[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]peterm533 wrote:
Experience trumps science everytime. If you haven’t done the sport, you cannot knowledgeably comment on its demands.
…or presumably coach it both of which are I think questionable assertions.
It is wrong to believe that Sardines 12 is asserting some wildly ignorant and improbable view about the energy demands of fighting and unfortunately personality and emotion have clouded the argument.
You may not find Sardines 12 view persuasive but it is totally in line with that put forward by Joel Jamieson
who is not only extremely well versed in exercise physiology but also is a trainer of UFC pro fighters
such as Franklin, Pulver, Leben and others.
You may not agree with him, his observations, his extensive testing and his experience of training pro fighters but if as Fighting Irish has asserted you consider that MMA is not aerobic (or predominantly aerobic) you need more than simply a perception of how you feel hitting the bag to rubbish his views.
[/quote]
Goldengloves gave that earlier when he said he’s trained amateurs and had success with them running sprints, etc.
I’ve found the same thing with myself, and I’ve seen fighters I’ve been around do the same.
And there’s plenty of trainers that have their fights doing the same thing in pro boxing.
I don’t know who Jamieson is and I don’t care. I know what I see first hand, and what boxing trainers themselves do. That whole “first hand” thing is lacking severely here though.
I am not saying not to run for long distances! Or that boxing is not, in part, aerobic. But the idea that he put forward saying sprints don’t have a place is fucking asinine, ESPECIALLY coming from somebody who doesn’t know what the sport requires.
And boxing (or kickboxing) is one of those sports that you really have to have first hand experience in or else you cannot understand the beating it puts on you, as well as the pyschological factors involved.[/quote]
What you originally said was: Boxing is not aerobic. MMA is even less so.
You now say: Boxing is IN PART ( my capitals) aerobic.
Whether you still believe that MMA is not aerobic is not clear.
You say that you are not saying not to run long distances which is fair enough but you appear to be attacking Sardines for asserting that sprints do not have a place.
Honestly he made no such assertion. He made it clear that boxing is primarily an aerobic alactic sport and that if the OPs problem was poor endurance then he had to concentrate on improving his aerobic capacity. He specifically said that sprints can be helpful.
I do understand that the demands of boxing are severe but I also tried to explain that subjective feeling about the energy systems being utilised is not necessarily a good indicator
of the contributions being made by the aerobic and anaerobic systems.
I do not think this is about long distance running v sprints or aerobic v anaerobic training.
Clearly both have their part to play. It is I think about making an assessment of the energetic requirements of the sport AND attributes of the individual and making training recommendations which address the needs of the athlete.
Recent work on the energy systems and the work of Jamieson who you are wrong to dismiss
suggests strongly that the aerobic system needs more attention than previously thought.
I think that people here might like to consider not attacking the messenger and think more about the message. If you have strong reasons to believe that the analysis of the metabolic
demands of boxing/MMA etc is wrong or that a leading pro UFC trainer has no idea what he talking about then I am open to hear that reasoning.