[quote]pittbulll wrote:
How the fuck do you read with out me translating every word for you:)?[/quote]
I’d wager that you can’t read very many words beyond those of the three-lettered, monosyllabic type without noticeable lip movement.
I don’t want to harsh your buzz, but a parrot isn’t aware of what it’s saying. You should change your screen name to parrotbull. It would be so much more accurate.
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
How does one walk on human rights by collecting information?
What is private enterprise?
What is a nitch?
Who would fund the government if there were no “private enterprise” (whatever that is)?
[/quote]
I love this post it shows the true intellectual midget that you are 
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
How does one walk on human rights by collecting information?
What is private enterprise?
What is a nitch?
Who would fund the government if there were no “private enterprise” (whatever that is)?
[/quote]
I love this post it shows the true intellectual midget that you are :)[/quote]
I’m merely rising to the level of my counterpart. Why cast pearls before swine? Have a great day, peewee.
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
How does one walk on human rights by collecting information?
What is private enterprise?
What is a nitch?
Who would fund the government if there were no “private enterprise” (whatever that is)?
[/quote]
I love this post it shows the true intellectual midget that you are :)[/quote]
I’m merely rising to the level of my counterpart. Why cast pearls before swine? Have a great day, peewee.
[/quote]
I am glad you are rising , it at least explains why you even bother
[quote]pat wrote:
Still electric cars suck assholes. Until you can go more than a hundred or two miles on them and be able to charge them in less than 15 minutes, they will never be viable and always be marginal.[/quote]
Pat, you are wiser and more clairvoyant than the tree-hugging Liberals were in 2004…
The California Hydrogen Highway Failure…
The “California Hydrogen Highway,” Schwarzenegger’s vision to ensure that every Californian would have access to a hydrogen fueling station by the end of 2010, called for the state to spend more than $50 million to help deploy up to 100 hydrogen fuel stations that would serve 2,000 fuel cell vehicles. “We got 200 stakeholders around a table, literally, and mapped out who could get stations where,” said Terry Tamminen, a top adviser to Schwarzenegger.
But nearly nine years later, California has just nine hydrogen stations open for the public, and only about 200 fuel cell cars that can use them.
Many new companies were far too optimistic about their prospects and were selling products that could not compete on price against traditional transport and energy sources, not to mention increasingly cheap imports from China. Many were - and are - very reliant on fickle government support, and some were simply mismanaged.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_earth_an_open_or_closed_system[/quote]
wiki.answers doesn’t seem to know a huge amount about this subject
Hydrogen and helium molecules and also individual particles actually do leave the Earth’s atmosphere on a regular (but very slow) basis. So technically not a closed system for things other than energy either. This is a completely moot point imo, just a bit of curiosity for fun!
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I am glad you are rising , it at least explains why you even bother
[/quote]
Bother what? You’re stoned again, aren’t you?
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I am glad you are rising , it at least explains why you even bother
[/quote]
Bother what? You’re stoned again, aren’t you?[/quote]
I am high on life
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I am glad you are rising , it at least explains why you even bother
[/quote]
Bother what? You’re stoned again, aren’t you?[/quote]
I am high on life
[/quote]
Is that what all the kids are calling it these days?
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I am glad you are rising , it at least explains why you even bother
[/quote]
Bother what? You’re stoned again, aren’t you?[/quote]
I am high on life
[/quote]
Is that what all the kids are calling it these days? [/quote]
They have been calling it that since the beginning of time , I am happy to be a CONTRIBUTING (Help to cause or bring about.)to your INTELLECTUAL (Of or relating to the intellect: “intellectual stimulation”.) growth
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
While I agree warmth is a major issue it is not the only major issue . With out light photosynthesis would not happen, I think the point of whether the Earth’s system is opened or closed is to ambiguous
[/quote]
no, it isn’t. Like, not even a little bit.
[quote]
As for as the CO2 and radiation’s effects on ( Anthromorphi ???) warming ( Attribution of human motivation, characteristics, or behavior to inanimate objects, animals, or natural phenomena.) I don’t understand :)[/quote]
lol. Got me. What can I say, radiation has a very warming personality.
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system[/quote]
Yes, if you randomly classify all external forces as internal then it’s closed, For any system ever.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system[/quote]
Yes, if you randomly classify all external forces as internal then it’s closed, For any system ever.[/quote]
in all honesty nothing exists with out something else but I don’t think that would qualify a statement that nothing is a closed system . It is a possibility we lack the vocabulary to state it properly
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system[/quote]
Yes, if you randomly classify all external forces as internal then it’s closed, For any system ever.[/quote]
in all honesty nothing exists with out something else but I don’t think that would qualify a statement that nothing is a closed system . It is a possibility we lack the vocabulary to state it properly
[/quote]
Global climate is a very very open system.
And yes, in the physical world, there is no such thing as a truly closed system other than the universe as a whole. You get into things like quantum entanglement and we don’t really even understand all the many ways particles can interact, even over large distances.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system[/quote]
Yes, if you randomly classify all external forces as internal then it’s closed, For any system ever.[/quote]
in all honesty nothing exists with out something else but I don’t think that would qualify a statement that nothing is a closed system . It is a possibility we lack the vocabulary to state it properly
[/quote]
Global climate is a very very open system.
And yes, in the physical world, there is no such thing as a truly closed system other than the universe as a whole. You get into things like quantum entanglement and we don’t really even understand all the many ways particles can interact, even over large distances.[/quote]
If no systems were closed than none would be able to be classified by a word.
Global climate is contained in the earths atmosphere
I know there are other globes but we are speaking of Earth
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ DD it could be argued that the radiation, warmth and light are part of Earth’s system making it a closed system[/quote]
Yes, if you randomly classify all external forces as internal then it’s closed, For any system ever.[/quote]
in all honesty nothing exists with out something else but I don’t think that would qualify a statement that nothing is a closed system . It is a possibility we lack the vocabulary to state it properly
[/quote]
Global climate is a very very open system.
And yes, in the physical world, there is no such thing as a truly closed system other than the universe as a whole. You get into things like quantum entanglement and we don’t really even understand all the many ways particles can interact, even over large distances.[/quote]
If no systems were closed than none would be able to be classified by a word.
[/quote]
Applied science can still make use of simplified and unrealistic conditions.
No, not even close. Like I said before half the equation, energy in, is entirely external.
Did you miss the post where I explained that not only do things other than energy enter Earth’s “system” via things like meteorites, but that particles and even molecules regularly escape Earth’s magnetic field? Basically Earth is sloughing off parts of its atmosphere into space all the time. It doesn’t matter that it’s an open system imo, but it is one nonetheless. There’s not really a case to be made otherwise.