X BETTER THAN 90% of the POSTERS IN THIS THREAD. Special shout out to all the people without pics – STFU.

lol @ people like Akuma saying dieting is easy. Easy to say that when you’ve never been lean… Yeah it’s a shorter process, but until you have walked the walk, please shut the fuck up. Aren’t you the guy who gave up on your diet? Guess it’s not so easy, even with Stu in your corner? Sorry for being a dick, but I call it like I see it.

If I could have his aesthetics, I would take them in a heartbeat, and then work for the next 10 years to slap on another quality 40lbs of lean mass.

His nuthuggers get equally annoying, I agree, but I think they are kind of funny because they?re so childish and can?t really be taken seriously.

In closing, dude looks sick, obvi not a bb’er, it’s not easy being lean 24/7 if you don?t have the genetics for it.

K I’m done, hope that post makes sense.
[/quote]

Best post in the thread.[/quote]

Agree!
Especially this part" “…HE LOOKS 10X BETTER THAN 90% of the POSTERS IN THIS THREAD. Special shout out to all the people without pics – STFU…”

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]JLone wrote:

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:
If I had a dollar for every time I was asked for advice concerning “I want to get muscular, but not TOO big (as they throw their arms out ILS style) y’know?” I’d be rich.[/quote]
You need to switch gyms. [/quote]

For realz. I don’t even see this much anymore. If anything, I would say I see way more guys trying to get big than before. The ones who don’t want to get too big seem to have quit coming to the gym so much…until New Years.[/quote]

Apparently I should’ve clarified this in my post; the retardation I mentioned happens at my job, not at my gym.

x2 on what your saying X. Within the past 7 or 8 months there have been more bodybuilders and less twilight rejects. Or maybe the rejects are still there but they are so small you can’t see 'em between all the others lol

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]JLone wrote:

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:
If I had a dollar for every time I was asked for advice concerning “I want to get muscular, but not TOO big (as they throw their arms out ILS style) y’know?” I’d be rich.[/quote]
You need to switch gyms. [/quote]

For realz. I don’t even see this much anymore. If anything, I would say I see way more guys trying to get big than before. The ones who don’t want to get too big seem to have quit coming to the gym so much…until New Years.[/quote]

Apparently I should’ve clarified this in my post; the retardation I mentioned happens at my job, not at my gym.

x2 on what your saying X. Within the past 7 or 8 months there have been more bodybuilders and less twilight rejects. Or maybe the rejects are still there but they are so small you can’t see 'em between all the others lol[/quote]

Before I got hurt, I was really starting to like my gym. There were more serious members than before (some who competed) and the smaller guys seemed to really be trying hard. Some of them had gotten big just over the last year.

I think that deathly ill skinny phase is dying off. Most of the people I see in the gym lately seem to want more.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

And Ruhl. Cant forget about Ruhl.

Or RogueVampire on a slightly scaled down level. Actually he surpasses the ‘monster’ category. Must be in his own category.

Manimal
Beast
Monster
RogueVampire[/quote]

Yeah for some reason I though he was taller, must have mistaken him for Gunther Schlierkampf…

Might as well toss Nasser into the mix as well

[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

And Ruhl. Cant forget about Ruhl.

Or RogueVampire on a slightly scaled down level. Actually he surpasses the ‘monster’ category. Must be in his own category.

Manimal
Beast
Monster
RogueVampire[/quote]

Yeah for some reason I though he was taller, must have mistaken him for Gunther Schlierkampf…

Might as well toss Nasser into the mix as well[/quote]

Oh he might be. I was just throwing a name so it didnt look the post was solely about RV